RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, is a key drug for ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important adverse effect of alectinib, which generally requires termination of treatment. However, we treated two patients with drug-induced ILD who continued to receive alectinib. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient 1 was a 57-year-old male with an ALK-rearranged Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who was administered alectinib as first-line therapy. Computed tomography (CT) detected asymptomatic ground-glass opacity (GGO) on day 33 of treatment. Alectinib therapy was therefore discontinued for 7 days and then restarted. GGO disappeared, and the progression of ILD ceased. Patient 2 was a 64-year-old woman with an ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma who was administered alectinib as third-line therapy. One year later, CT detected GGO; and she had a slight, nonproductive cough. Alectinib therapy was continued in the absence of other symptoms, and GGO slightly diminished after 7 days. Two months later, CT detected increased GGO, and alectinib therapy was continued. GGO diminished again after 7 days. The patient has taken alectinib for more than 2 years without progression of ILD. CONCLUSIONS: Certain patients with alectinib-induced ILD Grade 2 or less may continue alectinib therapy if they are closely managed.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbazoles/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Carbazoles/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab administration after chemoradiotherapy as the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in elderly patients aged 75 years or above remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab for LA-NSCLC, with a specific focus on elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 214 patients who received durvalumab out of 278 patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who underwent chemoradiotherapy at 7 institutions between July 2018 and March 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of durvalumab in elderly patients. RESULTS: The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-49.5%) and 77.1% (95% CI, 70.1-82.7%), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 8.2% of patients. PSM analysis revealed that OS was significantly shorter in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) than in younger patients (< 75 years) (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% CI, 1.39-8.99; P = .008), whereas PFS did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (HR: 1.50, 95% CI, 0.84-2.68, P = .169). The frequency of irAEs did not differ between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab administration following chemoradiotherapy for LA-NSCLC coincided with the PACIFIC trial's findings. Disease control achieved with this protocol did not differ significantly between elderly and younger patients but had acceptable tolerability, demonstrating its benefit even in elderly LA-NSCLC patients aged 75 years or above.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although osimertinib is a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the incidence rate of pneumonitis associated with osimertinib is high. However, there are few reports about the safety and efficacy of osimertinib rechallenge after the development of pneumonitis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients who developed pneumonitis associated with osimertinib as a first-line and received osimertinib rechallenge. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of any grade pneumonitis after osimertinib rechallenge. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients after osimertinib rechallenge. RESULTS: In total, 33 patients who received osimertinib rechallenge were included. Of them, 26 patients had grade 1, 6 patients had grade 2, and 1 patient had grade 3 initial pneumonitis. The median follow-up period after the osimertinib rechallenge was 16.9 months (interquartile range, 11.1-21.3 months). After the start of osimertinib rechallenge, five patients (15%) experienced mild relapsed pneumonitis. Three of the five patients had similar imaging patterns for initial and relapsed pneumonitis. No significant differences in characteristics were observed between patients with and without relapsed pneumonitis. The median progression-free survival after osimertinib rechallenge was not achieved (95% confidence interval: 10.3 months - not reached). CONCLUSION: Osimertinib rechallenge was feasible and effective for patients who developed initial pneumonitis associated with first-line osimertinib therapy. Osimertinib might be considered a treatment option even after the development of mild initial pneumonitis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores ErbB/genética , Compuestos de Anilina/efectos adversos , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether findings from pivotal trials can be extrapolated to the clinical practice setting remains unclear. Objective: To compare treatment outcome gaps following first-line chemoimmunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC between those who met and did not meet the eligibility criteria used in previous clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, at 32 hospitals in Japan, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Participants included consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab as first-line therapy. Exposures: Patients who met eligibility criteria for pivotal phase 3 clinical trials were considered trial-eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were differences in progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety according to whether key clinical trial eligibility criteria were met. Results: A total of 207 patients were analyzed (median age, 72 years; range, 46-87 years; 170 [82%] were male). Sixty-four patients (31%) were older adults (age ≥75 years), and most (184 [89%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. There were 132 (64%) trial-eligible patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for all patients was 38.8% (95% CI, 32.4%-45.7%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in trial-eligible patients and 4.7 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .03). The proportion of patients who achieved disease control was 93% (118 of 127) in trial-eligible patients and 77% (55 of 71) in trial-ineligible patients (P = .002). The median overall survival was 15.8 months in trial-eligible patients and 13.1 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.07; P = .10). The rate of severe adverse events was numerically higher among trial-ineligible patients than among trial-eligible patients (39% vs 27%; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the overall treatment outcome was comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials. However, treatment outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy might differ between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. These findings suggest that trial-eligibility criteria may be useful in clinical practice, and further studies using data from clinical practice settings are required to inform regulatory approval and clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Carboplatino/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Osimertinib is the primary treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, evidence of the outcomes of osimertinib treatment in patients over 75 years of age in the real-world setting is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 538 patients (203 elderly and 335 non-elderly) with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer in whom osimertinib was initiated as first-line treatment between August 2018 and December 2019. Patients over 75 years of age were classified as elderly. The data cut-off date was February 28, 2022. RESULTS: The progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the elderly and non-elderly groups [elderly group: median PFS, 16.9 months (95 % confidence interval (CI), 14.3-20.2); non-elderly group: median PFS, 22.1 months (95 % CI: 19.5-26.3); hazard ratio (HR) for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.21 (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50), p = 0.079]. However, the time to treatment failure (TTF) was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly [elderly group: median TTF, 14.0 months (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50); non-elderly group: median TTF, 21.8 months (95 % CI: 18.2-24.6); HR for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.46 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.77), p < 0.001]. Furthermore, the rate of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was 28.6 % in the elderly and 14.9 % in the non-elderly (p < 0.001). Among patients who discontinued treatment, the conversion rate to second-line treatment was 39.6 % in the elderly and 72.8 % in the non-elderly. In addition, the median overall survival was 30 months (95 % CI: 25.8-37.7) in the elderly and not reached (NR) (95 % CI: NR-NR) in the non-elderly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, elderly patients receiving osimertinib as first-line treatment should be aware of the frequent inability to transition to second-line treatment due to adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Receptores ErbB/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib has demonstrated impressive efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (m+) lung cancer. Drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) is a potentially lethal complication of osimertinib treatment, but reliable real-world data currently are lacking. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the prevalence of osimertinib-induced DRP in first-line settings? What are the characteristics, clinical impact, and risk factors of osimertinib-induced DRP? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients who received osimertinib as a first-line treatment for advanced EGFR m+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between August 2018 and December 2019. All chest CT scans and clinical information during osimertinib exposure were collected until June 2020. The primary end point was DRP incidence identified through central review. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients from 18 institutions were evaluated. Eighty patients (18%) had a diagnosis of DRP (all grades), and 21 patients (4.6%) had a diagnosis of grade 3 or more DRP. Among the patients with DRP, 46% were identified as having transient asymptomatic pulmonary opacity (TAPO). Regarding the CT scan patterns, organizing pneumonia, simple pulmonary eosinophilia, hypersensitivity pneumonia, diffuse alveolar damage, and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia were found in 30, 21, 18, 9, and two patients (38%, 26%, 23%, 11%, and 3%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, smoking history was identified as an independent risk factor for DRP (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01-2.89; P = .046). In the 3-month landmark analysis, DRP was associated with poor treatment efficacy; however, the presence of TAPO did not affect treatment efficacy negatively. INTERPRETATION: For osimertinib treatment in first-line settings, the frequency of DRP was considerably elevated to 18 %, and half of these patients exhibited TAPO features.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores ErbB/genética , Mutación , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Introduction: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with poor treatment outcome in patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs and chemotherapy (ICI/Chemo) combination therapy is currently the standard therapy for NSCLC, and some ICI/Chemo regimens for nonsquamous (non-Sq) NSCLC contain bevacizumab (BEV), which is effective for controlling MPE and may enhance immune response. This study aimed to determine the optimal first-line treatment for this clinical population. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE who received ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score more than or equal to 50% who were administered ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 high cohort) and in patients with any PD-L1 status, treated with ICI/Chemo with or without BEV (ICI/Chemo cohort). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias. Results: PD-L1 high and ICI/Chemo cohorts included 143 and 139 patients, respectively. In PD-L1 high cohort, 37 patients received ICI/Chemo. With PSM, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ICI/Chemo group than in the pembrolizumab group (11.1 versus 3.9 mo, respectively, p = 0.0409). In the ICI/Chemo cohort, 23 patients received BEV. With PSM, no significant difference occurred in median progression-free survival between BEV and non-BEV groups (6.1 versus 7.4 mo, p = 0.9610). Conclusion: ICI/Chemo seemed more effective than pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE. Nevertheless, the synergistic effect of BEV with ICI/Chemo may be limited. Further studies are needed to clarify the key factor in the tumor-induced immunosuppression environment in these patients.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor that was initially indicated for monotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. The Japanese Lung Cancer Society conducted an observational study on pembrolizumab using confirmative data obtained through postmarketing all-case surveillance (PMACS), which was performed by a pharmaceutical company under the Japanese law in 2017. Methods: This multicenter observational study was conducted by the Japanese Lung Cancer Society using PMACS data with the newly created central registration system regarding patients with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy between February 1, 2017 and June 30, 2017; a new database was created by adding the clinical information regarding prognosis for 3 years after therapy to the existing data collected by PMACS. Results: A total of 300 patients from 43 facilities were enrolled in this study. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after pembrolizumab initiation were 558 and 188 days, respectively. Moreover, the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 58.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Results of multivariate analysis revealed performance status (p < 0.0001), histology (p = 0.0118), previous chemotherapy (p = 0.0007), programmed death-ligand 1 expression status (p = 0.0195), and previous steroid use (p = 0.0460) as significant factors that affected overall survival. The toxicity profile was similar to that previously reported. Conclusions: In this first attempt to use PMACS data, we successfully collected clinical information and found the real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The incidence of real-world pneumonitis and durvalumab rechallenge during chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab consolidation for non-small cell lung cancer is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 302 consecutive patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer who started chemoradiotherapy between May 2018 and May 2019. RESULTS: Median age was 70 (range: 40-87) years. Volume of lung parenchyma that received 20 Gy (V20) exceeded 35% in 2% and mean lung dose exceeded 20 Gy in 1% of patients. Durvalumab consolidation was delivered to 225 patients (75%). Overall, 83% (n = 251), 34% (n = 103), 7% (n = 21), and 1% (n = 4) of the patients developed any grade of pneumonitis, symptomatic pneumonitis, ≥grade 3 pneumonitis, and fatal (grade 5) pneumonitis, respectively. Corticosteroids were administered to 25% of the patients to treat pneumonitis. Multivariate analysis identified the predictive factors for the development of symptomatic pneumonitis: V20 Gy or more ≥ 25% (odds ratio [OR]: 2.37, P = 0.008) and mean lung dose (MLD) ≥ 10 Gy (OR: 1.93, P < 0.0047). Of the 52 patients who received corticosteroids for pneumonitis after durvalumab initiation, 21 were rechallenged with durvalumab. Overall, 81% of patients met the PACIFIC study's rechallenge criteria and did not experience a severe pneumonitis relapse. CONCLUSION: High V20 and MLD were independent risk factors of symptomatic pneumonitis. More than 80% of the patients who were rechallenged with durvalumab after pneumonitis met the PACIFIC study's rechallenge criteria. Consequently, severe relapse did not occur. Cooperation between radiation and medical oncologists is important for safe chemoradiotherapy and the safe completion of durvalumab consolidation therapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Neumonitis por Radiación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Consolidación , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología , Neumonitis por Radiación/epidemiología , Neumonitis por Radiación/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is the standard of care in the initial treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer. However, clinical data and reliable prognostic biomarkers are insufficient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre cohort study for 538 EGFR mutation-positive patients, who received osimertinib as the initial treatment between August 2018 and December 2019. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median observation period was 14.7 months (interquartile range 11.4-20.0). The median PFS was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.6-not reached). Multivariate analysis showed that sex (male) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.35-2.93, P = 0.001), malignant effusions (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11-2.04, P = 0.008), liver metastasis (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.33, P = 0.037), advanced unresectable cases (HR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.04-2.82, P = 0.036), mutation type and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were associated with PFS. The L858R (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.38, P = 0.043) and uncommon mutations (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.70-5.83, P < 0.001) were associated with PFS. PD-L1 expression of 1-49% (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05-2.63, P = 0.029), ≥50% (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.17-4.30, P = 0.015) and unknown (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.22, P = 0.026) was associated with PFS. The main reasons for treatment discontinuation among 219 patients were disease progression (44.3%), pneumonitis (25.5%) and other adverse events (16.0%). CONCLUSION: During initial treatment with osimertinib, PD-L1 expression is significantly related to PFS. Adverse events are a noteworthy reason for discontinuation.
Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
There have been no report of objective clinical characteristics or prognostic factors that predict fatal outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) since the Berlin definition was published. The aim of this study is to identify clinically available predictors that distinguish between two phenotypes of fatal ARDS due to pneumonia. In total, 104 cases of Japanese patients with pneumonia-induced ARDS were extracted from our prospectively collected database. Fatal cases were divided into early (< 7 days after diagnosis) and late (≥ 7 days) death groups, and clinical variables and prognostic factors were statistically evaluated. Of the 50 patients who died within 180 days, 18 (36%) and 32 (64%) were in the early (median 2 days, IQR [1, 5]) and late (median 16 days, IQR [13, 29]) death groups, respectively. According to multivariate regression analyses, the APACHE II score (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.12-1.39, p < 0.001) and the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for early death. In contrast, late death was associated with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score indicating early fibroproliferation (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.13-1.42, p < 0.001) as well as the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.01-1.52, p = 0.039). The extent of fibroproliferation on HRCT, and the APACHE II scores along with coagulation abnormalities, should be considered for use in predictive enrichment and personalized medicine for patients with ARDS due to pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
APACHE , Infecciones/fisiopatología , Fenotipo , Neumonía/complicaciones , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR driver mutations. Although some patients discontinued these treatments because of adverse events, it is unclear whether switching EGFR-TKI because of adverse events provides a benefit. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated data from 22 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who received at least two EGFR-TKIs that were switched because of adverse events (March 2011 to September 2017). Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) was defined as the time from starting of the first EGFR-TKI treatment to disease progression during the second EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received gefitinib as the first EGFR-TKI treatment, while four patients received afatinib and one patient received erlotinib. The median time to failure of the first EGFR-TKI treatment was 1.6 months. The EGFR-TKIs were switched because of hepatotoxicity (n = 16), interstitial lung disease (n = 3), and other reasons (n = 3). The median washout period was 1.1 months. Seventeen patients received erlotinib as the second EGFR-TKI treatment, while three patients received gefitinib and two patients received afatinib. The median PFS for the second EGFR-TKI treatment was 15.2 months. The median PFS2 was 17.7 months and the median overall survival was 32.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Switching EGFR-TKIs because of adverse events provided a clinical benefit for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Appropriate judgment regarding switching from one EGFR-TKI to another may improve the performance status and prognosis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Receptores ErbB/efectos adversos , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of baseline tumor burden (TB) as a prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and associations between TB and other prognostic biomarkers remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the association between TB and survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs in comparison with other biomarkers. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 83 NSCLC patients with ICIs administered between February 2016 and December 2018. TB was measured as the sum of the unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions. RESULTS: The median observation period was 14.2 months. A total of 42 patients died during the follow-up. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that baseline TB was associated with OS. Cox regression analysis adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) alone or with addition of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and treatment line showed that TB was a prognostic factor for OS. Using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal TB cutoff for predicting OS was 12 cm, and patients were divided into a high TB group (n = 21) and a low TB group (n = 62). The low TB group achieved significantly longer OS than the high TB group (median OS: 18.5 months, [95% CI = 11.7-not reached] vs. 2.3 months [95% CI = 1.3-2.9], P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TB is a useful, clinically measurable prognostic factor of survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated survival benefits, although some treatment responders (defined as patients with non-progressive disease) are forced to discontinue treatment because of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). An association between treatment efficacy and irAEs has been reported. However, it is unclear which treatment responders are likely to develop severe irAEs. We aimed to examine risk factors for ICI-related severe irAEs in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2016 and October 2018, we retrospectively evaluated 42 patients with NSCLC at our institution who responded to ICI treatment. Tumor burden was measured as the sum of the unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: ICIs were discontinued in 15 of 42 treatment responders because of severe irAEs. Tumor burden was a significant independent predictor of severe irAEs (p = 0.03). The odds ratio of severe irAEs and tumor burden over 90 mm was 8.62 (95% confidence interval = 1.96-37.9, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: A high tumor burden was a risk factor for severe irAEs in patients with NSCLC who responded to ICI treatment.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/epidemiología , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Receptores Coestimuladores e Inhibidores de Linfocitos T/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/etiología , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
Leptomeningeal metastasis is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer. Its prognosis is very poor and conventional treatments have limited efficacy. However, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have exhibited high response rates in EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer patients with central nervous system metastases. It has been postulated that this could be due to the penetration of agents into the central nervous system and a high cerebrospinal fluid concentration is a key consideration in measuring treatment effect. Bevacizumab has also been used as an effective therapeutic agent in patients with central nervous system metastases. However, the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor doublet therapy for leptomeningeal metastases and the cerebrospinal fluid penetration of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have yet to be determined. Moreover, the safety of this doublet regimen in patients with a poor general condition is not known. Herein, we report on a case treated with erlotinib plus bevacizumab for leptomeningeal metastases from EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The patient's performance status significantly improved and the cerebrospinal fluid penetration rate of erlotinib plus bevacizumab was equal to or greater than the past reports of erlotinib alone.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Meníngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Meníngeas/secundario , Mutación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Encéfalo/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a life-threatening form of respiratory failure without an established pharmacological treatment. Recently, macrolides have been found to be beneficial in cases of acute lung injury, but evidence is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort evaluation of hospitalized patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome aimed to assess the impact of azithromycin on clinical outcomes by using a propensity score analysis. All data were collected prospectively as part of ongoing research on high-resolution computed tomography of acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary outcome was 60-day mortality; the secondary outcome was the number of ventilator-free days. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 125 patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (23.2 %) received azithromycin within 24 h after acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, azithromycin use was associated with lower 60-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95 % confidence interval, 0.11-082; P = 0.02) and a shorter time to successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin use was associated with decreased mortality and ventilator dependency in patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed.
RESUMEN
Orbital metastasis of lung cancer is rare. It often causes visual disorder. To date, there are only a few case reports. Crizotinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that leads to responses in most patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Visual disorder is one of the popular adverse events of crizotinib, but the symptom almost decreases over time. We report a case of orbital metastasis as the disease progression of ALK-positive lung cancer treated with crizotinib. It should be kept in mind that orbital metastasis can be the disease progression of lung adenocarcinoma with ALK translocation treated with crizotinib. When physicians encounter a patient receiving crizotinib with visual disorder, we must distinguish between adverse events and orbital metastasis.
RESUMEN
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by oculocutaneous albinism, bleeding tendency, and lysosomal accumulation of ceroid-like material, with occasional development of interstitial pneumonia (IP). Nine genetically distinct subtypes of HPS are known in humans; IP develops primarily in types 1 and 4. Most reported cases of HPS with IP are type 1, and there are no published reports of type 4 in Japanese individuals. A 58-year-old man with congenital oculocutaneous albinism and progressive dyspnea for 1 month was admitted to our hospital. We administered high-dose corticosteroids on the basis of a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia. Respiratory symptoms and the findings of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) showed improvement. He was diagnosed with HPS type 4 with interstitial pneumonia on the basis of gene analysis. He has been receiving pirfenidone for 1 year and his condition is stable. This is the first report on the use of pirfenidone for HPS with IP caused by a novel mutation in the HPS4 gene. We conclude that HPS should be suspected in patients with albinism and interstitial pneumonia. High-dose corticosteroid treatment may be useful in cases of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia due to HPS-4, and pirfenidone may be useful and well tolerated in patients with HPS-4.