Trichomonas vaginalis detection using real-time TaqMan PCR.

1978 women and 93 men, all suspected of having a Trichomonas vaginalis infection, were tested for the presence of T. vaginalis by real-time PCR using the T. vaginalis-specific 2-kb repeated sequence, and by direct microscopy and culture. 40 samples were positive by T. vaginalis real-time PCR and 27 were positive by wet mount microscopy, either direct or after culture. All samples positive by direct microscopy of culture were also positive by real-time PCR. Of the 13 samples which were real-time PCR positive but negative by direct microscopy and culture 11 were confirmed by another T. vaginalis real-time PCR based on the beta tubulin gene. Only 2 samples (0.1%) showed inhibition in the PCR. The prevalence of T. vaginalis infection in the female patients was 1.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the real-time PCR were 100%, 99.9%, 95% and 100%, respectively. The same test characteristics for the combined conventional T. vaginalis detection methods (microscopy+culture) were 71%, 100%, 100% and 99%, respectively. Therefore, real-time PCR is the method of choice for the diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection.

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex with Real Time PCR: comparison of different primer-probe sets based on the IS6110 element.

The sensitivity and specificity to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex of four Real Time PCR primer-probe sets was compared. Three sets targeted nearly the same location on the IS6110 sequence and set 4 targeted a location 200 bp downstream on IS6110. Real Time PCR's with sets 1, 2 and 3 were carried out with co-amplification of a modified target as an internal amplification control. By testing identical DNA samples it was shown that small changes in primer and probe sequences result in differences in the performance of the assays, regarding analytical sensitivity and specificity.

An international external quality assessment of nucleic acid amplification of herpes simplex virus.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing awareness of the need for external quality control of diagnostic virology. OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) of herpes simplex within Europe. STUDY DESIGN: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) proficiency panels were produced at the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control on behalf of the European Union Concerted Action for Quality Control of Nucleic Acid Amplification in 1999 and 2000. Nine reference laboratories evaluated the production process. Each panel consisted of 12 coded samples with various concentrations of inactivated, freeze-dried HSV type 1 (HSV-1), and HSV type 2 (HSV-2), or negative controls. Positive samples included HSV-1 and HSV-2 in a range of concentrations (2 x 10(2) to 2 x 10(7) genome copies per ml) similar to those found in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with HSV encephalitis. RESULTS: Sixty-six participants reported a total of 76 data sets for panel 1, and 71 reported 78 data sets for panel 2. The majority of the participants employed qualitative 'in-house' polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, either in a single, nested or semi-nested format. For panel 2, 9 laboratories reported use of 'real-time' PCR in contrast to 3 for panel 1. Three laboratories submitted quantitative results on both panels. Thirty percent of the data sets had correct results for the entire panel 1. In 6 data sets (8%) a total of 11 false positive results were reported. For panel 2, 28% of the data sets had correct result. Nineteen false positive results were reported in 14 data sets (18%), but most of the incorrect results reflected a lack of test sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high frequency of false positive results and the large number of false-negative results, albeit at low copy number, stress the need for improvement in the quality of HSV NAT and for external quality control programmes.

Acute hepatitis B in a healthcare worker: a case report of genuine vaccination failure.

BACKGROUND: Individuals who reach the antibody threshold level of 10IU/l against the surface protein of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) after completion of a series of hepatitis B vaccination are considered to be long-term protected against a clinically manifest HBV infection. CASE REPORT: Here we describe an acute hepatitis B infection in a patient who received five hepatitis B vaccinations. Although his initial response to vaccination was moderate, he finally reached an excellent hepatitis B surface antibody level (anti-HBs) titres of more than 1000 IU/l in response to a booster vaccination with a recombinant DNA vaccine. Nevertheless, he developed full-blown acute hepatitis due to an HBV infection 14years after this booster vaccination. A DNA analysis of the surface protein encoding region followed by phylogenetic analysis showed that our patient was infected with a normal HBV strain that is circulating among men who have sex with men. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a genuine hepatitis B vaccination failure in someone who acquired a high anti-HBs level in response to a recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine. CONCLUSION: Healthcare workers whose response to the initial hepatitis B vaccination is moderate might be vulnerable to hepatitis B virus infection.

Strengthening the diagnostic capacity to detect Bio Safety Level 3 organisms in unusual respiratory viral outbreaks.

BACKGROUND: Experience with a highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreak in the Netherlands (2003) illustrated that the diagnostic demand for respiratory viruses at different biosafety levels (including BSL3), can increase unexpectedly and dramatically. OBJECTIVES: We describe the measures taken since, aimed at strengthening national laboratory surge capacity and improving preparedness for dealing with diagnostic demand during outbreaks of (emerging) respiratory virus infections, including pandemic influenza virus. STUDY DESIGN: Academic and peripheral medical-microbiological laboratories collaborated to determine minimal laboratory requirements for the identification of viruses in the early stages of a pandemic or a large outbreak of avian influenza virus. Next, an enhanced collaborative national network of outbreak assistance laboratories (OAL) was set up. An inventory was made of the maximum diagnostic throughput that this network can deliver in a period of intensified demand. For an estimate of the potential magnitude of this surge demand, historical counts were calculated from hospital- and physician-based registries of patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: Number of respiratory physician-visits ranged from 140,000 to 615,000 per month and hospitalizations ranged from 3000 to 11,500 per month. The established OAL-network provides rapid diagnostic response with agreed quality requirements and a maximum throughput capacity of 1275 samples/day (38,000 per month), assuming other routine diagnostic work needs to be maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Thus surge demand for diagnostics for hospitalized cases (if not distinguishable from other respiratory illness) could be handled by the OAL network. Assessing etiology of community acquired acute respiratory infection however, may rapidly exceed the capacity of the network. Therefore algorithms are needed for triaging for laboratory diagnostics; currently this is not addressed in pandemic preparedness plans.

Comparison of COBAS AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR, including confirmation with N. gonorrhoeae-specific 16S rRNA PCR, with traditional culture.

A total of 3,023 clinical specimens were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by using COBAS AMPLICOR (CA) PCR and confirmation of positives by N. gonorrhoeae-specific 16S rRNA PCR. The sensitivity of CA plus 16S rRNA PCR was 98.8%, compared to 68.2% for culture. Confirmation of CA positives increased the positive predictive value from 54.8 to 96.6%.

External quality assessment program for qualitative and quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in diagnostic virology.

To assess the performance of laboratories in detecting and quantifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels in HCV-infected patients, we distributed two proficiency panels for qualitative and quantitative HCV RNA testing. The panels were designed by the European Union Quality Control Concerted Action, prepared by Boston Biomedica Inc., and distributed in May 1999 (panel 1) and February 2000 (panel 2). Each panel consisted of two negative samples and six positive samples, with HCV RNA target levels from 200 to 500,000 copies/ml. Panel 1 had four samples with at least 50,000 copies/ml, and panel 2 had two samples with at least 50,000 copies/ml. Fifty-seven laboratories submitted 45 qualitative and 35 quantitative data sets on panel 1, and 81 laboratories submitted 75 qualitative and 48 quantitative data sets on panel 2. In both panels, about two-thirds of the qualitative data sets and >90% of the quantitative data sets were obtained with commercial assays. With each panel, two data sets gave one false-positive result, corresponding to false-positivity rates of 1.3% and 0.8% for panel 1 and panel 2, respectively. Samples containing at least 50,000 copies/ml were found positive in 97% and 99% of the cases with panel 1 and panel 2, respectively. In contrast, the positive samples containing < or =5,000 copies/ml were reported positive in only 71% and 77% of the cases with panel 1 and panel 2, respectively. Adequate or better scores on qualitative results (all results correct or only the low-positive samples missed) were obtained in 84% (panel 1) and 80% (panel 2) of the data sets. In the analysis of quantitative results, 60% (panel 1) and 73% (panel 2) of the data sets obtained an adequate or better score (> or =80% of the positive results within the range of the geometric mean +/- 0.5 log(10)). Our results indicate that considerable improvements in molecular detection and quantitation of HCV have been achieved, particularly through the use of commercial assays. However, the lowest detection levels of many assays are still too high, and further standardization is still needed. Finally, this study underlines the importance of proficiency panels for monitoring the quality of diagnostic laboratories.

Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.

The first European Quality Control Concerted Action study was organized to assess the ability of laboratories to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in a panel of urine samples by nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs). The panel consisted of lyophilized urine samples, including three negative, two strongly positive, and five weakly positive samples. Ninety-six laboratories in 22 countries participated with a total of 102 data sets. Of 204 strongly positive samples 199 (97.5%) were correctly reported, and of 506 weakly positive samples 466 (92.1%) were correctly reported. In 74 (72.5%) data sets correct results were reported on all samples, and 17 data sets (16.7%) showed either one false-negative or one false-positive result. In another 11 data sets, two or more incorrect results were reported, and two data sets reported a false-positive result on one negative sample. The Roche COBAS Amplicor test was performed in 44 (43%) data sets, the Abbott LCx assay was performed in 31 (30%) data sets, the Roche Amplicor manual assay was performed in 9 (9%) data sets, an in-house PCR was performed in 9 (9%) data sets, the Becton Dickinson ProbeTec ET assay was performed in 5 (4.9%) data sets, and the GenProbe TMA assay was performed in 4 (3.9%) data sets. The results of the Roche Amplicor manual (95.6% correct), COBAS Amplicor (97.0%), and Abbott LCx (94.8%) tests were comparable (P = 0.48). The results with the in-house PCR, BD ProbeTec ET, and GenProbe TMA tests were reported correctly in 88.6, 98, and 92.5% of the tests, respectively. Freeze-drying of clinical urine specimens proved to be a successful method for generating standardized, stable, and easy-to-transport samples for the detection of C. trachomatis by using NATs. Although the results, especially the specificity, for this proficiency panel were better than most quality control studies, sensitivity problems occurred frequently, underlining the need for good laboratory practice and reference reagents to monitor the performance of these assays.