NCCN Guideline Concordance Improves Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although management guidelines in adult rectal cancer are widely studied, no consensus guidelines exist for the management of pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2018) was queried for pediatric (age 0-21) and young adult (age 22-40) patients with rectal cancer. Patients were analyzed for receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant therapy. Impact on survival was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: 6655 patients (108 pediatric and 6547 young adult patients) with rectal cancer were included. Similar to previously published NCCN quality measures with overall guideline concordance approaching 90 % in adults, 89.6 % of pediatric and 84.6 % of young adult patients were classified as receiving pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy. However, pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive post-operative guideline-concordant therapy than young adult patients (65.3 % verse 76.7 %, respectively, p = 0.008). Risk of death was significantly lower for pediatric patients who received post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.313; CI, 0.168-0.581; p < 0.001). In young adult patients, risk of death was significantly lower for those who received pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.376, CI 0.338-0.417, p < 0.001), and post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.456; CI 0.413-0.505; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: NCCN-based guidelines may reasonably guide peri-operative management decisions and improve survival in pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. Given the rarity of this cancer in young patients, employment of an experienced surgical and oncologic multidisciplinary team, along with discussion and involvement of the patient and family, are keys for balancing risks and benefits to offering the best therapeutic strategy. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Pancreatic retransplantation is associated with poor allograft survival: an update of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of pancreas retransplantation versus primary pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on all adult (age, ≥18 years) subjects who received pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 were analyzed (n = 20,854). The subjects were analyzed in the following 2 groups: retransplant (n = 1149) and primary transplant (n = 19,705). RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly different patient survival (P < 0.0001) and death-censored graft survival (P < 0.0001) between the primary transplant versus retransplant subjects. Allograft survival was significantly poorer in the retransplantation group. Patient survival was greater in the retransplant group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study differ from previous studies, which showed similar allograft survival in primary and secondary pancreas transplants. Further studies may elucidate specific patients who will benefit from retransplantation. At the present time, it would appear that pancreas retransplantation is associated with poor graft survival and that retransplantation should not be considered for all patients with primary pancreatic allograft failure.