Strategies to prevent long-term opioid use following trauma: a Canadian practice survey.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how Canadian clinicians involved in trauma patient care and prescribing opioids perceive the use and effectiveness of strategies to prevent long-term opioid therapy following trauma. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these strategies were also assessed. METHODS: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey. Potential participants were identified by trauma program managers and directors of the targeted departments in three Canadian provinces. We designed our questionnaire using standard health survey research methods. The questionnaire was administered between April 2021 and November 2021. RESULTS: Our response rate was 47% (350/744), and 52% (181/350) of participants completed the entire survey. Most respondents (71%, 129/181) worked in teaching hospitals. Multimodal analgesia (93%, 240/257), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (77%, 198/257), and physical stimulation (75%, 193/257) were the strategies perceived to be the most frequently used. Several preventive strategies were perceived to be very effective by over 80% of respondents. Of these, some that were reported as not being frequently used were perceived to be among the most effective ones, including guidelines or protocols, assessing risk factors for opioid misuse, physical health follow-up by a professional, training for clinicians, patient education, and prescription monitoring systems. Staff shortages, time constraints, and organizational practices were identified as the main barriers to the implementation of the highest ranked preventive strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Several strategies to prevent long-term opioid therapy following trauma are perceived as being effective by those prescribing opioids in this population. Some of these strategies appear to be commonly used in everyday practice and others less so. Future research should focus on which preventive strategies should be given higher priority for implementation before assessing their effectiveness.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Évaluer comment les cliniciens canadiens impliqués dans les soins aux patients traumatisés et prescrivant des opioïdes perçoivent l'utilisation et l'efficacité des stratégies visant à prévenir le traitement prolongé par opioïde après un traumatisme. Les obstacles et facilitateurs de la mise en œuvre de ces stratégies ont aussi été analysés. MéTHODES: Nous avons réalisé une enquête transversale via le Web. Les participants potentiels ont été identifiés par les gestionnaires et directeurs de programmes de traumatologie des départements ciblés dans trois provinces canadiennes. Nous avons conçu notre questionnaire en utilisant la méthodologie de recherche usuelle des enquêtes de santé. Le questionnaire a été administré entre avril 2021 et novembre 2021. RéSULTATS: Notre taux de réponse a été de 47 % (350/744) et 52 % (181/350) des participants ont complété l'enquête dans sa totalité. La majorité des personnes interrogées (71 %, 129/181) travaillait dans des hôpitaux universitaires. L'analgésie multimodale (93 %, 240/257), les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (77 %, 198/257) et la stimulation physique (75 %, 193/257) étaient les stratégies perçues comme étant le plus fréquemment utilisées. Plusieurs stratégies préventives étaient perçues comme étant très efficaces par plus de 80 % des répondants. Parmi celles-ci, certaines étaient signalées comme n'étant pas utilisées très souvent, mais perçues comme étant les plus efficaces, notamment les lignes directrices et protocoles évaluant les facteurs de risque d'utilisation abusive des opioïdes, le suivi de la santé physique par un professionnel, la formation des cliniciens, l'éducation des patients et les systèmes de suivi des prescriptions. La pénurie de personnels, les contraintes de temps et les pratiques de l'établissement ont été identifiées comme étant les principaux obstacles à la mise en place des stratégies préventives classées parmi les premières. CONCLUSIONS: Plusieurs stratégies de prévention du traitement par opioïdes à long terme après un traumatisme sont perçues comme efficaces par ceux qui les prescrivent à cette population de patients. Certaines de ces stratégies apparaissent comme couramment utilisées dans la pratique quotidienne et d'autres moins souvent. La recherche future devrait se concentrer sur la détermination des stratégies préventives auxquelles il faudrait accorder la plus grande priorité de mise en œuvre avant d'évaluer leur efficacité.

Optoelectronic Pressure Sensor Based on the Bending Loss of Plastic Optical Fibers Embedded in Stretchable Polydimethylsiloxane.

We report the design and testing of a sensor pad based on optical and flexible materials for the development of pressure monitoring devices. This project aims to create a flexible and low-cost pressure sensor based on a two-dimensional grid of plastic optical fibers embedded in a pad of flexible and stretchable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The opposite ends of each fiber are connected to an LED and a photodiode, respectively, to excite and measure light intensity changes due to the local bending of the pressure points on the PDMS pad. Tests were performed in order to study the sensitivity and repeatability of the designed flexible pressure sensor.

Factors associated with discharge destination following inpatient functional rehabilitation in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of data from a prospective database of a Level 1 trauma center. OBJECTIVES: This project aims to identify factors collected during the acute and rehabilitative care following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) associated with success and failure to return home after inpatient intensive functional rehabilitation (IFR). SETTING: Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: All eligible patients from our prospective database were separated into two groups according to discharge destination following IFR. Clinical variables collected during the acute and rehabilitative care as well as demographic variables were compared between patients who managed to return home (Group 1) and those who were discharged elsewhere (Group 2). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted with variables that were significant at the univariate level. RESULTS: Out of the 193 patients included, 22 (11%) failed to return home following IFR. Six variables were associated with failure to return home at the univariate level: longer acute length of stay (LOS), longer rehabilitation LOS, living alone, higher neurological level of injury, having comorbidities, and having a pressure injury (PI) during acute care. Three variables remained significant at the multivariate level: living alone, increasing acute LOS and presenting a high cervical (C1-C4) neurological level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that acute care clinicians recognize the aforementioned factors early after TSCI in order to optimize patients for community reintegration.

Are early clinical manifestations of spasticity associated with long-term functional outcome following spinal cord injury? A retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of a prospective cohort of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: Determine the relationship between the occurrence of early spasticity, defined as the development of signs and/or symptoms of spasticity during the hospitalization in traumatology, and the functional outcome 6-12 months following a SCI. Secondly, to determine the specific impact of early clonus, velocity-dependent hypertonia and/or muscle spasms on the functional outcome at the same timepoint. SETTING: Single trauma center specialized in SCI care. METHODS: One hundred sixty-two patients sustaining an acute traumatic SCI were included in the analyses. Comparative analysis was performed to describe the characteristics of patients with early spasticity. Correlations were performed to determine the relationship between the clinical signs of spasticity and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) scores collected 6-12 months after SCI. RESULTS: 51.9% of the cohort developed clinical signs of spasticity during the hospitalization in traumatology (29.7 days) following SCI. These showed a significantly lower total SCIM score and subscores compared to individuals without early spasticity at follow-up (p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the occurrence of early spasms was only clinical sign of spasticity significantly associated with a decreased mobility at follow-up (r = -0.17, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The development of signs and symptoms of spasticity, in particular the occurrence of spasms in the first month following the injury may be associated with decreased functional outcome and mobility. Early assessment of spasticity following SCI is thus recommended.

An evaluation of the representativeness of a national spinal cord injury registry: a population-based cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study for the western part of Quebec. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of declining to participate in a national spinal cord injury (SCI) registry on patient outcomes and continuum of care. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: This cohort study compared the outcomes of 444 patients who were enrolled in the Rick Hansen SCI registry and 140 patients who refused. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between voluntary participation and the outcomes, while adjusting for confounding factors. The main outcomes were: attendance to follow-up 6- to 12-month post injury, 1-year mortality, and the occurrence of pressure injury during acute care. RESULTS: Declining to be enrolled in the registry was a significant predictor of lower attendance to specialized follow-up (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.08). It was also associated with a higher 1-year mortality rate (OR 12.50, CI 4.50-33.30) and higher occurrence of pressure injury (OR 2.56, CI 1.56-4.17). CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds invaluable insight on individuals that researchers and clinicians are usually blind to in SCI cohort studies. This study suggests that decline to participate in a registry during the care hospitalization may be associated with worsened health, poorer outcomes, and reduced follow-up to specialized care. Declining the enrollment to voluntary registry could represent a potential prognostic factor for future research.

Clinical judgment is a cornerstone for validating and using clinical prediction rules: a head-to-head study on ambulation outcomes for spinal cord injured patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are an effervescent topic in the medical literature. Recovering ambulation after a traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a priority for patients and multiple CPRs have been proposed for predicting ambulation outcomes. Our objective is to confront clinical judgment to an established CPR developed for patients with tSCI. SETTINGS: Level one trauma center specialized in tSCI and its affiliated rehabilitation center. METHOD: In this retrospective comparative study, six physicians had to predict the ambulation outcome of 68 patients after a tSCI based on information from the acute hospitalization. Ambulation was also predicted according to the CPR of van Middendorp (CPR-vM). The success rate of the CPR-vM and clinicians to predict ambulation was compared using criteria of 5% for defining clinical significance, and a level of statistical significance of 0.05 for bilateral McNemar tests. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the overall performance of physicians (success rate of 79%) and of the CPR-vM (81%) for predicting ambulation. The differences between the CPR-vM and physicians varied clinically and significantly with the level of experience, clinical setting, and field of expertise. CONCLUSION: Confronting CPRs with the judgment of a group of clinicians should be an integral part of the design and validation of CPRs. Head-to-head comparison of CPRs with clinicians is also a cornerstone for defining the optimal strategy for translation into the clinical practice, and for defining which clinician and specific clinical context would benefit from using the CPR.

Morphological features of thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological outcome in thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To identify specific morphological characteristics in thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological outcome after severe traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological (CT scan morphological characteristics) data of 25 consecutive patients admitted for TSCI secondary to a burst fracture at levels from T11 to L2 between 2010 and 2017 in single level-1 trauma center. We included severe TSCI, defined as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B or C. RESULTS: Among the 25 patients with severe TSCI, 14 were AIS A, 5 were AIS B, and 6 were AIS C upon initial preoperative neurological evaluation. The AIS grade and the burden of associated injuries (Injury Severity Score, ISS) were the only clinical factors significantly associated with poor neurological recovery. The trauma level of energy was not associated with neurological outcome. Several fractures parameters were independently related to neurological recovery: the postero-inferior corner translation, presence of retropulsed fragment comminution and complete lamina fracture. The magnitude of sagittal kyphosis angle, vertebral kyphosis index and vertebral body comminution were not associated with the neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Morphological features of the bony structures involving the spinal canal in thoracolumbar burst fractures with severe TSCI are associated with the chronic neurological outcome and could provide more insight than the AIS clinical grading. The fracture pattern may better reflect the actual level of energy transferred to the spinal cord than distinguishing between low- and high-energy trauma.

The use of classification and regression tree analysis to identify the optimal surgical timing for improving neurological outcomes following motor-complete thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To identify the optimal surgical timing for improving neurological outcomes in patients that sustained a motor-complete traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) secondary to a thoracolumbar injury. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center specialized in TSCI care. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed clinical data of 35 patients admitted for motor-complete TSCI secondary to a thoracolumbar injury. We quantified neurological recovery with three different outcomes: the improvement of at least one grade on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), of at least one neurological level of injury (NLI), and of at least 10-points on the motor score (MS). Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify outcome predictors and to provide cutoff values of surgical timing associated with recovery. RESULTS: The proportion of the patients improving by at least one AIS grade was higher in the group undergoing early surgery within 25.7 h of the TSCI (46% vs 0%). The proportion of patients that improved by at least one NLI was also higher in the group undergoing early surgery within 21.5 h of the TSCI (71% vs 18%). Lastly, 25% of the AIS grade A patients undergoing early surgery within 25.6 h of the TSCI improved 10 MS points or more as compared with 0% in the other group. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier surgery was effective in improving neurological outcome in motor-complete TSCI at the thoracolumbar levels. Performing surgery within 21.5 h from the traumatic event in these patients increases the likelihood of improving the neurological recovery. SPONSORSHIP: This study was supported by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS), Department of the Army-United States Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry and Medtronic research chair in spinal trauma at Université de Montréal.

Patterns and predictors of functional recovery from the subacute to the chronic phase following a traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of functional recovery between 6 and 12 months following a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and to identify individuals achieving a small clinical functional improvement during this period. SETTING: A single level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care. METHODS: A cohort of 125 patients sustaining TSCI was studied. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III at 6 and 12 months post injury was used as the main outcome measure. RESULTS: The observed functional improvement for the final cohort did not reach a clinically significant level between 6 and 12 months post injury. However, 30.4% of individuals achieved this level (≥4 points in the SCIM-III total score). This group showed a higher proportion of motor-complete TSCI (AIS grade A or B) and showed a tendency toward older age and higher trauma severity. Longer duration of intensive functional rehabilitation was the single factor associated with reaching a small clinically important improvement in the SCIM-III total score. CONCLUSIONS: Functional status between 6 and 12 months following a TSCI may be considered clinically similar, regardless of the level of injury. However, 30% may reach a small clinical functional improvement in the subacute to chronic phase following TSCI, particularly individuals sustaining severe deficits and older age, which may highlight the importance of functional compensation during this period for these patients.

The relevance of MRI for predicting neurological recovery following cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 82 patients with cervical traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). OBJECTIVES: Determine the relevance of preoperative MRI to predict neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. SETTING: Level I trauma center specialized in TSCI. METHODS: The following three MRI parameters were assessed: presence of an intramedullary hemorrhage, intramedullary lesion length and maximal compression of the spinal cord compression (MSCC). Analyses were performed to assess the relationship between MRI parameters and three neurological outcomes: ASIA motor score (AMS), improvement by at least one ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade (conversion of AIS grade), and reaching AIS grade D or E. RESULTS: Predicting AMS based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage resulted in a validation R-squared of 0.662, and of 0.636 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting conversion of AIS grade based on initial AIS grade, intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length resulted in a validation c-index of 0.704, and of 0.727 when using only the initial AIS grade. Predicting the likelihood of a follow-up AIS grade D or E based on initial AIS grade and intramedullary hemorrhage in a validation c-index of 0.903, and of 0.873 when using only the initial AIS grade. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary hemorrhage and lesion length assessed from preoperative MRI were predictors of the neurological recovery following cervical TSCI. However, the clinical benefit of these MRI parameters to predict the neurological recovery remains limited when the initial AIS grade is available, confirming that the initial neurological status remains the most important predictor of the neurological outcome.