RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the gold standard procedure for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis after failed conservative therapy. Digital templating is commonly employed in preoperative preparation for THA and contributes positively to its outcome. However, the impact of coxa valga and antetorta (CVA) configurations on stem size prediction accuracy remains not reported. Previous studies demonstrated that the size of the lesser trochanter (LT) can be used to determine femoral anteversion on pelvis radiographs. This study investigates the accuracy of preoperative digital templating in predicting stem size in patients with CVA undergoing cementless THA. METHODS: Preoperative radiographs of 620 patients undergoing cementless THA were retrospectively investigated. Radiographs were standardized with patients standing and the leg internally rotated by 15°. A CVA group was established including patients with a CCD angle greater than 140° and a lesser trochanter (LT) size of at least 10 mm for men and 8 mm for women. For the control group, radiographs with a CCD angle ranging from 125-135° and LT size 3-10 mm for men and 3-8 mm for women were selected. Preoperative templating was performed using mediCAD. To reduce confounding factors, case-control matching was carried out for BMI and body height. RESULTS: After case-control matching, a total of thirty-one matches were analyzed. Stem size was underestimated in 74% (23/31) in the CVA and 13% (4/31) in the control group (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with CVA were more likely to be underestimated by two sizes compared to controls (p < 0.004). In contrast, the exact stem size was predicted more frequently in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stem size in patients with a CVA configuration are at high risk of being underestimated when using digital templating. These findings can be valuable for guiding in intraoperative decisions and lowering the risk of complications associated with an undersized femoral component.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fémur , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Femenino , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Masculino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Meniscus repair has gained increasing interest over the last two decades as loss of meniscus tissue predisposes to early onset knee arthritis. Although there are many reports of meniscus repair outcome in short-term studies, data on the long-term outcome of meniscus repair are still scarce. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the overall failure rate of meniscus repair with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Additionally, possible factors influencing meniscus repair outcome were assessed. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies of the last 20 years reporting on meniscus repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search terms used for this study were ([meniscus OR meniscal] AND repair). Titles and abstracts were evaluated by two authors independently. Using meta package of R (version 3.6.2), random-effect models were performed to pool failure rates. Subgroup analyses were performed and effect estimates in form of an odds ratio with 95% CIs were established. RESULTS: In total, 12 studies with 864 patients were included. Degenerative tears were excluded in two studies and one study only included traumatic meniscus tears. Other studies did not state whether the cause of meniscus tear was degenerative or traumatic. Studies reporting meniscus repair outcome on root repairs, revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, discoid menisci or ramp lesions were excluded. Revision surgery was used as failure definition in all included studies. The overall failure rate of meniscal repair at a mean follow-up of 86 months was 19.1%. There was no significant difference in meniscus repair outcome when performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to isolated meniscus repair (18.7% vs. 28%; n.s.) or when performed on the lateral meniscus compared to the medial meniscus (19.5% vs. 24.4%; n.s.). There was no significant difference of meniscus repair outcome between vertical/longitudinal tears and bucket-handle tears (n.s.). Thirty-six percent of meniscus repair failures occur after the second postoperative year. The only significant finding was that inside-out repair results in a lower failure rate compared to all-inside repair (5.6% vs. 22.3%; p = 0.009) at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The overall meniscus repair failure rate remains nineteen percent in long-term studies. The cause of failure is poorly documented, and it remains unclear whether failure of the meniscus repair itself or additional adjacent tears lead to revision surgery. Despite the given technical advantages of all-inside repair devices, this meta-analysis cannot demonstrate superior outcomes compared to inside-out or outside-in repair at 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Menisco , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Artroscopía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Menisco/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. PURPOSE: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established. RESULTS: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; P = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; P = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; P > .05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of <10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.
Asunto(s)
Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Articulación de la Rodilla , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugíaRESUMEN
Despite its clinical relevance in the context of ankle fractures, little is known about the bone microarchitecture and strength of the distal fibula, especially regarding age-, sex-, and subregion-specific effects. To address this gap of knowledge, we obtained fibulae from 30 skeletally intact donors at autopsy (each 15 male and female), which were analyzed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography including micro-finite element analysis. Scans were performed in a 7-cm volume of interest and evaluated in three subregions according to the Danis-Weber fracture classification. Group comparisons and linear regression analyses were applied to evaluate the effects of age, sex, and subregion. From distal to proximal, we observed an increase of cortical parameters and a decrease of trabecular parameters. Age was primarily associated with a cortical decrease in all subregions (Danis-Weber type A, B, and C) in women. While women showed a greater magnitude of decline, men also exhibited an age-associated decrease for some parameters, including cortical area and cortical thickness in the type C subregion. Stiffness and failure load were highest in the type C subregion in both women and men. A critical age-related decline in bone strength parameters in the type B subregion was observed in women, providing an explanation for the increased incidence of low-traumatic type B fractures in the elderly. Together, these findings extend the current understanding of distal fibular microarchitecture, likely explaining the epidemiologic features of distal fibula fractures and emphasizing the need for age-adapted treatment algorithms.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo , Densidad Ósea , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Peroné/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Radio (Anatomía) , TibiaRESUMEN
Background: Several fibula-based reconstruction techniques have been introduced to address ligamentous injuries of the posterolateral corner of the knee. These techniques involve a drill tunnel with auto- or allograft placement through the proximal fibula. Purpose: To determine the skeletal microarchitecture of the proximal fibula and its association with age and to compare the microarchitecture within the regions of different drill tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 30 human fibulae were analyzed in this cadaveric imaging study. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements were performed in a 4.5 cm-long volume of interest at the proximal fibula. Three-dimensional microarchitectural data sets of cortical and trabecular compartments were evaluated using customized scripts. The quadrants representing the entry and exit drill tunnel positions corresponding to anatomic techniques (LaPrade/Arciero) and the Larson technique were analyzed. Linear regression models and group comparisons were applied. Results: Trabecular microarchitecture parameters declined significantly with age in women but not men. Analysis of subregions with respect to height revealed stable cortical and decreasing trabecular values from proximal to distal in both sexes. Along with a structural variability in axial slices, superior values were found for the densitometric and microarchitectural parameters corresponding to the fibular drill tunnels in the anatomic versus Larson technique (mean ± SD; bone volume to tissue volume at the entry position, 0.273 ± 0.079 vs 0.175 ± 0.063; P < .0001; cortical thickness at the entry position, 0.501 ± 0.138 vs 0.353 ± 0.081 mm; P < .0001). Conclusion: Age represented a relevant risk factor for impaired skeletal microarchitecture in the proximal fibula in women but not men. The region of drill tunnels according to anatomic techniques showed superior bone microarchitecture versus that according to the Larson technique.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Lung cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer globally and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for only 15% of all cases but exhibits a dismal prognosis. The standard of care of SCLC has not changed for decades and novel biomarkers and novel strategies for patient's care are urgently needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of the two potential markers MUC1 and CD147 was evaluated in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and CTC-derived SCLC cell lines using qRT PCR, western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA assays. RESULTS: Both CTCs enriched from patient blood samples by Parsortix isolation technology and SCLC/CTC cell lines exhibited significant expression of MUC1 and CD147. Silencing of MUC1 increased chemosensitivity of an SCLC line to topotecan. CONCLUSION: Both markers, MUC1 and CD147, are highly expressed in patient-derived SCLC and SCLC CTC cell lines and show promise as potential biomarkers in SCLC.