Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(6): 1103-1106, 2021 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33772269

RESUMEN

Three rapid diagnostic test panels (Verigene BC-GN, BioFire BCID, and BCID 2 [RUO]) were compared using the Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy (DOOR-MAT) to evaluate potential downstream antimicrobial prescribing decisions resulting from the panels' different organism and resistance detection. BioFire BCID 2 (RUO) had the best mean DOOR-MAT scores.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Bacteriemia , Sepsis , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Cultivo de Sangre , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(9): e0044121, 2021 08 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34228533

RESUMEN

Decisions regarding which rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for bloodstream infections to implement remain challenging given the diversity of organisms detected by different platforms. We used the desirability of outcome ranking management of antimicrobial therapy (DOOR-MAT) as a framework to compare two RDT platforms on potential desirability of antimicrobial therapy decisions. An observational study was performed at University of Maryland Medical System comparing Verigene blood culture (BC) to GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture ID (BCID) (research use only) panels on blood cultures from adult patients. Positive percent agreement (PPA) between each RDT platform and Vitek MS was calculated for comparison of on-panel targets. Theoretical antimicrobial decisions were made based on RDT results, taking into consideration patient parameters, antimicrobial stewardship practices, and local infectious diseases epidemiology. DOOR-MAT with a partial credit scoring system was applied to these decisions, and mean scores were compared across platforms using a paired t test. The study consisted of 160 unique patients. The Verigene BC PPA was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.1 to 99.8), and ePlex BCID PPA was 98% (95% CI, 94.3 to 99.6). Among the 31 organisms not on the Verigene BC panels, 61% were identified by the ePlex BCID panels. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) DOOR-MAT score for Verigene BC was 86.8 (28.5), while that for ePlex BCID was 91.9 (23.1) (P = 0.01). Both RDT platforms had high PPA for on-panel targets. The ePlex BCID was able to identify more organisms than Verigene, resulting in higher mean DOOR-MAT scores.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Bacteriemia , Sepsis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Cultivo de Sangre , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(5): ofae176, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680612

RESUMEN

Subarachnoid neurocysticercosis can be challenging to recognize, which often leads to a delay in diagnosis. We report 3 cases presenting as chronic headache disorders that highlight the unique manifestations seen with this form of neurocysticercosis and the role that the infectious diseases consultant can play in ensuring a timely diagnosis.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA