Efficacy of surgical helmet systems for protection against COVID-19: a double-blinded randomised control study.

PURPOSE: This study assesses whether sterile surgical helmet systems (SSHS) provide surgeons with additional protection from aerosol pathogens alongside their traditional role protecting against splash. There has been debate on whether to use such systems in reopening elective orthopaedic surgery during the current COVID-19 pandemic environment. METHODS: Thirty-five participants were enrolled in a double-blinded randomised controlled study investigating efficacy of the Stryker Flyte Surgical Helmet (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) as protection against respiratory droplets. Wearing the SSHS in a fit testing hood, subjects were randomised to nebulised saccharin solution or placebo. Twenty were allocated to the saccharin group with 15 to placebo. Positive sweet taste represented a failure of the test. Taste tests were performed with the helmet fan turned on and off. RESULTS: SSHS did not prevent saccharin taste (p < 0.0001). Within the saccharin cohort, 40% recorded a positive taste with the fan on and 100% with the fan off. There was a statistically significant difference in mean time-to-taste saccharin (p = 0.049) comparing fan on (123.5 s) vs. off (62.6 s). CONCLUSIONS: SSHS do not protect against aerosol particulate and therefore are not efficacious in protection against COVID-19. The fan system employed may even increase risk to the surgeon by drawing in particulates as well as delay recognition of intraoperative cues, such as exhaust from diathermy, that point to respirator mask leak.

Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.

BACKGROUND: Mid-head resection total hip resurfacing arthroplasty was promoted as an alternative to traditional total hip resurfacing for patients with poor femoral head bone quality or abnormal femoral head morphology, because those patients are at high risk of failure with traditional total hip resurfacing. It is a large-headed metal-on-metal device that uses a short, bone-conserving stem. Good performance of the implant has been reported at short-term followup, but no information on the implant performance in the mid- or long-term is available. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we report (1) on the mid-term implant survivorship and hip scores in a single nondesigner surgeon series. Because of the occurrence of femoral neck osteolysis and pseudotumor in a subgroup of patients, we also investigated the following: (2) Were there any preoperative parameters that are associated with osteolysis? (3) Could we differentiate the osteolysis group from the others on the basis of implant component sizes, positions, and radiologic parameters? (4) Could we differentiate the osteolysis group from the others on the basis of metal ion levels? METHODS: Between 2006 and 2011, one surgeon performed a total of 49 Birmingham Mid-head Resection total hip resurfacing arthroplasties in 47 patients. The general indications for this procedure were young patients who were considered suitable for hip resurfacing arthroplasty but had avascular necrosis, large cysts, or severe deformity of the femoral head. Clinical followup including Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and UCLA hip scores were available preoperatively and at a mean of 6 years (range, 3-8 years) on all patients (100%), radiographic followup on 45 of 47 (96%), MRIs on 18 (38%), and metal ion levels on 37 (79%). Mean age at surgery was 50 years. Spearman's correlation was used to test the association between femoral neck osteolysis and preoperative parameters, implant component sizes and positions, and blood metal ion levels. RESULTS: We found 100% survival. Patients' median OHS was 46 of 48 (range, 35-48) and UCLA 8 of 10 (range, 4-10). However, 16% of the hips (seven of 45) demonstrated osteolysis in the femoral neck. Of the preoperative parameters, the osteolysis was associated with low weight (r = -0.337, p = 0.031) and to a lesser degree with female sex (r = 0.275, p = 0.067). Radiologically, the osteolysis was strongly associated with the presence of a pseudotumor on MRI (r = 0.663, p = 0.004). We could not differentiate the osteolysis group from the rest of the cohort on the basis of the implant sizes or radiographic implant component positions. The cohort's median whole blood cobalt was 1.77 ppb (range, 0.18-10.27 ppb) and chromium 1.88 ppb (range 0.36-10.09 ppb). There was no difference in the metal ion levels between the osteolysis group and the rest of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of silently developing femoral neck osteolysis associated with this implant is concerning and is expected to cause a high rate of failure at longer followup. We have instituted a program of annual clinical and radiologic followup for this group of patients. We have stopped implanting this device and recommend against its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Primary collared uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: a safe and reliable treatment option.

The age of patients undergoing primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) remains fairly constant despite an increasingly elderly population, possibly owing to concern over postoperative complications. This study evaluated 90-day outcomes in patients over 80, undergoing uncemented collared primary THA for osteoarthritis in a high volume unit. Data were recorded from 153 consecutive patients. There were 0.65% mortality rate and 1.3% major systemic complication rate. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade was an independent predictor of inpatient complications. Mean preoperative and 90-day postoperative Oxford Hip Score was 24 and 46 respectively. No radiological evidence of femoral stem migration was seen. Our cohort shows low morbidity and mortality rates. ASA not age helps predict inpatient complications. Uncemented collared femoral prosthesis resulted in excellent functional and radiological outcomes.

Distal periarterial sympathectomy surgery for chronic digital ischemia: A systematic review of the literature.

Objective: This study assesses the efficacy of distal periarterial sympathectomy in treating chronic digital ischemia by evaluating clinical outcomes of surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review of distal sympathectomy for chronic digital ischemia was conducted. Data extracted included study design, patient statistics, aetiology, follow-up duration, sympathectomy level, and surgical outcomes. Results: 21 studies were analysed, containing a total of 337 patients, 324 hands, and 398 digits. Patient age ranged from 23.2 to 56.6 years. Causes of ischemia included Scleroderma, Raynaud's disease, atherosclerosis/Buerger's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus/discoid lupus, undifferentiated rheumatic disorder/mixed connective tissue disease, CREST syndrome, trauma and unknown diagnoses. Common digital artery sympathectomy was mostly performed. Follow-up spanned 12-120 months. Outcomes: Distal sympathectomy led to reduced pain in 94.7 % patients. Complete resolution of ulceration was seen in 73 % patients. Subsequent amputation was required in 28 % patients. Other complications were reported in 24.1 % patients. Conclusions: This study indicates that distal periarterial sympathectomy may effectively treat chronic digital ischemia, offering pain relief and resolution of digital ulceration. However, risks of complications and amputation persist. Further research is required to inform patient selection and establish the optimal technique and extent of distal sympathectomy surgery, before it can be considered a valid treatment option.

Range of Movement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Elderly: A Comparison of Anatomical Versus Reverse Shoulder Replacements.

Introduction Shoulder arthroplasty is in increasing demand in the elderly given the rising prevalence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) across the population. There is a dearth of evidence in the current literature comparing anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in the elderly population. This study compares patient-reported outcome measures and range of movement (ROM) between anatomical and reverse total shoulder replacements in matched patient cohorts over the age of 70 years. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study compares range of movement and patient-reported outcomes between anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in matched cohorts over the age of 70 years at a single institution between 2011 and 2015. Overall, 75 patients were recruited, including 44 patients with anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty and 31 patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Cohorts were matched according to age, preoperative Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and preoperative range of movement. The minimum clinical follow-up was one year. Results At one year, range of movement metrics in flexion, abduction, and external rotation all demonstrated greater improvements in the anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty cohort in comparison to the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty cohort (p<0.0001). No statistical difference in Oxford Shoulder Score was evident between cohorts. Conclusion Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrates a significant improvement in range of movement in comparison to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in matched elderly patient cohorts. However, there was no statistical difference in functional assessment scores between reverse shoulder replacement and anatomical shoulder replacement.