Bowel Dysfunction After Colon Cancer Surgery: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies on functional outcomes after colon resection are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bowel dysfunction and related distress 1 and 3 years after colon resection using the low anterior resection syndrome score as well as specific validated items. DESIGN: This study presents the long-term results of bowel dysfunction and related distress based on the Quality of Life in Colon Cancer study, an observational, prospective multicenter study of patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 21 Swedish and Danish surgical centers between 2015 and 2019. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent right-sided or left-sided colon resection were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years, cognitive impairment, or inability to understand Swedish/Danish. Patients completed extensive questionnaires at diagnosis and after 1 and 3 years. Clinical data were supplemented by national quality registries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The low anterior resection syndrome score, specific bowel symptoms, and patient-reported distress were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1221 patients (83% response rate), 17% reported major low anterior resection syndrome 1 year after either type of resection; this finding was consistent at 3 years (17% right, 16% left). In the long-term, the only significant difference between types of resections was a high occurrence of loose stools after right-sided resections. Overall, less than one-fifth of patients experienced distress, with women reporting more frequent symptoms and greater distress. In particular, incontinence and loose stools correlated strongly with distress. LIMITATIONS: Absence of prediagnosis bowel function data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that bowel function remains largely intact after colon resection, with only a minority reporting significant distress. Adverse outcomes were more common among women. The occurrence of loose stools after right-sided resection and the association between incontinence, loose stools, and distress highlights a need for postoperative evaluations and more thorough assessments beyond the low anterior resection syndrome score when evaluating patients with colon cancer. See the Video Abstract . DISFUNCIONAMIENTO INTESTINAL DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA POR CNCER DE COLON ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO, LONGITUDINAL Y MULTICNTRICO: ANTECEDENTES:Los estudios longitudinales sobre el resultado funcional después de una resección cólica son limitados.OBJETIVO:Examinar la disfunción intestinal y el malestar relacionado uno y tres años después de la resección del colon utilizando la puntuación de referencia en el síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS), así como otros ítems de validez específica.DISEÑO:Este estudio presenta los resultados a largo plazo de la disfunción intestinal y la angustia relacionada según el estudio QoLiCOL (Quality of Life in COLon cancer), un analisis observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico de pacientes con cáncer de colon recién diagnosticado.AJUSTES:El presente estudio fué realizado en 21 centros quirúrgicos suecos y daneses entre 2015 y 2019.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes sometidos a resección de colon, tanto del lado derecho como el izquierdo se consideraron elegibles. Los criterios de exclusión fueron tener menos de 18 años, deterioro cognitivo o incapacidad para entender sueco/danés. Los pacientes completaron extensos cuestionarios en el momento del diagnóstico y después de uno y tres años. Los datos clínicos se complementaron con los registros de calidad binacionales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron los síntomas intestinales específicos, la puntuación LARS y la angustia manifestada por cada paciente.RESULTADOS:De 1221 pacientes (tasa de respuesta del 83%), el 17% informó LARS mayor un año después de cualquier tipo de resección, consistente a los tres años (17% derecha, 16% izquierda). A largo plazo, la única diferencia significativa entre los tipos de resección fue una alta incidencia de heces liquidas después de las resecciones del lado derecho. En general, menos de una quinta parte de los pacientes experimentaron angustia, y fué la poblacion femenina quién informó de síntomas más frecuentes y de mayor angustia. En particular, la incontinencia y las heces liquidas se correlacionaron fuertemente con la angustia.LIMITACIONES:Ausencia de datos de función intestinal previos al diagnóstico.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestro estudio indica que la función intestinal permanece en gran medida intacta después de la resección del colon, y sólo una minoría reporta malestar significativo. Los resultados adversos fueron más comunes en la población femenina. La aparición de heces liquidas después de la resección del lado derecho y la asociación entre incontinencia, heces liquidas y malestar resalta la necesidad de evaluaciones postoperatorias y valoraciones más exhaustivas más allá de la puntuación LARS al evaluar a los pacientes con cáncer de colon. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

The impact of the anastomotic configuration on low anterior resection syndrome 3 years after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a national cohort study.

AIM: After low anterior resection, the bowel can be anastomosed in different ways. It is not clear which configuration is optimal from a functional and complication point of view. The primary aim was to investigate the impact of the anastomotic configuration on bowel function evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Secondarily, the impact on postoperative complications was evaluated. METHOD: All patients who had undergone low anterior resection from 2015 to 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Three years after surgery, patients were sent an extensive questionnaire and were analysed based on anastomotic configuration ('J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis' or 'straight anastomosis'). Inverse probability weighting by propensity score was used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 892 patients, 574 (64%) responded, of whom 494 patients were analysed. After weighting, the anastomotic configuration had no significant impact on the LARS score (J-pouch/side-to-end OR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.34). The J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis was significantly associated with overall postoperative complications (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.95). No significant difference was seen regarding surgical complications (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.78-1.66). CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the impact of the anastomotic configuration on long-term bowel function, evaluated by the LARS score, in an unselected national cohort. Our results suggested no benefit for J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis on long-term bowel function and postoperative complication rates. The anastomotic strategy may be based upon the anatomical conditions of the patient and surgical preference.

Predicting life with a permanent end colostomy: A prospective study on function, bother and acceptance.

AIM: The factors that influence a patient's experience of a colostomy are not known. The aim of this study was to characterise stoma function, stoma-related bother and acceptance among patients operated for rectal cancer and to investigate if there were any preoperative personal factors with predictive impact on long-term stoma-related bother. METHODS: The QoLiRECT (Quality of Life in RECTal cancer) study is a prospective multicentre study of patients with rectal cancer. This was a subgroup analysis of patients with a permanent colostomy with a 2-year follow-up. Penalised regression models with shrinkage estimation were used to predict the 1-and 2-year bother using baseline data. The predictive value and the importance of the included variables were evaluated using bootstrap resampling techniques. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were included. Overall stoma acceptance was high and a majority of patients were not bothered by their stoma; 77% and 83% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The subgroup of patients with stoma-related bother had a high prevalence of difficulties, especially fear of leakage, and a low stoma acceptance in daily life. Both clinical and personal factors were associated with stoma-related bother. The most important factors were quality of life and physical health, but the prediction accuracy was low. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma-related bother was associated with overall stoma dysfunction. As stoma-related bother is a multifactorial problem, it was not possible to predict which patients will experience stoma-related bother. It is therefore of importance to prevent stoma-related symptoms and optimise stoma function to reduce long-term bother and increase stoma acceptance.