High failure rates following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for transsphincteric anal fistulas: are preoperative MRI measurements of the fistula tract predictive of outcome?

AIM: Treatment of transsphincteric fistulas (TSFs) with fistulotomy after an indwelling seton is tempered by risks of incontinence and litigation. Thus, ligation of the TSF tract has been popularized as an alternative option. We previously reported on 107 patients who underwent ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), with a 46% failure rate. Posterior fistula was the only predictor of recurrence. The aim of the present work was to investigate whether the length, width or depth of the fistula measured on preoperative MRI was correlated with recurrence. METHOD: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective analysis of our prospective Complex Anal Fistula Database from 1 January 2011 to 31 August 2019 was performed. Patients with TSF who underwent preoperative MRI and LIFT were included. Fistula location was classified as anterior, posterior or lateral. MRI measurements of fistula length, width and depth (in the intersphincteric groove) were performed. The type and rate of postoperative recurrence were analysed. RESULTS: 173 patients underwent MRI for an anal fistula; of these 40 underwent LIFT and 22/40 (55%) had preoperative MRI. There was no difference in the length, width or depth of anterior (n = 9), posterior (n = 7) or lateral (n = 6) fistula tracts. The overall recurrence rate was 9/22 (41%). Posterior TSFs had the highest recurrence rate (5/7, 71%). CONCLUSION: The mean length, width, and depth of the fistula tract, measured at the preoperative site of LIFT in the intersphincteric groove, did not correlate with recurrence regardless of fistula location.

Consequences of Increasing Complexity in Anorectal Surgery Performed at an Academic Center.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal surgery encompasses a wide range of procedures with varying complexity. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Review Committee for Colon and Rectal Surgery recommends minimum case numbers (60) for 1-year specialty trainees in 6 categories of anorectal surgery, with definitions for procedural complexity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the scope of anorectal procedures and propose a stratification of procedures based on a consensus of levels of difficulty, as well as to identify a predictive charge cutoff suggestive of procedural complexity. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing anorectal procedures between January 2011 and December 2014 identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding were entered into 6 categories. Codes were stratified as routine or complex based on an assessment of perioperative care and technical expertise required. Patients with an abdominal portion to any procedure were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The study measured distribution of complexity in anorectal surgical procedures and procedural charge associated with differentiating routine from complex procedures. RESULTS: Seven colorectal surgeons performed 2483 anorectal procedures (mean = 620 per year). Mean age was 48 ± 16 years. Forty six (64%) of 71 procedures were classified as routine and 25 (36%) of 71 as complex. Most disease processes had subsets with routine or complex procedures, whereas all of the procedures performed for fecal incontinence or advanced anorectal techniques were considered complex. Fistula procedures and transanal excisions were most heterogeneous, with a high procedural complexity rate (37% and 50%). After a procedural complexity rating, intraclass correlation by 6 surgeons was 0.70, demonstrating good correlation. Receiver operating curve assessments of consensus categorization according to billing codes revealed $553 as the optimal cutoff between routine and complex procedures. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-institution retrospective review. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal residents may benefit from anorectal case stratification, because it serves as a dialogue for those interested in complex anorectal surgery during training. Surgeon categorization of procedures correlates well with a charge-based model of complexity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A806.

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for primary and recurrent rectal prolapse: are the results comparable the second time?

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach to recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse after perineal rectosigmoidectomy is complicated by recurrent prolapse. The majority of patients who undergo perineal rectosigmoidectomy are elderly with comorbidities. Therefore, redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy is usually selected to avoid postoperative complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy for recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at Cleveland Clinic Florida, from January 2000 to March 2009. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-six patients (129 women), mean age 78 (range, 31-98) years, were included in the study; 113 patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse underwent primary perineal rectosigmoidectomy, and 23 patients with recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse underwent redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes, recurrence curves, and risk of recurrence were compared between the 2 groups. Age, anterior compartment prolapse, concurrent levatorplasty, and length of bowel resection were analyzed to identify factors potentially influencing recurrence. RESULTS: Both groups had comparable demographics, BMI, and ASA scores. Operative time, blood loss, length of bowel resection, hospital stay, and follow-up (mean, 42.5 months) were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates (redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy 17.4% vs. primary perineal rectosigmoidectomy 16.8%; p = 1.00). The recurrence rate for full-thickness rectal prolapse was significantly higher for redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy than primary perineal rectosigmoidectomy (39% vs. 18%; p = 0.007). None of the factors analyzed was associated with recurrence in either group. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective methodology. In addition, functional outcomes were not evaluated, because many of the patients died during the follow-up period or were unavailable because of advanced age. CONCLUSIONS: Redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy is as safe and feasible as primary perineal rectosigmoidectomy in elderly and fragile patients with recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse. However, the re-recurrence rate for full-thickness rectal prolapse is substantially higher for redo perineal rectosigmoidectomy than primary perineal rectosigmoidectomy.

Restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in obese patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in obese patients compared with a matched cohort of nonobese patients. METHODS: A review of all obese patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1998 to 2008 was performed. Obesity was defined as body mass index >or=30 kg/m. A matched control group of patients with body mass index within 18.5 to 25 kg/m was created. Primary end points included operative time, length of hospital stay, operative blood loss, and early (6 wk) postoperative complications. RESULTS: Sixty-five obese patients (mean body mass index, 34.3 +/- 0.51 kg/m) underwent proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Mean body mass index of the control group was 22.45 +/- 0.2 kg/m (P < .0001). The most common diagnosis was mucosal ulcerative colitis (84.6%), followed by familial adenomatous polyposis (13.9%) and Crohn's disease (1.5%). The obese population had a higher incidence of cardiorespiratory comorbidities (P = .044), and a trend for steroid and immunosuppressive therapy (P = .06) preoperatively. Obese patients required longer operative time (P = .001) and longer hospital stay (P = .009). Early postoperative complications were comparable (P > .05). Long-term outcomes were also similar, except for a higher incidence of incisional hernia in the obese group (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The overall postoperative complication rate in obese patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was similar to a matched nonobese cohort of patients. However, longer operative time, longer length of stay, and a higher rate of incisional hernia were noted in the obese population. Obese patients should be appropriately consulted about these issues before undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: does weight matter?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown improved outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for surgery for both benign and malignant colorectal diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study was designed to evaluate the results of laparoscopic colorectal resections in normal weight patients compared with overweight and obese patients with IBD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired institutional review board-approved surgical database was performed. All consecutive patients with IBD who underwent laparoscopy from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2008 were reviewed. BMI, age, gender, comorbidities, ASA classification, and surgical- and disease-related variables, including 60-day postoperative complications, were reviewed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients with IBD underwent laparoscopy: 48 were excluded and 213 were analyzed. Group I comprised 127 normal-weight patients (body mass index (BMI), 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), and group II included 67 overweight patients (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) and 19 obese patients (BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2)). Crohn's disease was diagnosed in 86 (67.7%) patients in group I and 52 (60.4%) in group II. Procedures performed included ileocolic resection in 56% of patients in each group. Total colectomy with or without proctectomy was undertaken in 39.4% in group I and 40.7% in group II. The conversion rate was 18% for group I and 22.09% for group II (p > 0.005; not significant). The most common reason for conversion was failure to progress due to adhesions or phlegmon. There were no differences in major postoperative complication rates (wound infection, abscess, anastomotic leakage, or small-bowel obstruction) or mean hospital stay (6.7, 6.8, respectively), and there was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD who were overweight or obese and who underwent laparoscopic bowel resection had no significant differences in the rates of conversion, major postoperative complications, or length of stay when comparing to patients with normal BMI. Therefore, the benefits of laparoscopic bowel resection should not be denied to overweight or obese patients based strictly on their BMI.

Management of low transsphincteric anal fistula with serial setons and interval muscle-cutting fistulotomy.

This study evaluates low transsphincteric anal fistula managed by serial setons and interval fistulotomy, with attention to healing without recurrence and preservation of continence. Following Institutional Review Board approval, consecutive anal fistula operations performed by a single surgeon from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 were retrospectively reviewed using electronic medical records and telephone interviews for patients lost to follow up. Of the 71 patients, 26 (37%) had low transsphincteric fistula (23 males and 3 females; mean age: 46 years), treated at our institution by seton placement followed by interval surgical muscle cutting and subsequent seton replacement or final fistulotomy. Of the 26 patients, 22 (85%) were initially referred due to previous failed treatment, with a 30.6 month mean duration of fistula prior to referral and a mean of 2.2 (range: 0 -6) prior anorectal surgeries. At a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, none of the 21 patients experienced recurrence or fecal incontinence. Serial seton with interval muscle-cutting sphincterotomy followed by complete fistulotomy is an effective treatment for the management of patients who are either initially seen for low transsphincteric fistula, or referred after failed anorectal surgery for that condition.

Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: Reports of virtual colonoscopy demonstrate sensitivity similar to that of conventional colonoscopy for polyps 5 mm or larger, suggesting the validity of its use for colorectal cancer screening. Critical to the success of either procedure is the ability to evaluate the entire colon. Cecal intubation rates during diagnostic or screening colonoscopies vary from 53 to 99 percent. We describe the added value of using a gastroscope to perform a colonoscopic examination that would otherwise result in an incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: From January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 a total of 1,979 colonoscopies were performed. A gastroscope was used in 1.3 percent (n = 26) of these colonoscopies in an effort to complete the index examination initially started with a standard or pediatric colonoscope. The success rate was defined as intubating proximal to the initial area of impasse and entering the cecum. RESULTS: Cecal intubation was achieved in 62 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy, the gastroscope can usually advance through the initial area of impasse with a cecal intubation rate of 62 percent.