RESUMEN
We report a case of a 75-year-old patient with hypopituitarism, bitemporal visual field deficits and a parasellar mass on pituitary MRI. During surgery, suspicion was raised that a non-functioning pituitary adenoma was accompanied by an abutting diaphragm sellae meningioma, which was confirmed at pathological examination. In retrospect, the initial MRI suggested two separate tumours on the basis of differing densities but this distinction was not seen on the last preoperative MRI.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo , Humanos , Anciano , Meningioma/complicaciones , Meningioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Meningioma/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Silla Turca/diagnóstico por imagen , Silla Turca/cirugía , Hipófisis/patología , Adenoma/complicaciones , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/patología , Neoplasias Meníngeas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the first experience of our multidisciplinary team with functional imaging using 11C-methionine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (11C-methionine PET-CT) co-registered with MRI (Met-PET/MRICR) in clinical decision making and surgical planning of patients with difficult to treat prolactinoma. METHODS: In eighteen patients with prolactinoma, referred to our tertiary referral centre because of intolerance or resistance for dopamine agonists (DA), Met-PET/MRICR was used to aid decision-making regarding therapy. RESULTS: Met-PET/MRICR was positive in 94% of the patients. MRI and Met-PET/MRICR findings were completely concordant in five patients, partially concordant in nine patients, and non-concordant in four patients. In five patients Met-PET/MRICR identified lesion(s) that were retrospectively also visible on MRI. Met-PET/MRICR was false negative in one patient, with a cystic adenoma on conventional MRI. Thirteen patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery, with nine achieving full biochemical remission, two clinical improvement and near normalized prolactin levels, and one patient clinical improvement with significant tumour reduction. Hence, nearly all patients (94%) were considered to have a positive outcome. Permanent complication rate was low. Three patients continued DA, two patients have a wait and scan policy. CONCLUSION: Met-PET/MRICR can provide additional information to guide multidisciplinary preoperative and intraoperative decision making in selected cases of prolactinoma. This approach resulted in a high remission rate with a low rate of complications in our expert centre.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Prolactinoma , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Metionina , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Prolactinoma/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Aspirin is typically discontinued in cranial and spinal surgery because of the increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, but comes together with the risk of resulting in an increase of cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority of perioperative continuation of aspirin patients undergoing low complex lumbar spinal surgery, compared with the current policy of perioperative discontinuation of aspirin. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups of 277 cases (554 in total). STUDY POPULATION: Patients undergoing low complex lumbar spinal surgery and using aspirin. All patients are aged >18 years. INTERVENTION: Peri-operative continuation of aspirin. STUDY OUTCOMES: Primary study outcome: composite of the following bleeding complications: Neurological deterioration as a result of hemorrhage in the surgical area with cauda and/or nerve root compression. Post-surgical anemia with hemoglobin level lower than 5 mmol/l, requiring transfusion. Subcutaneous hematoma leading to wound leakage and pain higher than NRS=7. Major and/or minor hemorrhage in any other body system according to the definition of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding scale. Secondary study outcomes: Each of the individual components of the primary outcome Absolute mean difference in operative blood loss between the study arms Thrombo-embolic-related complications: Myocardial infarction Venous thromboembolism Stroke Arterial thromboembolism FURTHER STUDY OUTCOMES: Anticoagulant treatment satisfaction by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and general health by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global-10) in the pre- and postoperative phase. NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE BURDEN AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICIPATION, BENEFIT, AND GROUP RELATEDNESS: Participation in this study imposes no additional risk to patients. Currently, there is no consensus on whether or not aspirin should be discontinued before cranial or spinal surgery. Currently, aspirin is typically discontinued in cranial and spinal surgery, because of a potential increased risk of hemorrhagic complication. An argument not based on a clinical trial. However, this policy might delay surgical procedures or carry the risk of resulting in an increase in cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events. It is unclear if the possibility of an increase in hemorrhage-related complications outweighs the risk of an increase in cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events. Furthermore, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be asked for safety analysis by monitoring the study. There are no further disadvantages to participating in this study. Outcome measurements are recorded during admission and regular outpatient visits, and thus, do not require additional visits to the hospital.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Trombosis , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In the surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis, it is debatable whether instrumented fusion is mandatory in addition to decompression. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to assess the long-term effect of decompression alone compared with decompression and instrumented fusion in patients who underwent the intervention of their own preference. The results were compared with those in patients who underwent randomly assigned treatment. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective observational multicenter cohort study, including 91 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis assigned to undergo either decompression alone (n = 44) or decompression and fusion (n = 47). The main outcomes were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) scores and the patient's perceived recovery at the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) leg pain and back pain scores and the reoperation rate. A meta-analysis was performed for data from this cohort study (n = 91) and from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) previously reported by the authors (n = 84). Subgroup analyses were performed on these combined data for age, sex, weight, smoking, and Meyerding grade. RESULTS: At the 12-week follow-up, improvements of RDQ scores were comparable for the two procedures (decompression alone [D group] 4.4, 95% CI 2.3-6.5; decompression and fusion [DF group] 5.8, 95% CI -4.3 to 1.4; p = 0.31). Likewise, VAS leg pain scores (D group 35.0, 95% CI 24.5-45.6; DF group 47.5, 95% CI 37.4-57.5; p = 0.09) and VAS back pain scores (D group 23.5, 95% CI 13.3-33.7; DF group 34.0, 95% CI 24.1-43.8; p = 0.15) were comparable. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of scores for RDQ (difference -3.1, 95% CI -6.4 to 0.3, p = 0.07), VAS leg pain (difference -7.4, 95% CI -22.1 to 7.2, p = 0.31), and VAS back pain (difference -11.4, 95% CI -25.7 to 2.9, p = 0.12). In contrast, patient-perceived recovery from leg pain was significantly higher in the DF group (79% vs 51%, p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate a superior outcome for decompression alone compared with decompression and fusion. Nine patients (20.5%) underwent reoperation in total, all in the D group. The meta-analysis including both the cohort and RCT populations yielded an estimated pooled mean difference in RDQ of -3.7 (95% CI -5.94 to -1.55, p = 0.0008) in favor of decompression and fusion at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, at the 2-year follow-up, patients who underwent decompression and fusion showed superior functional outcome and perceived recovery compared with those who underwent decompression alone. No subgroups benefited from decompression alone. Therefore, decompression and fusion is recommended over decompression alone as a primary surgical treatment option in isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Dolor de Espalda/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Metaanálisis en RedRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Full-endoscopic spine surgery is gaining interest as a less-invasive alternative to treat sciatica caused by a lumbar disc herniation. Concerns, however, exist with the learning curve as percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) appears to be more difficult to be performed compared to other techniques. In this study, the clinical outcomes during and after the learning curve are presented of 3 surgeons naïve to PTED. METHODS: In the first phase of a randomized controlled, noninferiority trial comparing PTED with microdiscectomy, 3 surgeons were trained in the PTED-procedure by a senior surgeon. After performing up to 20 cases under supervision, they started performing PTED on their own. Results of the early cases were compared to the later cases (>20). Furthermore, complications and reoperations were compared. Finally, differences in clinical outcomes between surgeons were compared. RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, 87% of the patients had follow-up data available. In general, there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between the early and later PTED cases. Furthermore, outcomes of the early PTED cases were comparable to the outcomes of microdiscectomy, while the later PTED cases had small, but more favorable outcomes compared to microdiscectomy. Two learning curve surgeons had substantially higher rates of reoperations within 1 year, compared to the senior surgeon or the microdiscectomy group. Duration of surgery was also longer for all learning curve surgeons. Finally, when comparing clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PTED versus microdiscectomy, there appears to be some statistically significant differences in outcomes compared between the senior and 3 learning curve surgeons. CONCLUSION: PTED appears to be safe to be adopted by surgeons naïve to the procedure when they are initially supervised by an experienced senior surgeon. Duration of surgery and risk of repeated surgery are increased during the learning curve, but patient-reported outcomes of the early PTED cases are similar to the outcomes of later PTED cases, and similar to the outcomes of microdiscectomy cases. This study underlines the need for an experienced mentor for surgeons to safely adopt PTED.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) was introduced as a less invasive procedure to treat sciatica. Even though the PTED has a small scar size, it is unknown if PTED also leads to better scar-related patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to compare scar-related outcomes between patients undergoing PTED vs open microdiscectomy. METHODS: Patients with at least 6 weeks of radiating leg pain were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to PTED or open microdiscectomy. Scar-related patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Body Image Score (BIS), Cosmesis Scale (CS) and a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) on scar esthetic. RESULTS: Of the 530 included patients, 286 patients underwent PTED and 244 underwent open microdiscectomy as allocated. At 12 months of follow-up, 95% of the patients had data available. At 12 months, the BIS was 6.2 ± 1.7 in the PTED-group and 6.6 ± 1.9 in the open microdiscectomy group (between-group difference .4, 95% CI .2 to .7). CS was 21.3 ± 3.0 in the PTED-group and 18.6 ± 3.4 in the open microdiscectomy group (between-group difference -2.7, 95% CI -3.1 to -2.3). Average NRS for scar esthetic was 9.2 ± 1.3 and 7.8 ± 1.6 in the PTED and open microdiscectomy groups, respectively (between-group difference -1.4, 95% CI -1.6 to -1.2). CONCLUSIONS: PTED leads to a higher self-rated scar esthetic as compared to open microdiscectomy, while self-reported body image seems to be comparable between both groups. Therefore, from an esthetic point, PTED seems to be the preferred technique to treat sciatica.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Transsphenoidal surgery is standard care in the treatment of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Current clinician-reported surgical outcome measures are one-dimensional, typically focusing primarily on complete or partial resection, and secondarily on complication rates. However, outcomes are best reflected by the delicate balance of efficacy and complications at patient level. OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a novel way to classify and report outcomes, integrating efficacy and safety at the patient level. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical procedures for acromegaly, Cushing's disease, and prolactinoma between 2010 and 2018 in a single tertiary referral center. We present our results in a classic (remission and complications separate) and in a novel outcome square integrating both outcomes, focusing on intended and adverse effects (long-term complications). This resulted in 4 outcome groups, ranging from good to poor. We use this approach to present these outcomes for several subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 198 surgical procedures were included (44 reoperations). Remission was achieved in 127 operations (64%). Good outcome was observed after 121 (61%), and poor outcome after 6 (3%) operations. When intended effect of surgery was applied (instead of remission), good outcome as intended was achieved after 148 of 198 surgeries (75%) and poor outcome after 4 (2%). CONCLUSION: Quality of a surgical intervention can be presented in 4 simple categories, integrating both efficacy and safety with flexibility to adapt to the individualized situation at patient, disease, and surgical strategy and to the outcome of interest.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Endocrinos/clasificación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/clasificación , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Acromegalia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Endocrinos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Endocrinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipersecreción de la Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica Pituitaria (HACT)/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prolactinoma/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hueso Esfenoides/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma is a safe and highly effective first-line treatment that is well tolerated by patients. Potential complications are plenty, and there is a large variation in complexity of surgery. This article presents the philosophy, surgical techniques, and outcomes of a high-volume pituitary adenoma center. Three surgical videos illustrate some procedures. The experience has reinforced the authors' belief that experience and surgical volume are key to high quality of care.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Adenoma/patología , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/normas , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/normas , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Discharge policies concerning hospitalization after endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery are highly variable. A few studies support fast-track discharge; however, this is not commonplace. Our goal was to report the transition to and evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical- and patient-reported outcomes and costs of fast-track care in pituitary surgery. METHODS: This observational study included 155 patients undergoing pituitary surgery between December 2016 and December 2018. Fast-track care consisted of planned discharge 2-3 days after surgery, followed by daily surveillance by a case manager. All outcomes were compared with patients not eligible for fast-track discharge. The total group (fast-track and non-fast-track) was compared with historic controls (N = 307). RESULTS: A total of 79/155 patients (51%) were considered eligible for fast-track discharge, of whom 69 (87%) were discharged within 3 days. The total group was discharged more often within 3 days compared with historic controls (49 vs. 20%, p < 0.001), the total length of stay did not differ (5.3 vs. 5.7 days, p = 0.363). Although the total group had more readmissions compared with historic controls (17 vs. 10%, p = 0.002), no life-threatening complications occurred after discharge. On average, clinical- and patient-reported outcomes improved over time, both in the fast-track and non-fast-track groups. The mean overall costs within 30 days after surgery did not differ between the total group 9992 (SD 4562) and historic controls 9818 (SD 3488) (p = 0.649). CONCLUSION: A stratified fast-track care trajectory with enhanced postoperative outpatient surveillance after pituitary tumor surgery is safe and feasible. As expected, costs of the fast-track were lower than the non-fast-track group, however we could not prove overall cost-effectiveness compared with the historic controls.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The intraoperative distinction between normal and abnormal pituitary tissue is crucial during pituitary adenoma surgery to obtain a complete tumor resection while preserving endocrine function. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is a technique to intraoperatively visualize tumors by using indocyanine green (ICG), a contrast agent allowing visualization of differences in tissue vascularization. Although NIR fluorescence imaging has been described in pituitary surgery, it has, in contrast to other surgical areas, never become widely used. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate NIR fluorescence imaging in pituitary surgery, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and to assess the additional value of resecting adenoma tissue under NIR fluorescence guidance. METHODS: We included 10 patients planned to undergo transnasal transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy. Patients received multiple intravenous administrations of 5 mg ICG, up to a maximum of 15 mg per patient. Endoscopic NIR fluorescence imaging was performed at multiple points in time. The NIR fluorescent signal in both the adenoma and pituitary gland was obtained, and the fluorescence contrast ratio was assessed. RESULTS: Four patients had Cushing disease, 1 had acromegaly, and 1 had a prolactinoma. Four patients had a nonfunctioning macroadenoma. In 9 of 10 patients with a histologically proven pituitary adenoma, the normal pituitary gland showed a stronger fluorescent signal than the adenoma. A fluorescence contrast ratio of normal pituitary gland to adenoma of 1.5 ± 0.2 was obtained. In 2 patients; adenoma resection was actually performed under NIR fluorescence guidance instead of under white light. CONCLUSION: NIR fluorescence imaging can easily and safely be implemented in pituitary surgery. The timing of ICG administration is important for optimal results and warrants further study. It appears that injection of ICG can best be postponed until some part of the normal pituitary gland is identified. Subsequent repeated low-dose ICG administrations improved the distinction between adenoma and gland.
RESUMEN
We assessed the value of postoperative plasma cortisol concentrations to predict cure and recurrence of Cushing's disease after transsphenoidal surgery (TS). Seventy-eight of 80 consecutive patients treated by TS for Cushing's disease were evaluated. TS cured 72% (n = 56) of the patients. Two weeks after surgery, patients with plasma cortisol levels below 138 nmol/liter (n = 50; three macroadenomas) and eight (27%) of 30 patients (nine macroadenomas) with cortisol greater than 138 nmol/liter were cured. Six (five with a macroadenoma) of these eight patients had cortisol values less than 50 nmol/liter 3 months after surgery. Therefore, the optimal cut-off value of cortisol predicting remission was 138 nmol/liter, measured 3 months after surgery (positive and negative predictive values 87 and 90%, respectively). Five patients (9%) had recurrent Cushing's disease during a median follow-up of 7 yr. Recurrence occurred in four of 24 (17%) patients with a follow-up of more than 10 yr. Therefore, cortisol levels above 138 nmol/liter, obtained 2 wk after TS, should be repeated, because they do not predict persistent Cushing's disease in 27% of those patients. Postoperative cortisol levels do not positively predict recurrence of disease during long-term follow-up of initially cured patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Cushing/sangre , Síndrome de Cushing/cirugía , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adolescente , Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Concentración Osmolar , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
We evaluated survival after optimal treatment for acromegaly and assessed the predictive effects of different remission criteria for survival in 164 consecutive acromegalic patients, treated by transsphenoidal surgery and adjuvant therapy between 1977 and 2002. The goal of treatment was a mean GH less than 5 mU/liter, a normal glucose-suppressed GH, and a normal IGF-I for age in all patients. Surgery initially cured 108 patients (66%). Adjuvant therapy for persistent disease was given to 49 patients. At the end of follow-up (mean, 12.3 yr), remission rates for surgery and multimodality treatment were 54% and 90%, respectively. In 2033 person-years of follow-up, 28 of 164 patients died, resulting in an observed:expected mortality ratio of 1.3 (confidence interval, 0.87-1.87). Significant predictors for survival were the duration of disease and the postoperative glucose-suppressed GH. The effects of these predictors became less significant with increasing follow-up duration. A time-dependent effect on survival was observed for serial IGF-I concentrations, but not for serial GH concentrations. Of the three remission criteria, IGF-I was the only one to be significantly associated with survival in this study, with a relative risk of 4.78 for an elevated as opposed to a normal IGF-I concentration.
Asunto(s)
Acromegalia/metabolismo , Acromegalia/mortalidad , Factor I del Crecimiento Similar a la Insulina/metabolismo , Acromegalia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECT: Cervical anterior discectomy with stand-alone cage (CADC) placement is a known treatment for cervical radiculopathy due to a herniated intervertebral disc or an osteophyte. Routine radiographs are obtained at regular postoperative intervals, but the consequences of routinely obtained radiographs are not known. In this study, the authors evaluated whether postoperative plain radiographs influenced the medical or surgical treatment of patients who underwent CADC placement. METHODS: The charts and radiographs of all patients who underwent CADC placement in 2007 were retrieved and reviewed retrospectively. In addition, the charts and radiographs of 50 consecutive patients who were seen after a CADC was placed during a period in 2008 were studied prospectively. Special emphasis was given to any abnormalities seen on the radiographs and especially their influence on further treatment. RESULTS: The charts and radiographs of 82 patients were retrospectively examined. A total of 138 levels were addressed, and in the prospective series 75 levels were surgically treated. The subsidence rate in the retrospective series was 14.5%. In 1 patient a slight anteroposition of the cage was seen. None of the radiographic abnormalities were related to the outcome of the patient or contributed to a change in the patient's treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Routine radiographs after CADC placement are not warranted. Intraoperative verification of the position of the cage is recommended. Obtaining radiographs are only mandatory when signs or symptoms suggesting a postoperative complication are present. The authors propose a new algorithm for the follow-up of patients after CADC placement.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía , Dolor de Cuello/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Discectomía/instrumentación , Discectomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiculopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of craniopharyngiomas is associated with long-term morbidity. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the long-term functional outcome and mortality rates after treatment for craniopharyngiomas, we audited our data with special focus on cardiovascular, neurological and psychosocial morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1965 and 2002, 54 consecutive patients underwent surgery for craniopharyngiomas at the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC). Fifteen patients (25%) received additional postoperative radiation therapy. The median follow-up period was 10 years (range 1-37 years). RESULTS: Long-term cure rate was 82% and long-term recurrence rate 18%. Visual fields/visual acuity stabilized or improved in 74% of cases. The long-term prevalence rate of hypopituitarism was 89%. In addition, long-term cardiovascular, neurological and psychosocial morbidity rates were high: 22% (risk factors 57%), 49% and 47%, respectively. Female sex was an independent predictor of increased cardiovascular, neurological and psychosocial morbidity (odds ratio 3.78, P = 0.031). Ten patients (18%) died during an 828 person-year follow-up. The actuarial patient survival rates 5, 10 and 20 years after the initial operation were 95, 85 and 85%, respectively. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 2.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-4.99]. CONCLUSION: Craniopharyngioma is associated with excessive long-term multisystem morbidity and mortality, especially in female patients, despite a high cure rate. These observations indicate that dedicated long-term follow-up of these patients is required. The purpose of the follow-up should be: first, to look for recurrences and to ensure appropriate endocrine replacement, especially oestrogen replacement in premenopausal females; and second, to achieve intensive control of glucose, lipids, blood pressure and weight, as in any other patient with increased risk for cardiovascular disease.