Point of care assay for blood aripiprazole concentrations: development, validation and utility.

BACKGROUND: The antipsychotic aripiprazole is often used in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. Measuring aripiprazole blood levels provides an objective measure of treatment adherence, but this currently involves taking a venous blood sample and sending to a laboratory for analysis. AIMS: To detail the development, validation and utility of a new point of care (POC) test for finger-stick capillary blood concentrations of aripiprazole. METHOD: Analytical performance (sensitivity, precision, recovery and linearity) of the assay were established using spiked whole blood and control samples of varying aripiprazole concentration. Assay validation was performed over a 14-month period starting in July 2021. Eligible patients were asked to provide a finger-stick capillary sample in addition to their usual venous blood sample. Capillary blood samples were tested by the MyCare™ Insite POC analyser, which provided measurement of aripiprazole concentration in 6 min, and the venous blood sample was tested by the standard laboratory method. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients agreed to measurements by the two methods. Venous blood aripiprazole concentrations as assessed by the laboratory method ranged from 17 to 909 ng/mL, and from 1 to 791 ng/mL using POC testing. The correlation coefficient between the two methods (r) was 0.96 and there was minimal bias (slope 0.91, intercept 4 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: The MyCare Insite POC analyser is sufficiently accurate and reliable for clinical use. The availability of this technology will improve the assessment of adherence to aripiprazole and the optimising of aripiprazole dosing.

Evaluation of a Nanoparticle-Based Busulfan Immunoassay for Rapid Analysis on Routine Clinical Analyzers.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is an alkylating agent used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for various malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan is common because busulfan exposure has been linked to veno-occlusive disease, disease relapse, and failed engraftment. The authors developed an automated immunoassay, along with stable calibrators and controls, and quantified busulfan in sodium heparin plasma. METHODS: The authors evaluated a homogenous nanoparticle immunoassay, the MyCare Oncology Busulfan Assay Kit (Saladax Biomedical, Inc), for precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and linearity on an open channel clinical chemistry analyzer; they compared the method with 2 mass spectrometry methods (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry), using anonymized, remnant patient samples. RESULTS: The coefficients of variation for repeatability and within-laboratory precision were ≤9.0%. The linear range was 150-2000 ng/mL; samples up to 6000 ng/mL can be measured with sample dilution. Measured values deviated by ≤14% from assigned values. Comparison between validated mass spectrometry methods resulted in a correlation coefficient R ≥ 0.995. CONCLUSIONS: The MyCare Busulfan Assay Kit shows the precision, accuracy, linearity, and test range for performing busulfan concentration measurements in sodium heparin plasma on routine clinical chemistry analyzers.

The Alzheimer's Association international guidelines for handling of cerebrospinal fluid for routine clinical measurements of amyloid ß and tau.

The core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid beta (Aß42 and Aß40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau, have been extensively clinically validated, with very high diagnostic performance for AD, including the early phases of the disease. However, between-center differences in pre-analytical procedures may contribute to variability in measurements across laboratories. To resolve this issue, a workgroup was led by the Alzheimer's Association with experts from both academia and industry. The aim of the group was to develop a simplified and standardized pre-analytical protocol for CSF collection and handling before analysis for routine clinical use, and ultimately to ensure high diagnostic performance and minimize patient misclassification rates. Widespread application of the protocol would help minimize variability in measurements, which would facilitate the implementation of unified cut-off levels across laboratories, and foster the use of CSF biomarkers in AD diagnostics for the benefit of the patients.

Randomized study of individualized pharmacokinetically-guided dosing of paclitaxel compared with body-surface area dosing in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS: This prospective, randomized study was initiated to assess the impact of pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided paclitaxel (PTX) dosing on toxicity and efficacy compared with body-surface area (BSA)-based dosing in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 319 stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive 3-weekly carboplatin plus PTX at a starting dose of 175 mg/m2 with subsequent PTX dosing based on either BSA or PK-guided dosing targeting time above a PTX plasma concentration of 0.05 µmol/L (PTXTc > 0.05 ) between 26 and 31 hours. The primary safety endpoint was grade 4 haematological toxicity. The secondary endpoints were neuropathy, objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 275 (86%) patients completed ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy (140 in BSA arm and 135 in PK arm). In cycle 1, with the same PTX dose, average PTXTc > 0.05 was 37 hours (range = 18-57 hours). Over cycles 2-4, patients in the PK arm had significantly lower average PTX doses and exposure compared with the BSA arm (128 vs 161 mg/m2 , P < .0001 and 29 vs 35 hours, P < .0001). PK-guided dosing significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of grade 4 haematological toxicity (15% vs 24%, P = .004), grade 4 neutropenia (15% vs 23%, P = .009) and grade ≥ 2 neuropathy (8% vs 21%, P = .005). Objective response rate (32% vs 26%, P = .28) and overall survival (21.0 vs 24.0 months, P = .815) were similar in PK and BSA arms. Progression-free survival was slightly improved in PK arm (4.67 vs 4.17 months, P = .026). CONCLUSION: PK-guided PTX dosing significantly reduced grade 4 haematological toxicities and grade ≥ 2 neuropathy without an adverse impact on clinical outcomes.

Validation of a Commercial Assay and Decision Support Tool for Routine Paclitaxel Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM).

BACKGROUND: The value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for paclitaxel (PTX) was recently demonstrated in the largest TDM trial ever conducted in oncology. The trial demonstrated significant reduction in neuropathy when using TDM. Dose adjustment for PTX was based on time above a threshold concentration (Tc>0.05). Tc>0.05 must be calculated with a pharmacokinetic model and complex nonlinear mixed-effects software. The use of the software and chromatographic methods to measure PTX requires specialized expertise. User-friendly methods to quantitate PTX and calculate Tc>0.05 could simplify the introduction of TDM into routine clinical practice. METHODS: The immunoassay (MyPaclitaxel) was used to quantitate PTX in samples from the clinical trial; the results were used to calculate Tc>0.05 using a stand-alone computer program with a simple, friendly graphical user interface for nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic calculations (MyCare Drug Exposure Calculator). The resulting dose recommendations from the calculated Tc>0.05 were compared with those using liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection and NONMEM to examine the efficacy of the simpler tools for TDM. RESULTS: There was a good agreement between the immunoassay and liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection: Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.045 and intercept was -6.00, R was 0.9757, and mean bias was -1.77 ng/mL (-2.07 nmol/L). Dosing recommendations were identical for 70% of the cycles and within 10% for 89% of the samples. All Tc>0.05 values were at the same or adjacent medical decision points. CONCLUSIONS: MyPaclitaxel assay and MyCare Drug Exposure Calculator are convenient, user-friendly tools that may be suitable for routine TDM of PTX in clinical care.

Rapid Homogeneous Immunoassay to Quantify Gemcitabine in Plasma for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine) is a nucleoside analog used as a single agent and in combination regimens for the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. Several studies have shown a relationship between gemcitabine peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and hematological toxicity. An immunoassay for gemcitabine in plasma was developed and validated to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by providing an economical, robust method for automated chemistry analyzers. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody was coated on nanoparticles to develop a homogenous agglutination inhibition assay. To prevent ex vivo degradation of gemcitabine in blood, tetrahydrouridine was used as a sample stabilizer. Validation was conducted for precision, recovery, cross-reactivity, and linearity on a Beckman Coulter AU480. Verification was performed on an AU5800 in a hospital laboratory. A method comparison was performed with (LC-MS/MS) liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using clinical samples. Selectivity was demonstrated by testing cross-reactivity of the major metabolite, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation for repeatability and within-laboratory precision were <8%. The deviation between measured and assigned values was <3%. Linear range was from 0.40 to 33.02 µ/mL (1.5-125.5 µM). Correlation with validated LC-MS/MS methods was R = 0.977. The assay was specific for gemcitabine: there was no cross-reactivity to 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, chemotherapeutics, concomitant, or common medications tested. Tetrahydrouridine was packaged in single-use syringes. Gemcitabine stability in whole blood was extended to 8 hours (at room temperature) and in plasma to 8 days (2-8°C). CONCLUSIONS: The assay demonstrated the selectivity, test range, precision, and linearity to perform reliable measurements of gemcitabine in plasma. The addition of stabilizer improved the sample handling. Using general clinical chemistry analyzers, gemcitabine could be measured for TDM.

Assessing the commutability of reference material formats for the harmonization of amyloid-ß measurements.

BACKGROUND: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-ß (Aß42) peptide is an important biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Variability in measured Aß42 concentrations at different laboratories may be overcome by standardization and establishing traceability to a reference system. Candidate certified reference materials (CRMs) are validated herein for this purpose. METHODS: Commutability of 16 candidate CRM formats was assessed across five CSF Aß42 immunoassays and one mass spectrometry (MS) method in a set of 48 individual clinical CSF samples. Promising candidate CRM formats (neat CSF and CSF spiked with Aß42) were identified and subjected to validation across eight (Elecsys, EUROIMMUN, IBL, INNO-BIA AlzBio3, INNOTEST, MSD, Simoa, and Saladax) immunoassays and the MS method in 32 individual CSF samples. Commutability was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression and the candidate CRM termed commutable when found within the prediction interval (PI). The relative distance to the regression line was assessed. RESULTS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for almost all method comparisons, except for the Simoa/MSD, Simoa/MS and MS/IBL where it was found just outside the 95% PI. However, the neat CSF was found within 5% relative distance to the regression line for MS/IBL, between 5% and 10% for Simoa/MS and between 10% and 15% for Simoa/MSD comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for 33 of 36 method comparisons, only one comparison more than expected given the 95% PI acceptance limit. We conclude that the neat CSF candidate CRM can be used for value assignment of the kit calibrators for the different Aß42 methods.

Excel-Based Tool for Pharmacokinetically Guided Dose Adjustment of Paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia is a frequent and severe adverse event in patients receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy. The time above a paclitaxel threshold concentration of 0.05 µmol/L (Tc > 0.05 µmol/L) is a strong predictor for paclitaxel-associated neutropenia and has been proposed as a target pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter for paclitaxel therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adaptation. Up to now, individual Tc > 0.05 µmol/L values are estimated based on a published PK model of paclitaxel by using the software NONMEM. Because many clinicians are not familiar with the use of NONMEM, an Excel-based dosing tool was developed to allow calculation of paclitaxel Tc > 0.05 µmol/L and give clinicians an easy-to-use tool. METHODS: Population PK parameters of paclitaxel were taken from a published PK model. An Alglib VBA code was implemented in Excel 2007 to compute differential equations for the paclitaxel PK model. Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimates of the PK parameters were determined with the Excel Solver using individual drug concentrations. Concentrations from 250 patients were simulated receiving 1 cycle of paclitaxel chemotherapy. Predictions of paclitaxel Tc > 0.05 µmol/L as calculated by the Excel tool were compared with NONMEM, whereby maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimates were obtained using the POSTHOC function. RESULTS: There was a good concordance and comparable predictive performance between Excel and NONMEM regarding predicted paclitaxel plasma concentrations and Tc > 0.05 µmol/L values. Tc > 0.05 µmol/L had a maximum bias of 3% and an error on precision of <12%. The median relative deviation of the estimated Tc > 0.05 µmol/L values between both programs was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The Excel-based tool can estimate the time above a paclitaxel threshold concentration of 0.05 µmol/L with acceptable accuracy and precision. The presented Excel tool allows reliable calculation of paclitaxel Tc > 0.05 µmol/L and thus allows target concentration intervention to improve the benefit-risk ratio of the drug. The easy use facilitates therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical routine.

An Automated Homogeneous Immunoassay for Quantitating Imatinib Concentrations in Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib pharmacokinetic variability and the relationship of trough concentrations with clinical outcomes have been extensively reported. Although physical methods to quantitate imatinib exist, they are not widely available for routine use. An automated homogenous immunoassay for imatinib has been developed, facilitating routine imatinib testing. METHODS: Imatinib-selective monoclonal antibodies, without substantial cross-reactivity to the N-desmethyl metabolite or N-desmethyl conjugates, were produced. The antibodies were conjugated to 200 nm particles to develop immunoassay reagents on the Beckman Coulter AU480 analyzer. These reagents were analytically validated using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Method comparison to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was conducted using 77 plasma samples collected from subjects receiving imatinib. RESULTS: The assay requires 4 µL of sample without pretreatment. The nonlinear calibration curve ranges from 0 to 3000 ng/mL. With automated sample dilution, concentrations of up to 9000 ng/mL can be quantitated. The AU480 produces the first result in 10 minutes and up to 400 tests per hour. Repeatability ranged from 2.0% to 6.0% coefficient of variation, and within-laboratory reproducibility ranged from 2.9% to 7.4% coefficient of variation. Standard curve stability was 2 weeks and on-board reagent stability was 6 weeks. For clinical samples with imatinib concentrations from 438 to 2691 ng/mL, method comparison with LC-MS/MS gave a slope of 0.995 with a y-intercept of 24.3 and a correlation coefficient of 0.978. CONCLUSIONS: The immunoassay is suitable for quantitating imatinib in human plasma, demonstrating good correlation with a physical method. Testing for optimal imatinib exposure can now be performed on routine clinical analyzers.

An automated nanoparticle-based homogeneous immunoassay for determining docetaxel concentrations in plasma.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere) (DTX) is a widely used chemotherapy agent used in many regimens for the treatment of solid tumors, for example breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gastric, prostate, and head and neck cancers. This drug meets the criteria for therapeutic dose management, in that it is associated with high pharmacokinetic variability and dose-limiting toxicity; it has a narrow therapeutic window, and there is a significant pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship. Measures of exposure and area under the time-concentration curve have been associated with both toxicity and outcomes, making therapeutic dose management for this drug an unmet clinical need. The current methodologies for measuring DTX are based on physical methods, making the analysis less available and costly. An automated immunoassay has been developed to provide greater access to DTX dose management. METHODS: A DTX immunoassay (MyDocetaxel) has been developed using a generic nanoparticle turbidimetric method that can be used on a wide variety of automated clinical chemistry analyzers including the Beckman Coulter AU400 and AU640 instruments, which were used in this study. The assay is based on a competitive assay format using a selective DTX monoclonal antibody. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols for establishing manufacturer's claims were used to verify performance. Testing at 3 clinical laboratories was undertaken using the same protocols for laboratory validation of precision, accuracy, and linearity. Method comparison (n = 89) was done using samples collected from patients on DTX therapy. The comparative method was LC-MS/MS validated according to Food and Drug Administration guidance on bioanalytical methods. Institutional review board approval was obtained for prospective collection of samples from patients on DTX therapy. RESULTS: The assay on the AU400 uses 2 µL of sample, provides the first result in 9.0 minutes and can generate 400 determinations per hour. Internal studies established a lower limit of detection ≤25 ng/mL and a lower limit of quantitation ≤30 ng/mL. Additional studies demonstrated no interference from coadministered drugs, major metabolites, or related compounds. Linearity from 50 to 1000 ng/mL was validated. Method comparisons between laboratories and to the physical method gave slopes: 1 ± 0.5, intercepts: < 2.0 ng/mL, R > 0.99, with the range of DTX concentrations measured by the assay 31-9754 ng/mL, with a mean of 689 ng/mL. In all 3 laboratories, the coefficient of variation percentage for repeatability ranged from 0.8% to 6.2% and the within-laboratory precision ranged from 1.4% to 10.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This immunoassay is suitable for quantifying DTX in plasma with advantages of small sample size, no sample pretreatment, and the ability to be applied to a wide range of clinical analyzers. With the validation of this method, the application of DTX testing in clinical practice may gain wider acceptance for individualizing patient DTX dosing.

Development and evaluation of a nanoparticle-based immunoassay for determining paclitaxel concentrations on routine clinical analyzers.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (PTX; Taxol, Abraxane) is used in many regimens for breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ovarian cancer. Multiple studies have demonstrated that PTX exhibits a greater than 10-fold interpatient variability of clearance rates when patients are dosed according to body surface area (BSA). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships have been elucidated from BSA-based dosing. PTX is a candidate for dose management, and studies have shown that therapeutic dose management (TDM) is feasible and may provide improved outcomes for patients undergoing treatment. METHODS: A PTX immunoassay (MyPaclitaxel) has been developed, which employs a novel PTX monoclonal antibody in a nanoparticle-based turbidimetric assay in a competitive format. Precision, accuracy, and linearity were evaluated by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols at 3 laboratories on the Olympus AU400 analyzer. Method comparison was done versus a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy method using samples (n = 119) collected from patients on PTX therapy. RESULTS: The assay requires 8 µL of plasma sample and can produce 400 determinations per hour. The response curve is based on a 6-point nonlinear curve fit and has a range of 0-320 ng/mL, extended to 3200 ng/mL with 10-fold autodilution. Three controls and 4 patient pools were used in precision studies. For all samples across 3 sites, repeatability coefficient of variation percentages ranged 0.9%-4.9%, and within-laboratory coefficient of variation percentages were 1.0%-4.2% with standard curve stability up to 24 days. Linearity was demonstrated over the linear range. Lower limits of detection and quantitation were 11 and 19 ng/mL, respectively. Method comparison results were analyzed by Deming regression, demonstrating a slope = 1.002 and intercept = -3.029 and an R = 0.996. The PTX samples ranged from 24 to 3164 ng/mL with a mean of 745 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of an automated immunoassay for PTX has been validated and may serve as a useful tool for TDM of this drug.

Paclitaxel exposure-toxicity analysis reveals a pharmacokinetic determinant for dose-limiting neutropenia in East-Asian solid tumor patients: results from two prospective, phase II studies.

PURPOSE: The time of a paclitaxel (PTX) concentration remains above 0.05 µM (Tc > 0.05) has been associated with PTX-induced adverse effects in Caucasians, while limited studies were reported in Asians. This study was aimed to explore the characteristics of Tc > 0.05 and the relationship between PTX exposure and toxicity in East-Asian patients. METHODS: This study was based on two prospective phase II clinical trials and patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were naïve to PTX were included independently. Eligible patients receive PTX (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) treatment every 3 weeks. PTX pharmacokinetic analysis was accessed. The relationship between PTX exposure and toxicities after first cycle as well as clinical efficacy was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 93 NPC and 40 NSCLC patients were enrolled. PTX exposure was consistent in two trials with average Tc > 0.05 duration of 38.8 h and 38.4 h, respectively. Average Tc > 0.05 in patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly higher than those without severe neutropenia in NPC patients (P = 0.003) and NSCLC patients (P = 0.007). Cut-off value of Tc > 0.05 were identified from the NPC cohort and then verified in the NSCLC cohort, dividing patients into high exposure Tc > 0.05 group (> 39 h) and low exposure group (≤ 39 h). Incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia were significantly higher in the high exposure group in NPC cohort (43.3% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001) and NSCLC cohort (42.1% vs 9.5%, P = 0.028). No significant relationship between Tc > 0.05 and efficacy were observed. CONCLUSION: Patients with PTX Tc > 0.05 duration above 39 h experience more severe neutropenia than those under 39 h. Prospective studies are needed to verify this threshold.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology consensus guidelines for imatinib therapy.

Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool in guiding drug dosing for other areas of medicine including infectious diseases, cardiology, psychiatry and transplant medicine, it has not gained wide acceptance in oncology. For imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a flat dosing approach is utilised for management of oral chemotherapy. There are many published studies examining the correlation of blood concentrations with clinical effects of imatinib. The International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) determined that there was a need to examine the published literature regarding utility of TDM in imatinib therapy and to develop consensus guidelines for TDM based on the available data. This article summarises the scientific evidence regarding TDM of imatinib, as well as the consensus guidelines developed by the IATDMCT.

Point-of-care measurement of clozapine concentration using a finger-stick blood sample.

BACKGROUND: The use of clozapine demands regular monitoring of clozapine plasma concentrations and of white blood cell parameters. The delay between sending blood samples for analysis and receiving the results hinders clinical care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) can provide drug assay results within a few minutes. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the utility of a novel point-of-care device that can measure clozapine concentrations using capillary blood samples collected via a finger stick. METHOD: During a five-week period starting in June 2019 eligible patients were asked to provide a finger-stick capillary sample in addition to their usual venous blood sample. Samples were analysed by the novel point-of-care device and by the standard laboratory method. Capillary blood samples were tested by the MyCare™ Insite POCT analyser, and a quantitative measurement of clozapine concentration was provided within six minutes. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients agreed to measurements by the two methods. Analysis revealed clozapine concentrations in venous blood as determined by the laboratory method ranged from 20 to 1310 ng/mL and by POCT from 7 to 1425 ng/mL. There was a strong positive correlation (R = 0.89) between the results from the venous and the capillary sample methods. The slope of the association between standard assay and MyCare™ Insite was 1.0 with an intercept of -21 ng/mL, indicating minimal bias. CONCLUSION: Clozapine concentrations can be accurately measured at the point of care using capillary blood samples collected via a finger stick. This approach may be more acceptable than venous sampling to patients and, with almost instant results available, more useful to clinicians.

Determination of busulfan in human plasma using an ELISA format.

High-dose busulfan is an important component of many bone marrow transplantation-preparative regimens. High busulfan plasma levels have been shown to increase the chance of venoocclusive disease and low levels are associated with recurrence of disease or graft rejection. Currently, busulfan levels are monitored by physical methods that are expensive and time consuming, resulting in relatively low overall use of busulfan testing for dose adjustment. Novel highly selective antibodies for busulfan have been generated and a microtiter plate immunoassay capable of quantifying busulfan levels in plasma has been developed. The assay was configured using a busulfan-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate as the reporter group and busulfan monoclonal antibodies. The assay requires 30 microL of plasma with no sample preparation. The immunoassay has a standard curve based on busulfan with a range of 75-2000 ng/mL. The time to first result is 30 minutes with up to 40 patient samples in duplicate; multiple plates can be run at once. The coefficient of variation (CV) on signal is <5% for an entire plate, and the 95% confidence interval for negative samples (n = 78) is below the lowest calibrator of 75 ng/mL. Cross-reactivity with the major inactive metabolites (tetrahydrothiophene, tetramethyl sulfone, and tetrahydrothiophene-3-ol-1,1-dioxide) was <0.1%. Results generated with clinical samples (n = 35 and n = 70) correlate well to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (R = 0.976 and 0.985, respectively) with a slope of 1.05 +/- 0.05. This immunoassay method is suitable for determining levels of busulfan in human plasma. It offers the advantages of using a smaller sample size, does not require sample preparation, and is less labor intensive than other methods. The ability to make 240 determinations per hour enables effective and timely routine monitoring of busulfan levels in clinical practice.

Multicenter evaluation of a novel nanoparticle immunoassay for 5-fluorouracil on the Olympus AU400 analyzer.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most widely used chemotherapy drug, primarily against gastrointestinal, head and neck, and breast cancers. 5-FU has large pharmacokinetic variability resulting in unexpected toxicity or ineffective treatment. Therapeutic drug management of 5-FU minimizes toxicity and improves outcome. A nanoparticle-based immunoassay was developed to provide oncologists with a rapid, cost-effective tool for determining 5-FU plasma concentrations. METHODS: Monoclonal antibodies, bound to nanoparticles, were used to develop an immunoassay for the Olympus AU400. Assay precision, linearity, calibration stability, and limit of detection were run at multiple centers; interference, cross-reactivity, lower limit of quantitation and recovery at 1 center. Clinical samples collected from 4 cancer centers were analyzed for 5-FU concentrations by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and compared with the immunoassay results. RESULTS: With calibrators from 0 to 1800 ng/mL 5-FU and autodilution, concentrations up to 9000 ng/mL could be determined. Time to first result was 10 minutes, and 400 samples per hour could be quantitated from a standard curve stored for >30 days. Imprecision across all laboratories was <5%, and the assay was linear upon dilution over the entire range. Cross-reactivities for dihydro-5-FU, uracil, capecitabine, and tegafur were <1%, 9.9%, 0.05%, and 0.23%, respectively. The limit of detection was 52 ng/mL with a lower limit of quantitation of 86 ng/mL. Assay results of clinical samples (93-1774 ng/mL) correlated with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry results: (R = 0.9860, slope 1.035, intercept 10.87 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: This novel immunoassay is suitable for quantitating 5-FU plasma concentrations with advantages of speed, small sample size, minimal sample pretreatment, and application on automated instrumentation. These advantages enable efficient therapeutic drug management of 5-FU in clinical practice.

All Optimal Dosing Roads Lead to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Why Take the Slow Lane.

This Viewpoint discusses therapeutic drug monitoring as a necessary treatment paradigm and the need for regulatory agencies to provide the conditions to make it happen.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of 5-Fluorouracil Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated in Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapy drugs leads to significant individual exposure variability, with a substantial risk of under- or overdosing. The present study was initiated to validate the use of therapeutic drug management (TDM) to personalize 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from 8 German medical centers received ≤ 6 administrations of infusional 5-FU according to the AIO (folinate, 5-FU; n = 16), FOLFOX6 (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], 5-FU, and oxaliplatin; n = 26), or FUFOX (oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/folinic acid; n = 33) regimen. Initial infusional 5-FU dosing for all patients was determined by the BSA. Individual 5-FU exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) was measured using an immunoassay of a blood sample taken during each infusion. To achieve a target AUC of 20 to 30 mg × h/L, subsequent infusional 5-FU doses were adjusted according to the previous cycle's 5-FU AUC. The primary objective was to confirm that TDM of infusional 5-FU resulted in an increased proportion of patients in the target AUC range at the fourth versus the first administration. The secondary objective was to determine whether 5-FU TDM reduced the treatment-related toxicities compared with the historical data. RESULTS: The average 5-FU AUC at the first administration was 18 ± 6 mg × h/L, with 64%, 33%, and 3% of the patients below, within, or above the target AUC range, respectively. By the fourth administration, the average 5-FU AUC was 25 ± 7 mg × h/L (P < .001), with 54% of patients within the target 5-FU AUC range (P = .0294). The incidence of 5-FU-related grade 3 and 4 diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (3.4%), fatigue (0.0%), and mucositis (0.2%) was reduced compared with the historical data, despite 55% of the patients receiving increased doses. CONCLUSION: Personalization of 5-FU dosing using TDM in routine clinical practice resulted in significantly improved 5-FU exposure and suggested a lower incidence of 5-FU-related toxicities.