Implantation of biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair-does it make sense?

BACKGROUND: Biological acellular porcine dermis mesh, such as Permacol™, has been used since 2009 to treat abdominal incisional hernias in a septic context. This study investigated the risk factors for incisional hernia recurrence after biological mesh augmentation. RESULTS: Over a period of 6 years from February 2009 to February 2015, 68 patients underwent surgery. The mesh was placed intraperitoneally with closure of the anterior fascia in 27 cases (39.7%). The biological mesh was placed in the retromuscular pre-fascial plane in 1 case (1.5%) and pre-aponeurotic plane in 1 case (1.5%). Closure of the anterior fascia was not achieved in 39 cases, including 20 cases in which the mesh was placed intraperitoneally (intraperitoneal bridging group, 29.4%) and 19 cases in which the mesh was placed between the edges of the fascia (inlay bridging group, 27.9%). There were 37 cases of postoperative surgical site infections (54.4%), and Clavien-Dindo morbidity staging indicated stage I-II and III-IV complications in 19.1% and 44.1% of the cases, respectively. The recurrence rate was 61.8%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The rate of recurrence was significantly lower in the «fascia approximated¼ group (37%), p = 0.001). Univariate analyses of risk factors for procedural failure indicated an increased risk of recurrence in cases of postoperative surgical site infections, complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher, an absent fascial closure in front of the mesh (OR = 8.69), an operating time longer than 180 min, and a VHWG score higher than 2. After logistic regression, the risk factors for recurrence were postoperative infections (OR = 6.2), placement of bridged biological mesh (OR = 22.3), and postoperative morbidity grade III or higher (OR = 16.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with postoperative surgical site infections are at an increased risk for recurrence, and bridged mesh placements lack efficacy. Overall, this study challenges the purported advantage of biologics in treating incisional hernia repairs.

C-reactive protein is a predictive factor for complications after incisional hernia repair using a biological mesh.

The introduction of biological or absorbable synthetic meshes has provided an alternative to conventional repair for incisional hernia. The ability to predict the development of complications after hernia surgery is important, as it guides surgical planning and patient management. This retrospective study assessed whether the postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level can predict complications after incisional hernia repair using biological mesh reinforcement. Patients who underwent incisional hernia repair surgery using biological meshes between February 2009 and February 2015 were screened for study inclusion. Patients included in the study were divided into two groups: those with and without postoperative complications. The two groups were analysed based on sex, surgical operation, length of intensive care unit stay (ICU), complications and mortality. Laboratory values, including white blood cell (WBC) count and CRP levels, were determined preoperatively and up to postoperative day (POD) 10. Postoperative complications requiring further management occurred in 32 of the 60 patients (53.3%). Among 47 patients, the mean CRP and WBC levels were 6.6 mg/L and 9.073 G/L in the group without complications vs. 141.0 mg/L, 16.704 G/L in the group with complications (p < 0.001). Patients with complications also had a longer ICU stay (10.1 vs. 0.6 days, p < 0.0001). A cut-off was 101 mg/L and offered 80.00% sensitivity (IC 61.43% to 92.29) and 95.24% specificity (76.18% to 99.88%) for postoperative complication. The rate of postoperative complications before POD10 was 95% in the group with CRP > 100 mg/L vs. 46% in the group with CRP < 100 mg/L (p = 0.000372). A high postoperative CRP level (> 100 mg/L) up to POD10 may serve as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing incisional hernia using biological meshes.

Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy: Necessity to Learn How to Do and Interpret Intraoperative Cholangiography.

Introduction: Biliary duct injury (BDI) is a serious complication during cholecystectomy. Perioperative cholangiography (POC) has recently been generating interest in order to prevent BDI. However, the current literature (including randomized controlled trials) cannot conclude whether POC is protective or not against the risk of BDI. The aim of our study was to investigate whether POC could demonstrate earlier BDI and which criteria are required to make that diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective study between 2005 and 2018 in our French tertiary referral center, which included all patients who had presented following BDI during cholecystectomy. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. Nine patients had POC, whereas 13 did not. When executed, POC was interpreted as normal for three patients and abnormal for six. In this latter group, only two cases had a BDI diagnosed intraoperatively. In other cases, the interpretation was not adequate. Conclusion: BDIs are rare but may reduce patients' quality of life. Our study highlights the surgeon's responsibility to learn how to perform and interpret POC in order to diagnose and manage BDIs and potentially avoid catastrophic consequences.

Identification of risk factors for morbidity and mortality after Hartmann's reversal surgery - a retrospective study from two French centers.

Hartmann's reversal procedures are often fraught with complications or failure to recover. This being a fact, it is often difficult to select patients with the optimal indications for a reversal. The post-recovery morbidity and mortality rates in the literature are heterogeneous between 0.8 and 44%. The identification of predictive risk factors of failure of such interventions would therefore be very useful to help the practitioner in his approach. Given these elements, it was important to us to analyze the practice of two French university hospitals in order to highlight such risk factors and to allow surgeons to select the best therapeutic strategy. We performed a bicentric observational retrospective study between 2010 and 2015 that studied the characteristics of patients who had undergone Hartmann surgery and were subsequently reestablished. The aim of the study was to identify factors influencing morbidity and postoperative mortality of Hartmann's reversal. Primary outcome was complications within the first 90 postoperative days. 240 patients were studied of which 60.4% were men. The mean age was 69.48 years. The median time to reversal was 8 months. 79.17% of patients were operated as emergency cases where the indication was a diverticular complication (39.17%). Seventy patients (29.2%) underwent a reversal and approximately 43% of these had complications within the first 90 postoperative days. The mean age of these seventy patients was 61.3 years old and 65.7% were males. None of them benefited from a reversal in the first three months. We identified some risk factors for morbidity such as pre-operative low albuminemia (p = 0.005) and moderate renal impairment (p = 0.019). However, chronic corticosteroid use (p = 0.004), moderate renal insufficiency (p = 0.014) and coronary artery disease (p = 0.014) seem to favour the development of anastomotic fistula, which is itself, a risk factor for mortality (p = 0.007). Our study highlights an important rate of complications including significant anastomotic fistula after Hartmann's reversal. Precarious nutritional status and cardiovascular comorbidities should clearly lead us to reconsider the surgical indication for continuity restoration.