Recent trends in american board of psychiatry and neurology psychiatric subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE: this article reviews the current status and recent trends in the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) psychiatric subspecialties and discusses the implications of those trends as well as several key questions whose answers may well determine subspecialty viability. METHODS: data are presented on specialty and subspecialty programs; graduates; and ABPN certification candidates and diplomates drawn from several sources, including the records of the ABPN, the websites of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Medical Association, and the annual medical education issues of JAMA. RESULTS: fewer than half of psychiatry graduates pursue subspecialty training. While most recent specialty graduates attempt to become certified by the ABPN, many subspecialists elect not to do so. There have been recent decreases in the number of fellowship programs and trainees in geriatric psychiatry and addiction psychiatry. The pass rates for fellowship graduates are superior to those for the "grandfathers" in all of the newer psychiatric subspecialties. Lower percentages of subspecialists than specialists participate in maintenance of certification, and maintenance of certification pass rates are high. CONCLUSION: the initial interest in training and certification in some of the ABPN subspecialties appears to have slowed, and the long-term viability of those subspecialties may well depend on the answers to a number of complicated social, economic, and political questions in the new health care era.

Relationship between Resident-In-Training Examination in psychiatry and subsequent certification examination performances.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the relationship between performance on The American College of Psychiatrists' Psychiatry Resident-In-Training Examination (PRITE) and the ABPN Part 1 examination. METHODS: Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between performance on the 2002 PRITE and the 2003 Part 1 examination for 297 examinees. RESULTS: The correlation between the PRITE global psychiatry and the Part 1 psychiatry scores was 0.59, and the correlation between the PRITE global neurology and the Part 1 neurology scores was 0.39. CONCLUSION: Although the PRITE and the Part 1 examination have different purposes and are developed independently, the significant correlations between scores on the two tests support the use of PRITE results to guide preparation for the Part 1 examination. Guidelines for PRITE scores associated with poor performance on the Part 1 examination are provided.

Guiding principles for physician reentry programs.

Physician reentry is defined by the American Medical Association (AMA) as: "A return to clinical practice in the discipline in which one has been trained or certified following an extended period of clinical inactivity not resulting from discipline or impairment." Physician reentry programs are creating an avenue for physicians who have left medicine in good standing to return to clinical practice. To date, however, programs have developed independently, with little coordination among them. If, as predicted, more physicians seek to reenter practice and more programs are developed in response, the need for information on program outcomes will grow. Valid assessment tools should be developed and shared across reentry programs to assess individual learner outcomes. This discussion paper sets forth Guiding Principles for Physician Reentry Programs as a step toward a more coordinated approach to physician reentry education and training. They serve as a reference for setting priorities and standards for action and, more specifically, offer a foundation from which programs can be planned, evaluated, and monitored. In addition to the guiding principles, an overview of physician reentry is provided including information on reentry physicians and physician reentry programs as well as a definition of physician reentry, reasons for taking leave and returning to clinical practice, and barriers physicians face as they seek to reenter clinical care.