RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This is a subanalysis of a previous study which compared the effectiveness of trimetoprim-sulfametoxazole (TMP-SMX) with all other regimens for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Aim of the current study was to focus on the effectiveness of a strategy based on TMP-SMX as de-escalation from ß-lactam including regimens. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients who were hospitalized for VAP from 2011 to 2019. Patients were distributed in two groups: NO SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, including patients who received ß-lactams for all treatment duration, and SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, which included patients who switched to TMP-SMX from a ß-lactam including regimen after microbiology diagnosis. Three clinical outcomes were analyzed: mortality at 30 days from the start of the antibiotic treatment (T30), mortality at the end of treatment (EoT), and acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria during hospitalization in intensive care unit. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients were included in the current study, 32/70 (45.7%) in NO SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group and 38/70 (54.3%) in SWITCH TO TMP-SMX group, 37/70 (52.8%) had been already included in the previous study. No significant differences in clinical outcomes and patient's characteristics were found when the two groups were compared. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation to TMP-SMX for VAP treatment was not associated with higher mortality at EoT and T30 than standard treatment with ß-lactam. Monotherapy with TMP-SMX as de-escalation from broad-spectrum empirical regimens is a ß-lactam sparing strategy worthy to be further investigated in either multicenter cohort studies or randomized clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Combinación Trimetoprim y SulfametoxazolAsunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Hepatitis Autoinmune/microbiología , Veillonella , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ecocardiografía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/patología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Hepatitis Autoinmune/etiología , Hepatitis Autoinmune/patología , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To define the factors associated with overprescription of antibiotics by general practitioners (GPs) for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. METHODS: Anonymised electronic prescribing records of 1370 GPs were analysed. Diagnosis and prescriptions were retrieved. The initiation rate by GP for 2020 was compared with 2017-2019. Prescribing habits of GPs who initiated antibiotics for > 10% of COVID-19 patients were compared with those who did not. Regional differences in prescribing habits of GPs who had consulted at least one COVID-19 patient were also analysed. RESULTS: For the March-April 2020 period, GPs who initiated antibiotics for > 10% of COVID-19 patients had more consultations than those who did not. They also more frequently prescribed antibiotics for non-COVID-19 patients consulting with rhinitis and broad-spectrum antibiotics for treating cystitis. Finally, GPs in the Île-de-France region saw more COVID-19 patients and more frequently initiated antibiotics. General practitioners in southern France had a higher but non-significant ratio of azithromycin initiation rate over total antibiotic initiation rate. CONCLUSION: This study identified a subset of GPs with overprescribing profiles for COVID-19 and other viral infections; they also tended to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics for a long duration. There were also regional differences concerning antibiotic initiation rates and the ratio of azithromycin prescribed. It will be necessary to evaluate the evolution of prescribing practices during subsequent waves.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos Generales , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Electrónica , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
Open lower limb fractures are common injuries, and the occurrence of infectious complications after open fractures is a usual problem. The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) and the nature and resistance of the germs responsible for SSIs remain poorly described. Our aim was to describe the bacterial epidemiology of SSIs after surgical management of an open lower limb fracture. We conducted a retrospective monocentric cohort study from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2020 based on the analysis of inpatient records in a non-university hospital of Ile de France region. All patients who underwent surgery for an open lower limb fracture were included. A total of 149 patients were included. In our population, 19 (12.7%) patients developed an SSI. Of these 19 patients, the sample was polymicrobial in 9 (47.4%) patients. In 9 (45%) cases, the samples identified a group 3 enterobacteria, Enterobacter cloacae being the main one in 7 (36.9%) cases. Staphylococci were identified in 11 patients, with Staphylococcus aureus in 9 (47.4%). All Staphylococcus aureus were susceptible to methicillin, and all enterobacteria were susceptible to C3G. Among all SSI, 10 (58.8%) contained at least one germ resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC). The SSIs rate was 12.7%. The main pathogens identified were Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus aureus. The presence of early SSI caused by group 3 Enterobacteriaceae renders current antibiotic prophylaxis protocols inadequate with AMC in half the cases.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study is to analyse the characteristics of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) inpatients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who developed VAP from March to May 2020 (VAP COVID-19). They were compared to non-COVID-19 patients who developed VAP from January 2011 to December 2019 (VAP NO COVID-19) and COVID-19 patients who did not develop VAP (NO VAP COVID-19). RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were included in the VAP COVID-19group, 37 in the NO VAP COVID-19 group, and 188 in the VAP NO COVID-19 group. VAP COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of shock (71% vs. 48%, p = 0.009), death in ICU (52% vs. 30%, p = 0.011), VAP recurrence (28% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001), positive blood culture (26% vs. 13%, p = 0.038), and polymicrobial culture (28% vs. 13%, p = 0.011) than VAP NO COVID-19. At the multivariate analysis, death in patients with VAP was associated with shock (p = 0.032) and SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.008) infection. CONCLUSIONS: VAP in COVID-19 patients is associated with shock, bloodstream, and polymicrobial infections.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical and medical care factors associated with mortality in three nursing homes in France. METHODS: Two nursing homes were hospital-dependent, had connections with infection prevention and control departments, and had permanent physicians. A third nursing home had no direct connection with a general hospital, no infection control practitioner, and no permanent physician. The main outcome was death. RESULTS: During the first 3 months of the outbreak, 224 of 375 (59.7%) residents were classified as COVID-19 cases and 57 of 375 (15.2%) died. The hospital-dependent nursing homes had lower COVID-19 case fatality rates in comparison with the non-hospital-dependent nursing home (15 [6.6%] vs 38 [25.8%], OR 0.20 [0.11-0.38], p = 0.001). During the first 3 weeks of the outbreak, mortality in COVID-19 patients decreased if they had a daily clinical examination (OR: 0.09 [0.03-0.35], p = 0.01), three vital signs measurement per day (OR: 0.06 [0.01-0.30], p = 0.001) and prophylactic anticoagulation (OR: 0 [0.00-0.24], p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that high mortality rates in some nursing homes during the COVID-19 outbreak might have been contributed by a lack of medical care management. Increasing human and material resources, encouraging presence of nursing home physicians and establishing a connection with general hospitals should be considered to deal with present and future health disasters in nursing homes.