Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cell Mol Neurobiol ; 44(1): 59, 2024 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39150567

RESUMEN

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is subdivided depending on eye pressure. Patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) have never had high intraocular pressure (IOP) measured while patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) have high eye pressure but no signs of glaucoma. Although IOP is considered to be a risk factor for all glaucoma patients, it is reasonable to assume that other risk factors such as inflammation play a role. We aimed to characterize the proteome and cytokine profile during hypoxia in plasma from patients with NTG (n = 10), OHT (n = 10), and controls (n = 10). Participants were exposed to hypoxia for two hours, followed by 30 min of normoxia. Samples were taken before ("baseline"), during ("hypoxia"), and after hypoxia ("recovery"). Proteomics based on liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed. Cytokines were measured by Luminex assays. Bioinformatic analyses indicated the involvement of complement and coagulation cascades in NTG and OHT. Regulation of high-density lipoprotein 3 (HDL3) apolipoproteins suggested that changes in cholesterol metabolism are related to OHT. Hypoxia decreased the level of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in OHT patients compared to controls. Circulating levels of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were decreased in NTG patients compared to controls during hypoxia. After recovery, plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) was upregulated in patients with NTG and OHT. Current results indicate an enhanced systemic immune response in patients with NTG and OHT, which correlates with pathogenic events in glaucoma. Apolipoproteins may have anti-inflammatory effects, enabling OHT patients to withstand inflammation and development of glaucoma despite high IOP.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Glaucoma de Baja Tensión , Hipertensión Ocular , Proteómica , Humanos , Citocinas/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Glaucoma de Baja Tensión/sangre , Proteómica/métodos , Hipertensión Ocular/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Presión Intraocular/fisiología
3.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 100(3): 253-261, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34128326

RESUMEN

Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers, or combination using beta-blockers, with and without preservatives. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic side effects, and other clinical and quality of life outcomes. Of 242 records identified, seven RCTs (1125 patients) were included. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. Timolol was used in five studies, and two studies used a combination (timolol with bimatoprost or dorzolamide). The difference in mean change (MD) in IOP between the preservative-free and the preserved drugs was statistically significant but not clinically relevant: (MD 0.29 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.51 mmHg, p = 0.010; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events: Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcome was low or very low and reported in few studies. No significant difference was observed on ocular surface symptoms. Tear break-up time (TBUT) was better with preservative-free drops (p < 0.001). Schirmer's test was better in the preservative-free group (p < 0.001). Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcomes was low or very low. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. We found no clinically relevant difference in mean change in IOP between the preserved and the preservative-free treatments. Data on adverse events used different methods and were incompletely reported. Although some measures of ocular surface health favoured preservative-free medications, more evidence is needed. The increasing use of preservative-free drops may be associated with better ocular surface and tolerability, but strong evidence from RCTs would be welcome.


Asunto(s)
Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto , Glaucoma , Hipertensión Ocular , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Glaucoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Hipertensión Ocular/tratamiento farmacológico , Soluciones Oftálmicas/uso terapéutico , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Timolol/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA