Development, Progression, and Mortality of Suspected Interstitial Lung Disease in COPDGene.

RATIONALE: Some with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) have suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD), a subgroup with adverse outcomes. Rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and their effect on mortality are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine rates of development and progression of suspected ILD and assess effects of individual ILD and progression criteria on mortality. METHODS: Participants from COPDGene were included. ILD was defined as ILA and fibrosis and/or FVC <80% predicted. Prevalent ILD was assessed at enrollment, incident ILD and progression at 5-year follow-up. CT progression was assessed visually and FVC decline as relative change. Multivariable Cox regression tested associations between mortality and ILD groups. RESULTS: Of 9,588 participants at enrollment, 267 (2.8%) had prevalent ILD. Those with prevalent ILD had 52% mortality after median 10.6 years, which was higher than ILA (33%; HR=2.0; p<0.001). The subgroup of prevalent ILD with fibrosis only had worse mortality (59%) than ILA (HR=2.2; p<0.001). 97 participants with prevalent ILD completed 5-year follow-up: 32% had stable CT and relative FVC decline <10%, 6% FVC decline ≥10% only, 39% CT progression only, and 22% both CT progression and FVC decline ≥10%. Mortality rates were 32%, 50%, 45%, and 46% respectively; those with CT progression only had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.6; p=0.005). At 5-year follow-up, incident ILD occurred in 168/4,843 participants without prevalent ILD and had worse mortality than ILA (HR=2.5; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Rates of mortality and progression are high among those with suspected ILD in COPDGene; fibrosis and radiologic progression are important predictors of mortality.

Racial and ethnic associations with interstitial lung disease and healthcare utilization in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic differences in presentation and outcomes have been reported in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, prior studies have limited diversity. We aim to evaluate if there are racial/ethnic differences associated with ILD, time intervals between SSc and ILD and with emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization rates. METHODS: Clinical and sociodemographic variables were extracted for 756 patients with SSc from longitudinal health records in an integrated health-system. Logistic regression models analyzed the association of covariates with ILD and age at SSc-ILD. Healthcare outcomes were analyzed with complementary log-log regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 33.7% of patients in the cohort had an ILD code, with increased odds for Asian (odds ratio [OR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-5.28; p=0.008) compared with White patients. The predicted age in years of SSc-ILD was younger for Hispanic (estimate, -6.5; 95% CI, -13--0.21; p = 0.04) and Black/African American patients (-10; 95% CI -16--4.9; p < 0.001) compared with White patients. Black/African American patients were more likely to have an ILD code before an SSc code (59% compared with 20.6% of White patients), and the shortest interval from SSc to ILD (3 months). Black/African American (HR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.47-4.49; p = 0.001) and Hispanic patients (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.37- 3.82; p = 0.002) had higher rates of an ED visit. CONCLUSION: We found that odds of SSc-ILD differed by racial/ethnic group, minoritized patients had earlier age of presentation, and greater rates of an ED visit.

Racial and ethnic associations with interstitial lung disease and healthcare utilization in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Rationale: Racial and ethnic differences in presentation and outcomes have been reported in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, diverse cohorts and additional modeling can improve understanding of risk features and outcomes, which is important for reducing associated disparities. Objectives: To determine if there are racial/ethnic differences associated with SSc-ILD risk and age; time intervals between SSc and ILD, and with emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization rates. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from an integrated health system, over a 5.5 year period was conducted using clinical and sociodemographic variables, models were generated with sequential adjustments for these variables. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of covariates with ILD and age at SSc-ILD. Healthcare outcomes were analyzed with complementary log-log regression models. Results: The cohort included 756 adults (83.6% female, 80.3% non-Hispanic White) with SSc with a mean age of 59 years. Overall, 33.7% of patients in the cohort had an ILD code, with increased odds for Asian (odds ratio [OR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29, 5.18; P =.007) compared to White patients. The age in years of patients with SSc-ILD was younger for Hispanic (mean difference, -6.5; 95% CI, -13, -0.21; P = 0.04) and Black/African American patients (-10; 95% CI -16, -4.9; P <0.001) compared to White patients. Black/African American patients were more likely to have an ILD code before an SSc code (59% compared to 20.6% of White patients), and had the shortest interval from SSc to ILD (3 months). Black/African American (HR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.47, 4.49; P =0.001) and Hispanic patients (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.37, 3.82; P =0.002) had higher rates of an ED visit. Conclusion: In this study, SSc-ILD presentation and outcomes differed by racial/ethnic group (increased odds of SSc-ILD, younger age at SSc-ILD, and preceding diagnosis with respect to SSc, rates of ED visit), some of which was attenuated with adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Differing presentation may be driven by social drivers of health (SDOH), autoantibody profiles, or other key unmeasured factors contributing to susceptibility and severity.