Plasma miRNA profile is a biomarker associated with urothelial carcinoma in chronic hemodialysis patients.

The incidence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is higher in patients undergoing chronic dialysis than in the general population. This study investigated plasma miRNA profiling as the ancillary diagnosis biomarker associated with UC in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. We successfully screened out and detected miRNA expression from plasma in eight patients undergoing dialysis through quantitative real-time PCR array analysis and identified eight candidate miRNAs. The candidate miRNAs were then validated using single quantitative RT-PCR assays from 52 plasma samples. The miRNA classifier for ancillary UC detection was developed by multiple logistic regression analyses. Moreover, we validated the classifier by testing another nine samples. Expression levels of miR-150-5p, miR-150-5p/miR-155-5p, miR-378a-3p/miR-150-5p, miR-636/miR-150-5p, miR-150-5p/miR-210-3p, and miR-19b-1-5p/miR-378a-3p were shown to be significantly different between UC and non-UC samples (P = 0.035, 0.0048, 0.016, 0.024, 0.038, and 0.048). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis also showed that low miR-19b-1-5p expression was associated with a worse prognosis (P = 0.0382). We also developed a miRNA classifier based on five miRNA expression levels to predict UC and found that the area under curve was 0.882. The classifier had a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval: 0.5191% to 0.9567%) and a specificity of 83.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.6799% to 0.9381%). This classifier was tested by nine samples with 100% accuracy. The miRNA classifier offers higher sensitivity and specificity than the existing makers. Thus, this approach will improve the prospective diagnosis of UC in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

Synchronous primary carcinomas of the bladder and prostate.

AIM: To determine the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate for patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer in Taiwan. METHODS: A total of 248 patients in Taiwan who were histologically confirmed for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder underwent cystoprostatectomy. Histopathologic evaluation of the prostate specimens sectioned at 5 mm intervals was performed. RESULTS: Of the 248 patients, 10 (4.03%) were found to have prostate cancer. Of the 10 cases of unsuspected prostate cancer, eight proved to be at stage T1 or T2, and two at T3 and T4, respectively. This rate of incidentally found prostate cancer amongst our bladder cancer patients appeared to be lower than that found in bladder cancer patients in similar studies in USA. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of incidental prostate cancer in patients in Taiwan with bladder cancer is not high compared with that in Western countries, we suggest that digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are important screening tools for men with bladder cancer, especially for those aged 60 years and older in Taiwan.

Correlation between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

BACKGROUND: The Gleason score has been shown to offer important information with regard to prognosis and therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. In this study, Gleason scores, as determined by 18-gauge core needle biopsies, were compared with both Gleason scores and the pathological staging of corresponding radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: Records of 78 consecutive patients undergoing a radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1998 and 2002 were reviewed. In total, 78 patients were enrolled, all of whom had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma by transrectal needle biopsies using an 18-gauge automated spring-loaded biopsy gun. RESULTS: Grading errors were greatest with well-differentiated tumors. The accuracy was 6 (23%) for Gleason scores of 2-4 on needle biopsy. Of the 36 evaluable patients with Gleason scores of 5-7 on needle biopsy, 28 (78%) were graded correctly. All of the Gleason scores of 8-10 on needle biopsy were graded correctly. Eighteen (33%) of 54 patients with a biopsy Gleason score of < 7 had their cancer upgraded to above 7. Tumors in 6 patients (60%) with both a Gleason score < 7 on the needle biopsy and a Gleason score of 7 for the prostatectomy specimen were confined to the prostate. CONCLUSION: The potential for grading errors is greatest with well-differentiated tumors and in patients with a Gleason score of < 7 on the needle biopsy. Predictions using Gleason scores are sufficiently accurate to warrant its use with all needle biopsies, recognizing that the potential for grading errors is greatest with well-differentiated tumors.