RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Drug-induced prolongation of the electrocardiogram QT interval, a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmia and death, has been observed for some small drugs with masses < 1 kDa. Over the last two decades, patient exposure to large molecule monoclonal antibody drugs with masses > 40 kDa has increased dramatically; hence, the aim of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature for evidence of QT prolongation induced by these drugs. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cases indicative of drug-induced QT prolongation for 28 pre-identified monoclonal antibody drugs authorized in Europe. Cases were identified by applying a standardized search string and a subsequent text search and manual review. In parallel, the public European Medicines Agency (EMA) database was searched for reported frequencies of adverse events indicative of QT prolongation. RESULTS: A valid case of drug-induced QT prolongation, caused indirectly by hypocalcaemia, could be identified for only 1 out of 28 monoclonal antibody drugs (denosumab) from the PubMed and Embase search. The EMA database showed no hits for denosumab. Considering that hypocalcaemia-mediated QT prolongation is an already-identified and labelled risk for denosumab, the current study did not identify any additional evidence of QT prolongation caused by monoclonal antibody drugs.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía/efectos de los fármacos , Bases de Datos Factuales , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In preclinical studies, combining M9241 (a novel immunocytokine containing interleukin (IL)-12 heterodimers) with avelumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody) resulted in additive or synergistic antitumor effects. We report dose-escalation and dose-expansion results from the phase Ib JAVELIN IL-12 trial investigating M9241 plus avelumab. METHODS: In the dose-escalation part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953), eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors; in the dose-expansion part, eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had progressed with first-line therapy. Patients received M9241 at 4, 8, 12, or 16.8 µg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W, dose levels (DLs) 1-4) or M9241 16.8 µg/kg Q4W plus avelumab 800 mg once a week for 12 weeks followed by Q2W (DL5/dose expansion). Primary endpoints for the dose-escalation part were adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and those for the dose-expansion part were confirmed best overall response (BOR) per investigator (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1) and safety. The dose-expansion part followed a two-stage design; 16 patients were enrolled and treated in stage 1 (single-arm part). A futility analysis based on BOR was planned to determine whether stage 2 (randomized controlled part) would be initiated. RESULTS: At data cut-off, 36 patients had received M9241 plus avelumab in the dose-escalation part. All DLs were well tolerated; one DLT occurred at DL3 (grade 3 autoimmune hepatitis). The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, and DL5 was declared the recommended phase II dose, considering an observed drug-drug interaction at DL4. Two patients with advanced bladder cancer (DL2 and DL4) had prolonged complete responses. In the dose-expansion part, no objective responses were recorded in the 16 patients with advanced UC; the study failed to meet the criterion (≥3 confirmed objective responses) to initiate stage 2. Any-grade treatment-related AEs occurred in 15 patients (93.8%), including grade ≥3 in 8 (50.0%); no treatment-related deaths occurred. Exposures for avelumab and M9241 concentrations were within expected ranges. CONCLUSIONS: M9241 plus avelumab was well tolerated at all DLs, including the dose-expansion part, with no new safety signals. However, the dose-expansion part did not meet the predefined efficacy criterion to proceed to stage 2.