Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Folia Primatol (Basel) ; 90(4): 199-214, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31067551

RESUMEN

Lemur catta is the most reported illegal captive lemur. We document 286 L. catta that were held in illegal captive conditions in Madagascar. Coastal tourist destinations are "hot spots" for sightings. Many of the L. catta reported were in businesses (49%) and were perceived to be held captive for the purpose of generating income (41%). Infant/juvenile L. catta were overwhelmingly observed annually in December (41%) and may suffer high mortality rates given that they are not weaned during this month of the year. Population growth modeling suggests that known capture rates may be sustainable in all but small populations of 500 individuals and when infants/juveniles are targeted. However, of the seven remaining populations of L. catta with more than 100 individuals, only one is known to contain more than 500 animals, and we present evidence here that infants/juveniles are targeted. Moreover L. catta face significant other threats including habitat loss, bushmeat hunting, and climate change. Several actions could reduce the illegal capture and ownership of L. catta in Madagascar such as tourist behavior change initiatives, enforcement of laws, and alternative livelihoods for local people. These interventions are urgently needed and could be adapted to protect other exploited wildlife in the future.


Asunto(s)
Comercio , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Lemur , Animales , Femenino , Madagascar , Dinámica Poblacional
2.
Folia Primatol (Basel) ; 89(1): 81-96, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631263

RESUMEN

Primates are kept as pets for various reasons including as indicators of wealth. Ownership of primates can also be influenced by religion. In Madagascar, thousands of lemurs are kept as pets, but the roles of wealth and religion in the ownership of captive lemurs have not been explored. We use quantitative and qualitative data to examine these aspects of ownership. Quantitative data were collected (July to August 2016) in households (n = 596) of 12 urban and rural towns in Madagascar using semi-structured interviews. International standards for research ethics were followed. Research was approved by an ethics oversight committee. We also opportunistically visited 13 religious facilities. Qualitative data were used to frame the context of the quantitative data. We found that pet lemur owners do not speak about their lemurs as a symbol of wealth, but non-owners associate pet lemurs with wealth. Therefore, status/wealth may be a motivating factor in the ownership of pet lemurs. We also found evidence that Catholic entities in Madagascar sometimes take in captive lemurs when the owner can no longer care for the animal (being viewed as animal-friendly institutions). However, we did not find evidence of religion (institutional or traditional) influencing the ownership of pet lemurs.


Asunto(s)
Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Religión , Factores Socioeconómicos , Strepsirhini , Animales , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Madagascar
3.
Am J Primatol ; 79(11)2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26927567

RESUMEN

Although it is illegal to capture, sell, and trade lemurs, the live capture of lemurs in Madagascar is ongoing and may have impacted over 28,000 lemurs between 2010 and 2013. Only one study has examined this trade and did so using in-person interviews in northern Madagascar. The current study sought to expand this existing dataset and examine the comparability of online surveys to more traditional on-location data collection methods. In this study, we collected data through a web-based survey resulting in 302 sightings of 685 captive lemurs. We also collected data from 171 hotel and 43 restaurant websites and social media profiles. Survey submissions included sightings of 30 species from 10 genera, nearly twice as many species as identified via the in-person interviews. Lemur catta, Varecia variegata, and Eulemur fulvus were the most common species sighted in captivity. Captive lemurs were reported in 19 of Madagascar's 22 administrative regions and most were seen in urban areas near their habitat ranges. This represents a wider geographic distribution of captive lemurs than previously found through in-person interviews. The online survey results were broadly similar to those of the in-person surveys though greater in species and geographic diversity demonstrating advantages to the use of online surveys. The online research methods were low in cost (USD $100) compared to on-location data collection (USD $12,000). Identified disadvantages included sample bias; most of the respondents to the online survey were researchers and many captive sightings were near study sites. The results illustrate the benefits of incorporating a social science approach using online surveys as a complement to traditional fieldwork. Am. J. Primatol. 79:e22541, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Crimen , Lemur , Animales , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Madagascar , Mascotas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/economía
4.
N Engl J Med ; 369(17): 1598-609, 2013 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252499

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections are rare complications of injections for treatment of chronic pain. In September 2012, we initiated an investigation into fungal infections associated with injections of preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate that was purchased from a single compounding pharmacy. METHODS: Three lots of methylprednisolone acetate were recalled by the pharmacy; examination of unopened vials later revealed fungus. Notification of all persons potentially exposed to implicated methylprednisolone acetate was conducted by federal, state, and local public health officials and by staff at clinical facilities that administered the drug. We collected clinical data on standardized case-report forms, and we tested for the presence of fungi in isolates and specimens by examining cultures and performing polymerase-chain-reaction assays and histopathological and immunohistochemical testing. RESULTS: By October 19, 2012, more than 99% of 13,534 potentially exposed persons had been contacted. As of July 1, 2013, there were 749 reported cases of infection in 20 states, with 61 deaths (8%). Laboratory evidence of Exserohilum rostratum was present in specimens from 153 case patients (20%). Additional data were available for 728 case patients (97%); 229 of these patients (31%) had meningitis with no other documented infection. Case patients had received a median of 1 injection (range, 1 to 6) of implicated methylprednisolone acetate. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 15 to 97), and the median incubation period (the number of days from the last injection to the date of the first diagnosis) was 47 days (range, 0 to 249); 40 patients (5%) had a stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a large, multistate outbreak of fungal infections showed substantial morbidity and mortality. The infections were associated with injection of a contaminated glucocorticoid medication from a single compounding pharmacy. Rapid public health actions included prompt recall of the implicated product, notification of exposed persons, and early outreach to clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides , Meningitis Fúngica/epidemiología , Metilprednisolona , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Ascomicetos/aislamiento & purificación , Aspergillus fumigatus/aislamiento & purificación , Composición de Medicamentos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Periodo de Incubación de Enfermedades Infecciosas , Inyecciones Espinales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Meningitis Fúngica/tratamiento farmacológico , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Pública , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/microbiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Folia Primatol (Basel) ; 87(1): 48-63, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27092548

RESUMEN

Live extraction of wildlife is a threat to biodiversity and can compromise animal welfare standards. Studies of the captive environments and welfare of pet primates are known, but none has focused on Madagascar. We aimed to expand knowledge about the captive conditions of pet lemurs in Madagascar. We hypothesized that captive lemurs would often be kept in restrictive settings, including small cages, would be fed foods inconsistent with their natural diets and, as a result, would be in bad physical or psychological health. Data were collected via a web-based survey (n = 253 reports) and from the websites and social media pages of 25 hotels. Most lemurs seen by respondents were either kept on a rope/leash/chain or in a cage (67%), though some lemurs were habituated and were not restrained (28%). Most of the time (72%) cages were considered small, and lemurs were rarely kept in captivity together with other lemurs (81% of lemurs were caged alone). Pet lemurs were often fed foods inconsistent with their natural diets, and most (53%) were described as being in bad health. These findings point to a need to undertake outreach to pet lemur owners in Madagascar about the captivity requirements of primates.


Asunto(s)
Dieta/veterinaria , Vivienda para Animales/normas , Lemur , Mascotas , Animales , Dieta/normas , Lemur/fisiología , Lemur/psicología , Madagascar , Mascotas/fisiología , Mascotas/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
N Engl J Med ; 367(23): 2194-203, 2012 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23131029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated an outbreak of fungal infections of the central nervous system that occurred among patients who received epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injections of preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate prepared by a single compounding pharmacy. METHODS: Case patients were defined as patients with fungal meningitis, posterior circulation stroke, spinal osteomyelitis, or epidural abscess that developed after epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injections. Clinical and procedure data were abstracted. A cohort analysis was performed. RESULTS: The median age of the 66 case patients was 69 years (range, 23 to 91). The median time from the last epidural glucocorticoid injection to symptom onset was 18 days (range, 0 to 56). Patients presented with meningitis alone (73%), the cauda equina syndrome or focal infection (15%), or posterior circulation stroke with or without meningitis (12%). Symptoms and signs included headache (in 73% of the patients), new or worsening back pain (in 50%), neurologic symptoms (in 48%), nausea (in 39%), and stiff neck (in 29%). The median cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count on the first lumbar puncture among patients who presented with meningitis, with or without stroke or focal infection, was 648 per cubic millimeter (range, 6 to 10,140), with 78% granulocytes (range, 0 to 97); the protein level was 114 mg per deciliter (range, 29 to 440); and the glucose concentration was 44 mg per deciliter (range, 12 to 121) (2.5 mmol per liter [range, 0.7 to 6.7]). A total of 22 patients had laboratory confirmation of Exserohilum rostratum infection (21 patients) or Aspergillus fumigatus infection (1 patient). The risk of infection increased with exposure to lot 06292012@26, older vials, higher doses, multiple procedures, and translaminar approach to epidural glucocorticoid injection. Voriconazole was used to treat 61 patients (92%); 35 patients (53%) were also treated with liposomal amphotericin B. Eight patients (12%) died, seven of whom had stroke. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an outbreak of fungal meningitis after epidural or paraspinal glucocorticoid injection with methylprednisolone from a single compounding pharmacy. Rapid recognition of illness and prompt initiation of therapy are important to prevent complications. (Funded by the Tennessee Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).


Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos/aislamiento & purificación , Aspergillus fumigatus/aislamiento & purificación , Brotes de Enfermedades , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides , Meningitis Fúngica/epidemiología , Metilprednisolona , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis/epidemiología , Composición de Medicamentos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Espinales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Meningitis Fúngica/diagnóstico , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias , Factores de Riesgo , Tennessee/epidemiología
7.
Med Care ; 50(9): 785-91, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22525612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Syringe reuse and other unsafe injection practices can expose patients to bloodborne pathogens (eg, hepatitis B and C viruses and human immunodeficiency virus). Evidence of such infection control lapses has resulted in patient notifications, but the scope and magnitude of these events have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To summarize patient notification events resulting from unsafe injection practices in the US health care settings. METHODS: We examined records of events that involved communications to groups of patients, conducted during 2001-2011, advising bloodborne pathogen testing stemming from potential exposures to unsafe injection practices. RESULTS: We identified 35 patient notification events related to unsafe injection practices in at least 17 states, resulting in an estimated total of 130,198 patients notified. Among the identified notification events, 83% involved outpatient settings and 74% occurred since 2007, including the 4 largest events (>5000 patients per event). The primary breach identified (≥16 events; 44%) was syringe reuse to access shared medications (eg, single-dose or multidose vials). Twenty-two (63%) notifications stemmed from the identification of viral hepatitis transmission, whereas 13 (37%) were prompted by the discovery of unsafe injection practices, absent evidence of bloodborne pathogen transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe injection practices represent a form of medical error that have manifested as large-scale adverse events, affecting thousands of patients in a wide variety of health care settings. Our findings suggest that increased oversight and attention to basic infection control are needed to maintain patient safety, along with research to identify best practices for triggering and managing patient notifications.


Asunto(s)
Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Trazado de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Notificación de Enfermedades , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Jeringas/efectos adversos , Revelación/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación de Equipos , Equipo Reutilizado , Humanos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Estados Unidos
8.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(6): 909-916.e2, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nursing homes (NHs) provide care in a congregate setting for residents at high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In spring 2020, NHs were implementing new guidance to minimize SARS-CoV-2 spread among residents and staff. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether telephone and video-based infection control assessment and response (TeleICAR) strategies could efficiently assess NH preparedness and help resolve gaps. DESIGN: We incorporated Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 guidance for NH into an assessment tool covering 6 domains: visitor restrictions; health care personnel COVID-19 training; resident education, monitoring, screening, and cohorting; personal protective equipment supply; core infection prevention and control (IPC); and communication to public health. We performed TeleICAR consultations on behalf of health departments. Adherence to each element was documented and recommendations provided to the facility. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Health department-referred NHs that agreed to TeleICAR consultation. METHODS: We assessed overall numbers and proportions of NH that had not implemented each infection control element (gap) and proportion of NH that reported making ≥1 change in practice following the assessment. RESULTS: During April 13 to June 12, 2020, we completed TeleICAR consultations in 629 NHs across 19 states. Overall, 524 (83%) had ≥1 implementation gap identified; the median number of gaps was 2 (interquartile range: 1-4). The domains with the greatest number of facilities with gaps were core IPC practices (428/625; 68%) and COVID-19 education, monitoring, screening, and cohorting of residents (291/620; 47%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TeleICAR was an alternative to onsite infection control assessments that enabled public health to efficiently reach NHs across the United States early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Assessments identified widespread gaps in core IPC practices that put residents and staff at risk of infection. TeleICAR is an important strategy that leverages infection control expertise and can be useful in future efforts to improve NH IPC.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Casas de Salud , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 51(3): 267-73, 2010 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20575663

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In January 2008, 3 persons with acute hepatitis C who all underwent endoscopy at a single facility in Nevada were identified. METHOD: We reviewed clinical and laboratory data from initially detected cases of acute hepatitis C and reviewed infection control practices at the clinic where case patients underwent endoscopy. Persons who underwent procedures on days when the case patients underwent endoscopy were tested for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and other bloodborne pathogens. Quasispecies analysis determined the relatedness of HCV in persons infected. RESULTS: In addition to the 3 initial cases, 5 additional cases of clinic-acquired HCV infection were identified from 2 procedure dates included in this initial field investigation. Quasispecies analysis revealed 2 distinct clusters of clinic-acquired HCV infections and a source patient related to each cluster, suggesting separate transmission events. Of 49 HCV-susceptible persons whose procedures followed that of the source patient on 25 July 2007, 1 (2%) was HCV infected. Among 38 HCV-susceptible persons whose procedures followed that of another source patient on 21 September 2007, 7 (18%) were HCV infected. Reuse of syringes on single patients in conjunction with use of single-use propofol vials for multiple patients was observed during normal clinic operations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-to-patient transmission of HCV likely resulted from contamination of single-use medication vials that were used for multiple patients during anesthesia administration. The resulting public health notification of approximately 50,000 persons was the largest of its kind in United States health care. This investigation highlighted breaches in aseptic technique, deficiencies in oversight of outpatient settings, and difficulties in detecting and investigating such outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Brotes de Enfermedades , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Inyecciones/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/clasificación , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nevada/epidemiología
12.
JAMA ; 303(22): 2273-9, 2010 Jun 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20530781

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: More than 5000 ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in the United States participate in the Medicare program. Little is known about infection control practices in ASCs. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) piloted an infection control audit tool in a sample of ASC inspections to assess facility adherence to recommended practices. OBJECTIVE: To describe infection control practices in a sample of ASCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All State Survey Agencies were invited to participate. Seven states volunteered; 3 were selected based on geographic dispersion, number of ASCs each state committed to inspect, and relative cost per inspection. A stratified random sample of ASCs was selected from each state. Sample size was based on the number of inspections each state estimated it could complete between June and October 2008. Sixty-eight ASCs were assessed; 32 in Maryland, 16 in North Carolina, and 20 in Oklahoma. Surveyors from CMS, trained in use of the audit tool, assessed compliance with specific infection control practices. Assessments focused on 5 areas of infection control: hand hygiene, injection safety and medication handling, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, and handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of facilities with lapses in each infection control category. RESULTS: Overall, 46 of 68 ASCs (67.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55.9%-77.9%) had at least 1 lapse in infection control; 12 of 68 ASCs (17.6%; 95% CI, 9.9%-28.1%) had lapses identified in 3 or more of the 5 infection control categories. Common lapses included using single-dose medication vials for more than 1 patient (18/64; 28.1%; 95% CI, 18.2%-40.0%), failing to adhere to recommended practices regarding reprocessing of equipment (19/67; 28.4%; 95% CI, 18.6%-40.0%), and lapses in handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment (25/54; 46.3%; 95% CI, 33.4%-59.6%). CONCLUSION: Among a sample of US ASCs in 3 states, lapses in infection control were common.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Auditoría Médica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Equipo Reutilizado , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Maryland , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , North Carolina , Oklahoma , Estados Unidos
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(6): 723-728, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32252834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The US Census Bureau's County Business Patterns (CBP) series provides a unique opportunity to describe the healthcare sector using a single, national data source. METHODS: We analyzed CBP data on business establishments in the healthcare industry for 2000-2016 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Setting and facility types were defined using the North American Industry Classification System. RESULTS: In 2016, CBP enumerated 707,634 US healthcare establishments (a 34% increase from 2000); 86.5% were outpatient facilities and services followed by long-term care facilities (12.5%) and acute-care facilities (1.0%). Between 2000 and 2016, traditional facilities such as general medical surgical and surgical hospitals (-0.4%) and skilled nursing facilities (+0.1%) decreased or remained flat, while other long-term care and outpatient providers grew rapidly. CONCLUSION: This analysis highlights the steady growth and increased specialization of the US healthcare sector, particularly in long-term care and outpatient settings.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Censos , Atención a la Salud , Hospitales , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Humanos , Estados Unidos
14.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 95(2): 243-254, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883694

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To summarize patient notifications resulting from unsafe injection practices by health care personnel in the United States and describe recommended actions for prevention and response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined records of events involving communications to groups of patients, conducted from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2018, in which bloodborne pathogen testing was recommended or offered because of potential exposure to unsafe injection practices by health care personnel in the United States. Information compiled included: health care setting(s), type of unsafe injection practice(s), number of patients notified, number of outbreak-associated infections, and whether evidence suggesting bloodborne pathogen transmission prompted the notification. We compared these numbers with a similar review conducted from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2011. RESULTS: From 2012 through 2018, more than 66,748 patients were notified as part of 38 patient notification events. Twenty-one involved exposures in non-hospital settings. Twenty-five involved syringe and/or needle reuse in the context of routine patient care; 11 involved drug tampering by a health care provider. The majority of events (n=25) were prompted by identification of unsafe injection practices alone, absent any documented infections at the time of notification. Outbreak-associated hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis C virus infections were documented for 11 of the events; 8 involved patient-to-patient transmission, and 3 involved provider-to-patient transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2001, nearly 200,000 patients in the United States were notified about potential exposure to blood-contaminated medications or injection equipment. Facility leadership has an obligation to ensure adherence to safe injection practices and to respond properly if unsafe injection practices are identified.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Equipo Reutilizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Inyecciones/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Jeringas , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0208577, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30625137

RESUMEN

Content shared on social media platforms can impact public perceptions of wildlife. These perceptions, which are in part shaped by context (e.g. non-naturalistic setting, presence of a human), can influence people's desires to interact with or acquire wild animals as pets. However, few studies have examined whether this holds true for wild animals featured in viral videos. This study reports on opportunistic data collected on Twitter before, during, and after a video that featured a habituated ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta), called "Sefo", in southern Madagascar went 'viral' (i.e. circulated rapidly on the internet). Our dataset of 13,953 tweets (from an 18.5-week time period in early 2016) referencing lemurs was collected using targeted keywords on the Twitonomy Service. We identified 613 individual tweets about people wanting a lemur as a pet. In addition, 744 tweets that were captured in our dataset linked to the Sefo viral video. We found that as the number of tweets about the viral video increased, so did the number of tweets where an individual wanted to have a lemur as a pet. Most tweets (91%) did not make reference to a specific species of lemur, but when they did, they often (82%) referenced ring-tailed lemurs (L. catta), ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.), and mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.). This study serves as a case study to consider how viral content can impact how wild animals are perceived. We close by noting that social media sites like Twitter, which are increasingly providing their users with news and information, should carefully consider how information about wild animals is shared on their platforms, as it may impact animal welfare.


Asunto(s)
Lemur/fisiología , Mascotas/fisiología , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Grabación en Video , Animales , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Especificidad de la Especie
16.
PLoS One ; 14(5): e0216593, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31067269

RESUMEN

Primates are extracted from the wild for the pet trade across the world. In Madagascar, lemurs are kept as illegal pets and an understanding of lemur pet ownership at the national level is lacking. In 2013 and 2016, we undertook a national survey in 11 of Madagascar's 22 administrative regions (n = 28 towns) with 1,709 households. To our knowledge, this is the first national survey of the household ownership of pet primates in a country where they are endemic. In the 1.5 years prior to being surveyed, 8% ± 4% (towns as replicates) of respondents had seen a captive lemur while a further 0.7% ± 0.5% of respondents had owned one personally. We estimate that 33,428 ± 24,846 lemurs were kept in Malagasy households in the six months prior to our survey efforts, with 18,462 ± 12,963 of these pet lemurs estimated in urban household alone. Rates of lemur ownership did not differ by province but increased with the human population of a town and with the popularity of the town on Flickr (a proxy indicator for tourism). We found that the visibility of pet lemur ownership did not differ across the country, but it did increase with the size of the town and popularity with tourists. Areas with visible pet lemurs were not always the areas with the highest rates of pet lemur ownership, highlighting that many pet lemurs are hidden from the general public. Our study highlights the need for conservation programs to consider both the proportion of inhabitants that own pet lemurs and the total number of lemurs that are potentially being kept as pets in those towns. We close by noting that for some species, even just a small amount of localized live extraction for pet ownership could be enough to cause localized population extinctions over time. Moreover, an urgent response is needed to combat a recent and alarming rise in illegal exploitation of biodiversity across Madagascar.


Asunto(s)
Composición Familiar , Lemur , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mascotas , Dinámica Poblacional , Animales , Humanos , Madagascar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(9): 1018-1023, 2017 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To inform development, targeting, and penetration of materials from a national injection safety campaign, an evaluation was conducted to assess provider knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to unsafe injection practices. METHODS: A panel of physicians (n = 370) and nurses (n = 320) were recruited from 8 states to complete an online survey. Questions, using 5-point Likert and Spector scales, addressed acceptability and frequency of unsafe practices (eg, reuse of a syringe on >1 patient). Results were stratified to identify differences among physician specialties and nurse practice locations. RESULTS: Unsafe injection practices were reported by both physicians and nurses across all surveyed physician specialties and nurse practice locations. Twelve percent (12.4%) of physicians and 3% of nurses indicated reuse of syringes for >1 patient occurs in their workplace; nearly 5% of physicians indicated this practice usually or always occurs. A higher proportion of oncologists reported unsafe practices occurring in their workplace. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dangerous minority of providers violating basic standards of care; practice patterns may vary by provider group and specialty. More research is needed to understand how best to identify providers placing patients at risk of infection and modify their behaviors.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Reutilizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Inyecciones/ética , Agujas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Jeringas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Inyecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
18.
MMWR Suppl ; 65(3): 50-6, 2016 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27390018

RESUMEN

The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa underscores the need for health care infection prevention and control (IPC) practices to be implemented properly and consistently to interrupt transmission of pathogens in health care settings to patients and health care workers. Training and assessing IPC practices in general health care facilities not designated as Ebola treatment units or centers became a priority for CDC as the number of Ebola virus transmissions among health care workers in West Africa began to affect the West African health care system and increasingly more persons became infected. CDC and partners developed policies, procedures, and training materials tailored to the affected countries. Safety training courses were also provided to U.S. health care workers intending to work with Ebola patients in West Africa. As the Ebola epidemic continued in West Africa, the possibility that patients with Ebola could be identified and treated in the United States became more realistic. In response, CDC, other federal components (e.g., Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response) and public health partners focused on health care worker training and preparedness for U.S. health care facilities. CDC used the input from these partners to develop guidelines on IPC for hospitalized patients with known or suspected Ebola, which was updated based on feedback from partners who provided care for Ebola patients in the United States. Strengthening and sustaining IPC helps health care systems be better prepared to prevent and respond to current and future infectious disease threats.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S. and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Epidemias/prevención & control , Instituciones de Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , África Occidental/epidemiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organización & administración , Personal de Salud/educación , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(1): 53-8, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25442395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug diversion by health care personnel poses a risk for serious patient harm. Public health identified 2 patients diagnosed with acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who shared a common link with a hospital. Further investigation implicated a drug-diverting, HCV-infected surgical technician who was subsequently employed at an ambulatory surgical center. METHODS: Patients at the 2 facilities were offered testing for HCV infection if they were potentially exposed. Serum from the surgical technician and patients testing positive for HCV but without evidence of infection before their surgical procedure was further tested to determine HCV genotype and quasi-species sequences. Parenteral medication handling practices at the 2 facilities were evaluated. RESULTS: The 2 facilities notified 5970 patients of their possible exposure to HCV, 88% of whom were tested and had results reported to the state public health departments. Eighteen patients had HCV highly related to the surgical technician's virus. The surgical technician gained unauthorized access to fentanyl owing to limitations in procedures for securing controlled substances. CONCLUSIONS: Public health surveillance identified an outbreak of HCV infection due to an infected health care provider engaged in diversion of injectable narcotics. The investigation highlights the value of public health surveillance in identifying HCV outbreaks and uncovering a method of drug diversion and its impacts on patients.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Personal de Salud , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/clasificación , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA