Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 23(1): 555, 2023 11 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Macrocephaly is present in 2.3% of children with important neurosurgical conditions in the differential diagnosis. The objective of this study was to identify clinical associations with actionable imaging findings among children with head imaging for macrocephaly. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of head imaging studies ordered for macrocephaly among children 24 months and younger in a multistate children's health system. Four neurosurgeons reviewed the images, determining cases to be a 'concern' if neurosurgical follow-up or intervention was indicated. Electronic health records were reviewed to collect patient-level data and to determine if surgery was performed. Controls were matched 3:1 to cases of 'concern' in a multivariate model using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: In the study sample (n = 1293), 46 (4%) were concern cases, with 15 (1%) requiring surgery. Significant clinical factors associated with neurosurgical concern were bulging fontanel [aOR 7.47, (95% CI: 2.28-24.44), P < 0.001], prematurity [aOR 21.26, (95% CI: 3.76-120.21), P < 0.001], any delay [aOR 2.67, (95% CI: 1.13-6.27), P = 0.03], and head-weight Z-score difference (W_diff, defined as the difference between the Z-scores of head circumference and weight) [aOR 1.70, (95% CI: 1.22-2.37), P = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: Head imaging for macrocephaly identified few patients with findings of concern and fewer requiring surgery. A greater head-weight Z-score difference appears to represent a novel risk factor for neurosurgical follow-up or intervention.


Asunto(s)
Megalencefalia , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Megalencefalia/diagnóstico por imagen , Megalencefalia/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Factores de Riesgo , Cefalometría
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(10): 1846-1854, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37428309

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early reports during the COVID-19 pandemic showed pregnant and postpartum women have increased rates of anxiety and depression. We hypothesized that exposure to more COVID-19-related events (e.g., stay-at-home orders, school closures, work layoffs, family members ill with COVID-19; Event Exposure), greater perceived impact of COVID-19 events on the family (Family Impact), and less social support would be associated with more anxiety and depression symptoms among first-time mothers. METHODS: We interviewed 125 first-time mothers of infants under 3 months of age from four pediatric primary care offices (June 2020 - February 2021) to assess COVID-19 experiences, anxiety and depression symptoms, and social support. Hierarchical linear regression evaluated relations between COVID-19 Event Exposure, COVID-19 Family Impact, and social support on maternal anxiety and depression symptoms. RESULTS: COVID-19 Event Exposure was not associated with depression or anxiety symptom scores. However, greater COVID-19 Family Impact was related to increased maternal depression and anxiety symptoms when controlling for COVID-19 Event Exposure. Reduced social support predicted higher depression symptom scores, but not anxiety symptom scores, when accounting for other variables. CONCLUSION: The number of COVID-19-related events experienced by first-time mothers did not predict anxiety or depression symptoms. However, greater perceived impact of COVID-19 on their family was associated with higher symptoms of anxiety and depression in these mothers. Pediatricians can promote resilience strategies to help new mothers adapt during the COVID-19 pandemic to help decrease anxiety and depression symptoms.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Depresión Posparto , Lactante , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Madres , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Periodo Posparto
3.
Acad Pediatr ; 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880392

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine opioid exposure (IOE) has increased over the last 2 decades and is associated with additional needs after birth. To date, no clinical guidelines address the primary care of children with IOE. We aimed to characterize clinician-reported screening and referral practices, barriers to effective primary care for children with IOE, and clinician- and practice-level characteristics associated with perceived barriers. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of pediatric residents, pediatricians, and advanced practitioners at 28 primary care clinics affiliated with 7 pediatric residency programs (April-June 2022). We assessed screening and other clinical practices related to IOE and perceived barriers to addressing parental opioid use disorder (OUD). We used descriptive statistics to analyze survey responses, assessed the distribution of reported barriers, and applied a 2-stage cluster analysis to assess response patterns. RESULTS: Of 1004 invited clinicians, 329 (32.8%) responses were returned, and 325 pediatric residents and pediatricians were included in the final analytic sample. Almost all (99.3%) reported parental substance use screening as important, but only 11.6% screened routinely. Half of the respondents routinely refer children with IOE to early intervention services and social work. Lack of standard screening for substance use was the most frequently selected barrier to addressing parental OUD. Participants reporting fewer barriers to addressing parental OUD identified having greater access to OUD treatment programs and home visiting programs. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians report variations in primary care screenings and referrals for children with IOE. Access to parental OUD treatment programs may mitigate perceived barriers to addressing parental OUD in the pediatric office.

4.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 34(1): 161-179, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464487

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Characterizing common concerns for children with intrauterine opioid exposure (IOE) can inform tailored primary care. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of primary care data of children with IOE from birth to age two years within one multi-state pediatric health system. Well child care (WCC) and problem-based visit diagnoses were categorized, and descriptive statistics were tabulated. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-five (385) children with IOE had 3,622 primary care visits, of which 51.4% were WCC and 48.6% were problem-based. Most frequent visit diagnoses were upper respiratory complaints (14.8% of visits), feeding difficulties (12.2%), and perinatal viral exposure (9.8%). Although visit type (WCC vs. problem-based) varied across diagnostic category, frequent utilization of both visit types were documented for several diagnoses in infancy (e.g., fussiness/colic, feeding difficulties). CONCLUSIONS: Well child care visits for children with IOE are key opportunities for anticipatory guidance with an emphasis on problems that may contribute to acute health care utilization, particularly in early infancy.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Servicios de Salud del Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salud Infantil , Atención Primaria de Salud
5.
J Child Health Care ; : 13674935231168676, 2023 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37043307

RESUMEN

Opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy has risen in the U.S. over the past two decades, resulting in a growing number of children with intrauterine opioid exposure (IOE). Limited research exists supporting best practices to optimize primary care for these children and their families, particularly mothers with OUD. Using a modified Delphi method, we surveyed pediatric primary care clinicians from a single children's health care system regarding their experiences in caring for this population. In Phase 1, open-ended survey questions inquired about needs and challenges facing these infants, their families, and clinicians and resources within primary care. After thematic analysis, the most frequent responses were presented as a Phase 2 survey for clinicians to select their top five. Percentages for the most commonly selected top five themes were tabulated. Survey response rates were 58/139 (42%) for Phase 1 and 45/137 (33%) for Phase 2. For infants with IOE and their families, respondents identified parenting knowledge and family issues related to maternal OUD as top challenges, with limited resources to address them in primary care. Clinicians identified time constraints and follow-up issues as top challenges. Future intervention in pediatric primary care could include addressing parenting education, resource gaps, and best practice recommendations in caring for children with IOE.

6.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 42(2): 128-134, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33538454

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has suggested an association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay. However, study samples drawn from children seen in subspecialty clinics increase the potential for selection and referral bias. Our study evaluates the association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay and the timing of these diagnoses in a primary care setting, where plagiocephaly is commonly diagnosed and managed. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis used electronic medical record data from 45 primary care sites within a children's health system from 1999 to 2017, including children aged 0 to 5 years with diagnoses determined by physician diagnosis codes at primary care visits. Children were classified in the plagiocephaly group if diagnosis occurred by 12 months of age. Primary outcome was any developmental delay. Pearson χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression analyses were conducted, with multivariable models adjusted for sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, prematurity status (22-36 weeks' gestation), primary care sites, birth year, and diagnoses of abnormal tone and torticollis. RESULTS: Of 77,108 patients seen by 12 months, 2315 (3.0%) were diagnosed with plagiocephaly, with an increase in diagnosis prevalence over the study time frame. Plagiocephaly was independently associated with an increased odds of any developmental delay diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.70). The diagnosis of plagiocephaly was recorded before the diagnosis of developmental delay in most cases when both diagnoses were present (374 of 404, 92.6%). CONCLUSION: Data from a large primary care cohort demonstrate an association between plagiocephaly and developmental delay, affirming findings in previous subspecialty literature.


Asunto(s)
Plagiocefalia no Sinostótica , Plagiocefalia , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Lactante , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Pediatrics ; 145(2)2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31896548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For children with intrauterine opioid exposure (IOE), well-child care (WCC) provides an important opportunity to address medical, developmental, and psychosocial needs. We evaluated WCC adherence for this population. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used PEDSnet data from a pediatric primary care network spanning 3 states from 2011 to 2016. IOE was ascertained by using physician diagnosis codes. WCC adherence in the first year was defined as a postnatal or 1-month visit and completed 2-, 4-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month visits. WCC adherence in the second year was defined as completed 15- and 18-month visits. Gaps in WCC, defined as ≥2 missed consecutive WCC visits, were also evaluated. We used multivariable regression to test the independent effect of IOE status. RESULTS: Among 11 334 children, 236 (2.1%) had a diagnosis of IOE. Children with IOE had a median of 6 WCC visits (interquartile range 5-7), vs 8 (interquartile range 6-8) among children who were not exposed (P < .001). IOE was associated with decreased WCC adherence over the first and second years of life (adjusted relative risk 0.54 [P < .001] and 0.74 [P < .001]). WCC gaps were more likely in this population (adjusted relative risk 1.43; P < .001). There were no significant adjusted differences in nonroutine primary care visits, immunizations by age 2, or lead screening. CONCLUSIONS: Children <2 years of age with IOE are less likely to adhere to recommended WCC, despite receiving on-time immunizations and lead screening. Further research should be focused on the role of WCC visits to support the complex needs of this population.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Citas y Horarios , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA