Improving cognitive and physical function through 12-weeks of resistance training in older adults: Randomized controlled trial.

We performed a randomized, controlled trial to analyse the effects of resistance training (RT) on cognitive and physical function among older adults. Fifty participants (mean age 67 years, ~60% woman) were randomly assigned to an RT program or a control group. Participants allocated to RT performed three sets of 10-15RM in nine exercises, three times per week, for 12-weeks. Control group did not perform any exercise. Variables included cognitive (global and executive function) and physical function (gait, mobility and strength) outcomes. At completion of the intervention, RT was shown to have significantly mitigated the drop in selective attention and conflict resolution performance (Stroop test: -494.6; 95%CI: -883.1; -106.1) and promoted a significant improvement in working memory (digit span forward: -0.6; 95%CI: -1.0; -0.1 and forward minus backward: -0.9; 95% CI: -1.6; -0.2) and verbal fluency (animal naming: +1.4, 95%CI 0.3, 2.5). No significant between-group differences were observed for other cognitive outcomes. Regarding physical function, at completion of the intervention, the RT group demonstrated improved fast-pace gait performance (-0.3; 95% CI: -0.6; -0.0) and 1-RM (+21.4 kg; 95%CI: 16.6; 26.2). No significant between-group differences were observed for other mobility-related outcomes. In conclusion, RT improves cognitive and physical function of older adults.

Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in school-age children with moderate-to-severe symptomatic asthma: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recently published data support the benefits and safety of the once-daily (OD) long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium bromide bronchodilator for the treatment of uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma in adults and adolescents. However, its role for the treatment of school-age asthmatics has not yet been clearly defined. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat® in children aged 6-11 years with moderate-to-severe symptomatic asthma. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included. Primary outcomes were peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured within 3 h post-dosing) [FEV1 (0-3 h) ] and trough FEV1 measured at the end of the dosing interval. RESULTS: Three studies (more than 900 patients) were selected. Tiotropium was associated with significant improvements in FEV1 peak (mean change from baseline) by 102 mL (P<.0001) and trough by 82 mL (P<.0001) compared with placebo. Tiotropium 5 µg dose presented a trend (statistically non-significant) toward a greater bronchodilation in comparison with 2.5 µg dose. Tiotropium significantly increased the rate of the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) responders compared with placebo (82.2% vs 75.4%, number needed to treat for benefit [NNTB]=15) and significantly decreased the number of patients with at least one exacerbation in comparison with placebo (29.1% vs. 39.8%, with a NNTB of 10). There were no significant differences in rescue medication use, withdrawals, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: OD tiotropium Respimat® is efficacious and well tolerated as an add-on to inhaled corticosteroids plus one or more controller medications in school-age symptomatic asthmatics.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination for the treatment of stable COPD.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta2-agonists as first-line therapy for COPD patients at risk for acute exacerbations and/or severe airflow limitation. This systematic review assesses available evidence on the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) combination versus each alone, for the treatment of patients with severe to very severe stable COPD. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of >8 weeks of duration were included. Primary end points were pulmonary function, COPD exacerbations and serious adverse events. FF/VI was compared with its mono-components. RESULTS: Five reports with six trials (n = 15,515 patients) met the entry criteria. FF/VI was associated with significant increases in trough FEV1 compared with vilanterol (VI) and fluticasone furoate (FF) (45 mL and 90 mL respectively). FF/VI significantly reduced the number of subjects with at least one moderate to severe exacerbation compared with VI (number needed to treat for benefit [NNTB] = 21) and with FF (NNTB = 26). There were no statistical differences in the rates of serious adverse events, cardiac events and all-cause mortality. On the contrary, FF/VI showed a significant 52% increase in the rate of pneumonia compared with VI monotherapy (5.3% vs. 3.5%). However, there was no difference in the rate of pneumonia when FF/VI was compared with FF alone. CONCLUSIONS: FF/VI combination was associated with a decrease of the rate of COPD exacerbations, without affecting mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with moderate to severe stable COPD. Also, the use of FF was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia.

NOMAD spectrometer on the ExoMars trace gas orbiter mission: part 2-design, manufacturing, and testing of the ultraviolet and visible channel.

NOMAD is a spectrometer suite on board the ESA/Roscosmos ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, which launched in March 2016. NOMAD consists of two infrared channels and one ultraviolet and visible channel, allowing the instrument to perform observations quasi-constantly, by taking nadir measurements at the day- and night-side, and during solar occultations. Here, in part 2 of a linked study, we describe the design, manufacturing, and testing of the ultraviolet and visible spectrometer channel called UVIS. We focus upon the optical design and working principle where two telescopes are coupled to a single grating spectrometer using a selector mechanism.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate and vilanterol for adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate and vilanterol is a new inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) combination developed for once-daily administration via a dry powder inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate-vilanterol in adolescents and adults with symptomatic asthma compared with ICS monotherapy or twice-daily ICS-LABA formulations. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials with longer than 8 weeks of treatment duration were included. Primary outcome was pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] or peak expiratory flow rate [PEF]). RESULTS: Seven published randomized clinical trials were included (5,668 patients). Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol was associated with significant increases in trough FEV1 and morning and evening PEF compared with fluticasone furoate, 100 µg, monotherapy (90 mL, 20.1 L/min, and 18.9 L/min respectively). Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol reduced significantly the rate of severe asthma exacerbations (number need to treat for benefit = 24). Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol also produced significant increases in weighted FEV1 and morning and evening PEF (140 mL, 32.6 L/min, and 25.7 L/min, respectively) compared with fluticasone propionate, 500 µg twice daily. Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol presented a nonsignificant increase in the frequency of cardiac events (6.4% vs 1.8%) compared with fluticasone propionate. No differences were found between both available doses of fluticasone furoate-vilanterol (200/25 µg and 100/25 µg) in terms of efficacy. However, patients receiving fluticasone furoate-vilanterol, 200/25 µg, had a trend toward an increased risk of cardiac events. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol combination was associated with an increase in trough FEV1 compared with fluticasone furoate-fluticasone propionate; however, observed differences may not be clinically significant. Studies comparing fluticasone furoate-vilanterol with fixed twice-daily ICS-LABA combinations are required.

Advances in acute asthma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to highlight some of the recent findings related with the management of acute exacerbations in the context of the emergency department setting. RECENT FINDINGS: ß2-agonist heliox-driven nebulization significantly increased by 17% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-29.4] peak expiratory flow, and decreased the rate of hospital admissions (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), compared with oxygen-driven nebulization. Other findings indicate that there is no robust evidence to support the use of intravenous or nebulized magnesium sulphate in adults with severe acute asthma, and that levalbuterol was not superior to albuterol regarding efficacy and safety in individuals with acute asthma. Finally, hyperlactatemia developed during the first hours of acute asthma treatment has a high prevalence, is related with the use of ß2-agonists and had no clinical consequences. SUMMARY: After a comprehensive review of the best quality pieces of literature published in the last year, it is possible to conclude that the goals of acute asthma management remain almost unchanged.

Systematic review on the use of omalizumab for the treatment of asthmatic children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: There are less data on omalizumab treatment in pediatric asthma than in adult population. Thus, to establish the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous omalizumab as an add-on therapy, a systematic review of placebo-controlled studies was performed. METHODS: Primary outcome was the frequency of asthma exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included spirometric measures, rescue medication use, asthma symptoms, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (1381 participants) fulfilled the selection criteria. During the stable phase, omalizumab decreased the number of patients with at least one significant asthma exacerbation (26.7% vs. 40.6%, NNTB = 7, 95% CI, 5, 11). The predefined post hoc subgroup analysis showed that duration of treatment did not influence this result. During the steroid reduction phase, omalizumab reduced the number of patients with at least one exacerbation (RR = 0.48, 95% CI, 0.38, 0.61; NNTB = 6, 95% CI, 4, 8) and also the mean number of asthma exacerbations per patient (MD = -0.44, 95% CI, -0.72, -0.17) when compared to placebo. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between omalizumab (5.2%) and placebo (5.6%), and there were no evidence of increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions, nor malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that the efficacy of an add-on omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled with recommended inhaled steroid treatment is accompanied by an acceptable safety profile.

Assessment of the internal structure of GOLD 2011 system.

BACKGROUND: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 introduced a new multidimensional system (symptom/risk) for assessment chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to explore the construct validity of the GOLD 2011 classification strategy; specifically, we evaluated its internal structure in terms of reliability and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). METHODS: Reliability (Cronbach alpha coefficient), correlations between variables and two successive EFA were performed to assess the internal structure of GOLD 2011. Symptoms (mMRC dyspnea score) and risk (number of previous year exacerbations and forced expiratory volume in the first second % of predicted) were selected as variables. RESULTS: The analysis included 679 COPD patients from two Spanish cohorts (71.4 ± 11.7 years). Alpha coefficient of the 3 items was 0.52 for the whole sample. Variables presented statistically significant correlations, but of low to moderate magnitude. A first EFA extracted only one factor accounting 52% of the total variance. A second EFA including four items (the three GOLD 2011 variables plus comorbidities as Charlson index score), extracted two-factors accounting for 65% of the total variance. The first factor included the three items of GOLD 2011, and the second contained only one variable (comorbidities). This solution was stable in patients with different levels of COPD severity. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that GOLD 2011 strategy presented a low reliability, and its theorized multidimensionality was not confirm by EFA. Comorbidities appears as a separate and independent domain.

Tiotropium for the treatment of adolescents with moderate to severe symptomatic asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of tiotropium for the treatment of adolescents with asthma has not yet been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled tiotropium in adolescents with moderate to severe symptomatic asthma. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included in this systematic review. Primary outcomes were peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: Three studies (approximately 1,000 patients) were included. Tiotropium was associated with significant improvements in FEV1 peak (mean change from baseline) by 120 mL (P < .001) and trough by 100 mL (P < .001) compared with placebo. Tiotropium significantly reduced the percentage of patients who experienced an Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 worsening episode defined as a change from trial baseline of 0.5 points or more compared with placebo (2.1% vs 4.8%, number needed to treat = 38) and also was associated with a significantly decreased in the number of patients with at least one exacerbation compared with placebo (17.6 vs 23.8%, number needed to treat = 16). Finally, no significant differences were found in rescue medication use, withdrawals, withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs), AEs (27.3% vs 27.1%), and serious AEs (6.5% vs 7.1%). Tiotropium in doses of 2.5 µg once daily or 5.0 µg once daily resulted in equivalent effects. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium was well tolerated and efficacious as an addition to maintenance treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid or an inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting ß-agonist in adolescents with moderate to severe asthma. Available data do not suggest an advantage of the 5-µg once-daily dose (used in adults) compared with the 2.5-µg once-daily dose of tiotropium.

Principal findings of systematic reviews for chronic treatment in childhood asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the principal findings pertaining to most effective long-term pharmacologic treatment of childhood asthma. METHODS: Systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (SRCTs) on pharmacologic chronic treatment in children (1-18 years) with persistent asthma were retrieved through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and CDSR (up to January2014). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three SRCTs were searched from databases. Among those, 39 SRCTs were included: two were related to step 1, 24 to step 2, nine to steps 3 and 4, and four to step 5 (according with NAEPP and GINA guidelines). The methodological quality of these SRCTs was determined by using the AMSTAR tool. RESULTS: For step 1: addition of ipatropium bromide to short-acting beta2-agonists does not show any benefit. For step 2: in preschoolers, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) reduce severe exacerbations and improve other clinical and lung function parameters. In children, ICSs are superior to leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), cromones, or xantines in reducing severe exacerbations, improving lung function and other clinical outcomes. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is better than beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide only for lung function; but similar to hydrofluoroalkane-BDP or to ciclosenide. Compared to low ICSs doses, moderate doses result in only better lung function, but this is not true for FP. For steps 3 and 4: adding LTRA to ICS confers a small benefit; adding LABA improves lung function but does not reduce exacerbations more than double or higher ICS doses. For step 5: adding omalizumab decreases exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: SRCTs are useful for guiding decisions in chronic childhood asthma treatment.

Principal findings of systematic reviews of acute asthma treatment in childhood.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to summarize the principal findings in the literature about acute asthma management in children. METHODS: Systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (SRCTs) with or without meta-analysis in children (1-18 years) admitted to the emergency department (ED) were retrieved using five data bases. Methodological quality was determined using the AMSTAR tool. RESULTS: One hundred and three studies were retrieved. Among those, 28 SRCTs were included: seven SRCTs related to short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA), three to ipratropium bromide (IB), eight to corticosteroids, one to racemic adrenaline, one to leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), four to magnesium sulfate, one to intravenous (IV) SABA, one to IV aminophylline, one to IV ketamine, and one to antibiotics. It was determined that administering SABA by MDI-VHC is superior to using a nebulizer, because it decreases the hospital admission rate, improves the clinical score, results in a shorter time in the ED, and causes fewer adverse effects. Levalbuterol and albuterol were similar. In patients with moderate to severe exacerbations, IB+SABA was superior to SABA, decreasing hospital admission and improving the clinical score. SABA heliox administered by nebulizer decreased exacerbation severity compared to oxygen. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), especially administered by nebulizer, showed results similar to oral corticosteroids (OCS) with respect to reducing hospital admission, unscheduled visits, and the requirement of additional systemic corticosteroids. ICS or OCS following ED discharge was similar with regard to relapse. Compared with a placebo, IV magnesium reduced hospital admission and improved lung function. CONCLUSIONS: SRCTs are useful for guiding decisions in acute asthma treatment.

NOMAD spectrometer on the ExoMars trace gas orbiter mission: part 1--design, manufacturing and testing of the infrared channels.

NOMAD is a spectrometer suite on board ESA's ExoMars trace gas orbiter due for launch in January 2016. NOMAD consists of two infrared channels and one ultraviolet and visible channel allowing the instrument to perform observations quasi-constantly, by taking nadir measurements at dayside and nightside, and during solar occultations. In this paper, the design, manufacturing, and testing of the two infrared channels are described. We focus upon the optical working principle in these channels, where an echelle grating, used as a diffractive element, is combined with an acousto-optical tunable filter, used as a diffraction order sorter.

Assessment of acute asthma severity in the ED: are heart and respiratory rates relevant?

BACKGROUND: Assessment of acute asthma severity in the emergency department (ED) determines the appropriate initial therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of heart and respiratory rates as determinants of severity of asthma exacerbations. METHODS: It was a pooled analysis of individual patient data from different controlled clinical trials performed over a 9-year period. The sample was characterized by patients with a diagnosis of asthma, age 18 to 50 years, and a forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) or a peak expiratory flow less than or equal to 50% of predicted at ED presentation. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-two severe acute asthmatics (age 33.9 ± 10.3 years and FEV1 = 27.4% ± 9.7%) were enrolled. Two-thirds of patients were categorized as having severe acute asthma (FEV1, 31%-50% of predicted) and the remaining third as life-threatening asthma (FEV1, ≤30% of predicted). There were no relationships between the intensity of airway obstruction as measured by the FEV1 and the degree of tachycardia (r = 0.05, P > .1) or tachypnea (r = 0.06, P > .1). Only 22% and 19% of the patients, respectively, met the heart rate and respiratory rate requirements for acute severe asthma (≥120/min and ≥25/min, respectively). In contrast to FEV1 and arterial oxygen saturation, baseline heart and respiratory rates did not predict admissions of patients at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis suggests a poor performance of heart and respiratory rates as determinants of acute asthma severity in the ED.

Heliox-driven ß2-agonists nebulization for children and adults with acute asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of heliox as a nebulizer ß2-agonist driving gas in acute asthma remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of heliox versus oxygen in driving ß2-agonist nebulization in patients with acute asthma. METHODS: A search was conducted of all randomized controlled trials published before August 2013. Primary outcomes were change in spirometric measurements and severity composite score (pediatric studies); secondary outcomes were hospitalizations and serious adverse effects. RESULTS: Eleven trials from 10 studies (697 participants) met the inclusion criteria (7 included adults and 3 included children). The mean duration of heliox therapy was 120 minutes and the most common helium-oxygen mixture used was 70:30. Patients receiving heliox presented a statistically significant difference for mean percentage of change in peak expiratory flow (17.2%; 95% confidence interval 5.2-29.2, P = .005). Post hoc subgroup analysis showed that patients with severe and very severe asthma showed a significant improvement in peak expiratory flow compared with those with mild to moderate acute asthma. Heliox-driven nebulization also produced significant decreases in the risk of hospitalizations (odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.79, P = .003) and severity of exacerbations (pediatric studies; standard mean difference -0.74, 95%% confidence interval -1.45 to -0.03, P = .04). There were no group differences for serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that heliox benefits in airflow limitation and hospital admissions could be considered clinically significant. Data support the use of heliox as a nebulizing ß2-agonist driving gas in the routine care of patients with acute asthma.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and allergic rhinitis as different multimorbid treatable traits in asthma.

Background: Respiratory multimorbidities are linked to asthma, such as allergic rhinitis (AR) with early allergic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with late nonallergic asthma. Objective: Our aim was to investigate the association of asthma severity and control with specific upper airway phenotypes. Method: Patients with asthma were prospectively recruited from 23 pulmonology and ear, nose, and throat clinics. Asthma severity and control, as well as upper airway comorbidities (AR and non-AR [NAR], CRSwNP, and CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP]) were assessed according to international consensus guidelines definitions. Results: A total of 492 asthmatic patients were included. Half of the asthmatic patients (49.6%) had associated rhinitis (37.0% had AR and 12.6% had NAR) and 36.2% had CRS (16.7% had CRSsNP and 19.5% had CRSwNP), whereas 14.2% had no sinonasal symptoms. Most cases of AR (78%) and NAR (84%) were present in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, whereas CRSwNP was more frequent in patients with severe asthma (35% [P < .001]), mainly nonatopic asthma (44% [P < .001]). Patients with severe asthma with CRSwNP had worse asthma control, which was correlated (r = 0.249 [P = .034]) with sinus occupancy. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that late-onset asthma, intolerance of aspirin and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and CRSwNP were independently associated with severe asthma. Conclusion: Severe asthma is associated with CRSwNP, with sinus occupancy affecting asthma control. This study has identified 2 main different upper airway treatable traits, AR and CRSwNP, which need further evaluation to improve management and control of patients with asthma.

Safety of long-acting ß agonists for the treatment of asthma: clearing the air.

Concerns about the safety of long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) therapy, has led to the appearance of multiple publications and recommendations. This review critically examines the available clinical evidence and safety requirements for LABA use. On the basis of nearly 20 systematic reviews and databases, the authors conclude that LABA monotherapy significantly increases the risk of asthma-related adverse effects. We also conclude that the use of LABAs concomitantly with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) significantly reduces asthma hospitalisations and is not associated with life-threatening events and asthma-related deaths, especially when concurrent use of LABAs and ICS can be reasonably assured (use of a single inhaler device). An appropriate clinical study would require an extremely large sample, making it impractical. Finally, some of the new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations have caused confusion and do not appear to be fully evidence based. Although limited by low statistical power, the evidence supports the use of LABAs plus ICS in a single inhaler device (to increase adherence and reduce the potential use of LABA monotherapy) for all patients (not only children) with moderate to severe asthma.

Comparison of three combined pharmacological approaches with tiotropium monotherapy in stable moderate to severe COPD: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend the use of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and their combinations for maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD. However, there are limited data supporting combination therapy. METHODS: This systematic review assessed the efficacy of three therapeutic approaches: tiotropium plus long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) ("dual" therapy), LABA/ICS ("combined" therapy), and tiotropium plus LABA/ICS ("triple" therapy), all compared with tiotropium monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials were identified after a search of different databases of published and unpublished trials. RESULTS: Twenty trials (6803 participants) were included. "Dual" therapy showed significant improvements in forced volume in the first second (FEV(1)), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and dyspnea. However, it failed to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations. Compared with tiotropium, "combined" therapy presented modest but significant effects on FEV(1), HRQoL, and dyspnea. Again, there was no significant difference in exacerbations, but it was associated with a significant increase of serious adverse effects (SAE) (number need to treat for harm [NNTH] = 20; 95% CI: 11-119). Finally, "triple therapy" increased FEV(1), improved HRQoL (both benefits exceeded minimal important differences) and decrease COPD exacerbations in anon-significant way. (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.37, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: "Dual" and "triple" therapy seem like the most promising for patients with moderate to very severe COPD. However, data are still scarce and studies too short to generate a strong recommendation. Future studies should examine long-term efficacy and safety.

A review on muscle activation behaviour during gait in shallow water and deep-water running and surface electromyography procedures.

BACKGROUND: Surface electromyography (sEMG) can provide information on muscle activation patterns during gait. OBJECTIVES: To characterize electromyographic activity during gait in shallow water and during deep-water running compare to on land and to review and analyse underwater surface-electromyographic (sEMG) procedures. SEARCH METHODS: Eight databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE, SPORT Discus, CINAHL, SCOPUS, SCIELO, and LILACS) were searched from their inception to the December of 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selected studies had to be related to electromyographic analysis of gait in an aquatic environment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed by two independent reviewers and divided into four groups. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Lower muscle activation was found with treadmill water walking compared to treadmill land walking. With deep-water running, the leg muscles (tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius lateralis) have lower muscle activation when compared to on land running, but the trunk and thigh muscles have higher activation. CONCLUSION: If gait is performed on an aquatic treadmill, the muscles assessed had lower muscle activation when compared to land. During deep-water running activities, lower activation of the distal leg muscles and a higher activation thigh muscles were found when compared to on land. Studies did not follow standard processes in sEMG procedures.

Predicting response to therapy in acute asthma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the prediction of response of therapy into the context of acute adult asthma assessment in the emergency department (ED) setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Close monitoring of the patient's condition at presentation (static assessment) and response to treatment (dynamic assessment), including serial measurements of lung function, is an essential part of the acute asthma care in the ED. The severity of airflow obstruction cannot be accurately judged by patient's symptoms and physical examination alone. Accordingly, it is very important to use an objective measure of airway obstruction (spirometry or peak flow meter). Although spirometry can be performed in acutely ill ED asthmatics, measurement of peak expiratory flow, with values expressed as predicted normal values, represents an alternative if spirometry is not available. SUMMARY: Failure of initial therapy to improve expiratory flow predicts a more severe course and need for hospitalization. Although several score systems have been developed, different factors limit their applicability in the ED setting. Thus, peak expiratory flow rate measures at 15-60 min of treatment, joined with continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation may be the best ways to assess patients with acute asthma.

[Asthma clinical practice guidelines: advantages and pitfalls]. / Guías de Práctica Clínica para el asma. Luces y sombras.

The Clinical Practice Guidelines on asthma have contributed towards unifying concepts and reaching a consensus on performances between different professional groups. However, they have failed in the overall improvement in the management of asthma, the final objective that they are meant to achieve. Today, almost 20 years after they appeared, the majority of asthmatic patients are still inadequately controlled, partly due to lack of follow up by doctors and the rest of health care staff who have to look after them. This lack of follow up of these recommendations is probably associated with a lack of well structured planning in their circulation and implementation. Also, although the recommendations of these guidelines agree in what is essential, they differ in other aspects, which in turn could be determining factors in clinical practice. The purpose of this article has been to establish the main differences in the recommendations that the principal clinical practice guidelines on the disease propose on the diagnosis, classification and treatment of asthma. To do this we have compared, The British Guideline on the Management of Asthma 2007, The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention/Global Initiative for Asthma 2006 (GINA), the National Prevention program for Education on Asthma (Programa Nacional de Prevención para la Educación del Asma) (NAEPP), the Spanish Guide for the Management of Asthma (Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma 2003) (GEMA) and the ALAT y SEPAR guides, Latin-America and Spain. Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Asthma Exacerbation (América Latina y España. Recomendaciones para la Prevención y el Tratamiento de la Exacerbación Asmática 2008) (ALERTA).