RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) are commonly used for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although other rheumatic diseases with arthritis can test positive. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for RF and anti-CCP with the best diagnostic performance in a sample of patients with RA, compared with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS: This was a descriptive, prospective study. EUROINMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for RF isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig) A (IgA), IgG and IgM and third-generation assay IgG for anti-CCP were used in serum samples of patients with RA, other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. The cutoff with the best diagnostic performance was determined by the Youden Index and receiver operating characteristic analysis Results: Three hundred and thirty-two serum samples were analysed. The cutoffs proposed in our population were for RF in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects IgM 135 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were psoriatic arthritis (Psa) IgA 47.2 IU/mL, clinically suspicious arthralgia (CSA) IgA 39.5 IU/mL, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) IgM 180.6 IU/mL, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgA 42.6 IU/mL, primary fibromyalgia (pFM) IgM 68.6 IU/mL, osteoarthritis (OA) IgM 48 IU/mL, gout IgM 117 IU/mL and healthy IgM 16.3 IU/mL. For anti-CCP, in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects 6.95 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were Psa 6.8 IU/mL, CSA 9.95 IU/mL, pSS 20.7 IU/mL, SLE 6 IU /mL, pFM 11.8 IU/mL, OA 11.9 IU/mL, gout 5 IU/mL and healthy 5 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, the RA versus differential diagnosis cutoffs must be considered.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Gota , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Factor Reumatoide , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Anticuerpos Antiproteína Citrulinada , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoanticuerpos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Inmunoglobulina A , Gota/diagnóstico , Péptidos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción EnzimáticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at increased risk of infections. Vaccination is recognized as a successful public health measure and is recommended for RD patients. The aim of this study was to describe the strategies implemented in an academic rheumatology outpatient clinic as part of a fellow-in-training-led vaccination quality improvement (QI) program and to explore the vaccination uptake before and one year after the implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The program's objective is the promotion of vaccination among patients and rheumatology fellows (by educational interventions, development of vaccination charts and orders, and modifications to electronic medical records to register vaccination dates and generate reminders). As part of the continuous evaluation of the QI program, a descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate vaccine uptake pre- and post-interventions and vaccination barriers one year after implementation. Consecutive patients with RD answered a self-administered questionnaire. Results are shown as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Before the program started 73 patients were surveyed and 102 patients one year after. The vaccination uptake rates for influenza pre- and post-interventions were 43% and 55%; for pneumococcal vaccination they were 26% and 30%; for herpes zoster they were 0% and 4%; for human papillomavirus they were 4% and 10%; for hepatitis B (HBV) they were 19% and 25% respectively. Eighty percent of patients reported some barriers to receiving any of the previous vaccines. The three main reasons for not receiving a vaccine were the lack of recommendation, the lack of availability, and the belief that vaccines do not work. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a pilot vaccination QI program led by rheumatology fellows-in-training showed promising preliminary benefits in the vaccination uptake among RD patients and helps to evaluate the barriers to surpass.
RESUMEN
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, characterized by multi-organ symptomatology. 16% of the patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia have SLE and are associated with high mortality. Intravenous methylprednisolone or high-dose steroids are the first-line treatments in those patients who experienced life-threatening bleeding or have a severely low platelet count, whereas a second line includes splenectomy, as well as other immunosuppressive agents as monotherapy or combined therapy, including azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil. However, response rates of these therapies vary considerably. Rituximab (RTX) became a useful tool in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, due to the decrease of autoantibodies production. In addition, there is evidence that low doses of RTX (100 mg IV per week for 4 weeks) can have a similar effect compared to the standard dose. The objective of this study was to describe the response to low doses of RTX in patients with lupus-induced thrombocytopenia. We present a report of four female patients with newly diagnosed SLE, accompanied by purpuric syndrome and severe thrombocytopenia (< 30 × 109/L) as the clinical debut that was refractory to glucocorticoids (GC) therapy and treated with low doses of RTX. By week 5, complete response (> 100 × 109/L) was achieved in two patients, partial response (> 50 × 109/L) in 1 patient, and no response in one patient. There is little information on the treatment of SLE-associated autoimmune thrombocytopenia. The most extensive study found at the time of our search was the study of 10 Asian patients. They found that 80% of the patients responded by week four and maintained until week 24 of follow-up. At week 36, a follow-up for two patients showed relapse; this occurred on patients with the most disease duration (> 5 years) and was associated with a lower response rate. In contrast, our study with four patients found that half of them presented a complete response: one patient added concomitant therapy with azathioprine (AZA) and another patient without the concomitant therapy. A third patient with a partial improvement, this was seen by week five of treatment. Moreover, a fourth patient who did not have a response by week five of treatment presented a clinical response in subsequent appointments with a count of > 100 at week 24. Those patients who required concomitant use of AZA were patients who had positive antiphospholipid serology. The use of low-dose RTX for the management of severe thrombocytopenia refractory to GC in patients with SLE has a good response. It could be a safe, economical, and effective therapy.
Asunto(s)
Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections attributed to disease activity, comorbidities, immunosuppressive therapy, and other factors. Vaccines are one of the safest and most effective public health interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes about influenza vaccination as factors influencing vaccine uptake and hesitancy in a population with RD. A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed. A self-administered questionnaire surveyed age, RD diagnosis, ten questions about the uptake, safety and efficacy of influenza vaccine, knowledge of cost-free availability, and the relationship between influenza vaccination and RD. A total of 223 questionnaires were filled; 79.8% of patients were vaccinated for influenza at least once. Uptake by diagnosis was 80.3% in rheumatoid arthritis, 76.2% in osteoarthritis, 86.7% in lupus, 73.9% in other auto-immune diseases (AID), and 60% in other non-AID; 83.9% of patients considered influenza vaccine as safe and effective. From those who had never been vaccinated, 26.7% of patients did not consider influenza vaccine safe and effective vs. 13.5% among patients who had been vaccinated (P = .032). Only 7.6% considered that RD patients could not be vaccinated; 11.7% thought that influenza vaccine would worsen their RD symptoms. This study showed that concerns about safety, efficacy, side effects, fear of the vaccine, and knowledge of cost diminished vaccine uptake. These are factors related to confidence, complacency, and convenience as components of vaccine hesitancy that affect influenza vaccination in RD patients.