RESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is growing evidence of an association between inflammatory processes and cancer development and progression. In different solid tumor entities, a pronounced inflammatory response is associated with worse oncological outcome. In this study, we aim to evaluate the prognostic role of clinically established pretreatment inflammatory markers in patients with localised prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: A total of 641 men met our inclusion criteria and were followed prospectively for a median of 2.85 years. Univariable logistic and Cox regression analysis were performed to analyse associations between preoperative inflammatory markers and tumor characteristics, and biochemical recurrence free survival (BRFS). RESULTS: Median age at RP was 64 years. Gleason Score (GS) 7a (263, 41%) was the most prevalent histology, whereas high-risk PCa (≥ GS 8) was present in 156 (24%) patients. Lympho-nodal metastasis and positive surgical margin (PSM) were detected in 69 (11%) and 180 (28%) patients, respectively. No statistically relevant association could be shown between pretreatment inflammatory markers with worse pathological features like higher tumor stage or grade, nodal positive disease or PSM (for all p > 0.05). Additionally, pretreatment inflammatory markers were not associated with a shorter BRFS (p > 0.05). Known risk factors (tumor grade, tumor stage, nodal positivity and positive surgical margins) were all associated with a shorter BRFS (for all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this large prospective cohort, preoperative inflammatory markers were not associated with worse outcome.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugíaRESUMEN
In this paper, a coherent boundary value problem to model metamaterials' behaviour based on the relaxed micromorphic model is established. This boundary value problem includes well-posed boundary conditions, thus disclosing the possibility of exploring the scattering patterns of finite-size metamaterial specimens. Thanks to the simplified model's structure (few frequency- and angle-independent parameters), we are able to unveil the scattering metamaterial's response for a wide range of frequencies and angles of propagation of the incident wave. These results are an important stepping stone towards the conception of more complex large-scale meta-structures that can control elastic waves and recover energy. This article is part of the theme issue 'Wave generation and transmission in multi-scale complex media and structured metamaterials (part 1)'.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze routine preoperative prostate MRI to predict erectile function (EF) before and after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Patients who underwent RP with an existing preoperative MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced images and completed International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaires at baseline and 12 months postoperative. They were divided into four erectile dysfunction (ED) groups according to preoperative IIEF-5 score. The perfusion quality was measured in the peripheral zone of the prostate by the ratio of signal increase 120 s after wash-in of contrast agent (Ratio120) in preoperative MRI and compared between the ED groups. RESULTS: Ratio120 showed differences among the preoperative ED groups (p = .020) in 97 patients. According to IIEF-5 at 12 months postoperative, 43 patients were dichotomized into "no to mild" (≥17 points) and "moderate to severe" (≤16) ED groups. Ratio120 revealed differences among the postoperative ED groups (128.84% vs. 101.95%; p = .029) and stayed an independent predictor for ED in the multivariable regression analysis (adjusted for age, nerve-sparing and preoperative IIEF-5). ROC curves demonstrated an additional diagnostic benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MRI of the prostate may be used for the prediction of EF and postsurgical recovery after RP. This may serve as important tool in preoperative patient counseling and management of expectations.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Erección Peniana , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Recuperación de la FunciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy against that of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy to detect prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 415 men who consecutively presented for prostate biopsy between November 2014 and September 2016 at our tertiary care center. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a 3 Tesla device without an endorectal coil, followed by transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy with the BiopSee® fusion system. Additional fusion guided targeted biopsy was done in men with a suspicious lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, defined as Likert score 3 to 5. Any Gleason pattern 4 or greater was defined as clinically significant prostate cancer. The detection rates of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided targeted biopsy were compared with the detection rate of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy using the McNemar test. RESULTS: We obtained a median of 40 (range 30 to 55) and 3 (range 2 to 4) transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy and fusion guided targeted biopsy cores, respectively. Of the 124 patients (29.9%) without a suspicious lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging 32 (25.8%) were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer on transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy. Of the 291 patients (70.1%) with a Likert score of 3 to 5 clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 129 (44.3%) by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided targeted biopsy, in 176 (60.5%) by transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy and in 187 (64.3%) by the combined approach. Overall 58 cases (19.9%) of clinically significant prostate cancer would have been missed if fusion guided targeted biopsy had been performed exclusively. The sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided targeted biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer was 84.6% and 56.7% with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 and 0.46, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging alone should not be performed as a triage test due to a substantial number of false-negative cases with clinically significant prostate cancer. Systematic biopsy outperformed fusion guided targeted biopsy. Therefore, it will remain crucial in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Triaje/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
Polyphosphates (PPs) constitute a class of food additives widely used due to their ability to exercise different useful activities. The food safety concern about the use of PPs in food is both the possible non-declared addition and some health effects, such as bile duct stones, decrease in oligo-element absorption, and allergic reactions in susceptible people. In this study, an analytical method based on ion chromatography with conductivity detection was applied for the detection and quantification of PPs in 238 samples of animal-derived products such as meat, dairy, and fish products. A contribution to risk assessment was also included. The monitoring confirmed the absence of non-compliant results. All concentrations of PPs were indeed lower than the legal limits set in European Regulation No. 1333/2008. Moreover, no residue of PPs was detected (> limit of quantification: 0.09 g kg-1) in samples where it was not reported on the product label. No PPs were detected in mollusks, meat-based preparations, semi-ripened, unripened, and spun paste cheese, while they are widely used in surimi, with concentrations in the range of 0.1-0.5 g kg-1. The highest concentrations were quantified in a würstel sample (4.7±0.3 g kg-1) and a spreadable cheese sample (8.9±0.7 g kg-1). Considering that the high exposure scenario together with a very susceptible population group (toddlers) were taken into account for this risk exposure study and that the highest admissible daily intake obtained was equal to 10.4%, the assessment demonstrated that the actual use of PPs in food does not pose a risk for food safety.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer closely monitors patients conservatively instead of the pursuit of active treatment to reduce overtreatment of insignificant disease. Since 2009, active surveillance has been recommended as the primary management option in the European Association of Urology guidelines for low-risk disease. The present study aimed to investigate the use and uptake of active surveillance over 10 years in our certified prostate cancer centre (University Hospital of Zurich) compared with those derived from the cancer registry of the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer at our institution and from the cancer registry of the canton of Zurich from 2009 to 2018. The primary treatment of each patient was recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the use of different treatments in our centre. The results were compared with those derived from the cancer registry. RESULTS: A total of 3393 men with low-risk prostate cancer were included in this study (University Hospital of Zurich: n = 262; cancer registry: n = 3131). In the University Hospital of Zurich and cancer registry cohorts, 146 (55.7%) and 502 (16%) men underwent active surveillance, respectively. The proportions of local treatment [115 (43.9%) vs 2220 (71%)] and androgen deprivation therapy [0 (0%) vs 43 (1.4%)] were distinctly lower in the University Hospital of Zurich cohort than in the cancer registry cohort. The uptake of active surveillance over the years was high in the University Hospital of Zurich cohort (35.4% in 2009 and 88.2% in 2018) but only marginal in the cancer registry cohort (12.2% in 2009 and 16.2% in 2018). CONCLUSION: Despite clear guideline recommendations, active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer is still widely underused. Our analysis showed that access to a certified interdisciplinary tumour board significantly increases the use of active surveillance.