oXiris® Use in Septic Shock: Experience of Two French Centres.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to an infection and can result in organ dysfunctions and death. Extracorporeal blood purification techniques aim to improve the prognosis of these patients by modulating the unbalanced immune response. This study reports our experience with the use of the oXiris® membrane for septic shock patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). SUMMARY: Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with septic shock and underwent CRRT with the oXiris® membrane between 2014 and 2019. We compared the observed hospital mortality with that predicted by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II). Change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and of the main clinical and biological parameters over time were analyzed. Hospital mortality was lower than predicted for the most severe patients (60 vs. 91% for the [74-87] SAPS II quartile and 70 vs. 98% for the [87-163] SAPS II quartile, p < 0.02). There was no significant improvement in the SOFA score from 0h to 48 h. An 88% relative decrease in norepinephrine infusion was observed (median at 0 h was 1.69 [0.52-2.45] µg/kg/min; at 48 h it was 0.20 [0.09-1.14] µg/kg/min, p = 0.002). Lactataemia and pH were significantly improved over time. Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis as well as those with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infections seemed to benefit the most from the therapy. Key Messages: CRRT with the oXiris® haemofilter resulted in higher observed survival than predicted by a severity score (SAPS II) for the most severe patients. Haemodynamic status and lactataemia appeared to improve, especially in intra-abdominal sepsis and GNB infections.

A new standardized tool for quantification of closed-loop communication in trauma care: CAST Grid reliability study.

BACKROUND: The CAST Grid has been developed to evaluate the use of closed-loop communication (CLC) in the trauma bay. METHODS: The CAST Grid and two validated non-technical team performance assessment tools (the TEAM and T-NOTECHS grids) were completed by 2 independent reviewers based on trauma care simulation videos from a French Level 1 trauma center. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were evaluated for CLC parameters and non-technical performance, and correlations between these parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: The study analyzed 11 videos. The intra- and inter-rater agreement for the number of CLC per minute (CLC/min) was moderate and good, respectively, based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient [95%CI] (0.57 [-0.40;0.94] and 0.77 [0.33;0.94]). However, the agreement was poor for the percentage of CLC (0.37 [-0.58;0.89] and -0.36 [-0.71;0.14], respectively). The study found that a lower number of CLC/min was correlated with an increased duration of the simulation (r = -0.75 [-0.93; -0.25]). CONCLUSION: The CAST Grid showed a relatively good inter-rater agreement to quantify the number of CLC/min which was inversely correlated with the duration of care. This tool opens up the possibility of quantifying CLC and allows for new analyses of team functioning and interactions.