Motivation towards first trimester screening for preeclampsia among pregnant women in Denmark: A cross-sectional questionnaire study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this cross-sectional questionnaire study was to investigate motivation to participate in a possible new screening for preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy among Danish pregnant women through a questionnaire based on Theory of Planned Behavior developed for this specific purpose. The new screening combines maternal characteristics with mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and biochemical markers to predict the risk of preeclampsia, whereas the current Danish screening uses maternal characteristics alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participation was offered to a proportion of women attending a first or a second trimester screening scan at two University Hospitals in Copenhagen. The questionnaire was set up in REDCap® and answers were entered directly into the database, which was accessed via a QR-code. RESULTS: We invited 772 pregnant women to participate in the questionnaire survey between November 2021 and April 2022 at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet (study site one) (n = 238) and Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre (study site two) (n = 534). The response rate was 71.8% (171/238) at study site one and 33.9% (181/534) at study site two. A total of 352 women were included in the study (total participation rate 45.6%). Most women had a positive attitude towards preeclampsia screening in pregnancy, and 99.4% said they would participate in a risk assessment for preeclampsia if given the opportunity. A total of 97.4% answered "yes" to whether a first trimester preeclampsia screening should be offered to all pregnant women in Denmark. Positive motivation to participate in preeclampsia screening was correlated with having a network with a positive attitude towards preeclampsia screening. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that Danish pregnant women have a positive attitude towards participation in a first trimester screening for preeclampsia. This observation might be useful in relation to possible future implementation in Denmark.

Risk of miscarriage in women conceiving after medically assisted reproduction with an ultrasound-verified viable pregnancy at 6-8 weeks' gestation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the risk of miscarriage after a viable fetus verified on ultrasound at 6-8 weeks' gestation among women who conceive with medically assisted reproduction (MAR), stratified by type of fertility treatment? DESIGN: A nationwide register-based cohort study of women identified in the Danish ART-Registry with a viable singleton pregnancy at 6-8 weeks' gestation between 2007 and 2010 (n = 10,011). Women were identified from The Danish Fetal Medicine Database (DFMD), which holds information on early (between 6-8 and 11-14 weeks) and late (between 11-14 and 22 weeks) miscarriages. The late miscarriage rate was compared with a control group of naturally conceived pregnancies with a viable fetus at 11-14 weeks' gestation from 2008 to 2010, identified in the DFMD (n = 146,932). RESULTS: In the MAR1 cohort, the overall miscarriage rate was 11.8% (1091/9261) after an ultrasound verified viable pregnancy at 6-8 weeks' gestation. Most miscarriages occurred before the 11-14-week scan (1035/1091 [94.9%]). The early miscarriage rate was slightly higher in women who conceived with frozen embryo transfer compared with intrauterine insemination (IUI), corresponding to an adjusted OR of 1.31 (1.02 to 1.68). We found no significant risk associated with IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with IUI pregnancies. The late miscarriage rate was 0.8% in women conceiving with MAR and 0.6% among controls (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for maternal characteristics, none of the fertility treatment types were associated with an increased risk of miscarriage compared with naturally conceiving women.

Can Strain Elastography Predict Malignancy of Soft Tissue Tumors in a Tertiary Sarcoma Center?

This study aims to investigate the ability of ultrasound strain elastography as an adjunct to predict malignancy in soft tissue tumors suspect of sarcoma or metastasis in a tertiary reference center for sarcoma. A total of 137 patients were included prospectively. Patients were referred on the basis of clinical or radiological suspicion of malignant soft tissue tumor. All patients had previously undergone diagnostic imaging (MRI, CT or PET-CT). After recording strain elastography cine loops, ultrasound guided biopsy was performed. Three investigators, who were blinded to final diagnosis, reviewed all elastograms retrospectively. For each elastogram, a qualitative, visual 5-point score was decided in consensus and a strain ratio was calculated. Final pathology obtained from biopsy or tumor resection served as gold standard. Eighty-one tumors were benign, and 56 were malignant. t-tests showed a significant difference in mean visual score between benign and malignant tumors. There was no significant difference in mean strain ratio between the two groups. Strain elastography may be a valuable adjunct to conventional B-mode ultrasound, perhaps primarily in primary care, when considering whether to refer to a sarcoma center or to biopsy, although biopsies cannot reliably be ruled out based on the current data.