Continuous positive airway pressure therapy in the management of hypercapnic cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) represent the first line therapy for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) together with medical therapy. CPAP benefits in acute CPE with normo-hypocapnia are known, but it is not clear whether the use of CPAP is safe in the hypercapnic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate CPAP efficacy in the treatment of hypercapnic CPE. We enrolled 9 patients admitted to the emergency room with diagnosis of acute CPE based on history, clinical examination, arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) and lung-heart ultrasound examination. We selected patients with hypercapnia (pCO2 >50 mmHg) and bicarbonate levels <30 mEq/L. All patients received medical therapy with furosemide and nitrates and helmet CPAP therapy. All patients received a second and a third ABG, respectively at 30 and 60 min. Primary end-points of the study were respiratory distress resolution, pCO2 reduction, pH improvement, lactates normalization and the no need for non-invasive ventilation or endo-tracheal intubation. All patients showed resolution of respiratory distress with CPAP weaning and shift to Venturi mask with no need for NIV or endo-tracheal intubation. Serial ABG tests showed clear reduction in CO2 levels with improvement of pH and progressive lactate reduction. CPAP therapy can be effective in the treatment of hypercapnic CPE as long as the patients have no signs of chronic hypercapnia on ABG and as long as the diagnosis of heart failure is supported by bedside lung-heart ultrasound examination.

Predictors of Intensive Care Unit admission in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Italy is currently experiencing an epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Aim of our study is to identify the best predictors of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in patients with Covid-19. We examined 28 patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) and subsequently confirmed as cases of Covid-19. Patients received, at the admission to the ED, a diagnostic work-up including: patient history, clinical examination, an arterial blood gas analysis (whenever possible performed on room air), laboratory blood tests, including serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), lung ultrasound examination and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax. For each patient, as gas exchange index through the alveolocapillary membrane, we determined the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO⁠2) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient augmentation (AaDO⁠2 augmentation). For each patient, as measurement of hypoxemia, we determined oxygen saturation (SpO2), partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO⁠2), PaO⁠2 deficit and the ratio between arterial partial pressure of oxygen by blood gas analysis and fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F). Patients were assigned to ICU Group or to Non-ICU Group basing on the decision to intubate. Areas under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to compare the performance of each test in relation to prediction of ICU admission. Comparing patients of ICU Group (10 patients) with patients of Non-ICU Group (18 patients), we found that the first were older, they had more frequently a medical history of malignancy and they were more frequently admitted to ED for dyspnea. Patients of ICU Group had lower oxygen saturation, PaO⁠2, P/F and higher heart rate, respiratory rate, AaDO⁠2, AaDO⁠2 augmentation and lactate than patients of Non-ICU Group. ROC curves demonstrate that age, heart rate, respiratory rate, dyspnea, lactate, AaDO2, AaDO2 augmentation, white blood cell count, neutrophil count and percentage, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose level, international normalized ratio (INR), blood urea and IL-6 are useful predictors of ICU admission. We identified several predictors of ICU admission in patients with Covid-19. They can act as fast tools for the early identification and timely treatment of critical cases since their arrival in the ED.

Diagnostic accuracy of inferior vena cava evaluation in the diagnosis of acute heart failure among dyspneic patients.

Acute dyspnea is one of the main reasons for admission to the Emergency Department (ED). A rapid and accurate diagnosis can be lifesaving for these patients. Particularly, it is important to differentiate between dyspnea due to acute heart failure (AHF) and dyspnea of pulmonary origin. The aim of this study is to evaluate the real accuracy of the evaluation of diameter and collapsibility of IVC for the diagnosis of AHF among dyspneic patients. We analyzed 155 patients admitted for acute dyspnea to the ED of "Maurizio Bufalini" hospital in Cesena (Italy) and "Antonio Cardarelli" hospital in Naples (Italy) from November 2014 to April 2017. All patients underwent ultrasound of inferior vena cava (IVC) examination with a hand-held device in addition to the traditional pathway. Patients were classified into AHF group or non-AHF group according to the current guidelines. The final diagnosis was AHF in 64 patients and dyspnea of non-cardiac origin in 91 patients. Sensibility and specificity of IVC hypo-collapsibility was 75.81% (95% CI 63.26% to 85.78%) and 67.74% (95% CI 57.25% to 77.07%) for the diagnosis of AHF. Sensibility and specificity of IVC dilatation was 69.35% (95% CI 56.35% to 80.44%) and 74.19% (95%CI 64.08% to 82.71%) for the diagnosis of AHF. AUC was 0.718 (0.635-0.801) for IVC hypo-collapsibility, 0.718 (0.634-0.802) for IVC dilatation. Our study demonstrated that the sonographic assessment of IVC diameter and collapsibility is suboptimal to differentiate acute dyspnea due to AHF or other causes in the emergency setting.

Point-of-care ultrasound with pocket-size devices in emergency department.

Point-of-care ultrasound is a useful tool for clinicians in the management of patients. Particularly in emergency department, the role of point-of-care ultrasound is strongly increasing due to the need for a rapid assessment of critically ill patients and to speed up the diagnostic process. Hand-carried ultrasound devices are particularly useful in emergency setting and allow rapid assessment of patient even in prehospital setting. This article will review the role of point-of-care ultrasonography, performed with pocket-size devices, in the management of patients presenting with acute onset of undifferentiating dyspnea, chest pain, and shock in emergency department.

Assessment of left atrial size in addition to focused cardiopulmonary ultrasound improves diagnostic accuracy of acute heart failure in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Acute dyspnea is one of the main reasons for admission to Emergency Department (ED). Availability of ultraminiaturized pocket ultrasound devices (PUD) adds diagnostic power to the clinical examination. The aim of this study was to identify an integrated ultrasound approach for diagnosis of acute heart failure (acute HF), using PUD and combining evaluation from lung, heart and inferior vena cava (IVC). METHODS: We included 102 patients presenting to the ED of "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital in Naples (Italy) for acute dyspnea (AD). All patients underwent integrated ultrasound examination (IUE) of lung-heart-IVC, using PUD. The gold standard was the final diagnosis determined by two expert reviewers: acute heart failure (acute HF) or noncardiac dyspnea. We used 2 × 2 contingency tables to analyze sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the three ultrasonic methods, and their combinations for the diagnosis of acute HF, comparing with the final, validated diagnosis. RESULTS: Lung ultrasound (LUS) alone exhibited a good sensitivity (100%) and specificity (82%) and had the highest accuracy (89%) among single modalities (heart and IVC) for the diagnosis of acute HF. The highest accuracy among all methods (96%) was obtained by the combination of positive LUS and either dilated left atrium or EF ≤ 40% or both (all P < .01 vs single modalities). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to ED, IUE using PUD is a useful extension of clinical examination and has a reliable diagnostic discriminant ability in the immediate evaluation of acute dyspnea. The combination of positive LUS with focused cardiac ultrasonography (FoCUS), including also dilated left atrium, substantially extends the spectrum of recognizable acute HF.

A case of pulmonary edema: The critical role of lung-heart integrated ultrasound examination.

Cardiogenic pulmonary edema is a common presentation of acute heart failure normally treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), diuretics and nitrates. This therapy is contraindicated in case of cardiac tamponade. We describe a case of pulmonary edema due to cardiac tamponade in which integrated lung-heart ultrasound examination allowed prompt diagnosis and pericardiocentesis before administration of CPAP thus avoiding circulatory collapse.

A challenging diagnosis of dyspnea: A case report of contralateral reexpansion pulmonary edema.

Reexpansion pulmonary edema (RPE) is an uncommon complication of thoracentesis or chest drainage. It occurs in the ipsilateral or contralateral lung. Causes, pathogenesis and therapy are not well understood especially for contralateral RPE. We describe a case of fatal contralateral RPE in a 59-years-old woman with right lung cancer underwent ultrasound-guided thoracentesis for massive pleural effusion and severe dyspnea. Pathogenesis of contralateral RPE is probably multifactorial and in this case is mostly due to the overperfusion of the healthy lung and consequent capillary damage. The right therapy for this condition is not known.

Diagnostic performance of multi-organ ultrasound with pocket-sized device in the management of acute dyspnea.

BACKGROUND: The availability of ultra-miniaturized pocket ultrasound devices (PUD) adds diagnostic power to the clinical examination. Information on accuracy of ultrasound with handheld units in immediate differential diagnosis in emergency department (ED) is poor. The aim of this study is to test the usefulness and accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) alone or combined with ultrasound of the heart and inferior vena cava (IVC) using a PUD for the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea (AD). METHODS: We included 68 patients presenting to the ED of "Maurizio Bufalini" Hospital in Cesena (Italy) for AD. All patients underwent integrated ultrasound examination (IUE) of lung-heart-IVC, using PUD. The series was divided into patients with dyspnea of cardiac or non-cardiac origin. We used 2 × 2 contingency tables to analyze sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the three ultrasonic methods and their various combinations for the diagnosis of cardiogenic dyspnea (CD), comparing with the final diagnosis made by an independent emergency physician. RESULTS: LUS alone exhibited a good sensitivity (92.6%) and specificity (80.5%). The highest accuracy (90%) for the diagnosis of CD was obtained with the combination of LUS and one of the other two methods (heart or IVC). CONCLUSIONS: The IUE with PUD is a useful extension of the clinical examination, can be readily available at the bedside or in ambulance, requires few minutes and has a reliable diagnostic discriminant ability in the setting of AD.

Assessment of E/A ratio helps emergency clinicians in the management of patients with acute dyspnea.

Acute dyspnea (AD) is one of the main reasons for admission to the Emergency Department (ED). In the last years integrated ultrasound examination (IUE) of lung, heart and inferior vena cava (IVC) has become an extension of clinical examination for a fast differential diagnosis. The aim of present study is to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of E/A ratio for diagnosing acute heart failure (aHF) in patients with acute dyspnea. We included 92 patients presenting to the ED of CTO Hospital in Naples (Italy) for AD. All patients underwent IUE of lung-heart-IVC with a portable ultrasound device. Left ventricle diastolic function was assessed using pulse wave doppler at the tips of the mitral valve and E wave velocity and E/A ratio were recorded. The FINAL diagnosis was determined by two expert reviewers: acute HF or non-acute HF (non-aHF). We used 2 × 2 contingency tables to analyze sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive value of ultrasound parameters for the diagnosis of AD, comparing with the FINAL diagnosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) showed high sensitivity, good specificity and accuracy in identification of patients with aHF. However, the highest accuracy was obtained by diastolic function parameters. The E/A ratio showed the highest diagnostic performance with an AUC for aHF of 0.93. In patients presenting with AD, E/A ratio is easy to obtain in a fast ultrasound protocol and showed an excellent accuracy for diagnosis of aHF.

Arterial blood gas analysis utility in predicting lung injury in blunt chest trauma.

BACKGROUND: thoracic trauma is one of the leading causes of death in all age groups and accounts for 25-50 % of all traumatic injuries. With the term lung injury in blunt chest trauma, we identified a spectrum of conditions: lung contusion, pneumothorax and haemothorax. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of arterial blood gas analysis parameters in predicting lung injury in blunt chest trauma. METHODS: we included 51 patients presenting to the Emergency Department of "C.T.O." Hospital in Naples [Italy] for blunt chest trauma. The patients were assigned to the Lung Injury Group or to the Non-Lung Injury Group basing on CT scan findings. For each patient, we calculated the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient [AaDO2], the AaDO2 augmentation, the arterial partial pressure of oxygen deficit [PaO2 Deficit] and the ratio between arterial partial pressure of oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen [P/F]. Areas under the curve [AUC] and receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve were used to compare the performance of each different test in relation to the detection of lung injury in blunt chest trauma. RESULTS: patients with lung injury had lower oxygen saturation, arterial partial pressure of oxygen, P/F and higher PaO2 Deficit, AaDO2, AaDO2 augmentation than patients without lung injury. PaO2 Deficit, AaDO2 and AaDO2 augmentation showed a good accuracy to predict lung injury in blunt chest trauma. CONCLUSION: our study demonstrates that the combination of different arterial blood gas analysis variables may be a fast approach for identifying patients with lung injury in the setting of blunt chest trauma in the Emergency Department.

Anterior vs lateral symmetric interstitial syndrome in the diagnosis of acute heart failure.

Acute dyspnea due to acute heart failure (AHF) is one of the most common reasons for admission to the Emergency Department (ED). The importance of lung ultrasound (LUS) examination in the diagnostic workup of AHF has been widely established. Limited anterior LUS examination for the diagnosis of AHF is controversial. This study compares the accuracy of LUS examination limited to the anterior or lateral lung zones for the diagnosis of AHF and their accuracy among patients with different levels of hypoxemia according to PO2/FiO2 ratio evaluation. We analyzed 170 patients admitted to the ED for acute dyspnea, who underwent multi-organ ultrasound examination of lung, heart and inferior vena cava for differential diagnosis. The thorax was examined following a simplified protocol that provides two scans at each side (anterior and lateral) to sample upper and lower lobes and the presence or the absence of interstitial syndrome (IS) was evaluated. The presence of anterior symmetric IS exhibited lower accuracy than lateral symmetric IS in the diagnosis of AHF in the whole population, but its diagnostic accuracy improves in sub-groups of patients with severe and critical hypoxemia.

Classes of antihypertensive medications and blood pressure control in relation to metabolic risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), despite use of aggressive therapy. This study was performed to assess whether the use of different classes of antihypertensive drugs might influence this association. METHODS: We evaluated risk of uncontrolled BP (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg under antihypertensive treatment) at the time of the last available visit, after a mean follow-up of 5 years in 4612 hypertensive patients without prevalent cardiovascular disease (43% women, 53 ±â€Š11 years) from the Campania Salute Network. RESULTS: At the time of the first visit, prevalence of MetS was associated with 43% increased risk of follow-up uncontrolled BP, independent of significant confounders and without a significant impact of specific classes of antihypertensive medications. At the time of the last available visit, patients with MetS had more often uncontrolled BP, despite more aggressive treatment. After adjusting for demographics, risk factors and number of antihypertensive medications, risk of uncontrolled BP was reduced with increased prescription of diuretics [DRTs; odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.86], renin-angiotensin system blockers [RAS-blockers (Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers); OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.91] and statins (OR 0.79, 95% 0.68-0.92, all P < 0.05), without significant impact of the other classes of medications. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of increased number of medications, hypertensive patients with MetS are at higher risk of uncontrolled BP. Among classes of antihypertensive medications, increased prescriptions of DRTs, RAS-blockers and also statins decrease the probability of poor BP control.