Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 95
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 277(5): e1130-e1137, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicenter study to assess treatments and outcomes in a national cohort of infants with congenital ovarian cysts. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Wide variability exists in the treatment of congenital ovarian cysts. The effects of various treatment strategies on outcomes, specifically ovarian preservation, are not known. METHODS: Female infants diagnosed with congenital intra-abdominal cysts between 2013 and 2017 at 10 Canadian pediatric surgical centers were retrospectively evaluated. Sonographic characteristics, median time to cyst resolution, incidence of ovarian preservation, and predictors of surgery were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with complex cysts and cysts ≥40 mm in diameter. RESULTS: The study population included 189 neonates. Median gestational age at diagnosis and median maximal prenatal cyst diameter were 33 weeks and 40 mm, respectively. Cysts resolved spontaneously in 117 patients (62%), 14 (7%) prenatally, and the remainder at a median age of 124 days. Intervention occurred in 61 patients (32%), including prenatal aspiration (2, 3%), ovary sparing resection (14, 23%), or oophorectomy (45, 74%). Surgery occurred at a median age of 7.4weeks. Independent predictors of surgery included postnatal cyst diameter ≥40 mm [odds ratio (OR) 6.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-35.9] and sonographic complex cyst character (OR 63.6, 95% CI 10.9-1232). There was no significant difference in the odds of ovarian preservation (OR 3.06, 95% CI 0.86 -13.2) between patients who underwent early surgery (n = 22) and those initially observed for at least 3 months (n = 131). CONCLUSIONS: Most congenital ovarian cysts are asymptomatic and spontaneously resolve. Early surgical intervention does not increase ovarian preservation.


Asunto(s)
Quistes , Enfermedades Fetales , Quistes Ováricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Canadá , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Fetales/cirugía , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Quistes Ováricos/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
2.
Gastroenterol Nurs ; 41(2): 159-164, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596130

RESUMEN

We sought to determine, among outpatients at one university hospital endoscopy center, rates of self-reported minor adverse events (MAEs) at 2, 14, and 30 days postcolonoscopy and to identify predictors of MAEs at Day 2 postcolonoscopy. A single-center longitudinal cohort study with follow-ups at Days 2, 14, and 30 postcolonoscopy was conducted in Montreal, Canada. Baseline self-report data included patient age, gender, gastrointestinal discomforts and other discomforts in the preceding month, and comorbidity. Intracolonoscopy procedures and the method of insufflation were obtained from endoscopy reports. Minor adverse event data were obtained by either phone or Internet survey. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of MAEs at Day 2. Of 705 individuals approached, 420 (mean age = 58.7 years; SD = 8.4, 45.7% female) were eligible and consented to study participation, and 378 (90%) participated in at least one follow-up. At Days 2, 14, and 30, 86 (25.1%), 46 (13.7%), and 13 (3.1%) patients, respectively, experienced at least one MAE. At the Day 30 follow-up, 2 (0.53%) patients reported having experienced a serious adverse event. The multivariable analysis results showed that screening compared with nonscreening colonoscopy was protective for MAEs at 2 days (OR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.3, 0.9]). We found that 25% of patients experienced at least one MAE at 2 days postcolonoscopy, and screening compared with nonscreening colonoscopy patients were half as likely to experience these early MAEs. Nurses may use these findings to educate and reassure patients about colonoscopy risks. Large, longitudinal multicenter studies are needed to corroborate our findings.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colonoscopía/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Quebec , Medición de Riesgo
3.
J Hepatol ; 67(4): 801-808, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatic steatosis (HS) seems common in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the relative effect of HIV, as well as hepatitis C virus (HCV) in those co-infected, and the influence of HS on liver fibrosis progression are unclear. METHODS: The LIVEr disease in HIV (LIVEHIV) is a Canadian prospective cohort study using transient elastography and associated controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) to screen for HS and liver fibrosis, in unselected HIV-infected adults. HS progression was defined as development of any grade HS (CAP ⩾248dB/m), or transition to severe HS (CAP >292dB/m), for those with any grade HS at baseline. Fibrosis progression was defined as development of significant liver fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] >7.1kPa), or transition to cirrhosis (LSM >12.5kPa) for those with significant liver fibrosis at baseline. Cox regression analysis was used to assess predictors of HS and fibrosis progression. RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, which included 726 HIV-infected patients (22.7% HCV co-infected). Prevalence of any grade HS did not differ between HIV mono-infected and HIV/HCV co-infected patients (36.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively). 313 patients were followed for a median of 15.4 (interquartile range 8.5-23.0) months. The rate of HS progression was 37.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.2-49.0) and 21.9 (95% CI 15.6-30.7) per 100 person-years in HIV mono-infection and HIV/HCV co-infection, respectively. HCV co-infection was an independent negative predictor of HS progression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.89). HS predicted liver fibrosis progression in HIV mono-infection (aHR 4.18, 95% CI 1.21-14.5), but not in HIV/HCV co-infection. CONCLUSION: HS progresses faster and is associated with liver fibrosis progression in HIV mono-infection but not in HIV/HCV co-infection. Lay summary: Fatty liver is the most frequent liver disease in Western countries. People living with HIV seem at high risk of fatty liver due to frequent metabolic disorders and the long-term effects of antiretroviral therapy. However, due to the invasiveness of liver biopsy, the traditional method of diagnosing fatty liver, there are few data regarding its frequency in people living with HIV. In this study, we used a non-invasive diagnostic tool to analyze the epidemiology of fatty liver in 726 HIV+ patients. We found that fatty liver affects over one-third of people living with HIV. When followed over time, we found that HIV+ patients without HCV co-infection develop fatty liver more frequently than those co-infected with HCV.


Asunto(s)
Coinfección/complicaciones , Hígado Graso/etiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 45(4): 371-378, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27928888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is very common in people with age-related eye disease. Our goal was to determine if self-care tools plus limited telephone support could reduce depressive symptoms in patients with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN: A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital in Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty participants were recruited. METHODS: To be eligible, participants must have had either late stage age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy, at least mild depressive symptoms, and visual acuity better than 20/200. Half were randomized to the intervention arm and half to delayed intervention/usual care. The intervention consisted of large print written and audio tools incorporating cognitive-behavioral principles plus three 10-minute telephone calls from a lay coach. Eight-week follow-up data were collected by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the 8-week change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, life space and self-efficacy. RESULTS: The baseline mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.37 (SD = 0.20), and the baseline mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score was 9.5 (SD = 3.9) indicating moderate depressive symptoms. After adjusting for baseline imbalances in visual acuity, the intervention reduced depressive symptoms by 2.1 points more than usual care (P = 0.040). The intervention was not associated with the secondary outcomes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Self-care tools plus telephone coaching led to a modest improvement in depressive symptoms in patients with age-related eye disease. Additional research on how to maximize their effect is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Autocuidado/métodos , Terapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual
5.
Sante Ment Que ; 42(1): 273-288, 2017.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28792572

RESUMEN

Objectives A research group based at St. Mary's Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, has conducted a research program over the past two decades that aims to inform improvements in the management of depression in primary care and general medical settings, among older adults. This paper reviews the findings from this research program, discusses the findings in the context of other research, and highlights the implications for practice and health policy.Methods Narrative review and synthesis of 25 published articles, that included: 4 systematic reviews, 10 observational studies, 9 intervention trials, and 2 consensus conference reports.Results The results pertain to 4 research areas: detection of depression in primary care and general medical settings; collaborative care of depression; depression self-care interventions; and the role of family and friends in supporting depression self-care interventions.Conclusions We propose six recommendations for improving the management of depression in the target population. 1) Depression detection and treatment can be improved through collaborative care models that involve primary care physicians, mental health specialists and non-physician mental health workers who are trained to assist with the detection of depression, with the delivery of brief, low-intensity psychological interventions and with self-care support. More research and evaluation are necessary to determine the factors that enhance the effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and consumer-centeredness of these interventions. 2) Supported depression self-care (and other low-intensity interventions such as short problem-solving therapy) offered by telephone or via internet, either as part of collaborative or usual care are feasible treatment options but more research is necessary to determine their effectiveness in different clinical populations. Some populations (e.g., those aged 75 and over, with visual and/or mild cognitive impairment) are likely to need greater or face-to-face support. 3) As most family physicians are unlikely to have the necessary time or interest to support depression self-care interventions, other sustainable programmatic contexts are needed for delivery of these interventions. Options include: nurses or other mental health workers in multidisciplinary family medicine groups; regional mental health programs; and voluntary organizations dedicated to assisting in the management of chronic illnesses. Research is needed on the feasibility and effectiveness of using peer support workers or volunteers to provide coaching of depression self-care interventions. 4) Involvement of family or friends in depression self-care may improve outcomes (e.g., dyadic interventions) but further research is necessary. 5) Further research should explore the potential of depression self-care interventions to prevent major depression and in depression relapse prevention in this population.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Depresión/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Conducta Cooperativa , Depresión/psicología , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Quebec , Autocuidado
6.
J Trauma Nurs ; 24(3): 182-192, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486325

RESUMEN

The number of patients 65 years and older has been rising steadily every year at our Level I trauma center. Our clinical experience demonstrated that once discharged, some of these patients were not managing well. Postdischarge portrait is difficult to ascertain because this information is not captured in the trauma registry database. The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of hospitalized trauma patients 65 years and older who are discharged home. A descriptive cross-sectional study of hospitalized trauma patients was conducted 1 month postdischarge using PREPARED Patient and 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires. Data were analyzed with SPSS and NVivo. A convenience sample of 33 participants was recruited from four surgical inpatient trauma units of an urban, downtown hospital in Eastern Canada. Participants scored below 50% on most categories related to discharge preparedness and reported not having received enough information about their medication, available community resources, and permitted activities. They had worries about managing at home and 40% experienced unexpected problems. Participants reported feeling confident (80%) to be discharged home mostly because of support or previous experience with illness and 53% felt very prepared to return home. Health status scores were lowest for the domain "role limitation due to physical health" at 16% and highest around 70% for "emotional well-being" and "general health." Patients did not receive enough information; some experienced unexpected problems once home but having support and previous experience with illness seems to help participants be confident with discharge home. There is room for improvement on specific aspects of discharge planning and preparedness.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Anciano , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico
7.
Gut ; 64(11): 1765-73, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25360036

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Histopathology is potentially an important outcome measure in UC. Multiple histological disease activity (HA) indices, including the Geboes score (GS) and modified Riley score (MRS), have been developed; however, the operating properties of these instruments are not clearly defined. We assessed the reproducibility of existing measures of HA. DESIGN: Five experienced pathologists with GI pathology fellowship training and expertise in IBD evaluated, on three separate occasions at least two weeks apart, 49 UC colon biopsies and scored the GS, MRS and a global rating of histological severity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The reproducibility of each grading system and for individual instrument items was quantified by estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on two-way random effects models. Uncertainty of estimates was quantified by 95% two-sided CIs obtained using the non-parametric cluster bootstrap method. Biopsies responsible for the greatest disagreement based on the ICC estimates were identified. A consensus process was used to determine the most common sources of measurement disagreement. Recommendations for minimising disagreement were subsequently generated. RESULTS: Intrarater ICCs (95% CIs) for the total GS, MRS and VAS scores were 0.82 (0.73 to 0.88), 0.71 (0.63 to 0.80) and 0.79 (0.72 to 0.85), respectively. Corresponding inter-rater ICCs were substantially lower: 0.56 (0.39 to 0.67), 0.48 (0.35 to 0.66) and 0.61 (0.47 to 0.72). Correlation between the GS and VAS was 0.62 and between the MRS and VAS was 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: Although 'substantial' to 'almost perfect' ICCs for intrarater agreement were found in the assessment of HA in UC, ICCs for inter-rater agreement were considerably lower. According to the consensus process results, standardisation of item definitions and modification of the existing indices is required to create an optimal UC histological instrument.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Adulto , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
8.
Eur Respir J ; 45(4): 962-8, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25406447

RESUMEN

The objective of the study was to assess whether the incidences of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are increased in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to the general population. A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the administrative health databases of Québec, Canada. Incidences of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis among patients with asthma and COPD were assessed for the 2001-2006 period. In total, 136 178 subjects with asthma and 143 904 subjects with COPD were identified. The average incidence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis was 23.1 and 8.8 per 100 000 person-years among asthmatic patients; in the COPD cohort there were 26.2 Crohn's disease cases and 17 ulcerative colitis cases per 100 000 person-years. The incidence of Crohn's disease in asthma and COPD patients was 27% and 55% higher than in the general population of Québec; the incidence of ulcerative colitis was 30% higher among COPD patients compared to the general population. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease was significantly increased in asthma and COPD patients compared to the general population of Québec. Incidence rates were particularly high in patients with COPD. Awareness of an association between airway diseases and inflammatory bowel disease in older age groups may play an important role in earlier detection of bowel disease and in the therapeutic management of such patients.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Asma/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Quebec/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Public Health ; 109(1): e9, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941749
10.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 53: 19160216241248670, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with radiation-based therapy suffer from short- and long-term toxicities that affect quality of life (QOL). Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has an established role in the management of early OPSCC but adjuvant treatment is often indicated postoperatively due to the high incidence of nodal metastasis associated with advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-related OPSCC. To overcome the need for adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and neck dissection (ND) is proposed. This study aimed to assess if QOL in HPV-associated OPSCC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and ND returns to baseline within 12 months of completing treatment. METHODS: A 12 month longitudinal study was carried out at McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Canada, among a convenience sample of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Seventh Edition stage III and IVa HPV-related OPSCC who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and ND. QOL data were obtained pretreatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following treatment completion using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core and Head and Neck extension modules. Paired t tests and mixed models for repeated measures analysis were used to assess changes in QOL from baseline to 12 months postoperatively and over time, respectively. RESULTS: Nineteen of 23 patients (median age 58 years) who received the study treatment fulfilled the eligibility criteria. OPSCC subsites were palatine tonsil (n = 12) and base of tongue (n = 7). All 19 patients were treated per protocol and none required adjuvant RT as per pathology review and protocol requirements at a postoperative multidisciplinary team tumor board discussion. No significant differences were found when comparing 12 month QOL follow-up scores to pretreatment scores in measures that would likely be affected by RT [eg, swallowing (P = .7), social eating (P = .8), xerostomia (P = .9)]. CONCLUSION: In HPV-related OPSCC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and ND as definitive treatment is associated with excellent QOL outcomes. Postoperative QOL scores returned to baseline by 3 months and were maintained for all measures, indicating a return to normal function.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirugía , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virología , Estudios Longitudinales , Disección del Cuello , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Adulto , Virus del Papiloma Humano
11.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 13: 78, 2013 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23638769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown that endoscopist specialty is associated with colorectal cancers missed by colonoscopy. We sought to examine the relationship between endoscopist specialty and polypectomy rate, a colonoscopy quality indicator. Polypectomy rate is defined as the proportion of colonoscopies that result in the removal of one or more polyps. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted of endoscopists and their patients from 7 Montreal and 2 Calgary endoscopy clinics. Eligible patients were aged 50-75 and covered by provincial health insurance. A patient questionnaire assessed family history of colorectal cancer, history of large bowel conditions and symptoms, and previous colonoscopy. The outcome, polypectomy status, was obtained from provincial health administrative databases. For each city, Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio for polypectomy comparing surgeons to gastroenterologists. Model covariates included patient age, sex, family history of colorectal cancer, colonoscopy indication, and previous colonoscopy. RESULTS: In total, 2,113 and 538 colonoscopies were included from Montreal and Calgary, respectively. Colonoscopies were performed by 38 gastroenterologists and 6 surgeons in Montreal, and by 31 gastroenterologists and 5 surgeons in Calgary. The adjusted odds ratios comparing surgeons to gastroenterologists were 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32-0.71) in Montreal and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.43-1.21) in Calgary. CONCLUSIONS: An association between endoscopist specialty and polypectomy was observed in both cities after adjusting for patient-level covariates. Results from Montreal suggest that surgeons are half as likely as gastroenterologists to remove polyps, while those from Calgary were associated with a wide, non-significant Bayesian credible interval. However, residual confounding from patient-level variables is possible, and further investigation is required.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Colonoscopía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Gastroenterología/normas , Cirugía General/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Especialización , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Anciano , Alberta , Competencia Clínica , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Gastroenterología/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 449, 2013 Oct 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24168208

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and second highest cause of cancer-related mortality in Canada. Despite the availability of screening services and establishment of guidelines, utilization of colorectal cancer screening in Canada remains low. In 2008, the province of Ontario launched ColonCancerCheck, an organized colorectal cancer screening program aimed at increasing CRC screening adherence. In this study, we adopt a quasi-experimental approach to estimate and describe the impact of ColonCancerCheck on screening behavior in the asymptomatic average risk population. METHODS: Annual screening rates from the target population were estimated using five cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey, a cross-sectional nationally representative survey of health status, healthcare use, and determinants of health in the Canadian population. We used a difference-in-differences design to measure the overall impact of ColonCancerCheck on past-year fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and endoscopy in Ontario relative to the rest of Canada. Several verification tests validated the suitability of our model specification. RESULTS: The difference-in-differences analysis shows that ColonCancerCheck increased FOBT screening in the average risk population by 5.2 percentage points (95% CI [3.2, 7.2]), an increase of 33% relative to pre-program screening rates. The program had no observed effect on endoscopy screening and we found no evidence that ColonCancerCheck differentially altered the screening practices of population sub-groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest ColonCancerCheck has been successful at increasing use of FOBT in the asymptomatic average risk population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sangre Oculta , Ontario/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
13.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 13: 45, 2013 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23574795

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies in administrative databases would be useful for monitoring colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake, tracking health resource utilization, and quality assurance. Previously developed algorithms based on expert opinion were insufficiently accurate. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the accuracy of model-based algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies in health administrative databases. METHODS: Patients aged 50-75 were recruited from endoscopy units in Montreal, Quebec, and Calgary, Alberta. Physician billing records and hospitalization data were obtained for each patient from the provincial administrative health databases. Indication for colonoscopy was derived using Bayesian latent class analysis informed by endoscopist and patient questionnaire responses. Two modeling methods were used to fit the data, multivariate logistic regression and recursive partitioning. The accuracies of these models were assessed. RESULTS: 689 patients from Montreal and 541 from Calgary participated (January to March 2007). The latent class model identified 554 screening exams. Multivariate logistic regression predictions yielded an area under the curve of 0.786. Recursive partitioning using the latent outcome had sensitivity and specificity of 84.5% (95% CI: 81.5-87.5) and 63.3% (95% CI: 59.7-67.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based algorithms using administrative data failed to identify screening colonoscopies with sufficient accuracy. Nevertheless, the approach of constructing a latent reference standard against which model-based algorithms were evaluated may be useful for validating administrative data in other contexts where there lacks a gold standard.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Alberta , Teorema de Bayes , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Can Fam Physician ; 59(12): e550-7, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24336560

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a call-in centre to deliver colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in primary care through self-administered fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). DESIGN: Four-month intervention study (September 2010 to January 2011) with randomly selected follow-up interviews. SETTING: The family medicine clinics of 3 hospitals in Montreal, Que. PARTICIPANTS: Letters from doctors invited their patients to contact the call-in centre (N = 761). Eligible patients agreeing to FOBT were sent testing kits that could be returned by mail (N = 100). Randomly selected patients (N = 36) were interviewed to explore the reasons why they did not contact the call-in centre, or why they did or did not adhere to FOBT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was assessed by the proportions of patients who contacted the call-in centre, who were eligible for FOBT, and who adhered to FOBT; and by the time between invitation mail-out and contact with the call-in centre, initial telephone contact and receipt of the signed consent form, and FOBT kit mail-out and receipt of the kit by the laboratory. Hierarchical logistic regression evaluated the effect of patient characteristics on feasibility indicators, adjusting for clustering by physician and centre. RESULTS: Of 761 patients (61.6% female, mean age 61.0 years), 250 (32.9%) contacted the call-in centre, of whom 100 (40.0%) were eligible for and consented to FOBT; 62 (62.0%) of these patients adhered to FOBT. Median (interquartile range) time from invitation mail-out to call-in centre contact was 21 (7 to 29) days, from initial telephone contact to receipt of the signed consent form was 24 (10 to 38) days, and from FOBT kit mail-out to receipt at the laboratory was 23 (18 to 32) days. With the exception of previous cancer diagnosis, patient characteristics were not associated with feasibility indicators. Of the 115 (46.0%) patients determined to be ineligible for FOBT screening, 111 (96.5%) were up to date with or already scheduled for screening. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of the call-in centre was demonstrated. Targeting screening-eligible individuals or coupling a call-in service with another evidence-based CRC screening improvement strategy might further improve uptake of fecal testing.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Sangre Oculta , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Correspondencia como Asunto , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios Postales , Teléfono , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 26(11): 791-4, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23166901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Polypectomy rate is a surrogate quality indicator for screening colonoscopy. Various methods for identifying screening colonoscopies have been used and it is unclear how different definitions affect the estimated polypectomy rate. OBJECTIVE: To estimate polypectomy rates and how they vary according to the definition of a screening colonoscopy, using patient- and endoscopist-reported indications. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of endoscopists and their patients 50 to 75 years of age who underwent colonoscopy was conducted. Based on questionnaire responses, four patient indications were derived: perceived screening; perceived nonscreening; medical history indicating nonscreening; and combination of the three indications. Endoscopist indication was derived from a questionnaire completed immediately after colonoscopy. Polypectomy status was obtained from provincial physician billing records. Polypectomy rates were computed, while accounting for physician and hospital level clustering, using all four patient indications, endoscopist indication, and the agreement between patient and endoscopist indications. The effect of indications on polypectomy rate was estimated adjusting for age, sex and family history of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 2134 patients and 45 endoscopists were included. The proportion of colonoscopies classified as screening according to the nine indications ranged from 32.2% to 70.9%. Polypectomy rates ranged between 22.6% and 26.2% for screening colonoscopy, and between 27.1% and 30.8% for nonscreening colonoscopy. Adjusted ORs for indication ranged between 0.74 and 0.94. DISCUSSION: Although the proportion of colonoscopies identified as screening varied considerably among the indications, the estimated polypectomy rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the way screening is defined does not greatly affect the estimates of polypectomy rate.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/patología , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Selección de Paciente , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 26(12): 889-93, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23248789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previously developed screening colonoscopy algorithms based on diagnostic and endoscopy procedural variables have not been sufficiently accurate for use in epidemiological and health services research. OBJECTIVE: To increase understanding of the administrative health database variables that could help to discern screening and nonscreening colonoscopy. METHODS: A qualitative study using physician focus groups was conducted in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Toronto (Ontario). Specialty-specific focus group sessions were held among family physicians and gastroenterologists - the physicians responsible for referring patients to and performing screening colonoscopy, respectively. Interview guides were developed to better understand physician clinical and billing practices. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Forty family physicians and seven gastroenterologists participated in five focus group sessions. Patient variables included demographics (age) and medical history (colorectal cancer risk factors/symptoms, medication for colorectal cancer risk factors/symptoms, gastrointestinal disorders, severe disease). Clinical practice variables included timing of the colonoscopy (evenings, weekends, holidays, during hospitalization; same-day endoscopist consultation and colonoscopy), use of services (hospitalization, annual examination, transfer from other facility) and procedure use patterns (large bowel or other medical/surgical procedure before and subsequent to colonoscopy). However, wide variability in clinical and billing practices will likely preclude the development of a reasonably accurate screening colonoscopy algorithm. Physicians suggested adding a screening colonoscopy code to the administrative health data. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to acknowledge the limitations of the provincial administrative health databases to identify screening colonoscopy may lead to incorrect conclusions and the establishment of inappropriate health care policies.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/clasificación , Vocabulario Controlado , Anciano , Canadá , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Grupos Focales , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Selección de Paciente
17.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 26(9): 611-3, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22993732

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rate of serious complications is one marker of the quality of colonoscopy services. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of serious complications of colonoscopy according to colonoscopy indication and polypectomy status. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients scheduled for colonoscopy who were recruited from seven endoscopy facilities across Montreal (Quebec) was conducted. Before colonoscopy, patients completed a brief questionnaire and provided their health insurance numbers. Colonoscopy indication was based on patient-reported medical history. Polypectomy status was obtained from provincial physician billing records (Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec). Diagnoses and procedures associated with hospitalization in the 30 days following colonoscopy were obtained from the provincial hospitalization database (MedEcho). RESULTS: Of the 2134 patients enrolled (mean age 60.9 years, 50.1% male), 33 (1.55% [95% CI 1.06% to 2.16%]) were hospitalized within 30 days. One patient experienced bleeding following a colonoscopy that involved polypectomy and was diagnosed with carcinoma in situ of the rectum. Based on self-reported rectal bleeding in the previous six months, the colonoscopy was nonscreening. The provincial hospitalization data showed no occurrences of perforation, diverticulitis, myocardial infarction/stroke or death; thus, the rate of serious colonoscopy complications was 0.05% (95% CI 0.00% to 0.26%). DISCUSSION: The rate of serious colonoscopy complications requiring hospitalization was low and comparable with what is reported in the literature. The serious complication occurred subsequent to polypectomy and in a nonscreening colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: The findings support the relative safety of screening colonoscopy in persons without large bowel diseases and symptoms. However, future research to determine the rate of serious complications not requiring hospitalization is warranted to reassure decision makers of the safety of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 26(12): 902-4, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23248792

RESUMEN

The present report summarizes the proceedings of the pan-Canadian Expert Forum on Using Information Technology to Facilitate Uptake and Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, which was held in Montreal, Quebec, November 18 to 19, 2011. The meeting assembled a multidisciplinary group of family physicians, gastroenterologists, nurses, patients, foundation representatives, screening program administrators and researchers to discuss the development of a mechanism or strategy that would permit the collection of comparable data by all colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, which would not only support the needs of each program but also provide a national perspective. The overarching theme of the meeting was 'designing a national approach to computerized electronic data collection and dissemination for CRC screening that would improve knowledge transfer across the continuum of preventive health care'. The forum encouraged presentations on clinical, research and technical topics. The meeting fostered valuable cross-disciplinary communication and delivered the message that it is essential to develop a national health informatics approach for CRC screening data collection and dissemination to support provincial CRC screening programs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Informática Médica , Adulto , Canadá , Colonoscopía , Congresos como Asunto , Recolección de Datos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros
19.
J Patient Exp ; 9: 23743735221092557, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35434295

RESUMEN

Patients with lower educational attainment are underrepresented in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) research. To increase our understanding of the health care perspectives of patients with less than a university degree, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 23 outpatients at the McGill University Health Centre IBD Centre (Montreal, Canada). Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Perspectives focused on communication with health care professionals, access to care, symptoms and treatment, and outside support. Access to an IBD specialist was the most important aspect of care. Good care, kind and receptive staff, and a lengthy delay to diagnosis were frequently reported experiences. IBD specialists, nurses, and family and friends were most helpful in managing disease. Physical and emotional symptoms, reduced social engagement, and medications were difficult aspects of living with IBD. An ideal IBD clinic would provide access to traditional and non-traditional services and assist with obtaining support to help patients engage in social activities, increase affordability of care, and maintain employment. Study findings may be helpful in designing equitable models of health care delivery.

20.
Laryngoscope ; 132(6): 1219-1223, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34825710

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify barriers in access to care for head and neck cancer (H&NC) patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), specifically within Dakar, Senegal, using both quantitative and qualitative data. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive observational study. METHODS: Patients with H&NC were selected from two independent university hospitals in Dakar, Senegal. A mixed-methods descriptive study was performed using a specifically tailored questionnaire and a focused ethnographic qualitative approach to identify factors that delay patient presentation, referral, and treatment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative using a deductive approach based on a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with a mean age of 57.8 years were included. Presentation delay was 5.7 months, mainly attributed to cost of consultation (39%), waiting time at doctor's office (15%), and distance to healthcare facility (12%). Referral delay greater than 3 months was observed in 60% of participants, secondary to misdiagnosis and lack of appropriate referral. Treatment delay was associated with limited local treatment capacity and securing cost of treatment. Cost of transportation impacted all delays. CONCLUSIONS: This work used an evidence-based approach to identify barriers in access to care for H&NC patients in sub-Saharan Africa. It suggests the feasibility and transferability of this methodology which combined a quantitative approach based on the literature with a qualitative analysis. Insight provided by this study will be used to guide development of implementation strategies for early detection of H&NC in LMICs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1219-1223, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Instituciones de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Senegal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA