Between-hospital and between-neighbourhood variance in trauma outcomes: cross-sectional observational evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area.

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in treatment outcomes for traumatic injury are an important concern for care providers and policy makers. Factors that may influence these disparities include differences in risk exposure based on neighbourhood of residence and differences in quality of care between hospitals in different areas. This study examines geographical disparities within a single region: the Detroit metropolitan area. DESIGN: Data on all trauma admissions between 2006 and 2014 were obtained from the Michigan State Inpatient Database. Admissions were grouped by patient neighbourhood of residence and admitting hospital. Generalised linear mixed modelling procedures were used to determine the extent of shared variance based on these two levels of categorisation on three outcomes. Patients with trauma due to common mechanisms (falls, firearms and motor vehicle traffic) were examined as additional subgroups. SETTING: 66 hospitals admitting patients for traumatic injury in the Detroit metropolitan area during the period from 2006 to 2014. PARTICIPANTS: 404 675 adult patients admitted for treatment of traumatic injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality, length of stay and hospital charges. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that there was substantial shared variance in outcomes based on hospital, but not based on neighbourhood of residence. Among all injury types, hospital-level differences accounted for 12.5% of variance in mortality risk, 28.5% of variance in length of stay and 32.2% of variance in hospital charges. Adjusting the results for patient age, injury severity, mechanism and comorbidities did not result in significant reduction in the estimated variance at the hospital level. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, geographical disparities in trauma treatment outcomes were more strongly attributable to differences in access to quality hospital care than to risk factors in the neighbourhood environment. Transfer of high-risk cases to hospitals with greater institutional experience in the relevant area may help address mortality disparities in particular.

Donation after circulatory determination of death: the university of michigan experience with extracorporeal support.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal support (ECS) during organ procurement from donors after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) could increase the number of donor organs and decrease posttransplant complications. This study reports the experience of a large transplant center with controlled DCDD. METHODS: A retrospective review of all potential controlled-DCDD cases between October 1, 2000 and July 31, 2013 was performed. We focused on methods, ethical and practical issues, and recipient outcome data of organs procured and transplanted in our institution using ECS-assisted DCDD (E-DCDD). RESULTS: ECS was used for organ procurement in 37 controlled DCDD. The number of organs procured per donor was 2.59, and the number of organs transplanted per donor was 1.68. Delayed graft function occurred in 31% of renal grafts. In three donors (8%), organ donation was not completed because of surgeon judgment. Forty-eight renal grafts (65.8%), thirteen livers (61.9%), and one pancreas (50%) were successfully transplanted. CONCLUSIONS: ECS can be routinely implemented in controlled DCDD. In our experience, the organs provided per donor was 2.59. Widely applied, EDCDD could result in more donor organs, especially when applied to DCDD in uncontrolled conditions.