ATM Mutations Associate with Distinct Co-Mutational Patterns and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in NSCLC.

PURPOSE: Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is the most frequently mutated DNA damage repair gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the molecular correlates of ATM mutations and their clinical implications have not been fully elucidated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Clinicopathologic and genomic data from 26,587 patients with NSCLC from MD Anderson, public databases, and a de-identified nationwide (US-based) NSCLC clinicogenomic database (CGDB) were used to assess the co-mutation landscape, protein expression, and mutational processes in ATM-mutant tumors. We used the CGDB to evaluate ATM-associated outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with or without chemotherapy, and assessed the effect of ATM loss on STING signaling and chemotherapy sensitivity in preclinical models. RESULTS: Nonsynonymous mutations in ATM were observed in 11.2% of samples (2,980/26,587) and were significantly associated with mutations in KRAS, but mutually exclusive with EGFR (q < 0.1). KRAS mutational status constrained the ATM co-mutation landscape, with strong mutual exclusivity with TP53 and KEAP1 within KRAS-mutated samples. Those ATM mutations that co-occurred with TP53 were more likely to be missense mutations and associate with high mutational burden, suggestive of non-functional passenger mutations. In the CGDB cohort, dysfunctional ATM mutations associated with improved OS only in patients treated with ICI-chemotherapy, and not ICI alone. In vitro analyses demonstrated enhanced upregulation of STING signaling in ATM knockout cells with the addition of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: ATM mutations define a distinct subset of NSCLC associated with KRAS mutations, increased TMB, decreased TP53 and EGFR co-occurrence, and potential increased sensitivity to ICIs in the context of DNA-damaging chemotherapy.

Co-administration of statins with cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors in a UK primary care population.

PURPOSE: The co-administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors with simvastatin or atorvastatin (CYP3A4-metabolised statins) is associated with increased statin exposure and can increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. The aim of this study was to measure the concomitant exposure of patients to CYP3A4-metabolised statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors in the UK primary care population. METHODS: The co-administration of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors during 2008 was examined in the General Practice Research Database, a large nationally representative UK primary care database. All known inhibitors were included with labelled inhibitors identified using the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Drug Safety Update and UK summary of product characteristics for statins. Exposure was examined in patients overall, patients 65 years and older and those prescribed higher doses of statins. RESULTS: There were 364,574 patients included in the analyses. Ninety-three percent of the patients were prescribed CYP3A4-metabolised statins, most whom received simvastatin (72%) and atorvastatin (24%). Approximately one third (30%) of the patients prescribed a CYP3A4-metabolised statin had also been prescribed a concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor during the study period, including 11% prescribed a concomitant labelled inhibitor, with an annualised median days of concomitant use of 173 days, predominantly involving macrolide antibiotics and calcium channel blockers co-prescriptions. Rates were higher in the subgroup aged 65 and over and in those on high dose statins. CONCLUSIONS: The co-prescription of CYP3A4-metabolised statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors is common in UK primary care. This co-prescription suggests the limited appreciation of potential interactions and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency safety advice, with the potential to increase likelihood for side effects amongst patients. Strategies to reduce drug interactions with potential adverse effects should be targeted at prescribers and pharmacists.

Evaluating a Cox marginal structural model to assess the comparative effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids versus no inhaled corticosteroid treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of a Cox marginal structural model (MSM) to estimate the time-varying causal inference of a known clinical trial association where the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid- (ICS-) versus non-ICS-containing treatments has been compared in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This retrospective study from 2006-2016 used linked data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink-GOLD, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Office for National Statistics mortality. A Cox MSM, incorporating a new-user design, was deemed capable of replicating a clinical trial-like pathway. Repeated outcomes for exacerbation events and stabilized weights were used to include time-varying and fixed covariate exposures. RESULTS: Of 45,958 patients, 55% were male; 52% had moderate COPD. ICS-treated patients had a higher incidence of comorbid asthma than non-ICS-treated patients. Adjusted hazard risk ratios for any exacerbation event: ICS and/or long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) versus long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.10); ICS/LABA versus LABA and/or LAMA, 1.05 (1.00-1.10); ICS and/or LABA and/or LAMA versus LAMA, 1.04 (1.01-1.06); ICS and/or LABA and/or LAMA versus LABA and/or LAMA 1.02 (0.97-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: The Cox MSM was not able to fully demonstrate results consistent with the previously established benefits of ICS-containing treatments seen in clinical trials. Future studies should continue to investigate causal inference methods and their capability to estimate the long-term outcomes of treatment in COPD.

Glycaemic, weight, and blood pressure changes associated with early versus later treatment intensification with dapagliflozin in United Kingdom primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Early treatment intensification for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is often required to achieve glycaemic control and avoid longer-term complications. We assessed associations between early versus later dapagliflozin initiation with changes in glucose control, weight, and blood pressure using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data. METHODS: People with T2DM aged ≥18 years, initiating dapagliflozin between November 2012 and August 2016 and with prior oral T2DM therapy (N = 3774), were included. The relationship between early (first intensification after metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy) and later (second or higher-order intensification) dapagliflozin use and baseline changes in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; ≥1.0% absolute reduction), weight (≥5.0% relative loss), and systolic blood pressure (SBP; ≥2 mmHg absolute reduction) after 6-12 months were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 25% of patients (951 of 3774) were early users and 75% (2823 of 3774) were later users. Later users were older, more likely to be men, and had longer disease duration. Early and later users had similar baseline mean HbA1c levels. For early versus later users, respectively, baseline-adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) reductions were 1.54% (-1.65, -1.44) versus 1.02% (-1.08, -0.97) in HbA1c, 3.31% (-4.37, -2.25) versus 4.06% (-5.05, -3.07) in weight, and 2.50 mm Hg (-3.89, -1.11) versus 2.84 mm Hg (-3.67, -2.01) in SBP. Early versus later use was associated with a greater likelihood of adjusted HbA1c reduction of ≥1% (odds ratio: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.15-2.45). CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic benefits were greater with early versus later dapagliflozin intensification. These results support broader and earlier dapagliflozin use.

Glycated Hemoglobin, Body Weight and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Initiating Dapagliflozin Treatment in Primary Care: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to describe characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in UK primary care initiated on dapagliflozin, post-dapagliflozin changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and blood pressure, and reasons for adding dapagliflozin to insulin. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with T2D in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink with first prescription for dapagliflozin. Patients were included in the study if they: (1) had a first prescription for dapagliflozin between November 2012 and September 2014; (2) had a Read code for T2D; (3) were registered with a practice for at least 6 months before starting dapagliflozin; and (4) remained registered for at least 3 months after initiation. A questionnaire ascertained reason(s) for adding dapagliflozin to insulin. RESULTS: Dapagliflozin was most often used as triple therapy (27.7%), dual therapy with metformin (25.1%) or added to insulin (19.2%). Median therapy duration was 329 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 302-361]. Poor glycemic control was the reason for dapagliflozin initiation for 93.1% of insulin-treated patients. Avoiding increases in weight/body mass index and insulin resistance were the commonest reasons for selecting dapagliflozin versus intensifying insulin. HbA1c declined by mean of 9.7 mmol/mol (95% CI 8.5-10.9) (0.89%) 14-90 days after starting dapagliflozin, 10.2 mmol/mol (95% CI 8.9-11.5) (0.93%) after 91-180 days and 12.6 mmol/mol (95% CI 11.0-14.3) (1.16%) beyond 180 days. Weight declined by mean of 2.6 kg (95% CI 2.3-2.9) after 14-90 days, 4.3 kg (95% CI 3.8-4.7) after 91-180 days and 4.6 kg (95% CI 4.0-5.2) beyond 180 days. In patients with measurements between 14 and 90 days after starting dapagliflozin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by means of 4.5 (95% CI -5.8 to -3.2) and 2.0 (95% CI -2.9 to -1.2) mmHg, respectively from baseline. Similar reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed after 91-180 days and when follow-up extended beyond 180 days. Results were consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSION: HbA1c, body weight and blood pressure were reduced after initiation of dapagliflozin in patients with T2D in UK primary care and the changes were consistent with randomized clinical trials. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

A double-blind, randomized, 26-week study comparing the cognitive and psychomotor effects and efficacy of 75 mg (37.5 mg b.i.d.) venlafaxine and 75 mg (25 mg mane, 50 mg nocte) dothiepin in elderly patients with moderate major depression being treated in general practice.

To investigate the efficacy and cognitive and psychomotor effects of venlafaxine and dothiepin in elderly patients with moderate major depression. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active comparator controlled study was conducted. Eighty-eight patients (aged > or = 60 years) were enrolled. Each patient received either venlafaxine (immediate release formulation) 37.5 mg twice per day or dothiepin 25 mg mane followed by 50 mg nocte for 26 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. A psychometric test battery to assess cognitive function, activities of daily living and sleep consisted of Critical Flicker Fusion (CFF), Short-term Memory--Kim's Game, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, Milford Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire, and an Accident Scoring Questionnaire. Quality of Life Questionnaires (Short Form 36 and Quality of Life in Depression Scale) were also administered. Venlafaxine significantly (p < 0.05) raised CFF scores compared to baseline but had no effect on any other measure. Dothiepin significantly (p < 0.05) lowered CFF threshold, and increased ratings of both sedation and difficulty in waking. The results showed that venlafaxine at doses of 37.5 mg b.i.d. in elderly depressed patients is free from disruptive effects on cognitive function and psychomotor performance.

Residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem following middle of the night administration five hours to one hour before awakening.

The objective was to assess residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem after a middle of the night administration. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, conducted in 40 healthy young male and female subjects. Subjects were awakened in the middle of the night and administered either placebo or zaleplon 10 or 20 mg or zolpidem 10 mg. A battery of objective tests exploring psychomotor and cognitive functions such as critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reáction time (CRT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), and memory tests (Sternberg memory scanning and a word list) were administered immediately after morning waking. Zaleplon 10 mg was devoid of residual effects whatever - the time of dosing - except a minimal but significant decrease in DSST scores when administered 1 h before awakening. Zaleplon 20 mg produced significant residual effects on performance (increase in CRT, and decrease in CFF threshold and in DSST scores) and memory (decrease in immediate and delayed free recall of words) only when administered 1 h before awakening. In contrast, zolpidem 10 mg produced significant detrimental residual effects on CRT and delayed free recall of words, when administered up to 5 h before waking, on DSST and Sternberg when administered up to 3 h before awakening and on CFF when administered 1 h before awakening. The residual effects of zolpidem 10 mg were more marked than those observed after zaleplon 20 mg. The present results demonstrate that zaleplon 10 mg has no or minimal residual effects when administered in the middle of the night as little as 1 h before waking. The lack of clinically significant residual effects with zaleplon may be explained by its unique pharmacokinetic (rapid elimination half-life) and pharmacodynamic (selective binding for GABA(A) receptors with the alpha(1) subunit, dissociation between sleep inducing properties and impairment of cognitive functions) profiles. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Annual cost of managing bipolar disorder to the UK healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder is a common illness characterized by recurrent episodes of pathological disturbances of mood. The aim of this study was to estimate the annual cost associated with bipolar disorder to the UK healthcare system (National Health Service). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Primary care resource use was estimated using the IMS Disease Analyzer, a nationally representative sample of general practitioner (GP) practices. Two sources of data from the NHS Information Centre were used to assess resource use in secondary care and in outpatient and community mental health. The number of bed days and day attendances for patients hospitalized was obtained from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). This was supplemented with Mental Health Minimum Dataset (MHMDS) to quantify outpatient and community mental health face-to-face contacts. Resource use was examined between 01 April 2007 and 31 March 2008. RESULTS: The annual NHS cost of bipolar disorder was estimated to be £ 342 million at 2009/2010 prices. Hospitalizations accounted for 60%, outpatient and community mental health 26.7%, and medication in primary care 7.4% of the overall direct costs of care. LIMITATIONS: This study may be confounded by the absence of a control group. This study was limited to an assessment of direct healthcare costs only, not the wider societal cost of bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The direct medical cost of managing bipolar disorder in the UK healthcare system is considerable. Therapeutic strategies that optimize community-based management, prevention of recurrence and hospitalization could reduce the economic burden of this illness.

Persistence with once-daily versus twice-daily bupropion for the treatment of depression in a large managed-care population.

In this study, the impact of dosing frequency [once daily with bupropion extended-release (XL) versus twice daily with bupropion sustained-release (SR)] on medication persistence was assessed over a 9-month period in a large cohort of patients with depression in a managed-care setting. Administrative claims data from the Integrated Health Care Information Services National Managed Care Benchmark database were analyzed for patients 18 to 64 years old with a documented diagnosis of depression who began treatment with bupropion XL or SR between September 2003 and February 2004. Persistence of use was higher with once-daily bupropion XL (n = 1074) than with twice-daily bupropion SR (n = 1917) across measures assessed by univariate tests of proportions. The mean (+/-SD) number of days between the first and last prescription claims was longer with bupropion XL (128.37 +/- 103.46 days) than with bupropion SR (82.31 +/- 96.86 days) (P < 0.0001). The bupropion XL cohort had higher persistency of use than the bupropion SR cohort (mean +/- SD = 0.47 +/- 0.38 versus 0.30 +/- 0.36) (P < 0.0001) and a higher medication possession ratio (mean +/- SD = 0.50 +/- 0.33 versus 0.36 +/- 0.31) (P < 0.0001). Medication persistency >0.7 and a medication possession ratio >0.7 were almost twice as likely in the bupropion XL cohort (38.5% and 32.0%, respectively) than in the bupropion SR cohort (21.5% and 17.0%, respectively). Results of multivariate analyses adjusted for age, gender, and index date support the univariate analyses. Because better persistence and adherence may be associated with less likelihood of relapse and lower depression-associated health care utilization and economic burden, health care providers should consider the potential benefits of initiating treatment with bupropion XL for bupropion candidates and for switching bupropion SR recipients to treatment with bupropion XL.

A meta-analysis of six prospective studies of falling in Parkinson's disease.

Recurrent falls are a disabling feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). We have estimated the incidence of falling over a prospective 3 month follow-up from a large sample size, identified predictors for falling for PD patients repeated this analysis for patients without prior falls, and examined the risk of falling with increasing disease severity. We pooled six prospective studies of falling in PD (n = 473), and examined the predictive power of variables that were common to most studies. The 3-month fall rate was 46% (95% confidence interval: 38-54%). Interestingly, even among subjects without prior falls, this fall rate was 21% (12-35%). The best predictor of falling was two or more falls in the previous year (sensitivity 68%; specificity 81%). The risk of falling rose as UPDRS increased, to about a 60% chance of falling for UPDRS values 25 to 35, but remained at this level thereafter with a tendency to taper off towards later disease stages. These results confirm the high frequency of falling in PD, as almost 50% of patients fell during a short period of only 3 months. The strongest predictor of falling was prior falls in the preceding year, but even subjects without any prior falls had a considerable risk of sustaining future falls. Disease severity was not a good predictor of falls, possibly due to the complex U-shaped relation with falls. Early identification of the very first fall therefore remains difficult, and new prediction methods must be developed.