RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in emergency departments for diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) and for differential diagnosis of other musculoskeletal infections; to correlate radiological findings with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 7 radiological parameters to be analysed on CECT scans were established, exams of 36 patients with proven diagnosis of NF (n 12) and other musculoskeletal infections (n 24) were retrospectively reviewed; LRINEC score was calculated. Fisher's test and Spearman's and Kendall's coefficients of rank correlations were performed. RESULTS: Two parameters were found to be strongly associated with the diagnosis of NF: involvement of the fascia (Spearman's ρ of 0.888, p < 0.001) and lack of fascial enhancement (Spearman's ρ of 0.672, p < 0.001). LRINEC score did not show strong association with the presence of fasciitis NF (Spearman's ρ of 0.490, p = 0.0024). CONCLUSION: Computed tomography (CT) parameters, which are significantly associated with the diagnosis of NF, are the involvement of the fascia and its lack of enhancement; LRINEC score could be high (>5) also in other musculoskeletal infections. Final diagnosis of necrosis among the fascia is surgical. Presence of gas is not a specific sign of necrotizing fasciitis being present in other musculoskeletal infections. CT could easily discriminate NF from other musculoskeletal infections, adds an important value to clinical and laboratory tests in diagnosis of NF in an emergency context when magnetic resonance imaging, which is superior to CT in this discernment, could not be performed.
Asunto(s)
Fascitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Anciano , Medios de Contraste , Fascitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Fascitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of the ultrasound (US) bedside examination is increasing for the detailed evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters, allowing the physicians to set the appropriate therapeutic strategies with greater precision. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the hemodynamic parameters (the cardiac output or CO, the central venous pressure or CVP and the systemic vascular resistance or SVR) in the patients with sepsis, by using a bedside US approach. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled n.82 patients of S.Andrea Hospital (n.47 with sepsis and n.35 without sepsis), examining the hemodynamic parameters by a bedside US evaluation. RESULTS: The incidence of sepsis was more than 50% of cases. The patients with sepsis presented higher comorbidity and polypharmacy (pâ<â0.01, pâ<â0.001), with increased creatinine (p < 0.001) and consequent esteemed glomerular filtration rate (p < 0.01), C-reactive protein (pâ<â0.01), SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score (pâ<â1.58×10-7) and reduced SVR (pâ<â0.05). The SOFA score was inversely related to the SVR (pâ<â0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To our best knowledge, this is the first study with a bedside US protocol to measure SVR, beyond the abdominal and cardiac qualitative evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Hemodinámica , Resistencia VascularRESUMEN
The use of portable ultrasound (US) devices is increasing, due to its accessibility, versatility, non-invasiveness, and its significant support in the patient management, extending the traditional physical examination through the POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound). The pocket-size or handheld ultrasound devices (HUDs) can easily perform focused exams, not aiming to substitute for the high-end US systems (gold standard), since the HUDs usually have more limited functions. The HUDs are promising tools for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of the COVID-19 infection and its related disorders. In conclusion, the routine use of HUDs may ameliorate the management of COVID-19 pandemic, according to the guidelines for the POCUS approach and the procedures for the protection of the patients and the professionals.
RESUMEN
The use of point-of-care ultrasound is rapidly increasing in medical practice. This study aims to evaluate the left ventricle systolic function by the bedside focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS). We consecutively enrolled n.59 patients of the Emergency Medicine Unit of S. Andrea Hospital. Every patient received a bedside FoCUS examination to estimate the left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF); the LV EF measurements were compared with those obtained by standard echocardiography (as gold standard). The LV EF obtained by the bedside FoCUS examination and the standard echocardiography, resulted, respectively: 50.2 ± 15.1% (by the Quinones equation), 39.5 + 12.0% (by the Lvivo app) and 53.7 + 11.1% (by the standard echocardiography). The correlations between the bedside FoCUS EF measurements versus standard echocardiography were statistically significant: r = + 0.694 p < 1.9 × 10-6 (Quinones equation, Bland-Altman analysis mean = - 2.3%) and r = + 0.571 p < 0.01 (Lvivo app, Bland-Altman analysis mean = - 13.3%). In conclusion, the present study showed a high accuracy of the bedside FoCUS EF evaluations, which may support the diagnosis of the heart failure in an emergency setting without delaying. The EF measurements by the operational method are more precise than those obtained by the unselected images of the software application.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Quinonas , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
. Care path for non-deferred elective hospitalizations in cardiology in the Covid-19 period. INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus-19 (Covid-19) has rapidly resulted in a global pandemic. Our hospital had to postpone all elective admissions to increase capacity for COVID-19 patients. Therefore, a rearrangement of the elective admissions was necessary to guarantee a restart of ordinary procedures. AIM: To describe the organizational model adopted for elective procedures during the Covid-19 pandemic, to guarantee maximum safety for patients and healthcare workers. METHODS: Patients on waiting list for cardiac procedures were rearranged based on risks prioritization. Procedure of coronary angiography and cardiac devices (PM and ICD) implants or replacement took priority upon other cardiac procedures. Each patient underwent a telephone nurse triage to assess for any covid-19 symptoms. The hospital admissions were organized in accordance with health and safety measures declared by the National Institute of Health, with different paths according to the swab results. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were contacted and 40 accepted the hospital admission (26 refused it, for fear of infection or covid-19 related family problems). No patient resulted positive to the nasal swab. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the impact on the health care system of this new pandemic, the choice of an appropriate pathway which can preserve patients' safety is essential, while guaranteeing the treatment of problems, such as cardiovascular diseases, with a high mortality rate.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Cardiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Pandemias , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
In December 2019 a novel coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was identified and the disease associated was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Fever, cough, myalgia, fatigue associated to dyspnea represent most common clinical symptoms of the disease. The reference standard for diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test applied on respiratory tract specimens. Despite of lower specificity, chest computed tomography (CT), as reported in manifold scientific studies, showed high sensitivity, therefore it may help in the early detection, management and follow-up of COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia usually showed on chest CT some typical features, such as: Bilateral ground glass opacities characterized by multilobe involvement with posterior and peripheral distribution; parenchymal consolidations with or without air bronchogram; interlobular septal thickening; crazy paving pattern, represented by interlobular and intralobular septal thickening surrounded by ground-glass opacities; subsegmental pulmonary vessels enlargement (> 3 mm). Halo sign, reversed halo sign, cavitation and pleural or pericardial effusion represent some of atypical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia. On the other hand lymphadenopathy's and bronchiectasis' frequency is unclear, indeed conflicting data emerged in literature. Radiologists play a key role in recognition of high suspicious findings of COVID-19 on chest CT, both typical and atypical ones. Thus, the aim of this review is to illustrate typical and atypical CT findings of COVID-19.
RESUMEN
AIM: The authors report the results observed in apparently healthy young adults undergoing chest radiography for pre-employment screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1996 and December 1997, 2292 young adults underwent conventional chest radiography for pre-employment screening purposes. Of these, 378 subjects (16.4%) in whom the chest X-ray showed alterations indicative for pulmonary parenchymal lesions were selected for the study. The lesions were divided into four groups: 1) single nodular opacity (n=98/378=25.9%); 2) multiple nodular opacities (n=25/378=6.6%); 3) single or multiple parenchymal consolidation(s) (n=203/378= 53.7%); 4) interstitial disease ( %). All subjects received a tuberculin skin test. The subjects in groups 1, 2 and 3 underwent the diagnostic protocol, which consisted of tuberculin skin test (TST) and CT scan for groups 1 and 2, and a repeat chest radiograph at 30 days for group 3. The subjects in group 4 were studied by high-resolution CT (HRCT). RESULTS: In group 1, CT showed nodular opacities with psammomatous calcifications in 13 cases, vascular dilatations in 3, calcified nodule in 7 subjects with positive TST, and uncalcified nodular lesions in 75 subjects (53/75 with positive TST). In group 2, FNAB confirmed the preliminary diagnosis of metastases in 2 cases; CT demonstrated the pleural origin of opacities in 1 patient, and multiple nodular lesions in 12 subjects; it invalidated the radiographic findings in 3 subjects, and demonstrated multiple nodules associated to increased interstitial thickening in 3 subjects. In group 3, the lung alterations had completely disappeared in 106 subjects, whereas in 97 subjects there was reduced extension of the previously observed lesions, but appearance of new sites of parenchymal consolidation. In group 4 CT confirmed the radiographic suspicion in 14 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tubercular infection is currently increasing in industrialised countries. In our study it showed a relatively high prevalence of about 4.5% in a young asymptomatic population.