Monitoring image guidance system accuracy during spinal surgery with mini-screw fiducials: technical note.

STUDY DESIGN: A technical note. OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for measuring accuracy of intraoperative image guidance systems in spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Image guidance may be of use when performing complex procedures on the spine. However, as the operation progresses and, in particular, once any deformity has been corrected, the image guidance system may become unreliable. In practice, this often results in repeated image acquisitions thus increasing the radiation exposure to the patient. METHODS: Small titanium, cranio-facial screws were placed on the dorsal aspect of the spine intraoperatively, before the acquisition of images and used as fiducials. RESULTS: The authors were able to accurately discern the true precision of the image guidance system used with an intraoperative computed tomography scanner, throughout the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: By using intraoperatively placed mini-screw fiducials, the surgeon may check and quantify the underlying system accuracy both initially and throughout the surgery. In the future, "auto-adjust" functions may be integrated into the computer software to automatically recalibrate the system when a probe is placed into the fiducials without the need for rescanning.

Postoperative infection treatment score for the spine (PITSS): construction and validation of a predictive model to define need for single versus multiple irrigation and debridement for spinal surgical site infection.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is very little evidence to guide treatment of patients with spinal surgical site infection (SSI) who require irrigation and debridement (I&D) in deciding need for single or multiple I&Ds or more complex wound management such as vacuum-assisted closure dressing or soft-tissue flaps. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to build a predictive model that stratifies patients with spinal SSI, allowing us to determine which patients will need single versus multiple I&D. The model will be validated and will serve as evidence to support a scoring system to guide treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive series of 128 patients from a tertiary spine center (collected from 1999 to 2005) who required I&D for spinal SSI were studied based on data from a prospectively collected outcomes database. METHODS: More than 30 variables were identified by extensive literature review as possible risk factors for SSI and tested as possible predictors of risk for multiple I&D. Logistic regression was conducted to assess each variable's predictability by a "bootstrap" statistical method. A prediction model was built in which single or multiple I&D was treated as the "response" and risk factors as "predictors." Next, a second series of 34 different patients meeting the same criteria as the first population were studied. External validation of the predictive model was performed by applying the model to the second data set, and predicted probabilities were generated for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-four of one hundred twenty-eight patients with spinal SSI required multiple I&D. Six predictors: anatomical location, medical comorbidities, specific microbiology of the SSI, the presence of distant site infection (ie, urinary tract infection or bacteremia), the presence of instrumentation, and the bone graft type proved to be the most reliable predictors of need for multiple I&D. Internal validation of the predictive model yielded an AUC of 0.84. External validation analysis yielded AUC of 0.70 and 95% confidence interval of 0.51 to 0.89. By setting a probability cutoff of .24, the negative predictive value (NPV) for multiple I&D was 0.77 and positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.57. A probability cutoff of .53 yielded a PPV of 0.85 and NPV of 0.46. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus culture or those with distant site infection such as bacteremia were strong predictors of need for multiple I&D. Presence of instrumentation, location of surgery in the posterior lumbar spine, and use of nonautograft bone graft material predicted multiple I&D. Diabetes also proved to be the most significant medical comorbidity for multiple I&D. The validation of this predictive model revealed excellent PPV and good NPV with appropriately chosen probability cutoff points. This study forms the basis for an evidence-based classification system, the Postoperative Infection Treatment Score for the Spine that stratifies patients who require surgery for SSI, based on specific spine, patient, infection, and surgical factors to assess a low, indeterminate, and high risk for the need for multiple I&D.

Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter ambispective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether applying Enneking's principles to surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine significant decreases local recurrence and/or mortality. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Oncologic management of primary tumors of spine has historically been inconsistent, controversial, and open to individual interpretation. METHODS: A multicenter ambispective cohort analysis from 4 tertiary care spine referral centers was done. Patients were analyzed in 2 cohorts, "Enneking Appropriate" (EA), surgical margin as recommended by Enneking, and "Enneking Inappropriate" (EI), surgical margin not recommended by Enneking. Benign tumors were not included in mortality analysis. RESULTS: Two cohorts represented an analytic dataset with 147 patients, 86 male, average age 46 years (range: 10-83). Median follow-up was 4 (2-7) years in the EA and 6 (5.5-15.5) years in the EI. Seventy-one patients suffered at least 1 local recurrence during the study, 57 of 77 in the EI group and 14 of 70 in the EA group. EI surgical approach caused higher risk of first local recurrence (P < 0.0001). There were 48 deaths in total; 29 in the EI group and 19 in the EA. There was a strong correlation between the first local recurrence and mortality with an odds ratio of 4.69, (P < 0.0001). EI surgical approach resulted in a higher risk of mortality with a hazard ratio of 3.10, (P = 0.0485) compared to EA approach. CONCLUSION: Surgery results in a significant reduction in local recurrence when primary bone tumors of the spine are resected with EA margins. Local recurrence has a high concordance with mortality in resection of these tumors. A significant decrease in mortality occurs when EA surgery is used.

Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist.

OBJECT: Magnetic resonance imaging has been proposed as a powerful technique for assessing the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) in spinal trauma. Because MR imaging is often used to determine appropriate treatment, it is important to determine the accuracy and reliability of MR imaging in diagnosing PLC disruption. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the radiologist and surgeon to assess disruption of the PLC in the setting of acute cervical and thoracolumbar trauma using MR imaging. METHODS: The components of the PLC in 89 consecutive patients with cervical or thoracolumbar fractures following acute spinal trauma were evaluated using MR imaging by both a musculoskeletal radiologist and an independent spine surgeon and assessed intraoperatively under direct visualization by the treating surgeon. The MR imaging interpretations of the musculoskeletal radiologist and surgeon were compared with the intraoperative report for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. A comparison between the radiologist's and spine surgeon's accuracy of MR imaging interpretation was performed. RESULTS: The agreement between both the spine surgeon's and radiologist's MR imaging interpretation and the actual intraoperative findings was moderate for most components of the PLC. Overall, the MR imaging interpretation of the surgeon was more accurate than that of the radiologist. The interpretation of MR imaging by the surgeon had negative predictive value and sensitivity of up to 100%. However, the specificity of MR imaging for both the surgeon and radiologist was lower, ranging from 51.5 to 80.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the MR imaging interpretations between surgeon and radiologist indicates that the surgeon was more accurate for some PLC components. The relatively low positive predictive value and specificity for MR imaging in assessing PLC integrity suggests that both the surgeon and radiologist tend to overdiagnose PLC injury using MR imaging. This can lead to unnecessary surgeries if only MR imaging is used for treatment decision making.

Challenges of local recurrence and cure in low grade malignant tumors of the spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and ambispective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVE: 1. To compare the effects of wide/marginal (en bloc) resection with intralesional resection on local recurrence and survival for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine. 2. To determine the influence of radiation therapy in the management of chordomas and chondrosarcomas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine are prone to local recurrence and death despite being low-grade malignant tumors. No study to date has enough numbers or adequate scientific rigor to determine the influence of resection or radiation therapy on outcome. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to evaluate the 2 objectives. In addition an ambispective multicenter cohort analysis of chordomas and chondrosarcomas was performed. The GRADE system of analysis integrating the results of the systematic review, the multicenter cohort study and the expert opinion of the Spine Oncology Study Group (SOSG) was used to arrive at treatment recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 63 articles were included in the systematic reviews. Evidence was low quality. En bloc resection appeared to improve both local recurrence and disease free survival in Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Radiation therapy had a positive impact on the management of Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma with predictably low side effects. The cohort analysis showed significantly decreased local recurrence for Chordoma (P < 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P < 0.0001) with en bloc resection, and significantly decreased death for both Chordoma (P = 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P = 0.0015) with en bloc resection. CONCLUSION: When wide or marginal margins (en bloc) are achieved in surgical resection of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine there is a decrease in local recurrence and mortality. Therefore, en bloc resection should be undertaken for the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine. Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence.Radiation therapy of at least 60 to 65 Gy equivalents is indicated as an adjuvant treatment for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the spine when there has been incomplete resection or an intralesional margin. Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence.

Injury of the posterior ligamentous complex of the thoracolumbar spine: a prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic imaging study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing injury of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) in patients with thoracolumbar trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment decisions in thoracolumbar injury patients are currently based on the status of the PLC. It is, therefore, important to understand the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing varying degrees of PLC injury. Prior studies report that MRI is up to 100% sensitive for diagnosing PCL injury. METHODS: Patients with an acute injury from T1 to L3 who required posterior surgery were prospectively studied. A musculoskeletal radiologist, based on the preoperative MRI findings, characterized each of the 6 components of the PLC as intact, incompletely disrupted, or disrupted. During the surgical procedure, the surgeon identified each component of the PLC as intact, incompletely disrupted, or disrupted. The radiologist's interpretation and surgical findings were compared. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 62 levels of injury were studied. There were 33 males (78.6%) and 9 females (21.4%), and the average age was 35.7 years. According to the kappa score, there was a moderate level of agreement between the radiologist's interpretation and the intraoperative findings for all PLC components except the thoracolumbar fascia, for which there was slight agreement. The sensitivity for the various PLC components ranged from 79% (left facet capsule) to 90% (interspinous ligament). The specificity ranged from 53% (thoracolumbar fascia) to 65% (ligamentum flavum). There was less agreement between the radiologist and surgeon for the patients with less severe neurologic compromise, i.e., those patients with an AIS grade of either D or E. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for diagnosing injury of the PLC are lower than previously reported in the literature. The integrity of the PLC as determined by MRI should not be used in isolation to determine treatment.