A systematic approach to estimating the effectiveness of multi-scale IAQ strategies for reducing the risk of airborne infection of SARS-CoV-2.

The unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has made more than 125 million people infected and more than 2.7 million people dead globally. Airborne transmission has been recognized as one of the major transmission routes for SARS-CoV-2. This paper presents a systematic approach for evaluating the effectiveness of multi-scale IAQ control strategies in mitigating the infection risk in different scenarios. The IAQ control strategies across multiple scales from a whole building to rooms, and to cubical and personal microenvironments and breathing zone, are introduced, including elevated outdoor airflow rates, high-efficiency filters, advanced air distribution strategies, standalone air cleaning technologies, personal ventilation and face masks. The effectiveness of these strategies for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection are evaluated for specific indoor spaces, including long-term care facility, school and college, meat plant, retail stores, hospital, office, correctional facility, hotel, restaurant, casino and transportation spaces like airplane, cruise ship, subway, bus and taxi, where airborne transmission are more likely to occur due to high occupancy densities. The baseline cases of these spaces are established according to the existing standards, guidelines or practices. Several integrated mitigation strategies are recommended and classified based on their relative cost and effort of implementation for each indoor space. They can be applied to help meet the current challenge of ongoing COVID-19, and provide better preparation for other possible epidemics and pandemics of airborne infectious diseases in the future.

Ventilation and Pollutant Concentration for the Pedestrian Zone, the Near-Wall Zone, and the Canopy Layer at Urban Intersections.

To gain further insight into the ventilation at urban street intersections, this study conducted 3D simulations of the ventilation at right- and oblique-angled intersections under eight wind directions by using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) κ-ε turbulence model. The divergent responses of ventilation and pollution concentration for the pedestrian zone (ped), the near-wall zone (nwz), and the canopy layer to the change in intersection typology and wind direction were investigated. The flow characteristics of the intersections, taken as the air flow hub, were explored by employing indices such as the minimum flow ratio (ß) between horizontal openings. The results show that oblique wind directions lead to a lower total volumetric flow rate (Qtotal) but a higher ß value for right-angled intersections. For T-shaped intersections, a larger cross-sectional area for the outflow helps to increase Qtotal. Oblique-angled intersections, for example, the X-shaped intersection, experience a more significant difference in Qtotal but a steady value of ß when the wind direction changes. The vertical air-exchange rate for the intersection was particularly significant when the wind directions were parallel to the street orientation or when there was no opening in the inflow direction. The spatially averaged normalized pollutant concentration and age of air (τ*¯) for the pedestrian zone and the canopy layer showed similar changing trends for most of the cases, while in some cases, only the τped*¯ or τnwz*¯ changed obviously. These findings reveal the impact mechanism of intersection configuration on urban local ventilation and pollutant diffusion.

Ventilation and Air Quality in Student Dormitories in China: A Case Study during Summer in Nanjing.

The Air quality in student dormitories can have a major impact on the health of millions of students in China. This study aims to investigate the ventilation and air quality in student dormitories. Questionnaire survey was conducted in eight dormitory buildings and field measurements were conducted in one dormitory during the summer in Nanjing. The survey result reveals that most students thought the indoor and outdoor air quality was neutral and the correlation between indoor and outdoor perceived air quality is statistically significant. There are few indoor PM2.5 and ozone sources in dormitories and natural ventilation is the most common form of ventilation. However, there is no statistically significant correlation between window opening behaviors and the perceptions of indoor and outdoor air quality. The field measurement result shows the measured I/O ratios of PM2.5 and ozone over 37 days are in the range of 0.42⁻0.79 and 0.21⁻1.00, respectively. The I/O ratios for PM2.5 and ozone are 0.49 ± 0.05 and 0.26 ± 0.05 in the case of the window being closed, and the I/O ratios for PM2.5 and ozone are 0.65 ± 0.08 and 0.50 ± 0.15 in the case of the window being open. The outdoor and indoor ozone concentrations show pronounced diurnal periodic variations, while the PM2.5 concentrations do not. Finally, recommended open/close window strategies are discussed to reduce indoor pollutant levels. Understanding the indoor/outdoor PM2.5 and ozone concentrations in different window patterns can be a guidance to preventing high indoor PM2.5 and ozone exposure in student dormitories.