Comparison of Anxiety and Depression Rates in Russian Health Care Professionals in 2020 and 2023.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the mental health of medical personnel worldwide, leading to increased levels of anxiety and depression. This study aimed to compare anxiety and depression levels among healthcare workers during the initial wave of the pandemic in April-May 2020 and the post-pandemic period in January-May 2023 in Russia. METHODS: Data from two similar surveys conducted during the respective periods were combined, and a case-control matching approach was used to ensure compatibility between the two samples. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess anxiety and depression levels. RESULTS: The mean total score for Anxiety subscale in 2020 was 4.126 (SD = 3.042), and in 2023 it increased to 6.632 (SD = 4.132) (F=20.751, df (1, 172), p<0.001, η2p=0.108). Similarly, the mean total score for Depression subscale increased from 3.253 (SD = 2.616) in 2020 to 4.115 (SD = 2.939) in 2023 (F=4.177, df (1, 172), p=0.043, η2p=0.024). The proportion of healthcare workers with higher-than-normal levels of anxiety increased from 16.09% in 2020 to 39.08% in 2023, whereas the effect size for depression remained negligible. The increase in anxiety severity was contrary to previous longitudinal studies showing a decrease in anxiety and depression levels after an initial increase during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The increase in anxiety and depression levels in healthcare workers in 2023 may be attributed to other factors like "special military operation" in Ukraine, sanctions, and announcement of partial mobilization in September 2022. These factors could be perceived as more serious adverse factors, leading to increased anxiety levels.

Potential Neurophysiological Markers of Combat-Related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that the components of brain-evoked potentials (EPs) may serve as biomarkers of the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by participation in combat operations; however, to date, research remains fragmented, with no studies that have attempted to combine different paradigms. In addition, the mismatch negativity component has not been studied in a Russian sample of veterans with PTSD. AIM: To identify objective neurophysiological markers of combat-related PTSD using the method of auditory-evoked potentials in active and passive listening paradigms. METHODS: The study included a recording of auditory EPs in an oddball paradigm in three settings: 1) directed attention to auditory stimuli, 2) passive listening while viewing a neutral video sequence, and 3) viewing a video sequence associated with a traumatic event. Combatants diagnosed with PTSD (18 people) were compared with mentally healthy civilian volunteers (22 people). RESULTS: An increase in the latency period of the early components of auditory EP (N100 and P200), an increase in the amplitude of the P200 component to a deviant stimulus, and a decrease to a standard one in the active listening paradigm were established in the PTSD group. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the P300 component. The characteristics of mismatch negativity in the passive paradigm were revealed: an increase in the phenomenon amplitude, both when shown a video sequence associated with a traumatic event and when shown a neutral video sequence. A binary logistic regression model constructed using the selected parameters showed that the identified characteristics can potentially be considered as diagnostic markers of PTSD in combatants, as the classification accuracy stood at 87% (sensitivity - 81%, specificity - 91%). CONCLUSION: Potential neurophysiological markers of PTSD are the following: the amplitude and latency of early components of auditory EPs in the paradigm of directed attention to stimuli and the amplitude of mismatch negativity during passive attention.

Lipids in Psychiatric Disorders: Functional and Potential Diagnostic Role as Blood Biomarkers.

Lipids are a crucial component of the human brain, serving important structural and functional roles. They are involved in cell function, myelination of neuronal projections, neurotransmission, neural plasticity, energy metabolism, and neuroinflammation. Despite their significance, the role of lipids in the development of mental disorders has not been well understood. This review focused on the potential use of lipids as blood biomarkers for common mental illnesses, such as major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. This review also discussed the impact of commonly used psychiatric medications, such as neuroleptics and antidepressants, on lipid metabolism. The obtained data suggested that lipid biomarkers could be useful for diagnosing psychiatric diseases, but further research is needed to better understand the associations between blood lipids and mental disorders and to identify specific biomarker combinations for each disease.

Modern Approaches to the Diagnosis of Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The aging of the worlds population leads to an increase in the prevalence of age-related diseases, including cognitive impairment. At the stage of dementia, therapeutic interventions become usually ineffective. Therefore, researchers and clinical practitioners today are looking for methods that allow for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment, including techniques that are based on the use of biological markers. AIM: The aim of this literature review is to delve into scientific papers that are centered on modern laboratory tests for Alzheimers disease, including tests for biological markers at the early stages of cognitive impairment. METHODS: The authors have carried out a descriptive review of scientific papers published from 2015 to 2023. Studies that are included in the PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was used to summarized the gleaned information. RESULTS: Blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of their use, are reviewed. The most promising neurotrophic, neuroinflammatory, and genetic markers, including polygenic risk models, are also discussed. CONCLUSION: The use of biomarkers in clinical practice will contribute to the early diagnosis of cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimers disease. Genetic screening tests can improve the detection threshold of preclinical abnormalities in the absence of obvious symptoms of cognitive decline. The active use of biomarkers in clinical practice, in combination with genetic screening for the early diagnosis of cognitive impairment in Alzheimers disease, can improve the timeliness and effectiveness of medical interventions.