A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine currently being developed for procedural sedation and for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. This trial was the fourth study for procedural sedation. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy profile of remimazolam and to refine suitable doses for subsequent phase III studies in this indication. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled clinical trial with 162 male and female patients, aged 18 to 70, scheduled to undergo a routine colonoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 remimazolam doses or midazolam for sedation. Supplemental oxygen and 100 µg of fentanyl was given before procedures were started, and the colonoscopy commenced as soon as suitable sedation had been achieved (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score ≤3). Top-up doses of the study drug and/or fentanyl were allowed to maintain suitable sedation and/or analgesia. Response was defined as sufficient sedation, no rescue sedative, and no ventilation required. RESULTS: This study showed that a single dose of remimazolam or midazolam, followed by top-up doses to maintain suitable sedation, provided adequate sedation with a high success rate (>92%) for the remimazolam groups, compared with 75% for the midazolam group (P = .007). There was no requirement for mechanical ventilation in any group, and procedure failures were all due to use of rescue sedative. CONCLUSIONS: The high success rates and good safety profile of remimazolam observed in this study warrants further investigation and confirmation in phase III trials. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01145222.).

A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study was the first study of remimazolam in patients to assess the safety and efficacy of different single doses for procedural sedation. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of remimazolam or midazolam (25 per group) in a double-blind manner. After a single dose of study drug to achieve sedation, patients underwent gastroscopy. We assessed the success of the procedure, sedation levels, recovery from sedation, and safety. RESULTS: A single dose of remimazolam resulted in a successful procedure in 32%, 56%, and 64% of patients in the low (0.10), middle (0.15), and high (0.20 mg/kg) dose groups compared with 44% of patients in the midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) dose group. The onset of sedation was 1.5 to 2.5 minutes in the remimazolam dose groups compared with 5 minutes for midazolam. Because this was a single administration study, sedation could be maintained for as long as necessary to complete the procedure, using rescue midazolam or propofol. Recovery from sedation was rapid for all treatment groups but was influenced by the choice of rescue medication. There were no obvious differences in the safety profiles of remimazolam and midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory dose-finding study showed that a single administration of remimazolam (0.10-0.20 mg/kg) was capable of inducing rapid sedation with a quick recovery profile in patients undergoing a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The safety profile was favorable and appeared to be similar to that of midazolam, warranting further development of this short-acting compound.

Nitroglycerin 0.4% ointment vs placebo in the treatment of pain resulting from chronic anal fissure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Complications of chronic anal fissure (CAF) treatments are prompting interest in lower-risk therapies. This study was conducted to compare nitroglycerin (NTG) 0.4% ointment with placebo for pain associated with CAF. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with one CAF and moderate-to-severe pain (≥50 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) received 375 mg NTG 0.4% (1.5 mg active ingredient) or 375 mg placebo ointment applied anally every 12 hours for 21 days. The primary end point was change from baseline VAS score in 24-hour pain averaged over days 14-18. Review of data from patients who withdrew early was blinded to treatment. To control for the confounding effects of analgesics, all patients received 650 mg acetaminophen for headache prophylaxis before each application. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were enrolled (NTG, n = 123; placebo, n = 124). The prespecified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) analysis found no significant difference between groups; however, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis showed a significant advantage for NTG. A post hoc analysis (LOCF/BOCF hybrid) demonstrated a significant adjusted mean difference of -7.0 mm in favor of NTG 0.4% (95% CI -13.6, -0.4; P = .038). Headache was the most common adverse event in the NTG (69.9%) and placebo (47.6%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first placebo-controlled study that also controlled for the confounding effects of analgesics used to treat NTG-induced headache. In patients with moderate-to-severe CAF pain, NTG 0.4% ointment effectively reduced CAF pain compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00522041.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind comparison of analgesic efficacy and tolerability of Q8003 vs oxycodone or morphine for moderate-to-severe postoperative pain following bunionectomy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy and tolerability of the dual-opioid, Q8003(®) (morphine/oxycodone combination) 12 mg/8 mg to morphine 12 mg or oxycodone 8 mg in subjects following bunionectomy surgery. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Hospitalized patients. PATIENTS: Healthy men or women aged ≥18 years with moderate or severe pain (score ≥2 on a 4-point Likert scale) and ≥4 on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale following surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Study medication was initiated after surgery and was given for 48 hours. OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy variable was mean sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores from the postsurgical baseline. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-two subjects were randomized; 31 (5.9%) discontinued, including 19 (3.6%) for adverse events. The mean total morphine equivalent dose (MED) was 182.7 mg from Q8003 12 mg/8 mg, 92.4 mg for morphine 12 mg, and 92.1 mg for oxycodone 8 mg. SPID from baseline over 24 hours and SPID from baseline over 48 hours were significantly (P < 0.02) higher for Q8003 12 mg/8 mg vs morphine 12 mg or oxycodone 8 mg. Significantly (P < 0.015) fewer subjects in the Q8003 group required ibuprofen rescue medication, used lower doses of rescue medication, and had a longer median time to first use of rescue medication. Oxygen desaturation <90% occurred in 5.3% with Q8003, 2.8% with morphine 12 mg, and 2.3% with oxycodone 8 mg, and the cumulative median dose at first desaturation was twofold greater with Q8003. CONCLUSION: Q8003 provided superior efficacy to its individual components at twice the MED with only a modest increase in the incidence of adverse events.

Dose-sparing H5N1 A/Indonesia/05/2005 pre-pandemic influenza vaccine in adults and elderly adults: a phase III, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses remain a threat to human health, with potential to become pandemic agents. METHODS: This phase III, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded study evaluated the immunogenicity, cross-reactivity, safety, and lot consistency of 2 doses of oil-in-water (AS03(A)) adjuvanted H5N1 A/Indonesia/05/2005 (3.75 µg hemagglutinin antigen) prepandemic candidate vaccine in 4561 adults aged 18-91 years. RESULTS: Humoral antibody responses in the H5N1 vaccine groups fulfilled US and European immunogenicity licensure criteria for pandemic vaccines in all age strata 21 days after the second dose. At 6 months after the administration of the primary dose, serum antibody seroconversion rates continued to fulfill licensure criteria. Neutralizing cross-clade immune responses were demonstrated against clade 1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004. Consistency was demonstrated for 3 consecutive H5N1 vaccine lots. Temporary injection-site pain was more frequent with H5N1 vaccine than placebo (89.3% and 70.7% in the 18-64 and ≥65 years strata vs 22.2% and 14.4% in the placebo groups). Unsolicited adverse event frequency, including medically attended and serious events, was similar between groups through day 364. CONCLUSIONS: In adults and elderly adults, AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 candidate vaccine was highly immunogenic for A/Indonesia/05/2005, with cross-reactivity against A/Vietnam/1194/2004. Temporary injection site reactions were more frequent with H5N1 vaccine than placebo, although the H5N1 vaccine was well tolerated overall. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00616928.

Safety and cross-reactive immunogenicity of candidate AS03-adjuvanted prepandemic H5N1 influenza vaccines: a randomized controlled phase 1/2 trial in adults.

BACKGROUND: The tocopherol-based oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant system family (AS03) improves antigen sparing with split-virion H5N1 influenza vaccines, representing an important development for pandemic preparedness. In this phase 1/2 randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study in 680 adults, we assessed the immunogenicity and safety of A/Indonesia/5/05 H5N1 (IBCDC-RG2, clade 2.1) prepandemic candidate vaccines produced at 2 separate manufacturing sites. METHODS: Two doses, each of which contained 3.75 microg of hemagglutinin antigen, were given 21 days apart either without adjuvant or with an adjuvant system containing 11.86 mg or 5.93 mg of tocopherol (AS03). RESULTS: The AS03-adjuvanted A/Indonesia/05/2005 (NIBRG-14) vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than nonadjuvanted vaccine in homologous assays. Neutralizing cross-clade immunogenicity against clades 1, 2.2, and 2.3 was demonstrated at day 42 with all vaccines; at 6 months, seroconversion rates were highest for clade 2.2 (60.7%) and for clade 1 (38.3%). Adjuvantation was associated with increased short-term injection-site reactions (pain) in 80% of participants, with such reactions assessed as being of grade 3 severity for 4.0% of doses. No other safety or reactogenicity concerns were identified over 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Humoral responses against the adjuvanted 3.75-microg hemagglutinin antigen vaccines from both manufacturing sites fulfilled European and US licensure criteria for immunogenicity for influenza vaccines.

Rifabutin-Containing Triple Therapy (RHB-105) for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: Randomized ERADICATE Hp Trial.

Due to increasing resistance to commonly used antibiotics, the World Health Organization and Food and Drug Administration have advocated the development of new therapeutic regimens for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). This phase three, double-blind study (ERADICATE Hp) randomized (2:1) treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection and dyspepsia to RHB-105 (an all-in-one combination of omeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and rifabutin 50 mg) or an identically-appearing placebo, both administered every 8 h for 14 days. The H. pylori eradication rate with RHB-105, using a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of subjects who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had test-of-eradication performed 28-35 days post-completion of therapy, was compared (one-sample Z-test) to a literature-derived comparator rate of 70% and success rate with physician-selected standard-of-care given to placebo failures. The mITT H. pylori eradication rate (95% CI) with RHB-105 of 89.4% (82.0-96.8%) was greater than both the literature-derived comparator rate (P < 0.001) and the standard-of-care rate of 63.0% (44.8-81.1%) (P = 0.006). Adverse events with an incidence ≥5% for RHB-105 were diarrhea (12.7%), headache (11.9%), chromaturia (9.3%), abdominal tenderness (6.8%), and dizziness (5.1%). No leukopenia was noted. RHB-105 (Talicia®) proved to be a safe and effective empiric therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Randomized sham-controlled trial of the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant health problem and additional therapies are needed to improve obesity treatment. OBJECTIVE: Determine the efficacy and safety of a 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss. SETTING: Fifteen academic and private practice centers in the United States. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial of the swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system plus lifestyle therapy compared with lifestyle therapy alone for weight loss at 6 months in participants aged 22 to 60 years with body mass index 30 to 40 kg/m2, across 15 sites in the United States. The following endpoints were included: difference in percent total weight loss in treatment group versus control group was >2.1%, and a responder rate of >35% in the treatment group. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-seven patients swallowed at least 1 capsule. Of participants, 93.3% completed all 24 weeks of blinded study testing. Nonserious adverse events occurred in 91.1% of patients, but only .4% were severe. One bleeding ulcer and 1 balloon deflation occurred. In analysis of patients who completed treatment, the treatment and control groups achieved 7.1 ± 5.0% and 3.6 ± 5.1% total weight loss, respectively, and a mean difference of 3.5% (P = .0085). Total weight loss in treatment and control groups were 7.1 ± 5.3 and 3.6 ± 5.1 kg (P < .0001), and body mass index change in the treatment and control groups were 2.5 ± 1.8 and 1.3 ± 1.8 kg/m2 (P < .0001), respectively. The responder rate in the treatment group was 66.7% (P < .0001). Weight loss maintenance in the treatment group was 88.5% at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with lifestyle therapy and the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system was safe and resulted in twice as much weight loss compared with a sham control, with high weight loss maintenance at 48 weeks.

A phase 1/2A trial of STA 5326, an oral interleukin-12/23 inhibitor, in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal inflammation associated with Crohn's disease is characterized by a type 1 helper T cell response and elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12. We report our clinical experience with a novel oral IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (STA 5326) for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an open-label, dose-escalating trial of the orally delivered small molecule immunomodulator STA 5326 in 73 patients with active Crohn's disease (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] 220-450, inclusive). Five cohorts of patients were treated for up to 4 weeks with 14 mg twice a day (bid), 35 mg daily (qd), 28 mg bid, 35 mg bid, or 70 mg qd. The endpoints of the study included safety and improvement in clinical activity measured by the CDAI and the Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity. RESULTS: STA 5326 was well tolerated. Reported adverse events were similar across dose cohorts. The most common (>15%) drug-related adverse events observed were dizziness, nausea, headache, and fatigue. Clinical activity at day 28/29 was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above for the clinical endpoints of response and remission: 70 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 42%-82% of patients); 100 points or greater decrease in CDAI (range 38%-64% of patients), and CDAI <150 (range 15%-36%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral qd dosing of STA 5326 for 4 weeks was well tolerated in doses up to 70 mg qd in patients with active moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Clinical activity was observed at qd doses of 28 mg and above.

Analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib for acute postoperative pain after bunionectomy.

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessed the analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after bunionectomy. Study 1 (N = 374) assessed the efficacy of two regimens of valdecoxib on the day after surgery (valdecoxib, 40 mg, with a 20-mg redose [n = 127]; valdecoxib, 40 mg, with a placebo redose [n = 122]; and placebo/placebo [n = 125]), and study 2 (N = 478) examined the efficacy of two different multiple-dose regimens on postoperative days 2 through 5 (valdecoxib, 20 mg, twice daily [n = 160]; valdecoxib, 20 mg, once daily [n = 159]; and placebo [n = 159]). Valdecoxib provided significant pain relief and reduced the use of opioid rescue medication. This efficacy was accompanied by improved global scores, decreased pain interference with function, and increased patient satisfaction.

Pharmacokinetic profile of dextromethorphan hydrobromide in a syrup formulation in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Dextromethorphan hydrobromide (DM) is a widely used antitussive. This study determined, for the first time, the basic pharmacokinetic profile of DM and its active metabolite, dextrorphan (DP) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Thirty-eight male and female subjects at risk for developing an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), or symptomatic with cough due to URTI, were enrolled in this single-dose, open-label study: ages 2-5 years (Group A, n = 8), 6-11 years (Group B, n = 17), 12-17 years (Group C, n = 13). Subjects were genotyped for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 polymorphisms and characterized as poor (PM) or non-poor metabolizers (non-PM). Groups A and B were dosed using an age-weight dosing schedule (DM range 7.5-24.75 mg); a 30-mg dose was used for Group C. RESULTS: Average exposures to total DP increased as age group increased, and average exposure to DM was highest in the adolescent group. One subject in that group was a PM. The terminal half-life (t ½) values were longer in the adolescent group due in part to the single PM subject. No relationship between body weight and pharmacokinetic parameters was noted. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of DM in children and adolescents. A single dose of DM in this population was safe, and well tolerated at all doses tested. The data are used to model and compare pediatric DM exposures with those of adults.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Conivaptan is a non-peptide dual antagonist of vasopressin V1A and V2 receptors that is approved in the United States as an intravenous formulation for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan had not been studied in patients with hepatic or renal impairment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment compared with subjects with normal function. STUDY DESIGN: These studies were phase I, open-label pharmacokinetic studies conducted at two sites in the US. PATIENTS: Men and non-pregnant women 30-70 years of age were allocated to the mild (Child-Pugh classification score of 5-6) or moderate (Child-Pugh classification score of 7-9) hepatically impaired groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on their liver function assessed at screening. For the renal study, men and non-pregnant women between 18 and 70 years of age were assigned to renal function groups (n = 8-9 per group) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessed at screening. Normal renal function was defined as an eGFR >80 ml/min, mild renal impairment as 50-80 ml/min, and moderate renal impairment as 30-49 ml/min. Subjects with normal hepatic or renal function were selected to match the race, sex, age, and body mass index of subjects enrolled in the impaired groups. INTERVENTION: Subjects were administered a 20-mg/30-min intravenous loading dose of conivaptan on day 1, followed by a 20-mg/23.5-h continuous conivaptan infusion. On day 2, immediately following the end of the day 1 infusion, a 20-mg/24-h continuous conivaptan infusion was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary pharmacokinetic parameters estimated were the area under the plasma conivaptan concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞), plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the 20-mg loading dose (C LD), and plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the second day 20-mg/24-h continuous infusion (C 48). RESULTS: For each of C LD, C 48, and AUC∞, the mean values were similar for subjects with mild hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function. Subjects with moderate hepatic impairment had a 73 % higher C 48 and an 80 % higher AUC∞ compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. There were no clinically relevant changes in conivaptan exposure in the mild and moderate renal impairment groups compared with subjects with normal renal function. Intravenous conivaptan was generally well tolerated in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment. Infusion-site reaction was the most commonly reported adverse event. CONCLUSION: Overall exposure to conivaptan increased in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Therefore, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, conivaptan should be initiated with a loading dose of 10 mg over 30 min followed by 10 mg per day as a continuous infusion for 2-4 days, which is half the approved dose. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment and in patients with mild hepatic impairment.

Effect of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mirabegron.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mirabegron, a selective ß3-adrenoceptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), is eliminated by renal and metabolic routes. The potential influence of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of mirabegron was evaluated. METHODS: Two separate open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies were conducted. Male and female subjects (n = 8 per group) were categorized according to their baseline renal function (mild, moderate, severe or no impairment as determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease formula) or hepatic function (mild, moderate or no impairment as determined by the Child-Pugh classification). All subjects received a single oral 100 mg dose of mirabegron. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma and urine concentration-time data of mirabegron and metabolites. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects who were similar overall in terms of age, sex and body mass index (BMI), the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞)) for mirabegron was 31, 66 and 118 % higher in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) increased 6, 23 and 92 %, respectively, in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. Renal clearance but not apparent total body clearance of mirabegron correlated well with renal function. Compared with healthy subjects matched for age, sex and BMI, mirabegron AUC(∞) values were 19 and 65 % higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively. Mirabegron C(max) was 9 and 175 % higher, respectively, compared with matched healthy subjects. No clear relationship was evident between pharmacokinetic parameters and Child-Pugh scores. Protein binding was approximately 71 % in healthy subjects and was not altered to a clinically significant extent in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. No consistent changes in mirabegron elimination half-life were observed in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. There was high pharmacokinetic variability and significant overlap in exposures between subjects with renal or hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Mirabegron AUC(∞) and C(max) increased 118 and 92 %, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment, and 65 and 175 %, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Pharmacokinetic changes observed in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment are of small magnitude and likely to be without clinical importance.

An assessment of the efficacy and safety of diclofenac potassium liquid-filled capsules in patients with various levels of baseline pain intensity.

CONTEXT: Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsule (DPSGC; Zipsor*) is a novel formulation of diclofenac potassium used to treat mild to moderate acute pain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether DPSGC 25 mg provided significant reduction in pain intensity compared with placebo, regardless of baseline pain intensity, a post hoc analysis was performed of pooled data from two replicate randomized controlled trials (NCT00366444 and NCT00375934) that evaluated the safety and efficacy of DPSGC in postbunionectomy treatment. METHODS: Patients from the two randomized trials were assigned to one of two subgroups: patients with baseline numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores of 4 or greater to less than 7 and those with baseline NPRS scores of 7 or greater. Within each subgroup, efficacy and safety of DPSGC was compared with placebo. RESULTS: Across the two studies, 73 DPSGC- and 59 placebo-treated patients had baseline pain intensity scores ranging from 4 or greater to less than 7, while 128 DPSGC- and 141 placebo-treated patients had baseline pain intensity scores of 7 or greater. Significantly lower mean 48-hour NPRS scores were observed in the DPSGC group, regardless of baseline pain intensity (P < 0.0001). In both subgroups, at least twice as many patients treated with DPSGC rated the study drug as very good or excellent compared with patients taking placebo. Potential limitations for this post hoc analysis include study design and patient population. As with all studies investigating treatment for pain, the use of rescue medication may also be a potential limitation. CONCLUSIONS: DPSGC provided significantly greater improvements in pain compared with placebo following bunionectomy, regardless of patients' baseline pain level.

Analgesic and adverse effects of a fixed-ratio morphine-oxycodone combination (MoxDuo) in the treatment of postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety profiles of an immediate-release morphine and oxycodone Dual-Opioid combination (MoxDuo) versus its individual components and versus its morphine-equivalent doses in moderate to severe postoperative pain patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, 48-hour, parallel-treatment, multicenter, six-arm study of MoxDuo. SETTING: Six US centers. PATIENTS: Within 6 hours after bunionectomy surgery, patients were eligible if they reported pain intensity > or = 2 on the 4-point Likert scale and > or = 4 on an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (197 randomly assigned; 175 completers). INTERVENTIONS: MoxDuo 12 mg/8 mg, MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg, morphine 12 mg, oxycodone 8 mg, morphine 6 mg, or oxycodone 4 mg (all administered q6h). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sum of pain intensity differences 0-24 hours after the first dose of study medication (SPID24) and percentage of patients with moderate to severe nausea, emesis, or dizziness. RESULTS: SPID24 was significantly better in the MoxDuo 12 mg/8 mg group when compared with its individual components (morphine 12 mg [p = 0.009] and oxycodone 8 mg [p = 0.037]), and when compared with MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg (p = 0.011; 54.3 vs 28.5, 35.7, and 30.0, respectively). MoxDuo6 mg/4 mg and its morphine-equivalent doses (morphine 12 mg and oxycodone 8 mg) had comparable analgesic effects. There was a 50-75 percent reduction in moderate to severe adverse events (AEs) commonly associated with opioids (ie, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) in the MoxDuo 6 mg/4 mg group when compared with its morphine-equivalent dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: MoxDuo produced superior analgesic effects when compared with its individual components, but comparable efficacy when compared with its morphine-equivalent doses. Common AEs were reduced at least 50 percent with MoxDuo when compared with its morphine-equivalent doses. MoxDuo may be an improved intervention in the management of moderate to severe acute pain.

Immunological priming induced by a two-dose series of H5N1 influenza antigen, administered alone or in combination with two different formulations of AS03 adjuvant in adults: results of a randomised single heterologous booster dose study at 15 months.

One influenza pandemic preparedness strategy involves priming a population with a pre-pandemic subtype-specific vaccine and boosting the immunological response at the time of the pandemic with a strain-matched vaccine. In the current study, adults (n=469) randomised 15 months previously to receive an A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) influenza vaccine (3.75 µg haemagglutinin antigen [HA]) administered alone or in combination with an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing 11.86 mg (AS03(A)) or 5.93 mg (AS03(B)) tocopherol per dose, received one booster dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 (H5N1) vaccine (3.75 µg HA) with or without AS03(A). An anamnestic antibody response that met US regulatory acceptance criteria was observed 15 months after priming. Although superior immunogenicity of AS03-adjuvanted compared to unadjuvanted priming was not demonstrated, higher antibody titres which persisted longer were seen when both priming and boosting regimens were adjuvanted. This may affect duration of response or heterologous immunity. The booster vaccines had a clinically acceptable safety/reactogenicity profile after adjuvanted or unadjuvanted priming. This study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00771615.

Fontolizumab in moderate to severe Crohn's disease: a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of fontolizumab, a humanized anti-interferon gamma antibody, was investigated in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Elevated gut mucosal levels of interferon gamma, a key cytokine involved in the inflammatory process of CD, are associated with disease symptoms. METHODS: A total of 201 patients with Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores between 250 and 450 were randomized to receive an initial intravenous dose of 1.0 or 4.0 mg/kg fontolizumab or placebo, followed by up to 3 subcutaneous doses of 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg fontolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks. Clinical response at day 29, the primary efficacy endpoint, was defined as a decrease in the CDAI of at least 100 points from baseline levels. RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 135 (67%) completed the study. Day 29 response rates were similar in all treatment groups (31%-38%). At subsequent timepoints a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 1.0 mg/kg intravenous / 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous fontolizumab group had clinical response and significantly greater improvement in the CDAI score compared with patients who received placebo. All fontolizumab groups had significant improvement in C-reactive protein levels. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar in all groups (58%-75%); most events were related to exacerbation of CD. There was a low frequency (5.2%) of neutralizing antibodies to fontolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Although a strong clinical response to fontolizumab was not observed, significant decreases in C-reactive protein levels suggest a biological effect. Fontolizumab was well tolerated, and further studies to assess its efficacy are warranted.

Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules in the management of patients with postbunionectomy pain: a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over 5 days.

BACKGROUND: Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsule (DPSGC) is a rapidly absorbed formulation of diclofenac potassium developed for the treatment of mild to moderate acute pain. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety profile of DPSGC 25 mg in patients with pain after first-metatarsal bunionectomy. METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study conducted over 5 days. Patients experiencing the requisite level of pain (score > or = 4 on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale [NPRS] from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain) on the day after bunionectomy were randomized to receive DPSGC 25 mg or matching placebo. A second dose was given when patients requested additional medication for pain. Subsequent doses were given every 6 hours over a 48-hour inpatient multiple-dose period and continued over an additional 48-hour outpatient multiple-dose period. Opioid rescue medication was available as needed after the second dose of study medication. The primary efficacy end point was the mean NPRS score over the 48-hour inpatient multiple-dose period. Additional measures included NPRS scores at predefined times over 48 hours, the summed pain intensity difference over 48 hours (SPID48), the time-weighted sum of pain relief scores over the first 8 hours, the mean dosing interval (the time from dosing to the time rescue medication or the next dose of study medication was administered, whichever was less), the proportion of patients requiring rescue medication, and the onset of perceptible and meaningful pain relief (2-stopwatch method). Tolerability was assessed based on physician monitoring and patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) and the results of standard laboratory tests. RESULTS: Of 201 randomized patients (102 DPSGC 25 mg, 99 placebo; 86.6% female; 58.2% white; mean [SD] age, 45.2 [11.5] years; weight range, 49.4-108.0 kg), 198 completed the study. Mean baseline NPRS scores did not differ significantly between the DPSGC and placebo groups (6.9 and 7.3, respectively). DPSGC was associated with significant improvements compared with placebo in mean NPRS score over 48 hours (2.5 vs 5.6, respectively; P < 0.001), mean SPID48 (210.0 vs 90.3; P < 0.001), and overall mean dosing interval (331.5 vs 263.9 min; P < 0.001). Significant differences in NPRS scores between DPSGC 25 mg and placebo were noted at all time points from baseline through 48 hours (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring rescue medication was significantly lower in the DPSGC group compared with the placebo group (39.2% vs 87.9% on day 1; 21.6% vs 64.6% on day 2; both, P < 0.001). Patients receiving DPSGC had a significantly faster onset of meaningful pain relief compared with those receiving placebo (P = 0.008). The most commonly reported AEs were nausea (7.8% vs 18.2%), headache (5.9% vs 9.1%), vomiting (3.9% vs 9.1%), and constipation (3.9% vs 2.0%). The overall incidence of AEs occurring in > or = 2% of patients was significantly lower in the DPSGC group than in the placebo group (20.6% vs 44.4%; P < 0.05); no patient receiving DPSGC had a serious AE. CONCLUSIONS: DPSGC 25 mg taken every 6 hours was effective in reducing postbunionectomy pain in the patients studied. DPSGC was well tolerated, suggesting that it may be a practicable option for the treatment of mild to moderate acute pain. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT00366444.

A randomized, double-blind, one-week study comparing effects of a novel COX-2 inhibitor and naproxen on the gastric mucosa.

CS-706 is a novel cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor with potent analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor properties in animal models. This one-week, multicenter study was undertaken to assess the safety and tolerability of CS-706 and to compare the effects of CS-706 versus naproxen on acute gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury. Healthy men and women (n=160) without evidence of underlying gastroduodenal lesions were randomized to placebo, 100 mg CS-706 once daily, 200 mg CS-706 once daily, or 500 mg naproxen twice daily, administered for 7 days. On Day 8, subjects underwent a posttreatment upper GI endoscopy to assess development of gastroduodenal petechiae, erosions, and ulcers. Inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 activity over the 24-hr postdose interval on Day 7 was determined in 48 subjects (12 per treatment group). CS-706 was safe and well tolerated. The extent of upper GI mucosal injury for both CS-706 dose groups was statistically significantly less than that for naproxen (P < 0.001) and was similar to placebo (P=0.615 and P=0.115 for 100 and 200 mg CS-706, respectively). No subject in placebo or either CS-706 treatment group had gastroduodenal ulcers, compared with 11 (28.2%) subjects treated with naproxen (P < 0.001). Both doses of CS-706 inhibited COX-2 activity to a similar extent as naproxen, whereas neither dose of CS-706 showed meaningful inhibition of platelet COX-1. In contrast, naproxen nearly completely inhibited COX-1 over the dosing interval. We conclude that CS-706, dosed up to 200 mg once daily, has an acute, upper GI toxicity profile similar to that of placebo and significantly superior to that of naproxen.