Blood cultures with one venipuncture instead of two: a prospective clinical comparative single-center study including patients in the ICU, haematology, and infectious diseases departments.

OBJECTIVES: Blood culture is a key method for diagnosing bloodstream infections. In this prospective study, we aimed to investigate whether blood cultures collected with the one-puncture method results in fewer contaminants, i.e. microorganisms from the skin or the environment, and the same detection of relevant pathogens compared to the two-puncture method. Further, we aimed to investigate if the time to blood culture positivity could be useful in evaluating contaminants. METHODS: Patients planned for blood cultures were asked to participate in the study. From each recruited patient, six blood culture bottles were drawn, bottles 1-4 from the first venipuncture and bottles 5-6 from the second venipuncture. Within each patient, bottles 1-4 were compared to bottles 1, 2, 5, and 6 for contaminants and relevant pathogens. A sub-analysis was conducted on patients admitted to the ICU and those in the haematology department. We also assessed time-to-positivity for coagulase-negative staphylococci. RESULTS: In the final analysis, 337 episodes from 312 patients were included. Relevant pathogens were identified in 62/337 (18.4%) episodes in both methods. Contaminants were detected in 12 (3.6%) and 19 episodes (5.6%) using the one-puncture and two-puncture method (p = .039), respectively. Corresponding results were observed in the sub-analysis. Notably, relevant coagulase-negative staphylococci demonstrated a shorter time-to-positivity compared to contaminant coagulase-negative staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Blood cultures obtained using the one-puncture method resulted in significantly fewer contaminants and detected relevant pathogens equally to the two-puncture method. Time-to-positivity may be a useful additive indicator for predicting coagulase-negative staphylococci contamination in blood cultures.

[Treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections]. / Handläggning av infektioner vid ortopediska implantat en utmaning för vården.

The Swedish National Guidelines for Bone and Joint Infections were revised during 2018. The work was carried out on behalf of the Swedish Society for Infectious Diseases. The study group consists of senior consultants in infectious diseases, supported by specialists in orthopedic surgery, clinical microbiology and allergology when needed. The study group emphasizes that implant associated infections are challenging and requires multidisciplinary cooperation, including, but not limited to, specialists in orthopedic surgery, infectious diseases, clinical microbiology and radiology for optimal treatment results. All aspects of the clinical management are equally important; selecting the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis in arthroplasty as well as fracture surgery, early diagnosis of infection, adequate treatment, follow-up, and finally a structured evaluation of outcome. Profound and updated knowledge of treatment of biofilm related infection is necessary to achieve optimal results in patients with implant-associated infections. Future challenges include improved decision support for combining surgical treatment with selection of proper antibiotics, as well as management of antibiotic resistance, drug-drug interactions and adverse effects of antibiotic treatment.