Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 27: e20180126, 2018 Dec 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30540073

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding strength of non-simplified dentin bonding systems (DBS) to dentin irradiated with a diode laser (970 nm) immediately and after 12 months of water storage following either primer or bond application. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The experimental design included three different factors: DBS type [AdperTM Scotchbond Multipurpose (MP) and Clearfil™ SE Bond (CSE)], irradiation [without irradiation - control (C), irradiation after primer application (AP), and irradiation after bond application (AB)], and time [initial (I) and after 12 months of water storage (12 m)]. Sixty sound human third molars (n = 10) were obtained, and their flat occlusal dentin areas were prepared and standardized. Laser irradiation was performed in the contact mode perpendicular to the dental surface over an automatically selected scanning area at a pulse energy of 0.8 W, frequency of 10 Hz, and energy density of 66.67 J/cm2. After 7 days of treatment, the specimens were cut, and half of them were subjected to microtensile testing (500 N/0.05 mm/min), whereas the remaining sticks were examined after 12 months of water storage. The obtained data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey test (p<0.05). The observed fracture modes were investigated using a portable digital microscope with a magnification of 40x. RESULTS: Among the utilized DBS, MP generally exhibited higher bond strengths, but did not always differ from CSE under similar conditions. The irradiation factor was statistically significant only for the MP/AB groups. After 12 months of storage, all groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the bond strength, whereas the results of fracture analysis showed a predominance of the adhesive type. CONCLUSIONS: The laser treatment of non-simplified DBS was not able to stabilize their bonding characteristics after 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/efectos de la radiación , Dentina/efectos de la radiación , Láseres de Semiconductores , Cementos de Resina/efectos de la radiación , Análisis de Varianza , Dentina/efectos de los fármacos , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/química , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Microscopía de Fuerza Atómica , Polimerizacion/efectos de la radiación , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cementos de Resina/química , Propiedades de Superficie/efectos de la radiación , Resistencia a la Tracción , Factores de Tiempo , Agua/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA