Real-world experience of nivolumab in the treatment of poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab improves disease control and survival in advanced NSCLC in patients with good performance status (PS), but there is limited data on its efficacy in patients with poor PS. AIM: Primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and examine the influence of PS on outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with single-agent nivolumab for advanced NSCLC at a single institution was performed. Sixty-six patients treated with nivolumab were identified (33 male) with a median age of 68.5 years. Fifty-six (85%) patients were current or former smokers and 17 (26%) had brain metastasis. All patients had received prior chemotherapy, 39 (59%) patients received one and 27 (41%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months (95%CI 3.61-11.3) in the overall study population. OS of patients with PS ≥2 at the start of treatment was 3.04 months (95%CI 1.64-7.36) as compared to 10.23 months (95%CI 7.06-18.9) with PS ≤1. The overall response rate was 7% (four patients had a partial response), 23 (40%) patients had stable disease; the overall disease control rate (partial response and stable disease) was 47%. Twenty-six (40%) patients had PS ≥2 at the start of treatment and 2 (8%) of these patients developed a partial response, 4 (15%) had stable disease; the overall disease control rate was 23%. Fourteen (58%) patients with PS ≥2 had disease progression at the time of first disease response evaluation. In the overall population, 20% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), most commonly pneumonitis, hepatitis, and colitis. Fourteen TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation, 9 (23%) adverse events (AEs) in patients with PS ≤1 and 5 (19%) with PS ≥2. Fourteen (21%) patients died within 30 days of the last nivolumab treatment. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation between the poor and good PS groups, but survival was shorter with poorer PS. PS appears to be an important prognostic factor and remains a relevant discriminator in the selection of treatment with immunotherapy for lung cancer.

Prognostic Differences of RAS Mutations: Results from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Registry.

BACKGROUND: Effective targeting of RAS mutations has proven elusive until recently. Novel agents directly targeting KRAS G12C have shown promise in early-phase clinical trials that included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Prior reports have suggested that G12C mutation may be predictive of poor outcome. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the specific characteristics and prognostic implications of individual RAS mutation subtypes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of individual RAS mutation types from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Registry between 2006 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 5165 patients entered onto the registry, 2305 (45%) had RAS mutation results available. 772 (33%) had a RAS mutation. The nature of the RAS mutation was available in 668 (87% of those with RAS mutation). Rare mutations (outside codons 12 and 13) made up 12.6% of the total. There were numerical differences in survival between the specific RAS mutation subgroups, with the longest median overall survival (30 months) observed in those with G12S mutations. However, there was no statistical difference in survival when comparing the various RAS mutations, including the comparison of G12C to G12S (p = 0.38). Patients with cancer harbouring rare RAS mutations had a median survival of 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the G12S mutation was associated with the longest survival numerically, the observed survival for patients with the most common RAS mutations (G12C, G12V, G12A, G12D and G13D) did not significantly differ.

Phase 1 trial of intraperitoneal paclitaxel in combination with intravenous cisplatin and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases (IPGP study).

AIMS: Gastric cancer with peritoneal involvement has a poor prognosis. Intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel has shown promising results in these patients. However, this approach has only been studied in the Asian population, and in combination with S-1. We investigated the maximum tolerated dose of IP paclitaxel, with a standard chemotherapy combination, in the Australian population. METHODS: The study of the population included metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal involvement. Treatment included six 21-day cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV, day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 PO BD, days 1-14) plus IP paclitaxel (days 1 and 8). IP paclitaxel doses for cohort 1-3 were 10, 20, and 30 mg/m2 , respectively, in a 3 + 3 standard dose-escalation design. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled of which 6 were female and the median age was 63. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicities. No grade 4/5 toxicities were recorded. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Therefore, as defined by the study protocol, the recommended phase-2 dose for IP paclitaxel was determined to be 30 mg/m2 . The 12-month survival rate was 46.7%, and the median survival was 11.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 15.3-6.9). CONCLUSIONS: IP paclitaxel is safe in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine and the recommended phase-2 dose is 30 mg/m2 .

Phase I Trial of nab-Paclitaxel Administered Concurrently With Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Inoperable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Nab-paclitaxel has radiosensitizing antitumor efficacy in pancreatic cancer. We aimed to establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nab-paclitaxel with radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: In a phase I dose escalation trial patients received weekly nab-paclitaxel for 6 weeks with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). 3 + 3 design was used with nab-paclitaxel doses: 25 mg/m 2 (cohort 1), 50 mg/m 2 (cohort 2), 75 mg/m 2 (cohort 3), and 100 mg/m 2 (cohort 4). Primary endpoint was MTD. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were recruited. Median age was 69 years (range, 40-86). Grade 1/2 toxicities were nausea (93%), vomiting (54%), diarrhea (57%), and fatigue (69%). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in cohorts 1 to 3. In cohort 4, DLTs of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis were observed in patient 1. Subsequent DLT of febrile neutropenia and enterocolitis occurred in patient 5 in the expanded cohort. Following chemoradiotherapy median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval, 2.5-27.5) and median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.37-25.2). CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel and EBRT was well-tolerated at doses below 100 mg/m 2 . The MTD and recommended phase II study dose for nab-paclitaxel with EBRT is 75 mg/m 2 in this disease.

Phase I open-label trial of intraperitoneal paclitaxel in combination with intravenous cisplatin and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases (IPGP study): study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis has a poor outcome. Only a few studies have specifically investigated this group of patients. Japanese researchers have shown that chemotherapy with intraperitoneal paclitaxel (IPP) and oral S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) is active and well tolerated. These results have been achieved in a specific genetic pool (Japanese population), using regimens that may not be available in other parts of the world. We have designed this phase I trial to investigate IPP in combination with a standard chemotherapy combination in these patients. METHODS: We use a 3+3 expanded cohort dose escalation until a predefined number of dose-limiting toxicities are reached. Patients will have an intraperitoneal catheter placed surgically after trial enrolment. Chemotherapy includes a maximum of six cycles (21 days) of capecitabine (X) (1000 mg/m2 two times a day, days 1-14)+cisplatin (C) (intravenous 80 mg/m2 day 1) and IPP (days 1 and 8) with the following doses: cohort-1: 10 mg/m2, cohort-2: 20 mg/m2 and cohort-3: 30 mg/m2. Primary endpoint is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of IPP. Secondary endpoints include determining the safety and tolerability of IPP in combination with C and X, overall response rates, ascites response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and effects on quality of life.Important inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 non-amplified gastric adenocarcinoma with histological or cytology-proven peritoneal involvement and adequate organ function. Exclusion criteria include previous malignancy within 5 years, recent abdominal or pelvic radiation treatment, significant abdominal adhesions or sepsis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee. A manuscript will be prepared for publication on the completion of the trial. This study will be conducted according to the Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95) annotated with TGA comments (Therapeutic Goods Administration DSEB July 2000) and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The study will be performed in accordance with the NHMRC Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans (© Commonwealth of Australia 2007), and the NHMRC Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (©Australian Government 2007), and the principles laid down by the World Medical Assembly in the Declaration of Helsinki 2008. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614001063606.

Very high GFR in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: prevalence, carboplatin dosing patterns and chemotherapy toxicity.

AIM: Carboplatin dosing depends on accurate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation. There is a lack of clinical agreement about carboplatin dosing when the GFR measurement is very high (>110 mL/min). METHODS: A retrospective audit of pre-chemotherapy 99m technetium (Tc) diethylenetriamene pentaacetate (DTPA) radionuclide GFR estimations and patients' chart review were performed from January 2006 to May 2009. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of patients with a high GFR and the incidence of myelotoxicity in this group. RESULTS: Overall 18 of 148 treated patients (14%) measured GFR >110mL/min. The GFR values of six of the 18 patients were capped for dose calculation. In eight patients a measured GFR corrected for body surface area was used and in four the actual measured GFR was used for dose calculation. In total, 63 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. Grade III or IV myelotoxicity accounted for 37% (15/41) of all myelotoxicities. Neutropenia accounted for almost 39% of all myelotoxicities (16/41). Two patients (11%) were hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. Eight patients (40%) had dose reduction and four (20%) had treatment delays due to myelotoxicity. The frequency of myelotoxicity was high irrespective of the GFR used (corrected or uncorrected) in calculating the chemotherapy dose. CONCLUSION: High values of GFR, by 99mTc DTPA radionuclide measurement, are a common finding in pre-chemotherapy patients irrespective of age. Carboplatin dosing patterns in this group of patients vary among treating oncologists and a standardized approach is needed.