Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Water Res ; 38(8): 2103-10, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15087191

RESUMEN

The toxicity of four xenobiotic compounds 3,5-dichlorophenol, formaldehyde, 4-nitrophenol and dichloromethane, representative of industrial wastewater contaminants was evaluated by a simple respirometric procedure set up on the basis of OECD Method 209 and by the Microtox bioassay. Very good reproducibility was observed for both methods, the variation coefficients being in the range of 2-10% for the respirometric procedure and 6-15% for Microtox, values that can be considered very good for a biological method. Comparison of EC(50) data obtained with the two methods shows that in both cases 3,5-dichlorophenol is more toxic than other compounds investigated and dichloromethane has a very low toxicity value. Intermediate EC(50) values were found for the two other chemicals, formaldehyde and 4-nitrophenol. Moreover, the Microtox EC(50) values are generally lower (except for dichloromethane) than the respirometric ones: these differences could be explained by the fact that the Microtox method uses a pure culture of marine species and, therefore, should not necessarily be expected to behave like a community of activated sludge bacteria. In conclusion, both methods can be usefully applied for toxicity detection in wastewater treatment plants but it is advisable to take into account that Microtox is more sensitive than respirometry in estimating the acute toxicity effect on the biomass operating in the plant.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/metabolismo , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Aguas del Alcantarillado/química , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos , Xenobióticos/toxicidad , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bioensayo , Biomasa , Clorofenoles/toxicidad , Ciudades , Formaldehído/toxicidad , Cloruro de Metileno/toxicidad , Nitrofenoles/toxicidad , Oxígeno/análisis , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Xenobióticos/análisis , Xenobióticos/química
2.
Ann Chim ; 92(5-6): 531-9, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12125458

RESUMEN

This is the second of two papers each dealing with a specific technological option for replacing the Fenton's reagent with simpler processes for treating industrial wastewater. In particular, the paper reports the results of an investigation aimed to check, at lab scale, the effectiveness of an alternative wastewater treatment combining biological degradation and chemical oxidation with ozone. The treatment was carried out in a lab scale hybrid reactor fed with the biological stage effluent of a plant treating the wastewater of a large tanning district in Central Italy whose residual COD result still higher than the Italian COD Maximum Allowable Concentration (MAC) value (i.e., 160 mgO2/L) The results are very promising, considering that a removal efficiency of 41% (as COD) has been achieved by treating an influent characterized by a COD content fully biorefractory. In addition, the proposed treatment presents the significant advantage of no additional sludge production, as happens with commonly utilized tertiary processes (i.e. Fenton), that is characterized by high chemical sludge production.


Asunto(s)
Residuos Industriales/análisis , Ozono/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Purificación del Agua/normas , Reactores Biológicos , Humanos , Oxidación-Reducción , Curtiembre , Purificación del Agua/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA