Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 388(10048): 994-1001, 2016 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402381

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2015, a large outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection occurred following a single patient exposure in an emergency room at the Samsung Medical Center, a tertiary-care hospital in Seoul, South Korea. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology of MERS-CoV outbreak in our hospital. METHODS: We identified all patients and health-care workers who had been in the emergency room with the index case between May 27 and May 29, 2015. Patients were categorised on the basis of their exposure in the emergency room: in the same zone as the index case (group A), in different zones except for overlap at the registration area or the radiology suite (group B), and in different zones (group C). We documented cases of MERS-CoV infection, confirmed by real-time PCR testing of sputum samples. We analysed attack rates, incubation periods of the virus, and risk factors for transmission. FINDINGS: 675 patients and 218 health-care workers were identified as contacts. MERS-CoV infection was confirmed in 82 individuals (33 patients, eight health-care workers, and 41 visitors). The attack rate was highest in group A (20% [23/117] vs 5% [3/58] in group B vs 1% [4/500] in group C; p<0·0001), and was 2% (5/218) in health-care workers. After excluding nine cases (because of inability to determine the date of symptom onset in six cases and lack of data from three visitors), the median incubation period was 7 days (range 2-17, IQR 5-10). The median incubation period was significantly shorter in group A than in group C (5 days [IQR 4-8] vs 11 days [6-12]; p<0·0001). There were no confirmed cases in patients and visitors who visited the emergency room on May 29 and who were exposed only to potentially contaminated environment without direct contact with the index case. The main risk factor for transmission of MERS-CoV was the location of exposure. INTERPRETATION: Our results showed increased transmission potential of MERS-CoV from a single patient in an overcrowded emergency room and provide compelling evidence that health-care facilities worldwide need to be prepared for emerging infectious diseases. FUNDING: None.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio de Oriente Medio/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Aglomeración , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
Crit Care Med ; 45(6): e552-e558, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28333762

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of targeted interventions on trends in central line-associated bloodstream infection. DESIGN: A before-and-after study between January 2013 and September 2014. SETTING: Tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea. PATIENTS: All patients with central-line catheters in the hospital. INTERVENTIONS: In September 2013, interventions that targeted central line insertion practices were implemented in 10 ICUs, including compliance monitoring with a central line insertion practices bundle and use of an all-inclusive catheter kit. The impact of targeted interventions on trends in central line-associated bloodstream infection was evaluated by segmented autoregression analysis of an interrupted time series. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The average hospital-wide central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in the baseline and intervention periods were 1.84 and 1.56 per 1,000 catheter-days, respectively. During the baseline period, there was an increase of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.12 per 1,000 catheter-days per month. In the intervention period, there was a decrease of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.16 per 1,000 catheter-days per month (change in slope, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.19; p < 0.0001). In ICUs, the average central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in the baseline and intervention periods were 1.92 and 1.64 per 1,000 catheter-days, respectively. During the baseline period, there was an increase of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.18 per 1,000 catheter-days per month in ICUs. After sequential-targeted interventions, there was a decrease of central line-associated bloodstream infection rate of 0.16 per 1,000 catheter-days per month (change in slope, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.18; p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions were associated with significant changes in trends in the occurrence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection in ICUs and the entire hospital.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , República de Corea , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(2): 2253600, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37732552

RESUMEN

The introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine amidst the pandemic has heralded a paradigm shift. Healthcare students in nursing, medicine, and dentistry must have positive attitudes owing to their future role in vaccine recommendations to the public and patients. This meta-regression analysis assessed the differences in COVID-19 vaccination intention (VI) of nursing, medical, and dental students. Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Korean MBASE were searched for eligible studies. Quality was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute's quality appraisal. Forty-one studies were included in the final analysis, and the estimation of pooled prevalence (68%) and relevant factors were assessed. Dental students were found to have the lowest VI (57%), which significantly (p = .018) differed from that of nursing students (64%). Countries in South-East Asia and those with high income levels were found to have high VI. Therefore, global vaccine programs for healthcare students should be prepared considering their geographical and economic status.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Intención , Estudiantes de Odontología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
5.
J Korean Acad Nurs ; 50(5): 658-670, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Coreano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33142298

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the predictors of blood and body fluid exposure (BBFE) in multifaceted individual (sleep disturbance and fatigue), occupational (occupational stress), and organizational (hospital safety climate) factors, as well as infection prevention behavior. We also aimed to test the mediating effect of infection prevention behavior in relation to multifaceted factors and the frequency of BBFE. METHODS: This study was based on a secondary data analysis, using data of 246 nurses from the Shift Work Nurses' Health and Turnover study. Based on the characteristics of zero-inflated and over-dispersed count data of frequencies of BBFE, the data were analyzed to calculate zero-inflated negative binomial regression within a generalized linear model and to test the mediating effect using SPSS 25.0, Stata 14.1, and PROCESS macro. RESULTS: We found that the frequency of BBFE increased in subjects with disturbed sleep (IRR = 1.87, p = .049), and the probability of non-BBFE increased in subjects showing higher infection prevention behavior (IRR = 15.05, p = .006) and a hospital safety climate (IRR = 28.46, p = .018). We also found that infection prevention behavior had mediating effects on the occupational stress-BBFE and hospital safety climate-BBFE relationships. CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbance is an important risk factor related to frequency of BBFE, whereas preventive factors are infection prevention behavior and hospital safety climate. We suggest individual and systemic efforts to improve sleep, occupational stress, and hospital safety climate to prevent BBFE occurrence.


Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Exposición Profesional , Estrés Laboral , Accidentes de Trabajo , Líquidos Corporales , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Seguridad , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos/efectos adversos , Sueño , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(2): 235-237, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050907

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate practical barriers to personal protective equipment (PPE) use found through health care personnel (HCP) training sessions held during and after the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak in Korea. Difficulties observed were ill-fitting sizes, anxiety, confusion from unstandardized protocols, doubts about PPE quality and effectiveness, and complexity of using several PPE items together. Further research to generate robust evidence and repeated HCP trainings are necessary to ensure HCP and patient safety in future outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Personal de Salud , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA