American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm - 2023 Update.

OBJECTIVE: This consensus statement provides (1) visual guidance in concise graphic algorithms to assist with clinical decision-making of health care professionals in the management of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus to improve patient care and (2) a summary of details to support the visual guidance found in each algorithm. METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) selected a task force of medical experts who updated the 2020 AACE Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm based on the 2022 AACE Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan and consensus of task force authors. RESULTS: This algorithm for management of persons with type 2 diabetes includes 11 distinct sections: (1) Principles for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes; (2) Complications-Centric Model for the Care of Persons with Overweight/Obesity; (3) Prediabetes Algorithm; (4) Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Algorithm: Dyslipidemia; (5) Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Algorithm: Hypertension; (6) Complications-Centric Algorithm for Glycemic Control; (7) Glucose-Centric Algorithm for Glycemic Control; (8) Algorithm for Adding/Intensifying Insulin; (9) Profiles of Antihyperglycemic Medications; (10) Profiles of Weight-Loss Medications (new); and (11) Vaccine Recommendations for Persons with Diabetes Mellitus (new), which summarizes recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning with the 2022 AACE diabetes guideline update, this 2023 diabetes algorithm update emphasizes lifestyle modification and treatment of overweight/obesity as key pillars in the management of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus and highlights the importance of appropriate management of atherosclerotic risk factors of dyslipidemia and hypertension. One notable new theme is an emphasis on a complication-centric approach, beyond glucose levels, to frame decisions regarding first-line pharmacologic choices for the treatment of persons with diabetes. The algorithm also includes access/cost of medications as factors related to health equity to consider in clinical decision-making.

Treatment of recurrent and persistent Cushing's disease after first transsphenoidal surgery: lessons learned from an international meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the first-line treatment for patients with Cushing's Disease (CD). Recurrence rates after a first TSS range between 3 and 22% within 3 years. Management of recurrent or persistent CD may include repeat TSS or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We performed a meta-analysis to explore the overall efficacy of TSS and SRS for patients with CD after an initial surgical intervention. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched from their dates-of-inception up to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were comprised of patients with an established diagnosis of CD who presented with persistent or biochemically recurrent disease after a first TSS for tumor resection and were treated with a second TSS or SRS. RESULTS: Search criteria yielded 2,116 studies of which 37 articles from 15 countries were included for analysis. Mean age ranged between 29.9 and 47.9 years, and mean follow-up was 11-104 months. TSS was used in 669 (67.7%) patients, while SRS was used in 320 (32.4%) patients, and remission rates for CD were 59% (95%CI 0.49-0.68) and 74% (95%CI 0.54-0.88), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the remission rate between TSS and SRS (P = 0.15). The remission rate of patients with recurrent CD undergoing TSS was 53% (95%CI 0.32-0.73), and for persistent CD was 41% (95%CI 0.28-0.56) (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Both TSS and SRS are possible approaches for the treatment of recurrent or persistent CD after a first TSS. Our data show that either TSS or SRS represent viable treatment options to achieve remission for this subset of patients.

Oral Octreotide: A Review of Recent Clinical Trials and Practical Recommendations for Its Use in the Treatment of Patients With Acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is characterized by chronic growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) hypersecretion, often caused by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Even though surgery remains the first line of treatment, medical therapy is essential if surgery is contraindicated, does not achieve remission, or does not prevent recurrence despite apparent surgical remission. Oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) that combine octreotide with a transient permeability enhancer technology are the first oral somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) approved in the United States for acromegaly. METHODS: We review the literature and clinical trial data on OOC therapy in patients with acromegaly and discuss the clinical assessment of OOC use, potential drug-drug interactions, drug initiation, dose titration, and monitoring of drug efficacy and tolerability. RESULTS: In 4 pivotal clinical trials involving 238 patients with acromegaly treated with OOC, effective suppression of serum GH and IGF-1 levels, maintenance of disease control, decreased breakthrough symptoms and symptomatic improvement with non-inferiority of OOCs to injectable SRLs in maintaining biochemical response was seen. Additionally, the safety profile of OOC therapy is comparable to that of injectable SRLs. Most patients who completed the clinical trials of OOCs have also expressed preference for oral compared with injectable SRL administration. CONCLUSION: OOCs are an effective treatment option for patients with acromegaly who previously responded to injectable SRLs, with the benefits of avoiding injection-related side effects. This article provides a review of the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy and offers practical recommendations on the use of OOCs to treat injectable SRL-responsive patients with acromegaly.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: Evaluation and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Endocrinopathies: A Practical Case-Based Clinical Approach.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case-based clinical review was to provide a practical approach for clinicians regarding the management of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-mediated endocrinopathies. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted using appropriate keywords. The discussions and strategies for the diagnosis and management of ICI-mediated endocrinopathies are based on evidence available from prospective, randomized clinical studies; cohort studies; cross-sectional studies; case-based studies; and an expert consensus. RESULTS: Immunotherapy with ICIs has transformed the treatment landscape of diverse types of cancers but frequently results in immune-mediated endocrinopathies that can cause acute and persistent morbidity and, rarely, death. The patterns of endocrinopathies differ between the inhibitors of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death protein 1 ligand pathways but most often involve the thyroid and pituitary glands. The less common but important presentations include insulin-deficient diabetes mellitus, primary adrenal insufficiency, primary hypoparathyroidism, central diabetes insipidus, primary hypogonadism, and pancreatitis, with or without subsequent progression to diabetes mellitus or exocrine insufficiency. CONCLUSION: In recent years, with increasing numbers of patients with cancer being treated with ICIs, more clinicians in a variety of specialties have been called upon to diagnose and treat ICI-mediated endocrinopathies. Herein, we reviewed case scenarios of various clinical manifestations and emphasized the need for a high index of clinical suspicion by all clinicians caring for these patients, including endocrinologists, oncologists, primary care providers, and emergency department physicians. We also provided diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ICI-induced endocrinopathies and proposed that patients on ICI therapy be evaluated and treated by a multidisciplinary team in collaboration with endocrinologists.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers. METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development. RESULTS: This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

A Telehealth-supported, Integrated care with CHWs, and MEdication-access (TIME) Program for Diabetes Improves HbA1c: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many individuals with diabetes live in low- or middle-income settings. Glycemic control is challenging, particularly in resource-limited areas that face numerous healthcare barriers. OBJECTIVE: To compare HbA1c outcomes for individuals randomized to TIME, a Telehealth-supported, Integrated care with CHWs (Community Health Workers), and MEdication-access program (intervention) versus usual care (wait-list control). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Low-income Latino(a) adults with type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: TIME consisted of (1) CHW-participant telehealth communication via mobile health (mHealth) for 12 months, (2) CHW-led monthly group visits for 6 months, and (3) weekly CHW-physician diabetes training and support via telehealth (video conferencing). MAIN MEASURES: Investigators compared TIME versus control participant baseline to month 6 changes of HbA1c (primary outcome), blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), weight, and adherence to seven American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care. CHW assistance in identifying barriers to healthcare in the intervention group were measured at the end of mHealth communication (12 months). KEY RESULTS: A total of 89 individuals participated. TIME individuals compared to control participants had significant HbA1c decreases (9.02 to 7.59% (- 1.43%) vs. 8.71 to 8.26% (- 0.45%), respectively, p = 0.002), blood pressure changes (systolic: - 6.89 mmHg vs. 0.03 mmHg, p = 0.023; diastolic: - 3.36 mmHg vs. 0.2 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.046), and ADA guideline adherence (p < 0.001) from baseline to month 6. At month 6, more TIME than control participants achieved > 0.50% HbA1c reductions (88.57% vs. 43.75%, p < 0.001). BMI and weight changes were not significant between groups. Many (54.6%) TIME participants experienced > 1 barrier to care, of whom 91.7% had medication issues. CHWs identified the majority (87.5%) of barriers. CONCLUSIONS: TIME participants resulted in improved outcomes including HbA1c. CHWs are uniquely positioned to identify barriers to care particularly related to medications that may have gone unrecognized otherwise. Larger trials are needed to determine the scalability and sustainability of the intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT03394456, accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03394456.

Managing pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia: a randomized, open-label, Phase IV study.

PURPOSE: Pasireotide is an effective treatment for acromegaly and Cushing's disease, although treatment-emergent hyperglycemia can occur. The objective of this study was to assess incretin-based therapy versus insulin for managing pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia uncontrolled by metformin/other permitted oral antidiabetic drugs. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase IV study comprising a core phase (≤ 16-week pre-randomization period followed by 16-week randomized treatment period) and optional extension (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02060383). Adults with acromegaly (n = 190) or Cushing's disease (n = 59) received long-acting (starting 40 mg IM/28 days) or subcutaneous pasireotide (starting 600 µg bid), respectively. Patients with increased fasting plasma glucose (≥ 126 mg/dL on three consecutive days) during the 16-week pre-randomization period despite metformin/other oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized 1:1 to open-label incretin-based therapy (sitagliptin followed by liraglutide) or insulin for another 16 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the difference in mean change in HbA1c from randomization to end of core phase between incretin-based therapy and insulin treatment arms. RESULTS: Eighty-one (32.5%) patients were randomized to incretin-based therapy (n = 38 received sitagliptin, n = 28 subsequently switched to liraglutide; n = 12 received insulin as rescue therapy) or insulin (n = 43). Adjusted mean change in HbA1c between treatment arms was - 0.28% (95% CI - 0.63, 0.08) in favor of incretin-based therapy. The most common AE other than hyperglycemia was diarrhea (incretin-based therapy, 28.9%; insulin, 30.2%). Forty-six (18.5%) patients were managed on metformin (n = 43)/other OAD (n = 3), 103 (41.4%) patients did not require any oral antidiabetic drugs and 19 patients (7.6%) were receiving insulin at baseline and were not randomized. CONCLUSION: Many patients receiving pasireotide do not develop hyperglycemia requiring oral antidiabetic drugs. Metformin is an effective initial treatment, followed by incretin-based therapy if needed. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02060383.

A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines.

Guidelines and consensus statements ensure that physicians managing acromegaly patients have access to current information on evidence-based treatments to optimize outcomes. Given significant novel recent advances in understanding acromegaly natural history and individualized therapies, the Pituitary Society invited acromegaly experts to critically review the current literature in the context of Endocrine Society guidelines and Acromegaly Consensus Group statements. This update focuses on how recent key advances affect treatment decision-making and outcomes, and also highlights the likely role of recently FDA-approved therapies as well as novel combination therapies within the treatment armamentarium.

Fluid Restriction After Transsphenoidal Surgery for the Prevention of Delayed Hyponatremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed hyponatremia is the primary cause of readmission after transsphenoidal surgery, with a reported incidence of 9% to 30.7%. Studies have failed to identify consistent predictive factors for postoperative hyponatremia; thus, it is difficult to determine patients that are at a high risk. Fluid restriction is one approach for the prevention of hyponatremia. We have performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of fluid restriction on hyponatremia and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from inception to May 2021, using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study question format: Do patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery and followed a postoperative fluid restriction regimen differ in terms of hyponatremia and readmission rates? Studies that implemented fluid restriction and reported hyponatremia and/or readmission rates were included for analysis. Data were pooled by meta-analysis and analyzed using fixed effect and random effect models. RESULTS: A total of 143 manuscripts representing 103 unique studies were identified, with 5 studies included for analysis, yielding a pooled cohort of 1586 patients: 594 on fluid restriction protocols and 992 control patients. Fluid restriction protocols ranged from 1.0 to 2.5 L and varied in the length time between postoperative days 1 to 15. Patients on fluid restriction had a decreased risk of hyponatremia (risk ratio: 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57; P < .00001) and readmission due to hyponatremia (risk ratio: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63; P = .0038). CONCLUSION: Postoperative fluid restriction after transsphenoidal surgery represents an effective method for the prevention of hyponatremia and hospital readmission and has the potential to decrease health care costs.

Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.

The 13th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was held in November 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and comprised acromegaly experts including endocrinologists and neurosurgeons who considered optimal approaches for multidisciplinary acromegaly management. Focused discussions reviewed techniques, results, and side effects of surgery, radiotherapy, and medical therapy, and how advances in technology and novel techniques have changed the way these modalities are used alone or in combination. Effects of treatment on patient outcomes were considered, along with strategies for optimizing and personalizing therapeutic approaches. Expert consensus recommendations emphasize how best to implement available treatment options as part of a multidisciplinary approach at Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence.

Telemedicine Training and Support for Community Health Workers: Improving Knowledge of Diabetes.

Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are a well-established source to improve patient health care, yet their training and support remain suboptimal. This limits program expansion and potentially compromises patient safety. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of weekly training and support by telemedicine (videoconferencing). Materials and Methods: CHWs (n = 6) who led diabetes group visits for low-income Latinos met weekly with a health care professional for training and support. Feasibility and acceptability outcome measures included telemedicine usability, knowledge of diabetes (baseline to 6 months), and program satisfaction. Results: Telemedicine training and support were found to be feasible and acceptable as measured by usability (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire: average 4.7/5.0, ±0.4), knowledge (Diabetes Knowledge Test: pretest 15.8 ± 1.3, posttest 21.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.001, respectively), and satisfaction (Texas Department of State Health Services survey: average 5.8/6.0, ±0.5). All CHWs preferred telemedicine to in-person training. Conclusions: Telemedicine is a feasible and acceptable modality to train and support CHWs.

TRANSCULTURAL DIABETES CARE IN THE UNITED STATES - A POSITION STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS.

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) has created a transculturalized diabetes chronic disease care model that is adapted for patients across a spectrum of ethnicities and cultures. AACE has conducted several transcultural activities on global issues in clinical endocrinology and completed a 3-city series of conferences in December 2017 that focused on diabetes care for ethnic minorities in the U.S. Proceedings from the "Diabetes Care Across America" series of transcultural summits are presented here. Information from community leaders, practicing health care professionals, and other stakeholders in diabetes care is analyzed according to biological and environmental factors. Four specific U.S. ethnicities are detailed: African Americans, Latino/Hispanics, Asian Americans, and Native Americans. A core set of recommendations to culturally adapt diabetes care is presented that emphasizes culturally appropriate terminology, transculturalization of white papers, culturally adapting clinic infrastructure, flexible office hours, behavioral medicine-especially motivational interviewing and building trust-culturally competent nutritional messaging and health literacy, community partnerships for care delivery, technology innovation, clinical trial recruitment and retention of ethnic minorities, and more funding for scientific studies on epigenetic mechanisms of cultural impact on disease expression. It is hoped that through education, research, and clinical practice enhancements, diabetes care can be optimized in terms of precision and clinical outcomes for the individual and U.S. population as a whole.

A Plethora of GLP-1 Agonists: Decisions About What to Use and When.

Incretin-based therapies are important addition to our armamentarium for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). There are six Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) which have received regulatory approval for clinical use. The short-acting GLP-1RAs include exenatide twice daily, liraglutide once daily, and lixisenatide once daily. The approved long-acting GLP-1RAs are administered weekly and are exenatide, albiglutide, and dulaglutide. Although all of these therapies lower hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), there also are unique features of GLP-1RAs that have been made manifest from clinical trial data with regard to weight-loss efficacy, fasting and post-prandial glucose control, cardiovascular safety and protection, and gastrointestinal and injection adverse effects. It is imperative to consider these features when tailoring the choice of a GLP-1RA to patient specific characteristics.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY DISEASE STATE CLINICAL REVIEW: UPDATE ON GROWTH HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING AND PROPOSED REVISED CUT-POINT FOR THE GLUCAGON STIMULATION TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and GH stimulation testing is often required to confirm the diagnosis. However, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the episodic and pulsatile GH secretion, concurrently modified by age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: PubMed searches were conducted to identify published data since 2009 on GH stimulation tests used to diagnose adult GHD. Relevant articles in English language were identified and considered for inclusion in the present document. RESULTS: Testing for confirmation of adult GHD should only be considered if there is a high pretest probability, and the intent to treat if the diagnosis is confirmed. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) are the two main tests used in the United States. While the ITT has been accepted as the gold-standard test, its safety concerns hamper wider use. Previously, the GH-releasing hormone-arginine test, and more recently the GST, are accepted alternatives to the ITT. However, several recent studies have questioned the diagnostic accuracy of the GST when the GH cut-point of 3 µg/L is used and have suggested that a lower GH cut-point of 1 µg/L improved the sensitivity and specificity of this test in overweight/obese patients and in those with glucose intolerance. CONCLUSION: Until a potent, safe, and reliable test becomes available, the GST should remain as the alternative to the ITT in the United States. In order to reduce over-diagnosing adult GHD in overweight/obese patients with the GST, we propose utilizing a lower GH cut-point of 1 µg/L in these subjects. However, this lower GH cut-point still needs further evaluation for diagnostic accuracy in larger patient populations with varying BMIs and degrees of glucose tolerance. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists BMI = body mass index GH = growth hormone GHD = GH deficiency GHRH = GH-releasing hormone GHS = GH secretagogue GST = glucagon stimulation test IGF = insulin-like growth factor IGFBP-3 = IGF-binding protein 3 ITT = insulin tolerance test ROC = receiver operating characteristic WB-GST = weight-based GST.

Pasireotide in Acromegaly: An Overview of Current Mechanistic and Clinical Data.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly is an insidious neuroendocrine disorder caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) by a somatotroph adenoma. Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are recommended as first-line medical therapy in patients for whom surgery has failed or is contraindicated. There are 5 known somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTRs), 2 of which, i.e. SSTR2 and SSTR5, are expressed by a majority of somatotroph adenomas. The currently available SRLs, i.e. octreotide and lanreotide, primarily bind to SSTR2. Pasireotide (SOM230) is a new multireceptor-targeted SRL which has a broader binding profile and an increased affinity for SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5. METHODS: PubMed searches were performed to identify all of the available published English language data on pasireotide with regard to the mechanism of action, in vitro effects, and clinical data. RESULTS: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that pasireotide has a broader range of functional activity than octreotide. Recently, the efficacy of pasireotide in attenuating GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels in patients with acromegaly has been evaluated in phase III clinical trials. Pasireotide demonstrated superiority over octreotide in achieving biochemical control (i.e. GH ≤2.5 µg/l and age- and sex-matched IGF-1 normalization) in patients with acromegaly, as well as significant efficacy in treating patients who were previously inadequately controlled on the maximum allowed doses of octreotide and lanreotide. Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia was the most concerning adverse event but was reversible upon discontinuation of pasireotide. CONCLUSION: The clinical data support pasireotide as a promising new therapy for the treatment of acromegaly, and the long-acting formulation was recently approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of acromegaly.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY DISEASE STATE CLINICAL REVIEW: CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF MACROPROLACTIN IN THE ABSENCE OR PRESENCE OF TRUE HYPERPROLACTINEMIA.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature regarding the prevalence of macroprolactin (macroPRL) in hyperprolactinemic patients and determine recommendations for testing. METHODS: An electronic United States National Library of Medicine PubMed search (through October, 2014) was conducted for search term "macroprolactin." Only English-language articles were considered. RESULTS: MacroPRL is an under-recognized cause of elevated prolactin (PRL) and is present in approximately 4% to 40% of hyperprolactinemic patients depending on the referral population. Clinical findings which could be due to hyperprolactinemia are the impetus for testing for PRL. Because of this there is significant overlap in the clinical presentation of patients with true hyperprolactinemia and those with macroPRL, differentiation cannot always be made on the basis of symptoms. A lack of recognition of the presence of macroPRL can lead to unnecessary laboratory investigations, imaging, and pharmacologic or surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Until there is a commercially available PRL assay that is not subject to interference by macroPRL, clinicians should consider the possibility of macroPRL, especially if the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and/or response to therapy reveal inconsistencies.

AACE/ACE Disease State Clinical Review: Dopamine Agonists for Hyperprolactinemia and the Risk of Cardiac Valve Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature regarding dopamine agonists (DAs) and the risk of the development of cardiac valve disease. METHODS: PubMed searches were performed to identify all of the available published data on DAs and valve disease in patients with hyperprolactinemia. RESULTS: Most of the available echocardiographic data from patients treated for hyperprolactinemia are from case-control studies, and prospective data are limited. The majority of the studies do not support an increased risk of clinically significant valve disease in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with cabergoline. Evidence for the use of echocardiography is needed to limit unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs. Based on the published literature describing Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, the daily and cumulative doses of cabergoline are important factors. Considerations to minimize exposure to cabergoline, such as surgical resection of adenomas or medication withdrawal in responders, may be appropriate depending on the clinical setting. CONCLUSION: There is no conclusive evidence that cabergoline causes clinically significant cardiac valve disease at the usual doses for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Although current recommendations from regulatory agencies advise routine echocardiography for patients receiving cabergoline, evidence-based criteria would be useful both to identify patients at risk and generate appropriate screening protocols.

Oral octreotide capsules for acromegaly treatment: application of clinical trial insights to real-world use.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder usually caused by a benign growth hormone‒secreting pituitary adenoma. Surgical adenoma resection is typically the first line of treatment, and medical therapy is used for patients with persistent disease following surgery, for adenoma recurrence, or for patients ineligible for, or declining, surgery. Approved somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) have been limited to injectable options, until recently. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) are the first approved oral SRL for patients with acromegaly. AREAS COVERED: We review published reports and provide case study examples demonstrating practical considerations on the use of OOC. Using two hypothetical case scenarios, we discuss current treatment patterns, breakthrough symptoms and quality of life (QoL), efficacy of SRLs, OOC dose titration, evaluation of OOC treatment response, and incidence and management of adverse events. EXPERT OPINION: OOC are an option for patients with acromegaly including those who experience breakthrough symptoms, who have preference for oral therapies, or other reasons for declining injectable SRLs. OOC have been associated with improved patient-reported QoL measures compared with those reported for lanreotide and octreotide. Continued real-world experience will determine whether OOC, alone or in combination with other therapies, provides further advantages over current injectable acromegaly treatments.