Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Neurology ; 44(3 Pt 1): 528-32, 1994 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8145926

RESUMEN

We evaluated the reproducibility of brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAERs) in 87 normal individuals in a longitudinal study by estimating the correlation coefficients and variability of the interpeak intervals and the V/I amplitude ratio between trials on the same day and between sessions spaced 2 years apart. The highest correlation coefficients occur for the I-V interpeak interval between trials on the same day. The coefficients for the I-III and III-V intervals are lower, due to the variability of wave III. The correlations between ears done on the same day are lower still and are similar to measures obtained from the same ear at a 2-year interval. BAERs are more variable than previously believed between ears and over time, but not in a manner that is clinically significant and can be used longitudinally as a measure of neurologic disease. Finally, we provide the sample size required to detect a significant change in interpeak intervals.


Asunto(s)
Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica , Adolescente , Adulto , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Neurology ; 57(6): 948-51, 2001 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11577748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemicrania continua is an indomethacin-responsive headache disorder characterized by a continuous, moderate to severe, unilateral headache. More than 90 cases of hemicrania continua have been reported, but there is still uncertainty about its clinical features. METHODS: The authors compared 34 new cases (24 women, 10 men) with previously reported cases. All the patients met Goadsby and Lipton's proposed criteria. The authors compared baseline (continuous background headache) and exacerbation (attacks of severe periods of headaches). RESULTS: The baseline headache was typically mild to moderate in intensity and usually not associated with severe disability. In contrast, the headache exacerbations were severe and associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and disability. At least one autonomic symptom was present in 25 patients (74%). Jabs and jolts were present in 14 patients (41%). The mean indomethacin dose was 136.7 +/- 60 mg (range 25 to 225 mg). Twenty-four patients (70.6%) met International Headache Society criteria for migraine in their exacerbation period. Occipital tenderness was observed in 23 patients (67.6%). The temporal pattern was remitting in four patients (11.8%), continuous from onset in 18 (52.9%), and continuous evolving from remitting in 12 (35.3%). CONCLUSION: Hemicrania continua is not a rare disorder. All cases of chronic unilateral daily headaches should receive an indomethacin trial early if not first in treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgias Vasculares/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Indometacina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Neurológico , Philadelphia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cefalalgias Vasculares/diagnóstico , Cefalalgias Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Cephalalgia ; 22(8): 659-63, 2002 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12383061

RESUMEN

We reviewed the electronic records of 74 migraine patients treated with topiramate for more than 6 weeks. Twenty-four patients had episodic migraine and 50 had chronic (transformed) migraine. Most (81%) started treatment at 25 mg per day and reached a dose of 100 mg twice a day (mean dose on the last follow-up visit was 208 mg). The mean headache frequency decreased from 20.6 days to 13.6 days per month (P<0.0001) for all headaches (9.9-5.1 (P<0.0001) and 25.7-17.7 (P<0.001) for episodic migraine and chronic migraine, respectively). The percentage of patients whose headache frequency was reduced by > or =50% was 44.6% for all patients; 58.3 for episodic migraine and 38.0 for chronic migraine. For all patients mean headache severity (10-point scale) was reduced from 6.2 to 4.8 (P<0.0001). Patients on monotherapy (20%) and polytherapy (80%) had similar reductions in headache frequency. Adverse events were usually mild to moderate and were seen in 58.1% (paresthesias in 25%, cognitive difficulties 14.9%). Mean weight loss was 3.1 +/- 4 kg (3.8% of total body weight).


Asunto(s)
Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Fructosa/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fructosa/administración & dosificación , Fructosa/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/efectos adversos , Medicina Preventiva/métodos , Topiramato , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Headache ; 40(7): 587-91, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10940098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe current practice in triptan use. BACKGROUND: Triptans are effective migraine treatments that cause chest symptoms in some patients. True cardiac ischemia is rare. Design.-Headache specialists and family practitioners completed questionnaires regarding the times when triptans are contraindicated, obtaining electrocardiograms (ECGs), and giving the first dose in the office. RESULTS: Sixty-five headache specialists and 67 family practitioners responded. Headache specialists saw an average of 36.3 patients with headache per week. Family practitioners saw an average of 7.2. Family practitioners and headache specialists had similar opinions regarding the age at which triptans were contraindicated with various numbers of risk factors. Sixty-one percent of headache specialists and 50% of family practitioners would not use a triptan at any age for patients with more than three risk factors (P = NS). Ten percent of headache specialists obtained an ECG for all patients being prescribed triptans, while no family practitioners did (P =. 008). Ten percent of both family practitioners and headache specialists never obtained an ECG, even with multiple cardiac risk factors. Headache specialists obtained ECGs more often than family practitioners (P <.002 for one to three risk factors). Family practitioners were more likely to give the first dose of the triptan in the office regardless of cardiovascular risk (58% versus 20%, P <. 001). Forty-five percent of headache specialists and 2% of family practitioners never gave the first dose in the office (P <.001). Family practitioners gave the first dose in the office more readily than headache specialists in patients with no risk factors (P =.001), but not for one or more risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: No consensus exists among family practitioners or headache specialists about when to avoid using a triptan due to excessive cardiac risk factors, when to obtain an ECG prior to using a triptan, and when to give the first dose of a triptan in the office. Headache specialists are more likely to obtain ECGs, whereas family practitioners are more likely to give the first dose of a triptan in the office.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Contraindicaciones , Electrocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Humanos , Medicina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores de Riesgo , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Especialización , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
5.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 70(5): 613-7, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11309454

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical characteristics of cluster headache in women. Cluster headache is a disorder of men (male to female ratio 6-7:1). METHODS: Retrospective chart review to identify all women diagnosed with cluster headache at an academic headache centre from January 1995 through July 1998. RESULTS: Thirty two women and 69 men were identified. The mean age of onset of cluster headache was 29.4 years in women versus 31.3 years in men. Two peaks of onset in women (2nd and 5th decade) were identified compared with one in men (3rd decade). Episodic cluster headache was present in 75% of women and 77% of men. Women and men had on average 3 attacks a day, but attack duration was shorter in women (67.2 minutes v 88.2 minutes). Cluster headache period duration (11.1 weeks v 10 weeks) and remission periods (21.1 months v 23.1 months) were similar in women and men. Miosis and ptosis seemed to be less common in women (miosis 13.3% v 24.6%, ptosis 41.9% v 58.1%) whereas lacrimation and nasal congestion/rhinorrhoea were almost equally prevalent in women and men. Women had more nausea than men (62.5% v 43.5%, p=0.09) and significantly more vomiting (46.9% v 17.4%, p=0.003). Photophobia occurred in 75% of women and 81.2% of men, and phonophobia occurred in 50% of women and 47.8% of men. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical characteristics of cluster headache in women are very similar to those in men. Women develop the disorder at an earlier age of onset and experience more "migrainous symptoms" with cluster headache, especially vomiting. Both men and women have frequent photophobia and phonophobia with cluster headache attacks. These symptoms are not included in the International Headache Society cluster headache criteria, suggesting the need for possible criteria revision.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/fisiopatología , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
6.
Cephalalgia ; 22(2): 137-41, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11972582

RESUMEN

The objective was to assess the efficacy of coenzyme Q10 as a preventive treatment for migraine headaches. Thirty-two patients (26 women, 6 men) with a history of episodic migraine with or without aura were treated with coenzyme Q10 at a dose of 150 mg per day. Thirty-one of 32 patients completed the study; 61.3% of patients had a greater than 50% reduction in number of days with migraine headache. The average number of days with migraine during the baseline period was 7.34 and this decreased to 2.95 after 3 months of therapy, which was a statistically significant response (P < 0.0001). Mean reduction in migraine frequency after 1 month of treatment was 13.1% and this increased to 55.3% by the end of 3 months. Mean migraine attack frequency was 4.85 during the baseline period and this decreased to 2.81 attacks by the end of the study period, which was a statistically significant response (P < 0.001). There were no side-effects noted with coenzyme Q10. From this open label investigation coenzyme Q10 appears to be a good migraine preventive. Placebo-controlled trials are now necessary to determine the true efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in migraine prevention.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Ubiquinona/análogos & derivados , Ubiquinona/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Coenzimas , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA