Meta-analysis of multi-modality therapies in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma-A timely update.

OBJECTIVES: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare but aggressive tumour with very poor prognosis. There are currently no well-established clinical trials to guide therapy and the impact of various treatment modalities on survival is not well defined. We aim to provide an updated systematic review on current treatment modalities on survival outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Individual patient data were extracted, and survival data pooled in a one-stage meta-analysis. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient-level comparisons stratified by treatment modalities, adjusted for demographics, were conducted using shared-frailty Cox regression. PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants include all patients diagnosed with SNUC based on histological evidence. We looked at the overall cumulative survival outcome for different treatment modalities and overall survival by treatment modality in low versus high stage SNUC patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Seventeen studies were identified, comprising 208 patients from 1993 to 2020. There was no significant difference in cumulative overall survival in low versus high stage patients, and no significant difference in outcomes by treatment modality. The overall cumulative survival of SNUC is 30% at 95 months. Among patients treated with various combinations of treatment modalities, patients with chemoradiotherapy had the highest cumulative survival of 42% at 40 months. Definitive chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved disease survival rate. Regardless of tumour stage, patients should be treated early and aggressively, with no superiority of one treatment regimen over another. Trimodality treatment does not confer survival advantage over bimodality treatment.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Heart failure is also one of the most common presentations of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Contemporary epidemiological data of CA in HF patients is lacking. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence of amyloidosis in HF patients, and to clarify the risk factors of concomitant CA and HF. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies were retrieved from Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane library. The search was not restricted in time, type or language of publication. The prevalence of CA in HF grouped according to diagnostic techniques and risk factors of CA with HF was analysed. RESULTS: Eleven (11) studies were included, involving 3,303 patients. The pooled prevalence of CA in HF was 13.7%. The overall prevalence of CA in HF with preserved ejection fraction was 15.1%, and that of HF with reduced ejection fraction was 11.3%. The main factors associated with the diagnosis of CA in HF included older age, males, raised NT pro-BNP, increased interventricular septal thickness in diastole, apical sparing, and reduced left ventricular systolic function. CONCLUSION: A high index of clinical suspicion is required to identify HF patients with CA. Supportive investigations may be helpful when clinically correlated. A considerable proportion of HF patients have CA and certain risk factors may be helpful in increasing suspicion of CA in HF.