RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Performance Measure bundle (SEP-1) metric to improve sepsis care, but evidence supporting this bundle is limited and harms secondary to compliance have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of an emergency department (ED) sepsis quality-improvement (QI) effort to improve CMS SEP-1 compliance, looking specifically at antibiotic overtreatment and harm from fluid resuscitation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted between March and July 2021 with patients for whom a sepsis order set was initiated. The primary outcomes included the number of patients treated with antibiotics who were ultimately deemed nonseptic and the number of patients who developed pulmonary edema, with or without need for positive pressure ventilation (PPV), within 48 h of receiving a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus. Data were collected via nonblinded chart reviews, with a free marginal κ-calculation indicating excellent interrater reliability. RESULTS: The study cohort included 273 patients, 170 (62.3%) who were ultimately determined to be septic and 103 (37.7%) who were nonseptic. Of the 103 nonseptic patients, 82 (79.6%) received antibiotics in the ED. Of the 121 patients (44.3%) who received a 30 mL/kg bolus, 5 patients (4.1%) developed pulmonary edema and 0 of 121 patients required PPV within 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: The QI effort led to moderate rates of antibiotic overtreatment and very few patients developed pulmonary edema due to a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus.
Asunto(s)
Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Edema Pulmonar , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medicare , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) has been shown to decrease mortality, reduce overdoses, and increase treatment retention for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and has become the state-of-the-art treatment strategy in the emergency department (ED). There is little evidence on long-term (6 and 12 month) treatment retention outcomes for patients enrolled in MOUD from the ED. METHODS: A prospective observational study used a convenience sample of patients seen at one community hospital ED over 12 months. Patients >18 years with OUD were eligible for MOUD enrollment. After medical screening, patients were evaluated by the addiction care coordinator (ACC) who evaluated and counselled the patient and if eligible, directly connected them with an addiction medicine appointment. Once enrolled, the patient received treatment with buprenorphine in the ED. A chart review was completed for all enrollments during the first year of the program. Treatment retention was determined by review of the prescription drug monitoring program and defined as patients receiving regular suboxone prescriptions at 6 and 12 months after index ED visit date. RESULTS: From June 2018 - May 2019 the ACCs evaluated patients during 691 visits, screening 571 unique patients. Of the 571 unique patients screened, 279 (48.9%) were enrolled into the MOUD program. 210 (75.3%) attended their first addiction medicine appointment, 151 (54.1%) were engaged in treatment at 1 month, 120 (43.0%) at 3 months, 105 (37.6%) at 6 months, and 97 (34.8%) at 12 months post index ED visit. Self-pay insurance status was associated with a significantly decrease in the odds of long-term treatment retention. CONCLUSION: Our ED-initiated MOUD program, in partnership with local addiction medicine services, produced high rates of long-term treatment retention.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
In the practice of modern emergency medicine (EM), transitions of care (TOC) have taken a prominent role, and during this time of healthcare reform, TOC has become a focal point of improvement initiatives across the continuum of care. This review includes a comprehensive examination of various regulatory, accreditation, and policy-based elements with which EM physicians interact in their daily practice. The content is organized into five domains: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), The Joint Commission, Affordable Care Act, National Quality Forum (NQF), and accountable care organizations. This review is meant to be a synthesis of TOC material, tailored for EM physicians and the teams that make these departments run. We include (1) relevant current regulations and standards from various entities that are most likely to affect the day-to-day practice of EM; (2) examination of the consequences of these regulations and standards and how they can be used to shape EM practice and clinical decision making; and (3) comparison of interventions aimed at improving TOC, including evidence from current literature, practical examples, and proposals. Emergency departments must develop, implement, and monitor TOC programs and processes that can facilitate seamless and efficient care as patients transfer between settings. This report provides a framework for that effort and is designed to help EM physicians continue to take the lead in improving TOC to help shape the future of modern practice.
Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Cuidado de Transición , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Consultores , Medicina de Emergencia , Atención al Paciente , Abuso Físico/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso Físico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Violencia Laboral/psicologíaRESUMEN
Background Emergency department (ED)-based medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has been shown to be effective in providing ease of access and successful treatment rates for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study examined the social determinants of health (SDOH) of patients entering an ED-based MOUD program through individual and focus group surveys. SDOH may impact treatment retention for current and future patients. Methods A survey of all patients entering our MOUD program at two hospital-based EDs and two free-standing EDs was conducted from January to March 2022. Addiction care coordinators (ACCs) used standardized screening tools to enroll patients into the MOUD program, and trained research coordinators used a standardized form, using previously validated survey questions, to examine the role of SDOH. Focused group surveys were also collected. The survey measured patients' perspectives of the program and solicited feedback on SDOH and program barriers. Results Of the 60 OUD patients inducted into the ED-based MOUD program during our survey period, 19 (32%) participated in an individual or focus group interview. Of these, 16 patients (27%) completed all survey questions. The mean age was 42 years old, 94% identified as Caucasian, and 65% were males. Over 94% of subjects found the ACCs helpful in providing follow-up care. Nearly 40% experienced transportation and financial issues. The vast majority found the MOUD program beneficial in coping with withdrawal symptoms, dealing with their addiction, and supporting recovery. Conclusion OUD patients found the ACCs and the MOUD program helpful for their transition to the treatment stage. The MOUD program can improve some patients' reluctance to engage with a healthcare system by addressing barriers related to transportation to appointments and financial issues.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Faculty productivity is of interest for hospital and university administrators as pressure is placed on them by government and private payors. Further, the effect of trainees on clinical productivity is of personal interest to physicians because their performance evaluations and earning potential are often tied to their productivity. Several groups have utilized creative methodology to study the effect of learners on emergency department (ED) productivity, but they were faced with multiple confounding variables for which it was difficult to adjust. In this study, we utilize relative value unit (RVU)/h to study the effect of resident physicians and medical students on the productivity of academic emergency physicians (EPs) during the implementation of a new residency program. Each physician's productivity on shifts with distinct types of learners present is compared to their shifts worked without any learners during the same time frame. Each attending physician serves as their own control while the confounding variables introduced by comparing over multiple years are minimized. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to measure the influence of emergency medicine (EM) residents on the clinical productivity of attending EPs. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of a single ED during implementation of a new residency program. The productivity of each EP was measured by RVU/h billed. Trainees' schedules and end-of-shift evaluations were utilized to determine what learners (if any) were working with the EP on each shift. RVU/h calculations were performed for each EP (overall, when working without learners, and when working with each of the four learner categories). The primary outcome (determined a priori) was the difference in RVU/h for the attending EPs when they worked without learners compared to when they worked a majority of their shift with at least one learner. The secondary outcome (also determined a priori) was determining the influence of the learners of each type on EP RVU/h for the subgrouped shifts in which a learner was present for the majority of the shift. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean EP RVU/h when attendings worked with a medical student or non-EM R1 in comparison to working without learners in the 1761 ED encounters analyzed (12.95â¯RVU/h vs. 12.52â¯RVU/h; p=0.125). Although there was variability among individual physicians, EP RVU/h increased significantly for the overall group when one or more EM R1s were present (15.19â¯RVU/h with one EM R1 present, 15.25â¯RVU/h with two, 24.75â¯RVU/h with three; p<0.001). Similarly, mean EP productivity increased significantly with the addition of an EM R2 (17.96â¯RVU/h vs. 16.84â¯RVU/h; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EM residents was positively associated with the clinical productivity of EM faculty as measured by RVU/h. There was also a positive association between productivity and the number of EM residents present as well as their training level. Non-EM residents and medical students had no effect on EP productivity.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Médicos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the incidence of injuries associated with pneumatic and explosive powered nail guns has steadily been rising due to increasing use of these devices by the untrained consumer. The vast majority of injuries involve the extremities, but injuries have been reported to occur in virtually every area of the body. OBJECTIVE: Discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of penetrating cardiac nail gun injuries. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old man sustained a penetrating cardiac injury from accidental discharge of a nail gun. The patient had successful repair of a laceration to his right ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating cardiac injuries from pneumatic nail guns are rare and have mortality similar to stab wounds. Improved safety mechanisms and training are the keys to prevention. Consideration also should be given to implementing legislation restricting the sale of nail guns.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo , Ventrículos Cardíacos/lesiones , Laceraciones/etiología , Heridas Penetrantes/etiología , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Laceraciones/cirugía , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) is an effective setting for initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD); however, predicting who will remain in treatment remains a central challenge. We hypothesize that baseline stage-of-change (SOC) assessment is associated with short-term treatment retention outcomes. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study of all patients enrolled in an ED MOUD program over 12 months. Eligible and willing patients were treated with buprenorphine at baseline and had addiction medicine specialist follow-up arranged. Treatment retention at 30 and 90 days was determined by review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. We used uni- and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate associations between patient variables and treatment retention at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: From June 2018-May 2019, 279 patients were enrolled in the ED MOUD program. Of those patients 151 (54.1%) and 120 (43.0%) remained engaged in MOUD treatment at 30 and 90 days, respectively. The odds of treatment adherence at 30 days were significantly higher for those with advanced SOC (preparation/action/maintenance) compared to those presenting with limited SOC (pre-contemplation/contemplation) (60.0% vs 40.8%; odds ratio 2.18; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 4.1; P <0.05). At 30 days, multivariate logistic regression determined that advanced SOC, age >40, having medical insurance, and being employed were significant predictors of continued treatment adherence. At 90 days, advanced SOC, non-White race, age > 40, and having insurance were all significantly associated with higher likelihood of treatment engagement. CONCLUSION: Greater stage-of-change was significantly associated with MOUD treatment retention at 30 and 90 days post index ED visit.
Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Objective: Distributed ledger technology can be used as a transparent, shareable ledger, that can record transactions between two parties efficiently and in a more secure, verifiable, and permanent way than the current electronic prescribing systems. We studied the use of a distributed ledger electronic prescribing programme, Prescription Abuse Greatly Reduced (PAGR) Prescriptions, to examine the effect of blockchain on provider prescribing efficiency at three family medicine clinics. Design: The PAGR was installed side-by-side to the electronic health record at three family medicine practice clinics in middle Tennessee. A prospective, convenience sample of patients at all three clinics was used for analysis. Trained observers were used in each clinic to document the side-by-side use of current prescribing practice versus the use of the PAGR electronic prescribing system by the individual providers.The primary outcome was total time to write the prescription. Secondary metrics included compliance with checking the state's Physician Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP.) , accuracy of medicine reconciliation, use of patient's eligibility on insurance, prescription benefits, and change in prescription caused by benefits analysis or drug-interactions. Provider satisfaction was measure on a 4-point Likert scale.Data were analysed using two-tailed, paired Student T-tests with alpha set at 0.05. A sample size of 107 patients was calculated to have a power of 80% to detect a 50% change in the prescription writing time. Results: The primary outcome of total prescription writing time was 171 ± 41 sec for current prescribing practice versus 63 ± 15 sec for the PAGR system (p = 0.0006). All providers were extremely satisfied with the use of the PAGR programme. Conclusion: Use of the PAGR electronic prescription programme significantly saved a mean of 1 min 48 sec per written prescription at the three Family Medicine Clinics. The PAGR also provided accurate medicine reconciliation and complete PDMP checks for controlled substance prescriptions. The patient real-time benefits check and drug-drug and allergy-drug reviews resulted in the provider changing the prescription 28% of the time, enhancing safety and out-of-pocket patient expenses. Future enhancements include expanding the insurance benefits analysis and developing provider notifications when patients are non-compliant with filling their prescriptions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We created an instructional waiting room video that explained what patients should expect during their emergency department (ED) visit and sought to determine whether preparing patients using this video would 1) improve satisfaction, 2) decrease perceived waiting room times and 3) increase calls to an outpatient referral line in an ambulatory population. METHODS: This serial cross-sectional study took place over a period of 2 months before (control) and 2 months after the introduction of an educational waiting room video that described a typical patient visit to our ED. We enrolled a convenience sample of adult patients or parents of pediatric patients who were triaged to the ED waiting room; a research assistant distributed and collected the surveys as patients were being discharged after treatment. Subjects were excluded if they were admitted. The primary outcome was overall satisfaction measured on a 5-point Likert scale, and secondary outcomes included perceived waiting room time, and the number of outpatient referral-line calls. RESULTS: There were 1132 subjects surveyed: 551 prevideo and 581 postvideo. The mean age was 38 years (standard deviation [SD] 18), 61% were female and the mean ED length of stay was 5.9 hours (SD 3.6). Satisfaction scores were significantly higher postvideo, with 65% of participants ranking their visit as either "excellent" or "very good", compared with 58.1% in the prevideo group (p = 0.019); however, perceived waiting room time was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.24). Patient calls to our specialty outpatient clinic referral line increased from 1.5 per month (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-2.42) to 4.5 per month (95% CI 1.19-7.18) (p = 0.032). After adjusting for possible covariates, the most significant determinants of overall satisfaction were perceived waiting room time (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.48) and having seen the ED waiting room video (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86). CONCLUSION: Preparing patients for their ED experience by describing the ED process of care through a waiting room video can improve ED patient satisfaction and the knowledge of outpatient clinic resources in an ambulatory population. Future studies should research the implementation of this educational intervention in a randomized fashion.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Grabación de Cinta de Video , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Florida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) superutilizers (patients with five or more visits/year) comprise only 5% of the patients seen yet comprise 25% of total ED visits. Although the reasons for this are multifactorial, the cost to the patient and the community is exceedingly high. The cost is not just monetary; care of these patients is inappropriately fragmented and their presence in the ED may contribute to overcrowding affecting the community's emergency readiness. Previous studies using staff trained to help patients navigate their care options have had conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether a trained patient navigator (PN) can reduce ED use and costs in superutilizers over a 1-year period. METHODS: Superutilizers were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized into the treatment arm and met with a PN who reviewed their diagnosis and associated care plan and identified proper primary care services and community resources for follow-up. The remaining control group was provided standard care. Both groups were given a follow-up call and survey by the PN within 7 days of their visit who assessed primary care follow-up and patient satisfaction using a 4-point Likert scale. After 12 months, the patients' return ED visits and ED costs were compared to the year prior and primary care compliance and satisfaction were measured using Student's t-tests with Bonferroni correction or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients were enrolled (148 in navigation treatment group, 134 controls). Patients were similarly matched in age, race, sex, insurance, and chief complaints. Overall ED visits decreased during the 12-month study period, compared to the 12 months prior to enrollment (2,249 visits prior to 2,050 visits during study period, -8.8%). There was a greater decrease in ED visits from the preenrollment year to postenrollment year in the treatment group (1,148 visits to 996 visits, -13.2%) compared to the control group (1,101 visits to 1,054 visits, -4.3%; p < 0.05). Overall health care costs (ED and hospital) for all 282 patients decreased in the year after compared to the 12 months prior to enrollment ($3.9M to $3.1M) with a greater decrease in the navigation treatment group (-26.6%) compared to the control group (-17.5%). Patient surveys found no difference in patient satisfaction in the pre- and postenrollment periods but there was an increase in primary care physician (PCP) use over the 12-month follow-up period in the treatment group (6.42 visits/patient) compared to the control group (4.07 visits/patient; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the overall number of return ED visits and costs did decrease for both groups, potentially inferring a placebo effect for the use of a PN; however, the decrease in ED visits and costs were greater in the treatment group. One-year follow-up noted an increase in PCP visits in the navigation group. Use of a PN may be cost-effective.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Navegación de Pacientes , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tennessee/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The effect of emergency medicine (EM) residents on the clinical efficiency of attending physicians is controversial. The authors hypothesized that implementing a new EM residency program would result in an increase in relative value units (RVUs) generated per hour by attending physicians and decrease staffing requirements. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational analysis of an emergency department before, during, and after the establishment of a new EM residency program. We analyzed the change in RVUs billed, patients seen, and hours worked by attending physicians, midlevel providers (MLPs), and residents, and addressed potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The clinical efficiency of attending physicians increased by 70%, or 4.98 RVUs/hour (from 7.12 [SD ± 1.4] RVUs/hour to 12.1 [SD ± 2.2] RVUs/hour, p < 0.001) with the implementation of an EM residency program. Overall, net department RVU generation rose by 32%, even as attending physician coverage decreased by 6.3% (p < 0.05), and MLP coverage dropped by 60% (p < 0.05). We estimated that the implementation of the residency saved 4,860 hours of attending physician coverage and 5,828 hours of MLP coverage per year. This represents an estimated $1,741,265 in annual staffing savings, comparable to the residency program's annual operating cost of $1,821,108. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an EM residency program had a positive effect on the clinical efficiency of attending physicians and decreased staffing requirements.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Adulto , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Médicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Ultrasound guidance is now the standard of care when placing a central venous catheter (CVC), resulting in decreased complications and increased first-pass success rates. However, even with ultrasound guidance being used for the initial venipuncture, misplacement of a CVC in either an unwanted vein or in an artery still occurs. Here, we discuss a simple technique to assist in the adequate placement of the CVC in the vena cava using bedside echocardiography.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Ecocardiografía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , HumanosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the association between historical and physical evidence with judicial outcome in sexual assault cases. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective review of forensic evidence was conducted for all sexual assault cases reported in Duval County, FL, during a 2-year period. Variables examined included age, race of victim, evidence of trauma (body, genital, or both), presence of spermatozoa at the time of the forensic examination, weapon use, and whether the victim knew the assailant. In cases in which an arrest was made, logistic regression was used to estimate the strength of association with the outcome of conviction in sexual assault cases. RESULTS: During the study period, 821 sexual assaults were reported, and 801 forensic examinations were performed. The victims were predominantly female (776; 97%), with 409 (51%) being black, 376 (47%) white, and 16 (2%) other minorities. A suspect was identified in 355 (44%) of the 801 cases for which a sexual assault forensic examination was conducted. No suspect was identified in 446 (56%) of these cases. There were 271 arrests made. The police did not have enough evidence to arrest a suspect after detention in 84 cases. For those cases in which a suspect was arrested, 153 had charges dropped, 89 were found guilty, 2 were found not guilty, and 27 cases were still pending or the files were sealed and unavailable for review. There was evidence of trauma in 202 (57%) of the examinations, and spermatozoa were found at the time of the forensic examination in 110 (31%) of the cases in which a suspect was identified. Logistic regression found that victims aged younger than 18 years, the presence of trauma, and the use of a weapon by the assailant were significantly associated with successful prosecution. There was a trend toward conviction if the victim was white. CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians have an obligation to provide care for victims of sexual assault cases. This care includes a possible legal defense. To that end, emergency physicians should be vigilant in the documentation of the history of the event (eg, weapon use) and in the documentation of traumatic injuries because these factors can assist in a successful prosecution.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Legal , Examen Físico , Delitos Sexuales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Violación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Violación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Delitos Sexuales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The purpose of the present study was to compare the use of lorazepam plus nitroglycerine (NTG) versus NTG alone in the reduction of cocaine induced chest pain in the emergency department. The secondary objective of the study was to help determine the safety of lorazepam in the treatment of cocaine- associated chest pain. The study was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial conducted at an university-affiliated urban emergency department (ED). All patients who presented with cocaine-associated chest pain were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included age greater than 45 years, documented coronary artery disease, chest pain of more than 72 hours duration, or pretreatment with nitroglycerin. Patients were given either sublingual nitroglycerine (SL NTG) (Group 1) or SL NTG plus 1 mg of lorazepam intravenously (Group 2) every 5 minutes for a total of 2 doses. Chest pain was recorded on an ordinal scale of 0 to 10 at baseline, and then at 5 minutes after each dose. Adverse reactions to medication were also recorded. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The average age of these subjects was 34.1 years, and 67% were men. The NTG-only group consisted of 15 patients and the NTG-plus-lorazepam group consisted of 12 patients. Baseline mean chest-pain scores were 6.87 in Group 1 and 6.54 in Group 2, with no differences between groups. Five minutes after initial treatment, mean scores for the two groups were 5.2 and 3.9, respectively, with a difference in means of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8-3.8). Five minutes after the second treatment, the mean scores were 4.6 and 1.5, respectively, with a difference in means of 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-5). Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significant difference in pain relief between the two study groups (P =.003), with greater pain relief noted at 5 and 10 minutes in the NTG-plus-lorazepam group (P =.02 and P =.005, respectively). All patients in the study were admitted to the hospital, but no patient in either group had an acute myocardial infarction or cardiac complications in the ED. No adverse side effects were noted for either group. The early use of lorazepam with NTG was more efficacious than NTG alone, and appears to be safe in relieving cocaine-associated chest pain.