Reimagining Merit and Representation: Promoting Equity and Reducing Bias in GME Through Holistic Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the capacity of a holistic review process in comparison with non-holistic approaches to facilitate mission-driven recruitment in residency interview screening and selection, with particular attention to the promotion of race equity for applicants underrepresented in medicine (URM). METHODS: Five hundred forty-seven applicants to a psychiatry residency program from US allopathic medical schools were evaluated for interview selection via three distinct screening rubrics-one holistic approach (Holistic Review; HR) and two non-holistic processes: Traditional (TR) and Traditional Modified (TM). Each applicant was assigned a composite score corresponding to each rubric, and the top 100 applicants in each rubric were identified as selected for interview. Odds ratios (OR) of selection for interview according to URM status and secondary outcomes, including clinical performance and lived experience, were measured by analysis of group composition via univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Relative to Traditional, Holistic Review significantly increased the odds of URM applicant selection for interview (TR-OR: 0.35 vs HR-OR: 0.84, p < 0.01). Assigning value to lived experience and de-emphasizing USMLE STEP1 scores contributed to the significant changes in odds ratio of interview selection for URM applicants. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional interview selection methods systematically exclude URM applicants from consideration without due attention to applicant strengths or potential contribution to clinical care. Conversely, holistic screening represents a structural intervention capable of critically examining measures of merit, reducing bias, and increasing URM representation in residency recruitment, screening, and selection.

Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review recent community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. We define community interventions as those that involve multi-sector partnerships, emphasize community members as integral to the intervention, and/or deliver services in community settings. We examine literature in seven topic areas: collaborative care, early psychosis, school-based interventions, homelessness, criminal justice, global mental health, and mental health promotion/prevention. We adapt the social-ecological model for health promotion and provide a framework for understanding the actions of community interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: There are recent examples of effective interventions in each topic area. The majority of interventions focus on individual, family/interpersonal, and program/institutional social-ecological levels, with few intervening on whole communities or involving multiple non-healthcare sectors. Findings from many studies reinforce the interplay among mental health, interpersonal relationships, and social determinants of health. There is evidence for the effectiveness of community interventions for improving mental health and some social outcomes across social-ecological levels. Studies indicate the importance of ongoing resources and training to maintain long-term outcomes, explicit attention to ethics and processes to foster equitable partnerships, and policy reform to support sustainable healthcare-community collaborations.

Cross-Sectional Study of Homeless High Service Utilizers in Los Angeles County Jails: Race, Marginalization and Opportunities for Diversion.

Objective: To describe the demographic, legal, and clinical characteristics of a cross-section of incarcerated homeless individuals with the highest utilization of Los Angeles (LA) County public services in order to increase opportunities for focused jail diversion. Methods: The "5% list" (N=5,905 in February 2018), LA County's list of homeless individuals with the highest 5% utilization of public services, was cross-matched with the total jail population to obtain a sample of 333 homeless high-utilizing individuals. This sample was compared with the overall jail population (N=17,121) from publicly available aggregate data by Chi-square testing. Results: 84% of the high-utilizing sample were male, 38% Black, 37% Hispanic, 21% White. 67% were prescribed psychiatric medication. Compared with the overall jail population, the sample was significantly older, with a greater proportion of Black and White persons, and a lesser proportion of Hispanic individuals relative to the overall jail population. A significantly greater proportion of high-utilizing individuals faced misdemeanor charges. Conclusion: These data highlight the compounding effects of homelessness, race, and mental illness on carceral and social vulnerability. Findings suggest homeless high utilizers in jail with mental illness are likely to benefit from court-based diversion efforts aimed at housing and treatment.

Differential Incarceration by Race-Ethnicity and Mental Health Service Status in the Los Angeles County Jail System.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed race-ethnicity and arrest charge data from the Los Angeles (LA) County jail mental health (JMH) population to examine disparities by race and ethnicity. METHODS: Data from the LA County Sheriff's Department for all persons in the JMH population on February 14, 2019 (N=5,134), and for the overall LA County jail population (N=16,975) were compared with chi-square tests (p≤0.05 for binary measures and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons). RESULTS: The JMH sample had a significantly larger proportion of black (41% versus 30%) and white (19% versus 15%) persons and a smaller proportion of Hispanic persons (35% versus 52%), compared with the overall jail population (p<0.001). A significantly smaller proportion of the JMH sample was charged with a felony (80% versus 91%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resources should be invested in prioritizing jail diversion of black individuals with mental illness and addressing the incarceration of persons with mental disorders charged with misdemeanors.

Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity.

(Reprinted with permission from Current Psychiatry Reports (2020) 21: 35).