RESUMEN
Climate adaptation and the management of climate impacts require cross-sectoral and regional coordination and collaboration, but presently there is no thorough assessment of the adaptation network in the Midwest United States to evaluate how well it achieves such collaboration. We investigated the climate adaptation network across the Midwest to inform the strategic agenda for a climate adaptation boundary organization in Minnesota - the University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership (MCAP). We identified 150 organizations and more than 500 unique connections between them. About ten organizations with more than 25 connections each link the existing Midwest climate adaptation network, but most organizations have fewer than five connections. This asymmetry can affect the flow of resources such as information, technical assistance, and financial support. It can also hinder coordination and collaboration as called for by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC et al., 2019). The Midwest adaptation network is not well-balanced with respect to the adaptation cycle: many organizations focus on understanding or planning for climate change, with few organizations focused on problem identification, plan implementation, or monitoring. The gaps identified here suggest that MCAP and other regional adaptation organizations can (1) improve cross-sectoral and intraregional coordination and collaboration, and (2) fill gaps in the adaptation cycle, particularly implementation and monitoring. As more communities and jurisdictions move beyond climate planning toward adaptation implementation and management, and as an increasing number of state, federal and private sector funds become available to support implementation, climate service providers such as MCAP should evaluate their services and capacities and adapt alongside the communities they support.
RESUMEN
Background: As climate change is expected to result in more frequent, larger fires and associated smoke impacts, creating and sustaining wildfire smoke-resilient communities is an urgent public health priority. Following two summers of persistent and extreme wildfire smoke events in Washington state, the need for additional research on wildfire smoke health impacts, risk communication, and risk reduction, and an associated greater coordination between researcher and practitioner communities, is of paramount importance. Objectives: On 30 October 2018, the University of Washington hosted a Wildfire Smoke Risk Communication Stakeholder Synthesis Symposium in Seattle, Washington. The goals of the symposium were to identify and prioritize practice-based information gaps necessary to promote effective wildfire smoke risk communication and risk reduction across Washington state, foster collaboration among practitioners and academics to address information gaps using research, and provide regional stakeholders with access to the best available health and climate science about current and future wildfire risks. Methods: Seventy-six Washington state practitioners and academics with relevant professional responsibilities or expertise in wildfire smoke and health engaged in small group discussions using the "World Café Method" to identify practice-relevant research needs related to wildfire smoke and health. Notes from each discussion were coded and qualitatively analyzed using a content analysis approach. Discussion: Washington state's public health and air quality practitioners need additional evidence to communicate and reduce wildfire smoke risk. Exposure, health risk, risk communication, behavior change and interventions, and legal and policy research needs were identified, along with the need to develop research infrastructure to support wildfire smoke and health science. Practice-relevant, collaborative research should be prioritized to address this increasing health threat.