The Role of Immune Checkpoints after Cellular Therapy.

Cellular therapies utilize the powerful force of the human immune system to target malignant cells. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the most established cellular therapy, but chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have gained attention in recent years. While in allo-HCT an entirely novel allogeneic immune system facilitates a so-called Graft-versus-tumor, respectively, Graft-versus-leukemia (GvT/GvL) effect against high-risk hematologic malignancies, in CAR T cell therapies genetically modified autologous T cells specifically attack target molecules on malignant cells. These therapies have achieved high success rates, offering potential cures in otherwise detrimental diseases. However, relapse after cellular therapy remains a serious clinical obstacle. Checkpoint Inhibition (CI), which was recently designated as breakthrough in cancer treatment and consequently awarded with the Nobel prize in 2018, is a different way to increase anti-tumor immunity. Here, inhibitory immune checkpoints are blocked on immune cells in order to restore the immunological force against malignant diseases. Disease relapse after CAR T cell therapy or allo-HCT has been linked to up-regulation of immune checkpoints that render cancer cells resistant to the cell-mediated anti-cancer immune effects. Thus, enhancing immune cell function after cellular therapies using CI is an important treatment option that might re-activate the anti-cancer effect upon cell therapy. In this review, we will summarize current data on this topic with the focus on immune checkpoints after cellular therapy for malignant diseases and balance efficacy versus potential side effects.

Loss of Biglycan Enhances Thrombin Generation in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice: Implications for Inflammation and Atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Thrombin signaling promotes atherosclerosis by initiating inflammatory events indirectly through platelet activation and directly via protease-activated receptors. Therefore, endogenous thrombin inhibitors may be relevant modulators of atheroprogression and cardiovascular risk. In addition, endogenous thrombin inhibitors may affect the response to non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants. Here, the question was addressed whether the small leucine-rich proteoglycan biglycan acts as an endogenous thrombin inhibitor in atherosclerosis through activation of heparin cofactor II. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Biglycan concentrations were elevated in the plasma of patients with acute coronary syndrome and in male Apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE(-/-)) mice. Biglycan was detected in the glycocalyx of capillaries and the subendothelial matrix of arterioles of ApoE(-/-) mice and in atherosclerotic plaques. Thereby a vascular compartment is provided that may mediate the endothelial and subendothelial activation of heparin cofactor II through biglycan. ApoE and Bgn double-deficient (ApoE(-/-)/Bgn(-/0)) mice showed higher activity of circulating thrombin, increased platelet activation and platelet adhesion in vivo, supporting a role of biglycan in balancing thrombin activity. Furthermore, concentrations of circulating cytokines and aortic macrophage content were elevated in ApoE(-/-)/Bgn(-/0) mice, suggesting a proinflammatory phenotype. Elevated platelet activation and macrophage accumulation were reversed by treating ApoE(-/-)/Bgn(-/0) mice with the thrombin inhibitor argatroban. Ultimately, ApoE(-/-)/Bgn(-/0) mice developed aggravated atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that biglycan plays a previously unappreciated protective role during the progression of atherosclerosis by inhibiting thrombin activity, platelet activation, and finally macrophage-mediated plaque inflammation.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Allogeneic Stem Cell transplantation-A Comprehensive Single Center Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antibiotics are still controversial during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In our transplant center, we suspended antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in 2017. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was the detailed analysis of the potentially beneficial impact of omittance of standard antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in survival and Graft-versus-Host disease (GvHD) development, especially with consideration of confounding factors and competing events. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of the risk of severe infections and transplant-related mortality without antibiotic prophylaxis, the detailed assessment of bacterial and viral infections including multiresistant pathogens as well as occurrence of relapse in both groups. This study aims to support the development of future antibiotic strategies in allo-HSCT. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed patient outcome in the time periods before (between December 2012 and February 2017) and after suspension (between March 2017 and June 2020) of antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT. Relevant clinical outcome parameters of the patients (n = 221) were collected by chart-review in the two groups (with antibiotic prophylaxis n = 101 versus without antibiotic prophylaxis n = 120). All patients were 18 years or older. Propensity score methods were used to adjust for potentially confounding patient characteristics. To address competing events, transitions between moderate/severe acute and chronic GvHD, relapse and death were analyzed using an inverse-propensity score weighted multistate modeling approach. RESULTS: While we observed a trend towards an improved outcome in the cohort without antibiotic prophylaxis, the inverse-propensity-score-weighted analyses did not show significant differences between the two groups in overall survival (OS) (P = .811) or development of acute GvHD (aGvHD) grade 3/4 (P = .158) and chronic moderate/severe GvHD (cGvHD) (P = .686). Multistate analysis respecting competing events revealed comparable estimated probabilities without antibiotic prophylaxis versus with antibiotic prophylaxis in OS (35.0% [95% CI: 28.2%-42.7%] versus 35.3% [95% CI: 27.8%-41.1%]) as well as development of aGvHD grade 3/4 (7.7% [95% CI: 5.9%-12.2%] vs. 10.6% [95% CI: 7.7%-15.7%]) and moderate/severe cGvHD (21.0% [95% CI: 17.7%-30.0%] vs. 23.8% [95% CI: 19.6%-31.4%]). Similar analyses showed also no significant differences in relapse rate, transplant-related mortality, relapse-related mortality, or GvHD-free/relapse-free survival between the two groups. An observed increase in severe infections without antibiotic prophylaxis did not lead to a significantly higher mortality rate. Viral reactivation and detection of multiresistant bacteria were comparable, yet a higher incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections was observed in patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Our study supports previous reports of noninferiority of allo-HSCT without use of antibiotic prophylaxis with close monitoring and rapid intervention, if infection is suspected. The trend towards improved outcomes without antibiotic prophylaxis, however, might not only be due to the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis but also due to additional progresses in the field over the recent years. While the present study is too small to draw definite conclusions, these results strongly warrant further multicenter studies addressing the potential benefit of omitting antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT.

[Long-lasting souvenir from Cameroon - Persistent, massive hypereosinophilia in amicrofilaremic infection with Loa loa]. / Langlebiges Souvenir aus Kamerun ­ persistierende, massive Hypereosinophilie bei amikrofilarämischer Infektion mit Loa loa.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of a polysymptomatic, rare parasitosis requires collaboration of internal specialists, tropical disease specialists, parasitologists and dermatologists. HISTORY: The course of disease is shown in a 66-year-old woman who regularly travels to Cameroon and presented with remarkable hypereosinophilia and pruritus with urticarial swellings. FINDINGS AND DIAGNOSIS: Using interdisciplinary diagnostics based on travel history, symptoms and laboratory results an occult amicrofilaraemic Loa loa infection with immunological hyperreaction to the parasite antigen, reactive hypereosinophilia and high antibody titers was diagnosed. THERAPY AND COURSE: Anthelmintic therapy was inducted with ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine. Treatment with ivermectin alone resulted in a prompt regression of symptoms and decrease of eosinophil levels and antibody titers. CONCLUSIONS: Parasitic diseases like L. loa infections are extremely rare in Europe but should be considered as differential diagnosis at an early stage when patients present with appropriate travel history and clinical findings. There is a lack of standardized therapy and follow-up recommendations. A precise recording of all new diagnoses with therapy progress/response should be established in an international registry.