ANTXR1 (TEM8) overexpression in gastric adenocarcinoma makes the protein a potential target of immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the promise of immunotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma, choices for the selection of effective antigenic targets are very limited. Previously published data and our own in-house computational analysis have suggested that ANTXR1 is a potential target, simultaneously expressed in malignant tumor cells and the endothelial cells of the tumors. However, the expression pattern of ANTXR1 protein in clinical samples of gastric adenocarcinoma has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we recorded the percentage of ANTXR1 positive cells separately in tumor cells and endothelial cells in the primary tumor, non-tumor gastric tissue adjacent to the primary tumor, and tumor in metastatic sites of 140 gastric adenocarcinoma patients. We also evaluated the association of ANTXR1 expression with the Lauren histological classification of the primary tumors, the patient's history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the patient's overall survival. RESULTS: ANTXR1 was expressed in a mean of 73.89 ± 30.12% of tumor cells and 13.55 ± 20.53% of endothelial cells in the primary tumors. Intestinal adenocarcinomas had lower ANTXR1 expression in the tumor cells and higher ANTXR1 expression in the endothelial cells of the tumor regions, and a history of neoadjuvant therapy was associated with increased ANTXR1 expression in the endothelial cells of the tumor regions. Finally, above median expression of ANTXR1 in the tumor cells of the tumor regions was associated with significantly lower overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ANTXR1 is a promising candidate for preclinical and clinical evaluation for gastric adenocarcinoma immunotherapy.

Decoding the expression pattern of MUC3A in gastric adenocarcinoma: unveiling the key to successful immunotherapy.

AIMS: Despite the promise of immunotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma, resistance is common, necessitating the validation of new targets. Based on our previous bioinformatics analysis, the MUC3A antigen emerged as a promising candidate for immunotherapy against gastric adenocarcinoma. However, a comprehensive understanding of its expression at protein level remains elusive, despite its crucial role in determining clinical response. We also sought to establish a connection between the expression pattern and relevant clinical variables of the disease, whenever feasible. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the percentage of MUC3A-positive tumor cells in primary (PT) and metastatic tumor (MT) sites of 190 gastric adenocarcinoma patients. We also evaluated the association between MUC3A expression and variables such as Lauren classification, history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and overall patient survival. RESULTS: Median MUC3A expression was 50% in PT and 70% in MT sites, exhibiting a positive correlation. MT intestinal type showed significantly higher MUC3A expression compared to other types. Neoadjuvant therapy history did not affect MUC3A expression. Higher MUC3A expression correlated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our previous bioinformatics data and the consistently high expression of MUC3A on gastric tumor cells, we propose advancing experimental aspects of anti-MUC3A immunotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Interpatient variability in mesothelin expression necessitates its evaluation before gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Aims: Mesothelin (MSLN) was applied for the immunotherapy of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma with a minimum expression of 60% to obtain a clinical response. Here, the authors evaluated MSLN expression as a potential target of gastric adenocarcinoma immunotherapy. Materials & methods: The expression of MSLN was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and was reported in primary tumor (PT) and metastatic tumor (MT) sites. Results: The results showed that only 17.1% and 13.5% of the patients had 60% or more MSLN expression in PT and MT sites, respectively. The expression of MSLN in PTs and MTs was not influenced by Lauren classification, neoadjuvant therapy or tumor stage. Conclusions: Interpatient variability in MSLN expression necessitates its evaluation before MSLN-based gastric cancer immunotherapy.