Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851577

RESUMEN

To comply with antibiotic restriction policies in the European Union, internal teat sealants (TS) are increasingly used at drying off (DO) in selective dry cow treatment protocols to maintain udder health. Post-calving TS residue attachment to milking equipment and associated cleaning difficulties is a reason for some farmers to stay away from blanket TS use. Our objective was therefore to improve insight in TS excretion visibility and to compare quantity, pattern, and presence versus absence of TS excretion post-calving between the typical 2 cow categories at DO: High (H) and Low (L) SCC cows, treated with antibiotic (AB) plus TS (H-ABTS) or TS only (L-TS), respectively. In herds in the Netherlands (n = 3), and Germany (n = 4), cows were enrolled at DO, and categorized as H-ABTS (n = 93), or L-TS (n = 99). Post-calving, quarter level TS visibility, quantities, patterns, and percentage of TS infused and excreted post-calving were recorded from 50 mL of pre-milk of every quarter at each of the first 15 or 16 milkings. Udder quarter health status was determined by bacteriological culture and somatic cell counting of quarter milk samples taken at DO and at d 3 post-calving and by clinical mastitis incidence from DO until 30 DIM. Univariable and multivariable models were created to explore associations of TS excretion presence versus absence at the first 3 milkings. Irrespective of SCC category, both laboratory personnel, and farmers saw TS residues at the first milking in an equal 72% of quarters. Compared with laboratory as the gold standard, farmer sensitivity to spot TS in pre-milk was 74.5% at the first milking, decreasing to a maximum of 8.3% at the last 3 milking's. At the first milking, TS excretion quantities showed a bimodal distribution pattern and the mean percentage of TS infused (3.83 g) that was excreted in pre-milk at the first milking, was higher in the L-TS (45.5%) compared with the H-ABTS cow category (32%). At the second and third milking, mean adjusted TS percentage excreted was higher in the H-ABTS (8.5% and 1.8%, respectively) compared with the L-TS category (4.6% and 0.4% respectively). The multivariable model of the first 3 milkings showed parity at both the first and second milking, and study group at both the second and third milking, was significantly associated to TS presence. The univariable model showed no association between TS presence at the first milking and udder health. In conclusion, in pre-milk of the first milking, TS residue excretion was bimodal, higher in L-TS cows, more likely present in multiparous cows, and not associated with udder health. At the second and third milking, excretion was higher in H-ABTS cows and TS presence was only more likely in multiparous cows at the second milking.

2.
J Dairy Sci ; 105(6): 5381-5392, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379456

RESUMEN

Since 2013, selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) has been the standard approach in the Netherlands where farmers select cows for the use of antimicrobials at drying-off. Shortly after its introduction, antimicrobial usage decreased significantly, and no significant association was found between the level of SDCT and clinical mastitis (CM). Obviously, at that time long-term associations could not be evaluated. This study aimed to provide insight into the methods and level of implementation of SDCT on Dutch dairy farms with a conventional milking system (CMS) or an automatic milking system (AMS) in 2016 and 2017, several years after the implementation of SDCT. Udder health and antimicrobial use were also assessed. For this study, 262 farmers recorded dry cow treatments as well as all CM cases in the period from May 1, 2016, until April 30, 2017. Additionally, somatic cell count (SCC) data on cow and herd level, treatment data on herd level and questionnaire results on udder health management were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with differences between milking systems being evaluated using nonparametric univariable statistics. In the study period, SDCT was applied on almost all (98.8%) of the participating dairy farms. The main reason for applying antimicrobials at drying-off was either the SCC history during the complete previous lactation or the SCC at the last milk recording before drying-off. The median percentage of cows treated with antimicrobials was 48.5%. The average incidence rate of CM was 27.3 cases per 100 cows per year. From all CM cases that were registered per herd, on average 32.8% were scored as mild, 42.2% as moderate, and 25.0% as severe CM. The mean bulk tank SCC of the herds was 168,989 cells/mL. A cow was considered to have subclinical mastitis (SCM) if individual SCC was ≥150,000 cells/mL for primiparous and ≥250,000 cells/mL for multiparous cows. Passing these threshold values after 2 earlier low SCC values was considered a new case of SCM. The mean incidence rate of SCM in these herds was 62.5 cases per 100 cows per year. Bulk tank SCC and the incidence rate of SCM on farms with a CMS were statistically lower than on farms with an AMS, whereas the incidence rate of CM did not significantly differ between both groups of farms. The AMS farms had more cows per herd treated with antimicrobials at drying-off and a larger proportion of severe CM cases than did CMS farms. It is unknown whether the differences are due to the milking system or to other differences between both types of farms. This study showed the level of adoption of SDCT, udder health, and antimicrobial usage parameters several years after the ban on the preventive use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry. It found that udder health parameters did not differ from those found in Dutch studies before and around the time of implementing SDCT, whereas SDCT was widely applied on Dutch dairy farms during the study period. Therefore, it was concluded that Dutch dairy farmers were able to handle the changed policy of antimicrobial use at drying-off while maintaining indicators of a good udder health.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Mastitis Bovina , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/metabolismo , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Industria Lechera/métodos , Granjas , Femenino , Lactancia , Glándulas Mamarias Animales , Mastitis Bovina/epidemiología , Leche/metabolismo
3.
J Dairy Sci ; 104(2): 2280-2289, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358166

RESUMEN

In 2013, the preventive use of antimicrobials in Dutch livestock was prohibited, including a ban on the blanket application of antimicrobial dry cow treatment (BDCT). Since then, selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) has become the standard approach. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of the ban on BDCT and the extent of the subsequent adoption of SDCT on antimicrobial usage (AMU) and udder health on Dutch dairy farms. In the Dutch cattle health surveillance system, AMU for dry cow treatment (AMUDCT), AMU for intramammary treatment at any point in time (AMUIMM), and udder health indicators are routinely and continuously monitored. This provided the opportunity to study associations among SDCT, udder health, and AMU on census data of approximately 17,000 dairy herds, with about 1.67 million cows in total (>2 yr old) at one moment in time in the period from 2013 until 2017. Six udder health parameters were evaluated using multivariable population-averaged generalized estimating equation models. The year in which the ban on BDCT was introduced (2013) was compared with the period thereafter (2014-2017). Additionally, AMUIMM and AMUDCT were included as independent variables to evaluate whether the extent to which SDCT was implemented on the herd level was associated with udder health. Demographic parameters were included as potential confounders. Since the ban on BDCT, overall declines of 63% in AMUDCT and 15% in AMUIMM were observed. The raw data show an improvement in 5 out of 6 evaluated udder health parameters between 2013 and 2017. Nevertheless, the multivariable model results showed that the period since the ban on BDCT was associated with a small but significant increase in the percentage of cows with high somatic cell count (HSCC) and new HSCC (+0.41% and +0.06%, respectively). Additionally, the probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% of primiparous cows having HSCC during the start of lactation increased slightly, associated with the period after which BDCT was banned (odds ratio = 1.08). The probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% cows having a persistent HSCC during the dry period was not affected and bulk milk somatic cell count showed a slight but significant reduction. The only udder health parameter that notably worsened during the study period was the probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% of multiparous cows with a new HSCC after the dry period, during the start of lactation (odds ratio = 1.23). In herds where the farmer decided not to apply any dry cow therapy (≈20% of all herds), all udder health parameters were poorer compared with herds in which dry cow therapy was applied to some extent. The ban on BDCT and implementation of SDCT in the Netherlands was associated with a considerable reduction in AMU without a major impairment in udder health at the national level. Although negative effects of changed dry cow management were observed in some herds, we conclude that SDCT can be introduced without substantial negative effects on udder health.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Industria Lechera , Glándulas Mamarias Animales , Mastitis Bovina/prevención & control , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bovinos , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Censos , Industria Lechera/métodos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Glándulas Mamarias Animales/efectos de los fármacos , Leche/citología , Países Bajos , Paridad , Embarazo
4.
J Dairy Sci ; 101(2): 1530-1539, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29224885

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to develop a mathematical model to identify a scenario with the lowest costs for mastitis associated with the dry period while restricting the percentage of cows to be dried off with dry cow antimicrobials. Costs of clinical and subclinical mastitis as well as antimicrobial use were quantified. Based on data from a large field trial, a linear programming model was built with the goal to minimize the costs associated with antimicrobial use at drying off. To enable calculations on minimizing costs of dry cow treatment on herd-level by drying-off decisions in an "average" herd, we created an example herd. Cows were projected on 3 different types of herds, based on bulk tank somatic cell count, and were categorized in groups based on parity and somatic cell count from the last test recording before drying-off. Economically optimal use of antimicrobials was determined while restricting the maximum percentage of cows dried off with antimicrobials from 100 to 0%. This restriction reveals the relationship between the maximum percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics and the economic consequences. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of variation in the most important input variables, with the effect of dry cow antimicrobials resulting in a lower or higher percentage of clinical and subclinical mastitis depending on being dried off with or without dry cow antimicrobials, respectively, and the milk price. From an economic perspective, blanket dry cow treatment seems not to be the optimal approach of dry cow therapy, although differences between approaches were small. With lower bulk tank somatic cell counts, more dry cow antimicrobials can be omitted without economic consequences. The economic impact of reducing the percentage of clinical mastitis was found to be much larger than reducing the bulk tank somatic cell count. The optimal percentage of cows to be dried off with antimicrobials depends on the udder health situation, expressed as the bulk tank somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. For all evaluated types of herds, selective dry cow treatment was economically more beneficial than blanket dry cow treatment. Economic profits of selective dry cow treatment are greater if bulk tank somatic cell count and clinical mastitis incidence are lower. Economics is not an argument against reduction of dry cow antimicrobials by applying selective dry cow treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mastitis Bovina/prevención & control , Animales , Antibacterianos/economía , Bovinos , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Femenino , Lactancia , Glándulas Mamarias Animales/efectos de los fármacos , Mastitis Bovina/economía , Modelos Biológicos , Embarazo
5.
J Dairy Sci ; 101(7): 6336-6345, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29605325

RESUMEN

In the Netherlands, regulations have been in place since 2008 to reduce the overall use of antimicrobials to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. As part of these regulations, a ban on the preventive use of antimicrobials, such as applying blanket dry cow treatment, was introduced and alternative measures such as selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) were implemented. Both farmers and veterinarians play an important role in implementing these measures and have a shared responsibility with respect to prudent antimicrobial use (AMU). The attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward restricted AMU and toward SDCT is unknown, but a favorable attitude toward this approach seems crucial for successful implementation. In 2015, an online questionnaire was collected from 181 veterinarians that contained questions with regard to their attitude and behavior toward reduction of AMU and toward SDCT. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data, and multivariable logistic regression models with a logit link function were applied to evaluate potential associations between veterinarians' attitudes toward AMU and SDCT and the rationale behind their mindset, based on positive and negative aspects of reduction in AMU. The veterinarians were divided into 3 groups based on their opinion on 4 statements with regard to AMU and SDCT: veterinarians with an unfavorable, a neutral, and a favorable attitude toward reduction of AMU and toward SDCT. For the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the first 2 groups were combined and compared with the veterinarians with a favorable attitude. The general attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward reduction of AMU was positive, and most expressed the belief that they can still be a good veterinarian when they prescribe less antimicrobials. Veterinarians indicated they progressively promoted SDCT beginning in 2013. Most veterinarians see the advice they provide to farmers on SDCT as the best possible approach and are convinced that their farmers apply this SDCT approach. The results of the multivariable analyses showed that veterinarians with a favorable attitude mentioned positive aspects of SDCT, such as an increased consciousness of AMU among farmers, improving animal health, reducing antimicrobial resistance, and a chance to add value for the farmer, more often than other veterinarians. The latter group significantly more often indicated negative aspects of SDCT, such as a higher risk of sick cows and feeling pushed to follow the rules. In conclusion, the general attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward reduction of AMU and SDCT was found to be positive. However, given the influence veterinarians potentially have on the attitude of farmers and the variability found in their attitude and behavior, veterinarians need specific attention if regional or national programs are organized trying to change behavior of farmers and encourage prudent AMU and SDCT.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mastitis Bovina/prevención & control , Veterinarios/psicología , Animales , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos , Bovinos , Industria Lechera , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Agricultores , Femenino , Países Bajos
6.
J Dairy Sci ; 99(5): 3753-3764, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26947289

RESUMEN

The goal of dry-cow therapy (DCT) is to reduce the prevalence of intramammary infections (IMI) by eliminating existing IMI at drying off and preventing new IMI from occurring during the dry period. Due to public health concerns, however, preventive use of antimicrobials has become questionable. In this study, we evaluated the effects of 8 scenarios for selecting animals for DCT, taking into account variation in parity and cow-level somatic cell count (SCC) at drying off. The aim of this study was to evaluate udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics at the herd level when using different scenarios for selecting cows for DCT. To enable calculation and comparison of the effects of different scenarios to select cows for DCT in an "average" herd, we created an example herd, with a virtual herd size of 100 dairy cows to be calving during a year. Udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics were evaluated during the dry period and the first 100 d in lactation, the period during which the greatest effect of DCT is expected. This leads to an estimated 13,551 cow-days at risk during a year in a 100-cow dairy herd. In addition to a blanket DCT (BDCT) scenario, we developed 7 scenarios to select cows for DCT based on SCC. The scenarios covered a range of possible approaches to select low-SCC cows for DCT, all based on cow-level SCC thresholds on the last milk recording before drying off. The incidence rate of clinical mastitis in the example herd varied from 11.6 to 14.5 cases of clinical mastitis per 10,000 cow-days at risk in the different scenarios, and the prevalence of subclinical mastitis varied from 38.8% in scenario 1 (BDCT) to 48.3% in scenario 8. Total antimicrobial usage for DCT and clinical mastitis treatment varied over the scenarios from 1.27 (scenario 8) to 3.15 animal daily dosages (BDCT), leading to a maximum reduction in antimicrobial usage of 60% for scenario 8 compared with BDCT. The total costs for each of the scenarios showed little variation, varying from €4,893 for scenario 5 to €5,383 for scenario 8. The effect of selective DCT compared with BDCT on udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics is influenced by the SCC criteria used to select cows for DCT. Scenario 2 resulted in the lowest increases in clinical and subclinical mastitis compared with BDCT. The greatest reduction in antimicrobial usage was achieved under scenario 8. From an economic perspective, lowest costs were achieved with scenario 5. Drying off dairy cows with antimicrobials has an effect on udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics.


Asunto(s)
Glándulas Mamarias Animales/efectos de los fármacos , Mastitis Bovina/epidemiología , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Bovinos , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Femenino , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Leche/efectos de los fármacos
7.
J Dairy Sci ; 99(10): 8259-8266, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27448856

RESUMEN

The attitude of Dutch dairy farmers toward selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) is unknown, although a favorable mindset toward application of SDCT seems crucial for successful implementation. Given the fact that blanket dry cow treatment has been strongly promoted until recently, the implementation of SDCT was expected to be quite a challenge. This study aimed to provide insight into the level of implementation of SDCT in 2013 in the Netherlands, the methods used by farmers for selection of cows for dry cow treatment (DCT), the relation between SDCT and udder health and antimicrobial usage (AMU) in 2013, and the mindset of farmers toward SDCT. In 2014, a questionnaire was conducted in a group of 177 herds included in a large-scale udder health study in 2013 and for which all clinical mastitis cases during this year were recorded. In addition, data on somatic cell count (SCC) parameters and AMU was available for these herds. The questionnaire included questions with regard to DCT with a special emphasis on farmers' attitude and mindset with regard to applying DCT in 2013. The data that were obtained from the questionnaire were combined with the data on clinical mastitis, SCC, and AMU. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data and to study the association between DCT, udder health, and AMU. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with a logit link function were applied to evaluate potential associations between DCT and farmers' mindset. Selective DCT was taken up progressively by the farmers in our study, with 75% of them implementing SDCT in 2013. The main criterion used to select cows for DCT was the SCC history during the complete previous lactation. The herds were divided into 3 groups based on the percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics in 2013 as indicated by the farmers during interviews. The first group applied BDCT, and the herds for which SDCT was applied were split in 2 equally sized groups based on the median percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics (67%). The incidence rate of subclinical and clinical mastitis were comparable between the groups. Results of the multivariable model showed that 4 factors related to farmers' mindset were associated with the probability to apply SDCT: "financial consequences of SDCT," "uncertainty whether a cow will recover without antimicrobials," the statement "I do not have a problem with the (potential) negative consequences of SDCT," and the usage of internal teat sealants. Application of SDCT appeared to be associated with farmers' attitude. The mindset of farmers with respect to reduction of AMU and the implementation of SDCT was generally positive.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores , Mastitis Bovina/epidemiología , Animales , Bovinos , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Femenino , Lactancia , Glándulas Mamarias Animales , Leche
8.
J Dairy Sci ; 97(6): 3606-14, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24746132

RESUMEN

The goal of dry cow therapy (DCT) is to reduce the prevalence of intramammary infections (IMI) by eliminating existing IMI at drying off and preventing new IMI from occurring during the dry period. Due to public health concerns, however, preventive use of antibiotics has become questionable. This study evaluated selective DCT in 1,657 cows with low somatic cell count (SCC) at the last milk recording before drying off in 97 Dutch dairy herds. Low SCC was defined as <150,000 cells/mL for primiparous and <250,000 cells/mL for multiparous cows. A split-udder design was used in which 2 quarters of each cow were treated with dry cow antibiotics and the other 2 quarters remained as untreated controls. The effect of DCT on clinical mastitis (CM), bacteriological status, SCC, and antibiotic use were determined at the quarter level using logistic regression and chi-squared tests. The incidence rate of CM was found to be 1.7 times (95% confidence interval = 1.4-2.1) higher in quarters dried off without antibiotics as compared with quarters dried off with antibiotics. Streptococcus uberis was the predominant organism causing CM in both groups. Somatic cell count at calving and 14 d in milk was significantly higher in quarters dried off without antibiotics (772,000 and 46,000 cells/mL, respectively) as compared with the quarters dried off with antibiotics (578,000 and 30,000 cells/mL, respectively). Quarters with an elevated SCC at drying off and quarters with a positive culture for major pathogens at drying off had a higher risk for an SCC above 200,000 cells/mL at 14 d in milk as compared with quarters with a low SCC at drying off and quarters with a negative culture for major pathogens at drying off. For quarters that were culture-positive for major pathogens at drying off, a trend for a higher risk on CM was also found. Selective DCT, not using DCT in cows that had a low SCC at the last milk recording before drying off, significantly increased the incidence rate of CM and SCC. The decrease in antibiotic use by drying off quarters without DCT was not compensated by an increase in antibiotic use for treating CM. Total antibiotic use related to mastitis was reduced by 85% in these quarters.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Células/veterinaria , Mastitis Bovina/tratamiento farmacológico , Mastitis Bovina/epidemiología , Leche/citología , Animales , Bovinos , Corynebacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Corynebacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella/aislamiento & purificación , Lactancia , Modelos Logísticos , Glándulas Mamarias Animales/microbiología , Mastitis Bovina/microbiología , Leche/química , Paridad , Prevalencia , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA