[A cause of acute renal dysfunction: a giant bladder diverticulum].

We describe the case of a previously 77-year-old man who accessed in our Nephrology Unit for acute kidney injury (AKI) on chronic kidney disease (CKD), gastric discomfort and vague urinary symptoms with apparently preserved diuresis and suspected "ascites". Physical examination confirmed the presence of abdominal effusion, even though ultrasound abdominal examination revealed the presence of a giant diverticular urinary bladder with bilateral hydronephrosis. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of these rare complications by briefly reviewing the technical aspects and the possible consequences.

Comparison Between 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 18F-Choline PET/CT Imaging in Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 64Cu-PSMA-617 positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) for restaging prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence (BCR) and to compare it with 18F-choline PET/CT in a per-patient analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational study was performed of 43 patients with BCR after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy who underwent 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT and subsequently 18F-choline PET/CT for restaging. The detection rates (DR) of 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT and of 18F-choline PET/CT were calculated by standardized maximum uptake value (SUVmax) at 4 hours and SUVmax at 1 hour as reference, respectively. Furthermore, univariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent predictive factors of positivity with 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT. RESULTS: An overall positivity with 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT was found in 32 patients (74.4%) versus 19 (44.2%) with 18F-choline PET/CT. Specifically, after stratifying for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, we found a good performance of 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT at low PSA levels compared to 18F-choline PET/CT, with a DR of 57.1% versus 14.3% for PSA 0.2-0.5 ng/mL (P = .031), and of 60% versus 30% with PSA 0.5-1 ng/mL. At univariate binary logistic regression analysis, PSA level was the only independent predictor of 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT positivity. No significant difference in terms of DR for both 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 18F-choline PET/CT was found according to different Gleason score subgroups. CONCLUSION: In our study cohort, a better performance was observed for 64Cu-PSMA-617 PET/CT compared to 18F-choline PET/CT in restaging after BCR, especially in patients with low PSA values.

Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Serum levels of neutrophils, platelets, and lymphocytes have been recognized as factors related to poor prognosis for many solid tumors, including bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic role of the combination of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial BC (NIMBC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1151 NMIBC patients who underwent first transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) at 13 academic institutions between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012 were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 48 mo. INTERVENTION: TURBT with intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of recurrence, progression, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality. A systemic inflammatory marker (SIM) score was calculated based on cutoffs for NLR, PLR, and LMR. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 48-mo recurrence-free survival was 80.8%, 47.35%, 20.67%, and 17.06% for patients with an SIM score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p<0.01, log-rank test) while the corresponding 48-mo progression free-survival was 92.0%, 75.67%, 72.85%, and 63.1% (p<0.01, log-rank test). SIM scores of 1, 2, and 3 were associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 3.73, 7.06, and 7.88) and progression (HR 3.15, 4.41, and 5.83). Limitations include the lack of external validation and comparison to other clinical risk models. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-grade T1 stage NMIBC with high SIM scores have worse oncologic outcomes in terms of recurrence and progression. Further studies should be conducted to stratify patients according to SIM scores to identify individuals who might benefit from early cystectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we defined a risk score (the SIM score) based on the measurement of routine systemic inflammatory markers. This score can identify patients with high-grade bladder cancer not invading the muscular layer who are more likely to suffer from tumor recurrence and progression. Therefore, the score could be used to select patients who might benefit from early bladder removal.