Sexual Offense Disclosure Assessment in Youth Referred to Community Treatment: A Latent Class Analysis.

This study seeks to extend research evaluating tools to assess the disclosure of sexually abusive behavior. The subjects were 239 male youth (ages 10-20 years) who were court-ordered to participate in a community-based collaborative intervention for sexual offending that includes outpatient and probationary services. All youth participated in an interview to capture referral incident details about admission, responsibility, empathy, and remorse at intake, during intervention, and at discharge. Intake, treatment, discharge, and recidivism measures were also collected from multiple sources. Latent class analysis identified three classes based on the intake interview: Empathetic Admitters (22%), Unempathetic Admitters (38%), and Unempathetic Deniers (40%). Significant class differences were found on intake (e.g., use of physical force, caregiver denial of youth responsibility), treatment (e.g., any sanctions/violations), and discharge measures (e.g., successful treatment, probation officer ratings), but not in recidivism rates. The findings extend efforts to identify and target different disclosure patterns whose clinical monitoring may support a comprehensive intervention.

Comparing In-Person and Synchronous Online Training for an Evidence-Based Treatment.

Online trainings in evidence-based treatments (EBT) can be effective platforms and may provide better access to community providers as compared with traditional in-person trainings. However, questions remain as to whether online trainings can achieve similar rates of training engagement and model application to traditional in-person trainings. We compared training engagement and model application (e.g., extent of use, fidelity) between participants attending in-person (n = 127) and synchronous online (n = 277) trainings for an EBT (Alternatives for Families: a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; AF-CBT). Data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires and trainers' records. Chi-square analyses and t-tests were used to test for differences between groups. Engagement regarding attendance at workshops and consultation calls was high for both groups, with no significant differences. A total of 81% and 76% presented at least one case and submitted at least one audio recording of an actual AF-CBT session, respectively. Participants rated the training workshop as high quality (M > 4.5/5), and the consultation calls as medium-to-high quality (M > 4/5) across both modalities, indicating good training engagement. In-person training participants were significantly more likely to submit two or more audio recorded sessions than online training participants. This was the only training requirement outcome that differed between the two groups. In examining model application, there were no significant differences between in-person and online training participants in self-reported delivery of AF-CBT, the number of clients with whom it was implemented, the extent they used the model, or the fidelity with which they delivered it. Both groups reported similar improvements in comfort when working with aggressive families, being directive, and using learning techniques like role plays. Online evidence-based treatment skills training appears to be feasible, efficient, and beneficial, with engagement and performance comparable to in-person training. We discuss potential advantages of online training (e.g., fewer costs, greater flexibility for staff from independent practices) and disadvantages (e.g., less satisfaction).

Integrated Pediatric Health Care in Pennsylvania: A Survey of Primary Care and Behavioral Health Providers.

This study reports on a statewide survey of medical and behavioral health professionals to advance the knowledge base on the benefits and obstacles to delivering integrated pediatric health care. Surveys distributed in 3 statewide provider networks were completed by 110 behavioral health specialists (BHSs) and 111 primary care physicians (PCPs). Survey content documented their perceptions about key services, benefits, barriers, and needed opportunities related to integrated care. Factor analyses identified 8 factors, and other items were examined individually. We compared responses by specialty group (BHS vs PCP) and integrated care experience (no vs yes). The findings revealed differences across domains by specialty subgroup. In several cases, BHS (vs PCP) respondents, especially those with integrated care experience, reported lower benefits, higher barriers, and fewer resource requests. The implications of these results for enhancing care integration development, delivery, training, and research are discussed along with the study's limitations and empirical literature.